47QFHA23K0007_T10_08f_Exhibit 2_PPQ.docx
DOCX document 24 KB Posted
- Attached to
- DLIFLC Advanced Language Enhancement Course (ALEC) IV Development Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 47QFHA23K0007
- Issued by
- GSA Federal Acquisition Service
About this file
This document is a past performance questionnaire for contractors responding to solicitation number 47QFHA23K0007 from the General Services Administration (GSA) Federal Acquisition Service. The solicitation is for the DLIFLC Advanced Language Enhancement Course (ALEC) IV Development contract. The past performance questionnaire requests information about the contractor's previous work including contract details, performance ratings, and a question on whether the evaluator would select the contractor again. Evaluators are asked to return the completed questionnaire by August 7, 2023 to provide input on the source selection process. Performance factors for evaluation include quality of work, personnel, cost/budget control, customer satisfaction, timeliness, and business relations. Ratings are on a scale of exceptional, very good, satisfactory, marginal, and unsatisfactory.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 47QFHA23K0007_T10_01_Amend 01_ALEC_07-21-2023_v2.pdf | ||
| 47QFHA23K0007_T10_08b_Attach 1_Updated PWS_ALEC Amend 01_21July2023.pdf | ||
| 47QFHA23K0007_T10_08d_Attach 3 - Provisions_Clauses (Incorporated by Reference).pdf | ||
| 47QFHA23K0007_T10_08a_SF1449_Solicitation_ALEC_SDVOSB_Set Aside_Final.pdf | ||
| 47QFHA23K0007_T10_08e_Exhibit 1_Q_A.docx | DOCX document | |
| 47QFHA23K0007_T10_08c_Attach 2_ Excel Pricing Spreadsheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 47QFHA23K0007_T10_08h_Exhibit 4_Section 508 ART Report.pdf | ||
| 47QFHA23K0007_T10_08b_Attach 1_PWS_PRS_ALEC_06July2023.pdf | ||
| 47QFHA23K0007_T10_08g_Exhibit 3 - Staffing Matrix.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SOLICITATION 47QFHA23K0007
Past Performance Questionnaire for GSA Solicitation 47QFHA23K0007 Project Name: DLIFLC Advanced Language Enhancement Courses (ALEC)
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE – DLIFLC Advance Language Enhancement Courses (ALEC)
Thank you in advance for your assistance in completing this questionnaire. GSA will use your feedback in evaluating past performance during source selection proceedings. The contractor that provided you this form is a potential candidate for award of a contract to provide Advanced Language Enhancement Course (ALEC). Please return your completed questionnaire by email to dee.sysengchanh@gsa.gov, matthew.hughes@gsa.gov, and christopher.nettey@gsa.gov later than August 7, 2023, 12:00 PM Central.
1. Contractor Name:
Role on Project: (Prime/Subcontractor):
2. Contract Number:
| 3. Contractor Address: |
| 4. Contract Type: |
____Firm Fixed Price
____T&M/LH
____Cost Reimbursement ____Other (Please Specify)
| 5. Evaluator Agency/Company Name: |
| 6. Evaluator POC/Phone/Email |
7. Period of Performance:
8. Dollar Amount of Award: $______________ Annual Amount: $______________ Total Dollar Value with Mods:$_____________
FTE:
If your firm was a subcontractor:
Annual Amount: $______________ Total Dollar Value with Mods:$_____________ # Of FTE: ____________
9. Project Title:
10. Description of Contract Service/Scope of Contract:
11. Complexity of Work: Difficult: ____________ Routine: ____________
NOTE: Please use adjectival ratings from attached sheet.
