47QFRA20Q0004 - Attachment 5 - Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 222 KB Posted

Attached to
Draft Request for Quotation (RFQ) for the National Security Space Institute (NSSI)
Solicitation number
47QFRA20Q0004
Issued by

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
47QFRA20Q0004 - Attachment 2 - Price and Cost Spreadsheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
ID08200023 Appendix M - Definitions.pdf PDF
ID08200023 Appendix O - Travel Authorization-Report.pdf PDF
ID08200023 Appendix D - SP200 and SP300 Curriculum Plan_Mar 2018.pdf PDF
ID08200023 Appendix Q - DD254 NSSI.pdf PDF
ID08200023 Appendix F - Space Power Lab Tech.pdf PDF
ID08200023 Appendix P - Material Inventory-Software List.pdf PDF
ID08200023 Appendix K - Materials and Equipment Historical.pdf PDF
ID08200023 Appendix B-C-E - NSSI FY19 Handbook.pdf PDF
47QFRA20Q0004 - Attachment 4 - Past Performance Data Sheet.pdf PDF
47QFRA20Q0004 - Attachment 6 - Vendor Comments Spreadsheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
47QFRA20Q0004 - Attachment 3 - Performance Requirements Summary.pdf PDF
ID08200023 Appendix J - Travel Projections.pdf PDF
47QFRA20Q0004 - Attachment 1 - NSSI PWS 22 Sep 2020.pdf PDF
ID08200023 Appendix I - Draft Visitors Group Security Agreement.pdf PDF
ID08200023 Appendix N - Future Training.pdf PDF
47QFRA20Q0004 - Attachment 7_NDA.pdf PDF
ID08200023 Appendix L - Applicable Publications.pdf PDF
ID08200023 Appendix G - Resource Center Network Diagram.pdf PDF
Appx A - Minimum Personnel Qualification Matrix 20200410 v2.pdf PDF
ID08200023 Appendix H - Space Power Lab Network Diagram.pdf PDF
Show all 21

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ID08200023 RFP Attachment 5

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)

CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-3)

1. Contractor Information

Firm Name: CAGE Code:

Address: DUNs Number:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:

2. Contract Information Contract Number:

Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):

Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Please specify):

Contract Title:

Contract Location:

Award Date (mm/dd/yy):

Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Explain Differences:

Original Contract Price (Award Amount):

Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):

Explain Differences:

3. Project Information:

Complexity of Work High Med Routine

Which project submitted for Factor 2 is this PPQ associated with?

CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 4-7)

4. Client Information

Name:

Title:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

5. Describe the client’s role in the project:

6. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):

7. Client’s Signature:

NOTE: THE CONTRACTING OFFICER REQUESTS THAT THE CLIENT COMPLETES THIS QUESTIONNAIRE AND SUBMITS

DIRECTLY BACK TO THE GOVERNMENT AT RACHEL.HICKENLOOPER@GSA.GOV. THE GOVERNMENT RESERVES THE

RIGHT TO VERIFY ANY AND ALL INFORMATION ON THIS FORM.

ID08200023 RFP Attachment 5

TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT

PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.

1. QUALITY:

Quality of technical data/report. E VG S M U N

Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance. E VG S M U N

Effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance.

E VG S M U N

Effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance).

E VG S M U N

2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:

Compliance with contract delivery schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below)

E VG S M U N

Rate the contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract.

E VG S M U N

3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project? E VG S M U N

Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff E VG S M U N

To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer?

E VG S M U N

Overall customer satisfaction. E VG S M U N

4. MANAGEMENT

Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force?

E VG S M U N

Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines. E VG S M U N

Ability to incorporate changes in requirements E VG S M U N

Effectiveness of overall management E VG S M U N

5. SECURITY:

Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements.

E VG S M U N

6. GENERAL:

Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues). E VG S M U N

Please provide a brief narrative addressing the questions above for any rating below Satisfactory. (please attach additional pages if necessary):

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .