552-21-102 Dayton - Evaluation Criteria.pdf

PDF 801 KB Posted

Attached to
C1CZ--Stabilize/Improve, Putnam Library B120 [552-21-102]
Solicitation number
36C25022R0087
Issued by

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
36C25022R0087.docx DOCX document
SOW 21-102 Stabilize-Improve Building120_REV.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Evaluation Criteria for the

STABILIZE/IMPROVE BUILDING 120

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Complete design services will be provided to renovate areas on all floors, including the basement, to measure approximately 16800 GSF. The project will construct primarily offices, administrative space, replace critical infrastructure items, address structural deficiencies, and update systems deemed necessary for the building areas to become active and functional. Project will include, but is not limited to, demolition, architectural feature restoration, code compliant electrical distribution, plumbing, lighting improvements, physical security devices, fire alarm and detection devices, modern communication systems, analyze existing HVAC systems and make recommendations for up-grades, and updated finishes to support usage, acoustics and design intent.

Some of the specific deficiencies/ focus areas that need to be addressed / investigated during design development/ schematics phase (list is not all-inclusive):

1. Plaster repairs or drywall board installation for all damaged areas on 1, 2nd, and 3rd floors.

2. Improve telecommunications connections to the building for more reliable telephone and internet service.

3. Exterior painting of front and rear porches, exterior wood trim.

4. Exterior painting of entire building to a non-pink color review early historic drawings of building for color selection.

5. HVAC efficiency and comfort; Perform an audit and make recommendations as part of the design development process. Design heating, cooling, air distribution systems; including required ventilation, per VA design criteria.

6. Demolish old mini-split and repair walls first floor.

7. Install strain gages to monitor cracks in stairwells, miscellaneous wall locations. Previous structural repairs have been made to the building.

8. Deep clean of entire building and analyze air quality.

9. Design for the refinish of all wood flooring surfaces, banisters and wood trim.

10. Elevator service to all floors.

11. Design for current VA ADA access requirements, exterior and interior.

Analyze current egress system for possible improvement. ADA parking locations etc.

12. Provide new energy efficient architecturally and historically compatible windows.

13. Perform an energy audit of the facility and make recommendations.

14. Moisture infiltration mainly at the basement level (potential impact on server room) possibly other areas such as skylights.

15. Evaluate functionality of older model backup generator system, parts availability, technology etc.

16. Building aesthetics and architectural historic preservation

EVALUATION FACTORS

The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:

a) Technical Capability

b) Past Performance

b) Location

Award shall be made to the offeror whose quote offers the best value to the government, considering technical capability, past performance, and location. The government will evaluate information based on the comparative evaluation procedures authorized in FAR Part 13.106-2 – Evaluation of Quotations of Offers using the following evaluation criteria:

Factor 1 - Technical Capability: The evaluation process will consider whether the proposal demonstrates a clear understanding of the technical features involved in meeting the requirements of the solicitation.

• Professional Qualifications necessary for satisfactory performance of required services. Provide resumes for all key personnel required to complete the services indicated in this solicitation. Professional disciplines are required to be licensed, registered or certified by a US state, the District of Columbia or a US territory.

• Specialized experience of personnel proposed for assignment to the contract and their record of working together as a team. Provide specialized experience and technical competence with healthcare related designs in inpatient, ambulatory care settings, in the type of work indicated in this solicitation.

Factor 2 - Past Performance: The offeror quote must include a summary description of at least three but no more than five prior contracts/orders per team member/sub-contractor for projects completed within the last five years with organizations with similar mission and functional domains, and of comparable size, complexity, and scope. These references must also include:

• Contract/Order Number, brief description of the project, type of contract, amount of the contract

• Contracting Officer’s Name and Phone Number, Government agency

• Contracting Officer’s Representative Name and Phone Number

• The Offeror must indicate whether they were the prime contractor, sub-contractor or other teaming arrangement. Prime shall indicate which aspect they are directly responsible for of this requirement.

• The Offeror is required to provide references for the above projects. In the event the company itself does not have relevant past performance; references may be submitted on contracts performed by the Key Personnel of the company. The VA reserves the right to contact all the references that the Offeror lists.

Factor 3 - Location: The Offeror must indicate how far their company is located from the Dayton VA Medical Center by stating the timeframe to be onsite for this project in response to an emergent need.

FACTOR DEFINITIONS:

Consensus Evaluation: State the reasons why the best rated proposal was found to be superior to the others. What major evaluation factors were significant in your decision? What limitations of non-selected firms were significant? This paragraph should be two or three sentences, using information provided above, and should clearly explain your selection. This is a consensus report, and I should only receive one of these from the team. Your raw worksheets should be provided as well, but the Chair has the responsibility for combining all the comments into a coherent explanation of the TEB’s selection.

Complete design services will be provided to renovate areas on all floors, including the basement, to measure approximately 16800 GSF. The project will construct primarily offices, administrative space, replace critical infrastructure items, address s...

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .