NOI-P20AC00353.pdf

NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE: NOTICE OF INTENT TO AWARD

This announcement is not a request for applications.

This announcement is to provide public notice of the National Park Service’s intention to award financial assistance for the following project activities. Refer to Section 2. Grants.gov Posting Determination.

ABSTRACT

Grants.gov Opportunity Number Project Title Recipient Anticipated Federal Funding Non-Federal Cost Share Total Anticipated Award Amount

Award Instrument

Anticipated Period of Performance

Legal Authority

CFDA # and Title

Single Source Justification Criteria

National Park Service Point of Contact

PROJECT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

STATEMENT OF PUBLIC PURPOSE

Section 1. Project Summary

Task Agreement Cooperative Agreement

Grant Agreement

Current as of 10/29/2018

STATEMENT OF WORK SUMMARY

RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE PARTIES

A. The recipient shall be responsible for the following items under this agreement:

B. The NPS Responsibilities:

A task agreement is proposed;

A cooperative agreement is proposed;

therefore substantial involvement by NPS is anticipated during the period of performance of this agreement. In support of this agreement NPS will:

A grant agreement is proposed, therefore no substantial involvement on the part of the NPS is anticipated for the successful completion of the statement of work. It is anticipated that involvement will be limited to actions related to monitoring project performance and technical assistance at the request of the recipient.

Section 3. Single Source Justification

NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

SINGLE SOURCE POLICY REQUIREMENTS

National Park Service Policy FAP&P 1443-2015-06 requires a written justification which explains why competition is not practicable. The justification must address one of the following criteria.

In order for an assistance award to be made without competition, the award must satisfy one or more of the following criteria:

(1) Unsolicited Proposal – The proposed award is the result of an unsolicited assistance application which represents a unique or innovative idea, method, or approach which is not the subject of a current or planned contract or assistance award, but which is deemed advantageous to the program objectives. The unsolicited proposal must demonstrate an innovative capability or concept not currently available to the government, and prepared without Government involvement. ;

(2) Continuation – The activity to be funded is necessary to the satisfactory completion of, or is a continuation of, an activity presently being funded, for which competition would have a significant adverse effect on the continuity or completion of the activity;

(3) Legislative intent – The language in the applicable authorizing legislation or legislative history clearly indicates Congress’ intent to restrict the award to a particular recipient of purpose;

(4) Unique Qualifications – The applicant is uniquely qualified to perform the activity based upon a variety of demonstrable factors such as location, property ownership, voluntary support capacity, technical expertise, or other such unique qualifications. Successful past performance, familiarity with existing requirements, capabilities that can be obtained or matched by a competitor, or a positive reputation, are not considered to be unique qualifications.

(5) Emergencies – Program/award where there is insufficient time available (due to a compelling and unusual urgency, or substantial danger to health or safety) for adequate competitive procedures to be followed.

NPS did not solicit full and open competition for this award based the following criteria:

Task Agreement issued under previously competed or single source master cooperative agreement per Section 2 above. Single Source Justification not applicable.

Continuation

Unique Qualifications

Unsolicited Proposal

Legislative Intent

Explanation of the proposed recipient’s qualifications or the criteria of the proposed project which requires use of the single source criteria cited.

Section 2. Grants.gov Posting Determination

Emergency

The National Park Service intends to award a task agreement under a previously competed or single source justified award.

The National Park Service intends to award a single source justified cooperative agreement. Refer to Section 3 Single Source Justification.

The National Park Service intends to award a single source justified grant agreement. Refer to Section 3 Single Source Justification.

Section 4. Department of the Interior Secretary’s Priorities

This award will support the following DOI Secretary priority(ies):

Other Key Initiatives:

Employment of veterans.

Supporting DOI Infrastructure needs.

Creating jobs in the American economy.

Access to outdoor recreation opportunities.

Priority 1: Creating a conservation stewardship legacy second only to Teddy Roosevelt Utilize science to identify best practices to manage land and water resources and adapt to changes in the environment.

Examine land use planning process and land use designations that govern public use and access.

Revise and streamline the environmental and regulatory review process while maintaining environmental standards.

Review DOI water storage, transportation, and distribution systems to identify opportunities to resolve conflicts and expand capacity.

Foster relationships with conservation organizations advocating for balanced stewardship and use of public lands.

Identify and implement initiatives to expand access to DOI lands for hunting and fishing.

Shift the balance towards providing greater public access to public lands over restrictions to access.

Priority 2: Utilizing our natural resources Ensure American energy is available to meet our security and economic needs.

Ensure access to mineral resources, especially the critical and rare earth minerals.

Refocus timber programs to embrace the entire 'healthy forests' lifecycle.

Manage competition for grazing resources.

Priority 3: Restoring trust with local communities Be a better neighbor with those closest to our resources by improving dialogue and relationships with persons and entities bordering our lands.

Expand the lines of communication with Governors, state natural resource offices, Fish and Wildlife offices, water authorities, county commissioners, Tribes, and local communities.

Priority 4: Ensuring sovereignty means something Support tribal self-determination, self-governance, and sovereignty.

Solidify mutual interests between the U.S. and the freely associated states and territories.