| 12. Evaluation Factor |
| 13. Comments (Attach additional sheets, if necessary.) |
| 14. Rating |
a. Quality of Work
COMMENTS ARE HIGHLY ENCOURAGED/ APPRECIATED ESPECIALLY FOR RATINGS OF EXCEPTIONAL OR UNSATISFACTORY
b. Personnel
COMMENTS ARE HIGHLY ENCOURAGED/ APPRECIATED ESPECIALLY FOR RATINGS OF EXCEPTIONAL OR UNSATISFACTORY
c. Cost/Budget Control
COMMENTS ARE HIGHLY ENCOURAGED/ APPRECIATED ESPECIALLY FOR RATINGS OF EXCEPTIONAL OR UNSATISFACTORY
d. Customer Satisfaction
COMMENTS ARE HIGHLY ENCOURAGED/ APPRECIATED ESPECIALLY FOR RATINGS OF “5” or “0”
1 through 5
| e. Timeliness of Performance / Deliverables |
| COMMENTS ARE HIGHLY ENCOURAGED/ APPRECIATED ESPECIALLY FOR RATINGS OF EXCEPTIONAL OR UNSATISFACTORY |
f. Business Relations
COMMENTS ARE HIGHLY ENCOURAGED/ APPRECIATED ESPECIALLY FOR RATINGS OF EXCEPTIONAL OR UNSATISFACTORY
| g. Overall Performance |
| COMMENTS ARE HIGHLY ENCOURAGED/ APPRECIATED ESPECIALLY FOR RATINGS OF EXCEPTIONAL OR UNSATISFACTORY |
15. Would you select this contractor again? Please explain. (Attach additional sheet if necessary.)
| 16. Name & Date: |
| 17. Title: |
PAST PERFORMANCE RATING GUIDELINES
Summarize Contractor Performance in each of the rating areas. Assign each area a rating of Unsatisfactory, Marginal, Satisfactory, Very Good, and Exceptional. Use the following instructions as guidance in making these evaluations. Please use the comments area on the preceding form to justify the rating given.
| Ratings |
| Quality of Work/ |
Personnel/Service
-Compliance w/contract requirements -Accuracy of reports -Appropriateness of personnel -Technical excellence
Cost/Budget Control
-Within budget -Current, accurate, complete billings -Relationship of negotiated costs to actual -Cost efficiencies -Change orders issued Customer Satisfaction
Customer Satisfaction is a measure of how products and services supplied by a company meet or surpass customer expectation.
On a scale of 1-5 (5 being the highest) please rate and describe your level of satisfaction with the contractor’s performance.
5 - Very satisfied
4 - Somewhat satisfied
3 - Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied
2 -Somewhat dissatisfied
0 - Very dissatisfied
Timeliness of Services/Deliverables
-Met interim milestones -Reliable -Responsive to technical direction -Completed on time Business Relations
-Effective Mgmt -Business like correspondence -Responsive to contract reqmnts -Prompt notification of problems -Reasonable/ cooperative -Flexible -Pro-active
| Unsatisfactory |
| Nonconformances |
are comprising the achievement of contract reqmnts Cost issues are comprising performance
| Delays are compromising achievement of contract reqmts |
| Response is not effective |
| Marginal |
| Nonconformances require major agency resources to ensure achievement of contract reqmnts |
| Cost issues require major agency resources to ensure achievement of contract reqmnts |
| Delays require major agency resources to ensure achievement of contract reqmnts |
| Response is marginally effective |
| Satisfactory |
| Nonconformances |
do not impact achievement of contract reqmnts Cost issues do not impact achievement of contract reqmnts
| Delays do not impact achievement of contract reqmnts |
| Response is usually effective |
| Very Good |
| There are no quality problems/issues, and the contractor has substantially exceeded the contract performance requirements without commensurate additional costs to the Government |
| There are no cost management issues and the Contractor has exceeded the contract requirements, achieving cost savings to the Government. |
| There are no delays |
| Response to inquiries and/or technical, service, administrative issues are effective. |
Exceptional The contractor has demonstrated an exceptional performance level that was significantly in excess of anticipated achievements and is commendable as an example for others. It is expected that this rating will be used in those rare circumstances where contractor performance clearly exceeds the performance levels described as "Exceptional".
The contractor has demonstrated an exceptional performance. It is expected that this rating will be used in those rare circumstances where the contractor achieved cost savings and performance clearly exceeds the performance levels described as "Exceptional".
The contractor has demonstrated an exceptional performance level. It is expected that this rating will be used in those rare circumstances where contractor performance clearly exceeds the performance levels described as "Exceptional".
The contractor has demonstrated an exceptional performance level. It is expected that this rating will be used in those rare circumstances where contractor performance clearly exceeds the performance levels described as "Exceptional".
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .