J-and-A-Federal-Supply-Schedule (FY2025 ATT Bridge Agency-Wide Wiress Services) SAM.pdf

PDF 2 MB Posted

Attached to
Notice of Intent to Award Sole Source - AT&T MOBILITY, LLC BRIDGE
Solicitation number
47QTCA19D00MV-75H70425F80010
Issued by

About this file

This document is a Limited-Sources Justification (LSJ) template for a Federal Supply Schedule (FSS) contract for Agency-Wide Wireless Services with AT&T Mobility LLC. The Indian Health Service (IHS) is seeking a bridge contract for wireless telephone services, including wireless-enabled devices (WEDs), voice and data plans, accessories, and network enhancement equipment. The estimated contract value is $2,355,947.55, with a base period from 08/01/2025 to 01/31/2026 and two 3-month option periods following.

The justification indicates this is a follow-on requirement to continue mission-critical services, sourced through the Federal Supply Schedule at the highest Category Management level. The contract will be limited to iOS (Apple) products distributed agency-wide to employees. The procurement is being pursued as a sole-source and competitive dual-award approach, with the original requirement placed under the Federal Strategic Sourcing Initiative Wireless Services Program. The contract is being justified under FAR 8.405-6 as a logical follow-on to the original order, with pricing considered predetermined as fair and reasonable by GSA.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Template for a Federal Supply Schedule (FSS) Limited-Sources Justification

Completion Instructions: HHS has established a standard template for the preparation of a Limited-Sources Justification (LSJ) pursuant to FAR Subpart 8.4. This template is for use with orders issued under the Federal Supply Schedule (FSS) program where the value exceeds simplified acquisition threshold and competition is restricted: (1) to fewer schedule contractors than required in FAR 8.405-1 or 8.405-2, or (2) to an item peculiar to one manufacturer. See FAR Subpart 8.4 for additional guidance. This template is not for use with acquisitions other than those under FAR Subpart 8.4.

Tailor all aspects of this template to the individual acquisition. Consult FAR 8.405-6 for guidance.

Delete the highlighted portions of this document prior to signature. Do not include these instructions in the final document or contract file.

FEDERAL SUPPLY SCHEDULE

LIMITED-SOURCES JUSTIFICATION

Acquisition Title: Agency-Wide Wireless Services Award, Bridge Contract (AT&T)

Agency: IHS

Acquisition Year: FY 2025

Author: Brendon Moran

2. Description of Action:

Nature: New Requirement Follow-on Requirement

Modification to Existing Purchase Order/Contract Number:

Pricing: Firm-Fixed Price Time & Materials Cost

Other:

Funds: OMA Other Funds:

<For each proposed contractor if more than one (e.g., brand name):>

Name of Proposed Contractor(s): AT&T Mobility LLC

Street Address: 1025 Lenox Park BLVD NE

City, State, Zip: Atlanta, GA 30319-5309

Remove ContractorAdd Contractor

3. Description of Supplies or Services:

Wireless telephone services (mobile solutions), including: Wireless enabled devices (WED), associated voice + data plans, accessories, and equipment (network enhancement, etc.). These services are utilized by a large majority of agency staff, including on-call medical staff, support personnel, public disaster response officials, etc.

The estimated value of the proposed action, including all options, is $ 2,355,947.55

Briefly describe the supplies or services to be provided, including make & model number where appropriate. Indicate whether the item to be procured is peculiar to one manufacturer (e.g., a particular brand name, product, or a feature of a product, peculiar to one manufacturer). If applicable, include quantities of supplies or period of performance for services. Provide information for any options included in the order. If the action is a modification to an existing order, distinguish clearly between the work covered by the basic order and the work to be obtained by the proposed modification.

WEDs are limited to iOS (Apple) products. Distribution will be Agency-wide to employees across the nation. The anticipated Periods of Performance are as follows: BASE Period - 08/01/2025 to 01/31/2026, Option Period I (3 Month Option) 02/01/2026 to 04/30/2026, Option Period II (3 Month Option) 05/01/2026 to 07/31/2026.

