Attachment 4rev - Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf

REQUEST FOR QUOTE NUMBER: 50310220Q0059,

Attachment 4 PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Past Performance Questionnaire

The United States Securities and Exchange Commission, Office of Acquisitions, intends to acquire Technical Surveillance Countermeasure (TSCM) services for the SEC Headquarters, Washington, D.C. As part of the acquisition process, an increased emphasis is being placed on past performance as a source selection factor.

In order to accurately evaluate the quoter’s past performance, your assistance is requested in obtaining and verifying the past performance history of this quoter. It is important to note that names of individuals providing reference information about a quoter’s past performance will not be released to the contractor.

Two forms are provided to complete the evaluation: 1) Performance Rating Form; and 2) Additional Comment Form. Upon completion of this form, please submit it as an e-mailed attachment to LaToya Carter at CarterL@sec.gov. Please make the subject line of the e-mail read “50310220Q0059 - Past Performance Questionnaire – Insert Evaluated Company’s Name.”

Submissions must be received by June 29, 2020 at 12:00 PM EST.

The following standards shall be used in arriving at the rating.

Exceptional Contractor’s performance exceeded customer expectations or contract requirements and demonstrated an exceptional understanding of the requirements, providing significant features or benefits.

Acceptable Contractor’s performance met customer expectations or contract requirements and demonstrated an acceptable understanding of the requirements.

Marginal Contractor’s performance barely met customer expectations or contract requirements and demonstrated a marginal understanding of the contract requirements.

Unacceptable Contractor’s performance did not meet customer expectations or contract requirements and demonstrated an unacceptable understanding of the requirements.

Other If the element is not applicable, indicate with “N/A.” If no data has been obtained or additional comments are provided, please note in this column.

CarterL Highlight

Performance Rating Form

NAME OF COMPANY EVALUATED:

ADDRESS OF COMPANY EVALUATED:

CONTRACT NUMBER CONTRACT PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE

CONTRACT VALUE CONTRACT TYPE

CONTRACTING OFFICER NAME,

ADDRESS, FAX AND TELEPHONE NUMBER, AND EMAIL ADDRESS

TYPE OF SERVICES PERFORMED (ACTIVITY):

NAME OF EVALUATOR, COMPANY/AGENCY,

ADDRESS, FAX AND TELEPHONE NUMBER AND

EMAIL ADDRESS

DATE EVALUATION PROVIDED

Performance Element Exceptional Acceptable Marginal Unacceptable

Other

Technical Performance (Quality of Product or Services)

1. QUALITY OF TECHNICAL APPROACH

(For example: Were the services comprehensive, complete, and feasible? (Met the needs, performed successfully, and accommodated changing requirements.)

2. UNDERSTANDING OF REQUIREMENTS

(For example: Did the contractor show an understanding of the scope of the requirements and an appreciation of the complexity of the requirements? And did the contractor effectively identify flaws, inconsistencies and other inaccuracies in your technical direction?)

Timeliness of Performance

3. EFFECTIVE AND EFFICIENT USE OF RESOURCES

(For example: Was the contractor able to obtain in a timely manner the amount and type of personnel resources required to support the project, effectively train personnel to perform the work required for the project, and maintain the required workforce throughout the term of the contract?)

4. TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE

(For example: Was the contractor successful in planning and proposing realistic schedules, monitoring performance, completing work on time, and implementing corrections/changes in a timely manner?)

QUALITY/CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

5. QUALITY OF PERFORMANCE/CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

(For example: Was the contractor committed to customer satisfaction?)

6. BUSINESS BEHAVIOR

(For example: Was the contractor reasonable and cooperative at the corporate and program levels in response to changes in technical direction, correcting errors, poor performance, criticism/rejection of contract deliverables and other quality issues?)

7. COMMUNICATION

(For example: Did the contractor work and communicate well with contracting officers, contracting officer’s technical representatives, end users, other contractors, subcontractors, and in-house staff?)

COST CONTROL

8. COST CONTROL

(For example: Was the contractor successful in planning and proposing realistic costs, monitoring performance, operating at or below budget, and implementing corrections/changes in a cost effective manner?)

For #9, PLEASE ANSWER “Yes” or “No”, as appropriate YES NO

9. Given the choice, would you do business with this contractor again?

Additional Comment Form

Please provide any additional comments regarding your performance element ratings in the space below. Please add additional pages as necessary.