DouglasLPOEAmendment0001.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

1. Contract ID Code Page of Pages

1 2

2. Amendment No. 3. Effective Date 4. Requisition/Purchase Req. No. 5. Project No. (if applicable)

0001 February 20, 2024

6. Issued By Code 9PCE 7. Administered By (If other than Item 6) Code

GSA, PBS, Acquisition Management Div. 9PQ2PC SEE BLOCK 6

50 United Nations Plaza, 3rd Floor

San Francisco, CA 94102-3434

Shelita Harper (415)264-2517

(X) 9A. Amendment of Solicitation No.

(Northern

9B. Date (See Item 11)

8. Name and Address of Contractor (No., Street, County, and Zip

Code)

Perspective Offerors - Phase 1 RFQ New Douglas Commercial LPOE Douglas, Az

10A. Modification of Contract/Order No.

10B. Date (See Item 13)

Code Facility Code

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended X is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:(a)

By completing items 8 and 15, and returning 01 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDG-

MENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT

IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. Accounting and Appropriation Data (if required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACT/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

(x) A. This change order is issued pursuant to: (Specify authority) The changes set forth in item 14 are made in the Contract Order No. in item 10A.

B. The above numbered Contract/Order is modified to reflect the administrative changes (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.)

Set fourth item 14, pursuant to the authority of FAR 43.103 (b)

C. This supplemental agreement is entered into pursuant to authority of:

D. Other (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. Description of Amendment (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

SUBJECT: RFQ Phase 1 New Douglas Commercial Land Port of Entry and

Douglas, Az

The purpose of this amendment is to incorporate the following changes in the RFQ as indicated per the attached: 2 Attachments Attachment 1 - Contractor/Attendee Sign in Sheet (Virtual RFQ Meeting) not mandatory Attachment 2 - Responses to RFI

Reminder: Please acknowledge amendment(s) on page 2 of your SF1442 and submit with your Phase 1 RFQ Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. Name and Title of Signer (Type or Print) 16A. Name and title of Contracting Officer (Type or Print)

Shelita Harper 415-522-3206

Contracting Officer

Shelita.harper@gsa.gov

15B. Contractor/Offeror 15C. Date Signed 16B. United States of America

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C. Date Signed

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

02/20/2024

NSN 7540-01-152-8070 30-105 STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

47PK0124R0001

PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE

SIGN IN SHEET

New Douglas Commercial LPOE Deign Build Phase 1

47PK0124R0001

Pre-Proposal Virtual Conference 02/01/2024

Name Company Phone Email address

Christopher Harvey AIS Infrastructure LLC Charvey@ais-infrastructurellc.com

Greg Thornton AIS Infrastructure LLC gthornton@ais-infrastructurellc.com

Matt Pike AIS Infrastructure LLC mpike@ais-infrastructurellc.com

Judd Murphy AISI judmurphy@ais-infrastructurellc.com

Jessica Rafferty Atelier Ten jessica.rafferty@atelierten.com

Brandon Ames Brasfield & Gorrie bames@brasfieldgorrie.com

Walter Jones Brasfield & Gorrie wjones@brasfieldgorrie.com

Victoria Connell Buro Happold victoria.connell@burohappold.com

Dennis Shepard Caddell dennis.shepard@caddell.com

Honie Maddaloni Caddell Construction honie.maddaloni@caddell.com

Lainie Cleghorn Caddell Construction lainie.cleghorn@caddell.com

Noa Rand Diamond West Construction, LLC. noa.rand@diamondwestaz.com

Felicia Berger Ennead Architects fberger@ennead.com

Michaela Lunz Ennead Architects michaela.lunz@ennead.com

Robert Theel EXP robert.theel@exp.com

Nawaz Hormozdyaran Future Visions Inc. nawaz@fvinc.com

Tiffany Gorrell GLHN Architects & Engineers tgorrell@glhn.com

Dan Maher GLHN Architects and Engineers dmaher@glhn.com

Andrew Moore Hensel Phelps amoore@henselphelps.com

Eric Niec Hensel Phelps eniec@henselphelps.com

Jerry Boat Hensel Phelps Gboat@Henselphelps.com

Jim Bohling Hensel Phelps jbohling@henselphelps.com

Rachel Pratt Hensel Phelps rpratt@henselphelps.com

Steve Grauer Hensel Phelps sgrauer@henselphelps.com

Jeff Stoddard Hensel Phelps JStoddard@henselphelps.com

Jen Bottomley HGA jbottomley@hga.com

Michael Anderson HGA manderson@hga.com

Jeanie James Identiv jjames@identiv.com

Mina Shoja Innovative Project Solutions mina.shoja@ipsinc.net

Phil Krueger INTEGRUS architecture pkrueger@integrusarch.com

Adam Carlson Interface Engineering adamc@interfaceeng.com

Kori Zummach Interface Engineering koriz@interfaceeng.com mailto:JStoddard@henselphelps.com

Julie Deschenes Ironmark Building Company jdeschenes@ironmarkbuildingco.com

Brian Farling Jones Studio brianfarling@jonesstudioinc.com

Eddie Jones Jones Studio eddie@jonesstudioinc.com

Jacob Benyi Jones Studio jacob@jonesstudioinc.com

Kirsten Keane Jones Studio kirstenkeane@jonesstudioinc.com

Neal Jones Jones Studio neal@jonesstudioinc.com

Beth Resetco KCCT bresetco@kcct.com

Kevin Bell LPI East, LLC Flagstaff AZ, 860-777-5731 kbell@lpieast.com

Chadi Karam Michael Baker Engineering chad.karam@mbakerintl.com

Karisma Dev Michael Maltzan Architecture kdev@mmaltzan.com

Bill Schmalz Perkins&Will bill.schmalz@perkinswill.com

Chris Connell Perkins&Will chris.connell@perkinswill.com

Eric Aukee Perkins&Will

Eric.aukee@perkinswill.com

Sandra Cervantes Perkins&Will

Sandra.Cervantes@perkinswill.com

Bob Wirth Prodims 480 902 0570 bwirth@prodims.com

Gina Rainwater ProDims g.rainwater@prodims.com

Christy Foushee Richard Kennedy Architects cfoushee@rkarch.com

Heather Root Richard Kennedy Architects hroot@rkarch.com

Rich Sourbrine Richard Kennedy Architects rsourbrine@rkarch.com

Jim Richard Richard+Kennedy

Jrichard@rkarch.com

Sabina Cheng RIOS sabina@rios.com

Erica Insley SAM LLC erica.insley@sam.biz

John Tran Smith Group john.tran@smithgroup.com

John Crump SmithGroup john.crump@smithgroup.com

Mackenzie Haehl SmithGroup (602) 284-7276 mackenzie.haehl@smithgroup.com

Bill Ferris Stantec bill.ferrisjr@stantec.com

Ann Steele Steele Strategies ann.steele@steelestrat.com

Erica Driscoll Steele Strategies erica.driscoll@steelestrat.com

Joel Velazquez Thornton Tomasetti jvelazquez@ ThorntonTomasetti.com

Josh Roberts Advance Drainage Systems, Inc. joshua.roberts@adspipe.com

Peter Koliopoulous Circle West Architects 480.600.7913 peter@circlewest.net

Jorge Fernandez Miranda William Charles Construction 773.951.6654 Tim.Bridges@williamcharles.com Jorge.Fernandez@williamcharles.com mailto:joshua.roberts@adspipe.com mailto:peter@circlewest.net mailto:Tim.Bridges@williamcharles.com mailto:Jorge.Fernandez@williamcharles.com

The above-mentioned RFQ is hereby amended to incorporate the following:

RESPONSE TO RFI

RFI QUESTIONS AND RESPONSES

New Douglas Commercial Land Port of Entry, Douglas, Arizona Solicitation No.: 47PK0124R0001, Amendment 0001

1. Section II.B Proposal Format limits the number of pages to 50, including the table of contents, charts, exhibits, etc. As noted in Section VI.G Non-Price Factors, the RFQ notes page limits in each section as follows:

Cover & tabs – Nine (9) pages Cover Letter – One (1) page Table of Contents – One (1) page Factor 1 – Subfactor 1A limits three (3) projects to four (4) pages totaling 12 pages Factor 1 – Subfactor 1B requires PPQs for the General Contractor (3 projects x 5 pages) totaling 15 pages Factor 2 – Narrative totaling six (6) pages Factor 3 – Subfactor 3A limits three (3) projects to four (4) pages totaling 12 pages Factor 3 – Subfactor 3B requires PPQs for the Lead Designer (3 projects x 5 pages) totaling 15 pages

As noted above, the total required pages, covers, tabs, and cover letter is 71, exceeding the 50-page limit. Is it acceptable to exclude the cover, tabs, and PPQs in the total 50-page limit along with the Surety Letter, SAM registration verification, SF1442, acknowledgments of any amendments, Offeror Reps and Certs, and DHS Non-Disclosure Agreement Form 1000-6?

GSA Response: Following items can be excluded from the 50-page limit.

• Two PPQ's

• Surety Letter

• SAM registration verification

• SF1442

• Acknowledgments of any amendments

• Offeror Reps and Certs

• DHS Non-Disclosure Agreement Form 1000-6

2. Who is designing the security systems and what agency is issuing the credentials?

GSA Response: All CBP security systems should be designed by DB team, except NII security system which will be designed by CBP approved vendor. This information will also be issued in Phase 2 RFP.

