552-19-107 boiler commissioning Dayton Evaluation Factors 07182023.docx

Evaluation Criteria for the

552-19-107 REPLACE BOILERS MAIN PLANT COMMISSIONING

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Provide architecture and engineering services in support of a project to commission boilers installed in project 552-19-107 Replace Boilers Main Plant. The Architectural and Engineering (AE) firm shall review the construction specifications and drawings including bulletins, RFI responses and construction modifications to provide commissioning of the 4 new boilers installed during this construction project..

EVALUATION FACTORS

The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:

a) Technical Capability- 40%

b) Past Performance- 25%

c) Construction Period Services- 10%

d) Location-15%

e) SDVOSB/VOSB or other small business subcontractors 10% The government will evaluate information based on the evaluation procedures authorized in FAR 36.602-1, Selection Criteria using the following evaluation criteria:

Factor 1 - Technical Capability: The evaluation process will consider whether the qualifications demonstrate a clear understanding of the technical features involved in meeting the requirements of the solicitation.

· Professional Qualifications necessary for satisfactory performance of required services. Provide resumes for all key personnel required to complete the services indicated in this solicitation. Professional disciplines are required to be licensed, registered, or certified by a US state, the District of Columbia or a US territory.

· Specialized experience of personnel proposed for assignment to the contract and their record of working together as a team. Provide specialized experience and technical competence with healthcare related designs in inpatient, ambulatory care settings, in the type of work indicated in this solicitation.

Factor 2 - Past Performance: The offeror’s proposal must include a summary description of at least three to five prior contracts/projects per team for projects completed within the last five years with organizations with similar mission and functional domains, and of comparable size, complexity, and scope. These references must also include:

· Contract/Order Number, brief description of the project, type of contract, amount of the contract

· Contracting Officer’s Name and Phone Number, Government agency

· Contracting Officer’s Representative Name and Phone Number

· The Offeror must indicate whether they were the prime contractor, sub-contractor or other teaming arrangement. Prime shall indicate which aspect they are directly responsible for of this requirement.

· The Offeror is required to provide references for the above projects. In the event the company itself does not have relevant past performance; references may be submitted on contracts performed by the Key Personnel of the company. The VA reserves the right to contact all the references that the Offeror lists.

Factor 3 - Construction Period Services:

Experience in construction period services to include professional field inspections during the construction period shall be included as an evaluation criterion when construction period services is included in the statement of work for A-E services.

· Professional Field Inspections Factor 4 - Location: The Offeror must indicate how far their company is located from the Dayton VA Medical Center by stating the timeframe to be onsite for this project in response to an emergent need.

Factor 5 - The extent to which potential contractors identify and commit to the use of service-disabled Veteran-owned small businesses, Veteran-owned small businesses, and other types of small businesses as subcontractors:

· Firms (Prime and Subcontractor(s)) shall be certified through the SBA Veteran Small Business Certification if SDVOSB or VOSB.

· All other socioeconomic firms shall be certified by Systems of Award Management and/or Small Business Administration.

· Estimate percent of project overall workload shall be designated for each firm (prime and sub).

a) SDVOSB shall be given greatest preference.

b) VOSB shall be given great preference.

c) All other social economic classifications to be preferred.

FACTOR DEFINITIONS:

Table 1: Technical Ratings

Consensus Evaluation: State the reasons why the best rated qualifications were found to be superior to the others. What major evaluation factors were significant in your decision? What limitations of non-selected firms were significant? This paragraph should be two or three sentences, using information provided above, and should clearly explain your selection. This is a consensus report, and I should only receive one of these from the team. Your raw worksheets should be provided as well, but the Chair has the responsibility for combining all the comments into a coherent explanation of the SSEB’s selection.

image1.png image2.jpg