Priority 5: Generating additional revenues to support DOI & National interests Ensure that the public receives the full market value for the natural resources produced on Federal lands.

Ensure that fees or costs levied for DOI services are reasonable and targeted to achieve cost recovery.

Consider the impact of DOI decisions on economic development and job creation.

Priority 6: Protecting our people and the border Actively support efforts to secure our southern border.

Ensure DOI law enforcement staffing addresses public safety risks anticipated on DOI land.

Promote a "public service" demeanor within our law enforcement community.

Priority 7: Striking a regulatory balance

Reduce the administrative and regulatory burden imposed on U.S.

industry and the public.

Ensure that Endangered Species Act decisions are based on strong science and thorough analysis.

Priority 8: Modernizing our infrastructure Support the White House Public/Private Partnership Initiative to modernize U.S. infrastructure.

Remove impediments to infrastructure development and facilitate private sector efforts to construct infrastructure projects serving American needs.

Prioritize DOI infrastructure needs to highlight:

1. Construction of infrastructure;

2. Cyclical maintenance;

3. Deferred maintenance.

Senior executives are expected to provide leadership in achieving goals of the President and the Secretary.

The Management Team is expected to:

1. Ensure cost-effective operations and quality service to the public;

2. Facilitate organizational cooperation and conflict resolution;

3. Ensure the workplace environment is conducive to employee productivity and safety;

4. Hold individuals accountable for actions that violate DOI policies and requirements.

Priority 10: Achieving our goals and leading our team forward

The proposed project does not support any of the DOI Secretary priorities, but the project is being funded for the following reasons:

Priority 9: Reorganizing for the next 100 years

Improve alignment and integration of the DOI organizational structure. Redistribute organizational resources (people and funding) to enhance mission achievement and improved public service.

Improve organizational alignment with Executive Branch counterparts with major land management assets or influence.

a) assess the status of marine, coastal and terrestrial habitats at the four Caribbean parks and

b) develop a restoration plan that defines restoration objectives, recommended appropriate restoration actions, and defines cost estimates necessary for successful implementation.

2. Project Objective – The objective of this project is to restore coral reefs, mangrove, beaches, and terrestrial sites at VIIS, VICR, BUIS, and SARI through the development and subsequent implantation of management actions identified within a restoration plan.

Dr. Pedro Ramos form the University of Texas-Austin, will participate as a member of the IDT and will write portions of the plan requiring his area of expertise. He will contribute input on impacts of runoff and sediment load and how this might affect habitats and restoration goals. Additionally, he will contribute to the development of restoration goals, monitoring goals and on-the-ground restoration practices and procedures. As an IDT member, he will also provide expertise on watershed management with an emphasis on sediment reduction.

• Complete all contracting and procurement actions including the development of Interagency Agreements, Cooperative Agreements, and General Agreements with each IDT member agency and the park.

• Complete all National Environmental Policy Act, environmental, and cultural compliance requirements to include completion of environmental screening forms, consultation with trustee agencies and representatives, documentation of compliance decisions and supporting documentation, and completion of park compliance completion letters for each park.

• Report bi-weekly and monthly status of this project to park, regional, Washington, and Department of Interior representatives through scheduled calls, completion of project tracking spreadsheet reports, and written status reports.

• Develop the draft site assessment methodology and the restoration plan format and template.

• Identify, collect, and provide written and digital data to be reviewed by the IDT and used to develop the restoration plan

• Provide logistical support for the on-site visits to BUIS, SARI, VIIS, and VICR

• Participate in on-site field assessments and the on-site meeting

• Write portions of the draft and final restoration plan

• Organize the peer review and accessibility review of the draft and final restoration plan as required by policy.

• Participation in field site visits to understand the current condition and status of each site visited involving the generation of notes and observations that will be used in the development of written assessments.

• Written assessments of each field site visited, which will be completed during the on-site meeting. Format, templates, datasheets, and any other information needed to facilitate the assessments will be provided by the NPS prior to the site visits.

• Written restoration plan

IDT Member Specific Responsibilities:

Recipient will participate as a member of the IDT and will write portions of the plan requiring his area of expertise. He will contribute input on impacts of runoff and sediment load and how this might affect habitats and restoration goals. Additionally, he will contribute to the development of restoration goals, monitoring goals and on-the-ground restoration practices and procedures. As an IDT member, he will also provide expertise on watershed management with an emphasis on sediment reduction. His insights and expertise will aid in information mangrove and coral restoration as it relates to sediment input.

As a member if the IDT he will:

• Communicate with local park staff and the IDT Project Lead when planning park site visits and while working within park boundaries. While on-site, the partner will be in phone contact where possible.

• Participate in conference calls scheduled prior to the site-visit/meeting. The purpose of these calls will be to come to a common agreement on the overall scope of the project, reiterate roles and responsibilities, develop the site assessment protocol, and create a general restoration plan outline.

• Participate in calls following the site-visit/meeting. The purpose of these calls will be to complete the development of the entire restoration plan. Smaller groups may be assigned to meet separately (e.g. corals versus mangroves) to develop specific plan sections.

• Conduct site assessments.