3. Is this LPOE assessed as FSL III or FSL II?

GSA Response: FSL III.

4. Please confirm that improvements or modifications to the existing RHC LPOE are not part of the scope of this solicitation.

GSA Response: The improvements or modifications to the existing RHC LPOE are not part of the scope of this solicitation.

5. Will the requirement for low-carbon concrete, steel, asphalt, and glass simply be to meet or exceed the “Better Than Average” threshold as published in the Interim IRA Low Embodied Carbon Material Requirements dated May 16, 2023?

GSA Response: Please use the updated IRA Low Embodied Carbon Material (LEC) Requirements dated December 12th, 20223.

6. Will additional evaluation points be awarded for providing materials compliant with the more stringent carbon content thresholds (Top 40% and Top 20%)? If so, what are the relative points achievable for each threshold?

GSA Response: Yes, additional evaluation points will be awarded for providing LEC materials compliant with the top 40% and top 20%. The evaluation criteria will be provided in Phase 2 RFP.

7. P100 section 1.9.2.9 requires that new construction projects target a 20% reduction in whole-building embodied carbon from materials within the structure and enclosure, as compared to a conventional standard baseline building and calculated with a whole-building life-cycle assessment.

a. Will the whole-building embodied carbon reduction be considered under the sustainability factor?

GSA Response: No. More information will be provided in Phase 2 RFP.

b. If so, will additional evaluation points be awarded for achieving whole-building carbon reduction greater than the 20% target?

GSA Response: No. More information will be provided in Phase 2 RFP.

8. EO 14026 is unique, in that it requires payment of the federal minimum wage for each year during the performance of the work. Please confirm that the current minimum wage is $17.20/hr and that if adjustments to the minimum wage are made effective on January 1 of each successive year during the period of performance, contractor (and its subcontractors) are entitled to an equitable adjustment for same, including any progressive pay scales related to increasing in minimum pay. If this is correct, please state the specific information that the Government will seek to substantial the equitable adjustment.

GSA Response: The Davis-Bacon prevailing wage determination will be provided in Phase 2 RFP which will be incorporated as part of the awarded contract.

9. Will the existing/site utilities survey be available for phase 2 procurement?

GSA Response: This is a vacant site with no existing utilities. Existing boundary survey will be provided in Phase 2 RFP.

10. will a soil conditions survey be available for phase 2 procurement?

GSA Response: Existing Geotechnical Evaluation Report will be provided in Phase 2 RFP.

11. Will this project, at any point, be subject to EO 14063? If so, please provide details. If not, please share exemption status given that this project will be awarded after January 1, 2024.

GSA Response: This solicitation was issued prior to Executive Order 14063 which was effective on January 22nd, 2024. As a result, this procurement is not subject to mandatory PLA. However, as noted in Phase 2 RFP, contractors can provide pricing with or without a PLA for this procurement.

12. please clarify the extent to which CBP/DHS guidelines apply to the design-build delivery for this project.

GSA Response: The question is unclear. However, CBP design standards will apply to this project.

13. If the project cannot meet LEC/EPD goals, is the project fully funded for award?

GSA Response: In Phase 2, the LEC goals falls under the sustainability factor with total weight of 15%. The base scope is fully funded for award.

14. Please confirm this project is not subject to any requirements of EO 14042.

GSA Response: On May 9, 2023, President Biden issued Executive Order on Moving Beyond COVID-19 Vaccination Requirements for Federal Workers, revoking Executive Order (EO) 14042, Ensuring Adequate COVID Safety Protocols for Federal Contractors.

15. For phase 2, please share what the GSA's planned stipend sum is for the firms not awarded to the project. Is the Government willing to accept industry feedback related to the stipend sum?

GSA Response: This project will not include stipend nor design charrette.

16. Please provide the GSA's planned team for the delivery of the project including: 1) project executive; 2) project manager: 3) contracting officer: 4) AHJ

GSA Response: Project Executive: Mario Ramirez. Project Manager: Bernard Tong. Contracting Officer: Shelita Harper. AHJ: Michael Hembree.

17. Please confirm that submission of a CPARs for a project is acceptable in lieu of a PPQ.

We have found that government representatives are not always willing to complete PPQs when CPARs exist.

GSA Response: Yes, CPARs are acceptable in lieu of a PPQ.

18. What is the anticipated completeness of design percentages for architecture, civil, and other engineering disciplines of the bridging set?

GSA Response: 15% of Design Development.

19. Will the phase two (pedestrian crossing) be a completely separate project solicitation?

GSA Response: POV is a separate project.

END OF AMENDMENT OF 0001