4. Authority:

ORDER AGAINST FSS: Authority of the Multiple Award Schedule Program, Title III of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 (41 U.S.C. 251, et seq.); Title 40 U.S.C. 501, Services for Executive Agencies; and Section 803 of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2002 (PL 107-107) and implemented by FAR 8.405-6. Mark the applicable exception and for each discuss how the cited authority applies in accordance with FAR 8.405-6(c)(2)(iv).

An urgent and compelling need exists, and following the procedures would result in unacceptable delays (FAR 8.405-6(a)(1)(i)(A));

Only one source is capable of providing the supplies or services required at the level or quality required because the supplies or services are unique or highly specialized (FAR 8.405-6(a)(1)(i)(B)); or

In the interest of economy and efficiency, the new work is a logical follow-on to an original Federal Supply Schedule order provided that the original order was placed in accordance with the applicable Federal Supply Schedule ordering procedures. The original order or BPA must not have been previously issued under sole-source or limited sources procedures (FAR 8.405-6(a)(1)(i)(C)); or

The original contract award was placed under the legacy Federal Strategic Sourcing Initiative Wireless Services Program. Award information is as follows: Contract # 47QTCA19D00MV - Order # 75H70420F80003.

An item peculiar to one manufacturer can be a particular brand name, product, or a feature of a product, peculiar to one manufacturer). A brand name item, whether available on one or more schedule contracts, is an item peculiar to one manufacturer. (FAR 8.405-6(b);

Describe in detail why a particular brand name, product, or a feature of a product, peculiar to one manufacturer must be used. Also, describe in detail the existence of other than the “Name Brand” product and discuss why they cannot be used.

5. Market Research:

Describe the extent of the market research conducted among the schedule holders and the results, or a statement of the reason that market research was not conducted. Brand name specifications shall not be used unless the particular brand name, product, or feature is essential to the Government’s requirements, and market research indicates other companies’ similar products, or products lacking the particular feature, do not meet, or cannot be modified to meet, the agency’s need.

Market research conducted was minimal. Meetings have recently been conducted with the intended vendor, GSA and the Government's FirstNet office to ensure that all known technical capabilities and network advantages are still current. This is a known vendor for commercial services, products and equipment. Sourcing is being conducted via the Federal Supply Schedule.

6. Actions to Increase Competition:

Describe the actions, if any, the agency may take to remove or overcome any barriers that led to the restricted consideration prior to any subsequent acquisition for the supplies or services is made. If no such actions have been taken, explain why.

The agency does not anticipate taking any actions to increase competition for these services at this time. While this follow-up requirement stems from a competitive action, the subsequent acquisition is anticipated to be sole-source due to the unique capabilities of the vendor's core network.

7. Any other facts supporting the justification:

The re-compete action for this requirement is currently being worked by a Contract Specialist/Contracting Officer team.

Whereas the original requirement was anticipated as a competitive, it was since been determined that a combined sole-source and competitive approach (dual award) is needed to meet the agency's needs. In addition, the service/product catalogs supported by the vendors listed on the current GSA IT Schedule 70 are not as robust as the Federal Strategic Sourcing Initiative offerings, necessitating additional acquisition planning, etc.

8. Technical / Requirements Certification: By my signature below, I certify that the supporting data under my review which is included in this Limited-Sources Justification is accurate and complete.

Program Manager

Name: Rebecca Martinez

Position Title: Program Analyst, Anticipated COR

Email address: Rebeccca.Martinez@ihs.gov

Phone: (240) 701-5114

Program Manager Supervisor (or one level above Program Manager)

Name: Michelle Riedel

Position Title: Capital Planning and Investment Control Manager (Acting)

Email address: Michelle.Riedel@ihs.gov

Signature

Date: Jul 18, 2025

9. Best Value Determination. By my signature below, after review of the relevant documents, I have determined that the order subject to this Limited-Sources Justification represents the best value for the Government as set forth in FAR 8.404(d), and constitutes a fair and reasonable price. The basis for my determination is as follows:

Describe in detail the basis for the determination that this order providers the best value, and that the price is fair and reasonable.

Attach and/or summarize applicable market research, commercial prices lists, comparable GSA schedule pricing or other markers that were used in this determination.

This is a follow-up requirement to continue mission-critical and operation-essential services for the agency. Sourcing for these services is being done at the highest known Category Management level via the Federal Supply Schedule (FSS). As such, pricing is considered predetermined as fair and reasonable by the GSA. In addition, any equipment not covered by the FSS catalog will be provided to the Government at prices reflecting the best offer to other governmental entities.

10. Contracting Officer's Approval (Required for proposed contract not to exceed $700,000 (value calculated including all options)): I hereby certify that this justification is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I approve this sole source justification subject to availability of funds, and provided that the services and supplies herein described have otherwise been authorized for acquisition.

Name: Brendon Moran Phone: (240) 478-1994

Signature: Date: Jul 18, 2025

11. Legal Review:

All J&As equal to or greater than $68 million must have a legal review from the General Law Division of the Office of the General Counsel prior to sending it to the Department.

12. OPDIV Competition Advocate Approval (Required for proposed contract over $700,000 but not exceeding $13.5 million value calculated including all options)):

I have reviewed this justification and find that it adequately supports other than full and open competition.

Name: Jeffrey Johnston Phone: (301) 945-3645

Signature: Date: Jul 21, 2025

13. Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization I have reviewed this justification and find that it adequately supports other than full and open competition.

Name: Phone:

Signature: Date:

14. OPDIV HCA Approval (Required for proposed contract over $13.5 million but not exceeding $68 million value calculated including all options)):

Name: Phone:

Signature: Date:

(The below approval paragraph is required if the cumulative contract value, including all options, equals or exceeds $68 million.)

HHS Senior Procurement Executive (SPE) Approval Based on the foregoing justification, I hereby approve the procurement of (state supplies/services being procured) on an other than full and open competition basis pursuant to the authority of (state the full statutory authority and FAR cite and title, consistent with paragraph 4, e.g. 41 U.S.C. 251), as implemented by FAR 8.405-6), subject to the availability of funds, and provided that the services herein described have otherwise been authorized for acquisition.

Name: Phone:

Signature: Date:

Template for a Federal Supply Schedule (FSS) Limited-Sources Justification

Completion Instructions: HHS has established a standard template for the preparation of a Limited-Sources Justification (LSJ) pursuant to FAR Subpart 8.4. This template is for use with orders issued under the Federal Supply Schedule (FSS) program where the value exceeds simplified acquisition threshold and competition is restricted: (1) to fewer schedule contractors than required in FAR 8.405-1 or 8.405-2, or (2) to an item peculiar to one manufacturer. See FAR Subpart 8.4 for additional guidance. This template is not for use with acquisitions other than those under FAR Subpart 8.4.

Tailor all aspects of this template to the individual acquisition. Consult FAR 8.405-6 for guidance.

Delete the highlighted portions of this document prior to signature. Do not include these instructions in the final document or contract file.

FEDERAL SUPPLY SCHEDULE

LIMITED-SOURCES JUSTIFICATION

2. Description of Action:

Nature:

Pricing:

Funds:

<For each proposed contractor if more than one (e.g., brand name):>

3. Description of Supplies or Services:

Briefly describe the supplies or services to be provided, including make & model number where appropriate. Indicate whether the item to be procured is peculiar to one manufacturer (e.g., a particular brand name, product, or a feature of a product, peculiar to one manufacturer). If applicable, include quantities of supplies or period of performance for services. Provide information for any options included in the order. If the action is a modification to an existing order, distinguish clearly between the work covered by the basic order and the work to be obtained by the proposed modification.

4. Authority:

Describe in detail why a particular brand name, product, or a feature of a product, peculiar to one manufacturer must be used. Also, describe in detail the existence of other than the “Name Brand” product and discuss why they cannot be used.

5. Market Research:

Describe the extent of the market research conducted among the schedule holders and the results, or a statement of the reason that market research was not conducted. Brand name specifications shall not be used unless the particular brand name, product, or feature is essential to the Government’s requirements, and market research indicates other companies’ similar products, or products lacking the particular feature, do not meet, or cannot be modified to meet, the agency’s need.

6. Actions to Increase Competition:

Describe the actions, if any, the agency may take to remove or overcome any barriers that led to the restricted consideration prior to any subsequent acquisition for the supplies or services is made. If no such actions have been taken, explain why.

7. Any other facts supporting the justification:

8. Technical / Requirements Certification: By my signature below, I certify that the supporting data under my review which is included in this Limited-Sources Justification is accurate and complete.

Program Manager Name:

Position Title:

Email address:

Phone:

Program Manager Supervisor (or one level above Program Manager) Name:

Position Title:

Email address:

Signature Date:

9. Best Value Determination. By my signature below, after review of the relevant documents, I have determined that the order subject to this Limited-Sources Justification represents the best value for the Government as set forth in FAR 8.404(d), and constitutes a fair and reasonable price. The basis for my determination is as follows:

Describe in detail the basis for the determination that this order providers the best value, and that the price is fair and reasonable. Attach and/or summarize applicable market research, commercial prices lists, comparable GSA schedule pricing or other markers that were used in this determination.

10. Contracting Officer's Approval (Required for proposed contract not to exceed $700,000 (value calculated including all options)): I hereby certify that this justification is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I approve this sole source justification subject to availability of funds, and provided that the services and supplies herein described have otherwise been authorized for acquisition.

Name:

Phone:

Signature:

Date:

11. Legal Review:

All J&As equal to or greater than $68 million must have a legal review from the General Law Division of the Office of the General Counsel prior to sending it to the Department.

12. OPDIV Competition Advocate Approval (Required for proposed contract over $700,000 but not exceeding $13.5 million value calculated including all options)):

I have reviewed this justification and find that it adequately supports other than full and open competition.

Name:

Phone:

Signature:

Date:

13. Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization I have reviewed this justification and find that it adequately supports other than full and open competition.

Name:

Phone:

Signature:

Date:

14. OPDIV HCA Approval (Required for proposed contract over $13.5 million but not exceeding $68 million value calculated including all options)):

Name:

Phone:

Signature:

Date:

(The below approval paragraph is required if the cumulative contract value, including all options, equals or exceeds $68 million.)

HHS Senior Procurement Executive (SPE) Approval Based on the foregoing justification, I hereby approve the procurement of (state supplies/services being procured) on an other than full and open competition basis pursuant to the authority of (state the full statutory authority and FAR cite and title, consistent with paragraph 4, e.g. 41 U.S.C. 251), as implemented by FAR 8.405-6), subject to the availability of funds, and provided that the services herein described have otherwise been authorized for acquisition.

Name:

Phone:

Signature:

Date:

11.0.0.20130303.1.892433.887364 Justification & Approval - Federal Supply Schedule Health and Human Services Justification & Approval - Federal Supply Schedule

AcquisitionTitle: Agency-Wide Wireless Services Award, Bridge Contract (AT&T)
Agency: IHS
PSCDrop:
NIHDrop:
PSCOther:
AcqusitionYear: FY 2025
Author: Brendon Moran
CheckBox4: 0
CheckBox5: 1
CheckBox1: 0
Order/Contract Number::
CheckBox8: 1
CheckBox7: 0
CheckBox6: 0
CheckBox9: 0
Other Pricing:
CheckBox10: 1
CheckBox11: 0
Funding amount:
TextField5: AT&T Mobility LLC
TextField5: 1025 Lenox Park BLVD NE
TextField5: Atlanta, GA 30319-5309
Button2:
Button1:
TextField8: Wireless telephone services (mobile solutions), including: Wireless enabled devices (WED), associated voice + data plans, accessories, and equipment (network enhancement, etc.). These services are utilized by a large majority of agency staff, including on-call medical staff, support personnel, public disaster response officials, etc.
TextField8: WEDs are limited to iOS (Apple) products. Distribution will be Agency-wide to employees across the nation. The anticipated Periods of Performance are as follows: BASE Period - 08/01/2025 to 01/31/2026, Option Period I (3 Month Option) 02/01/2026 to 04/30/2026, Option Period II (3 Month Option) 05/01/2026 to 07/31/2026.
TextField8: The original contract award was placed under the legacy Federal Strategic Sourcing Initiative Wireless Services Program. Award information is as follows: Contract # 47QTCA19D00MV - Order # 75H70420F80003.
TextField7: 2,355,947.55
CheckBox12: 1
CheckBox13: 0
CheckBox13: 0
CheckBox13: 1
CheckBox13: 0
Describe in detail the basis for the determination that this order providers the best value, and that the price is fair and reasonable. Attach and/or summarize applicable market research, commercial prices lists, comparable GSA schedule pricing or other markers that were used in this determination.: Market research conducted was minimal. Meetings have recently been conducted with the intended vendor, GSA and the Government's FirstNet office to ensure that all known technical capabilities and network advantages are still current. This is a known vendor for commercial services, products and equipment. Sourcing is being conducted via the Federal Supply Schedule.
Describe in detail the basis for the determination that this order providers the best value, and that the price is fair and reasonable. Attach and/or summarize applicable market research, commercial prices lists, comparable GSA schedule pricing or other markers that were used in this determination.: The agency does not anticipate taking any actions to increase competition for these services at this time. While this follow-up requirement stems from a competitive action, the subsequent acquisition is anticipated to be sole-source due to the unique capabilities of the vendor's core network.
Describe in detail the basis for the determination that this order providers the best value, and that the price is fair and reasonable. Attach and/or summarize applicable market research, commercial prices lists, comparable GSA schedule pricing or other markers that were used in this determination.: The re-compete action for this requirement is currently being worked by a Contract Specialist/Contracting Officer team. Whereas the original requirement was anticipated as a competitive, it was since been determined that a combined sole-source and competitive approach (dual award) is needed to meet the agency's needs. In addition, the service/product catalogs supported by the vendors listed on the current GSA IT Schedule 70 are not as robust as the Federal Strategic Sourcing Initiative offerings, necessitating additional acquisition planning, etc.
Describe in detail the basis for the determination that this order providers the best value, and that the price is fair and reasonable. Attach and/or summarize applicable market research, commercial prices lists, comparable GSA schedule pricing or other markers that were used in this determination.: This is a follow-up requirement to continue mission-critical and operation-essential services for the agency. Sourcing for these services is being done at the highest known Category Management level via the Federal Supply Schedule (FSS). As such, pricing is considered predetermined as fair and reasonable by the GSA. In addition, any equipment not covered by the FSS catalog will be provided to the Government at prices reflecting the best offer to other governmental entities.
Program Manager name: Rebecca Martinez
Program Manager position title: Program Analyst, Anticipated COR
Program Manager email address: Rebeccca.Martinez@ihs.gov
Program manager phone number: (240) 701-5114
Program Manager Supervisor name: Michelle Riedel
Program Manager Supervisor Position title: Capital Planning and Investment Control Manager (Acting)
Program Manager Supervisor email address: Michelle.Riedel@ihs.gov
HHS Senior Procurement Executive (SPE) signature:
Program Manager Supervisor date: 2025-07-18
filepath:
Contract Officer's Approval name: Brendon Moran
HHS Senior Procurement Executive (SPE) phone: (240) 478-1994
HHS Senior Procurement Executive (SPE) phone: (301) 945-3645
Contract Officer's Approval date: 2025-07-18
HHS Senior Procurement Executive (SPE) name: Jeffrey Johnston
DateField6: 2025-07-21
Office of Small Business date:
OPDIV HCA date:
HHS Senior Procurement Executive (SPE) date:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .