RFP 47PK0123R0002 Amendment 3.pdf

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION / MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

2. AMENDMENT / MODIFICATION NO. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION / PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (IF OTHER THAN ITEM 6) CODE

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION

ACQUISITION MANAGEMENT DIVISION

401 W. WASHINGTON ST., ROOM 210

PHOENIX, AZ 85003

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (NO., STREET, COUNTRY, STATE, ZIP CODE) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/RFP

X

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT / ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE FACILITY CODE

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of offers

X is extended is not extended

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods: (a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning two (2) copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED

FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER.

If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS / ORDERS,

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT / ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF :

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the administering office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

SEE ATTACHMENT TO SF 30 FOR DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT

Except as provided herein, all terms & conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force & effect.

15A. Name and Title of Signer (type or print) 16A. Name and Title of Contracting Officer (type or print)

DAN MAKOWSKI

15B. Contractor / Offeror 15C. Date Signed 16B. United States of America 16C. Date Signed

(Authorized signature) (Signature of Contracting Officer)

REVISED STANDARD FORM 30 (2-93)

3/27/2023

47PK0123R0002

SAN DIEGO, CA

"7th FLOOR CLERK OF THE COURT AND MAGISTRATE CHAMBER EXPANSION"

3 5/12/2023

CARTER & KEEP USCH

“7TH FLOOR CLERK OF THE COURT RFP NO. 47PK0123R0002

AND MAGISTRATE CHAMBER EXPANSION”

CARTER & KEEP USCH, SAN DIEGO, CA AMENDMENT NO. 3

ATTACHMENT TO STANDARD FORM 30

ITEM 14, DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT

Amendment No. 3 – 05/12/2023

THIS AMENDMENT IS ISSUED TO ADD OR CHANGE THE FOLLOWING ITEMS IN REQUEST FOR

PROPOSALS NO. 47PK0123R0002:

1. Questions received regarding the solicitation, along with the answers, are attached to this amendment. No further questions will be accepted or answered.

2. No other site visits for the solicitation will be scheduled or allowed.

3. The proposal closing date and time for this solicitation is extended until MONDAY, MAY 22, 2023, 4:00

PM (PDT).

ALL OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS REMAIN UNCHANGED.

***** YOU MUST ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF THIS AND ALL AMENDMENTS AS INDICATED

IN BLOCK 11 SHOWN ABOVE. FAILURE TO DO SO MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR

OFFER. *****

AND MAGISTRATE CHAMBER EXPANSION” AMENDMENT NO. 3

CARTER & KEEP USCH, SAN DIEGO, CA ITEM 1 - QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

PROPERTY OF THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT - FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Do not remove this notice

Properly destroy documents when no longer needed

The following questions were received in response to this solicitation. Answers follow in red.

1. Spec section 01 32 80 Asbestos Abatement asks that the contractor hire an Industrial Hygienist to test. Is there asbestos or lead in the building?

ANSWER: There is no known asbestos in the building, however the Contractor is required to have a third-party Industrial Hygienist perform a pre-demolition survey prior to start of construc-tion. See further details in specification section 013280.

2. Spec section 01 73 20 section 3.3 A. asks that if rodents or vermin are encountered that the con-tractor hire a pest control company. Should this be in the bid not knowing if rodents are present?

Are there rodents or vermin present in the building?

ANSWER: There are no known rodent or vermin issues at the building, if an issue is detected during construction the Contractor shall provide a proposal to address the issue and it will be ad-dressed through a modification to the contract.

3. Is the contractor responsible for engaging a structural engineer for all fasteners?

ANSWER: Yes, as noted in specification section 055000.

4. Please confirm that all or any wood used in the project will be certified by THE FOREST

STEWARDSHIP COUNCIL?

ANSWER: Yes, as noted in several sections of Attachment H – AE Specifications.

5. Please provide building O & M company contact information.

ANSWER: Patrick Walsh, KCORP – (858) 967-4687, Patrick.walsh@kcorpalaska.com

6. Please provide 7th floor to deck above height.

ANSWER: The Contractor must perform a site survey prior to construction, however see Attach-ment I – AE Drawings, Sheet A4.1.1 and the as-built sheet titled “As-built Section” (pdf attached to this amendment).

7. Requesting a 1-week extension on RFI due date and bid due date.

ANSWER: The proposal closing dated has been extended until Monday, May 22, 2023, 4:00 pm

(PDT). See item 3 of Amendment 3.

8. Requesting another job walk to view the area above the ceiling and the area under the raised floor that was not made accessible at the job walk on 4-13-23.

ANSWER: No further site visits will be allowed or conducted.

Properly destroy documents when no longer needed

9. Section II.D.Technical Proposal

“Similar Projects – Would GSA reduce the required “contract price” to at least 3.5M? Pro-jects in the $3.5M range performed in the past 7 years as adjusted for todays inflation would meet the $4M range.

ANSWER: The “Similar Project” minimum threshold was reduced to $3 million in Amend-ment 2, Item 1.

10. Section II.D. Technical Proposal

“Similar Interior Projects” – Please clarify if this interior project is to be the same project as in question 1 above or if it can be a separate interior finish project?

ANSWER: The (4) submitted projects under Evaluation Factor #1 must meet the definition of “Similar Project” under section II.D.A Technical Proposal (as amended, see question 9, above). “Additional consideration” may be granted for Evaluation Factor #1 for “Similar

Projects” that also meet the “Similar Interiors” project definition.

11. Section II.D Technical Proposal – Can the Technical Proposal contain a combination of Similar

Projects and Similar Interior Projects within the 4 required?

ANSWER: See response provided in Question 10.

12. Section II.D Technical Proposal

B. (1) (d) – If Offeror General Contractor is self-performing electrical and millwork can one nar-rative suffice for both addressing each trade scope within the similar projects listed?

ANSWER: Yes, if the Offeror is self-performing electrical and millwork than a single narra-tive is acceptable, however the narrative must include sections dedicated to the electrical and millwork trades.

13. Secton II.D Technical Proposal

(4) (a) – “The Offeror must include a table that lists each submitted project that includes cost con-trol and schedule control as evidenced on performance metrics.” If the PPQ addresses cost con-trol and schedule control is this sufficient? Otherwise please clarify the “table” requirement.

ANSWER: No, the table must be complete and list all projects that the Offeror is providing a

PPQ for under Evaluation Factor #4

14. Requesting clarification on project laydown space

ANSWER: Refer to pdf document titled “C&K 7th Flr_Laydown Space”, attached with this amendment. Approved laydown space is directly adjacent to area viewed during the Pre-proposal

Properly destroy documents when no longer needed

Conference and Site Walk on April 13, 2023. The approved laydown space is over a flat area of concrete and grass landscaping. Once the laydown space enclosure is removed, the Contractor shall bring the laydown space back to it’s original condition prior to project use. The laydown grass area and adjacent grass area must match.

15. Requesting building as-builts

ANSWER: As-builts will be provided to the successful offeror only after award of the contract.

16. Door schedule list doors 716 (A) and 716 (B) as 4’10” wide and the widest door that manufac-turer can provide with rating is 4’3” is this acceptable?

ANSWER: Doors 716 (A) and 716 (B) are elevator protection doors. The elevator openings will be 4’-10” and the protection doors must align with the opening. The Contractor may propose a different product for GSA and A/E review and approval.

17. Regarding past performance: Can the four (4) “similarly complex” projects come from one of the

Joint Venture partners only?

ANSWER: Yes, in accordance with 13 CFR § 125.8(e) regarding the SBA Mentor-Protege pro-gram, the four ‘similarly complex’ projects required in the RFP can come from one of a Joint

Venture's partners only.

Joint Venture offerors should be cognizant of the proposal submission requirements for Joint

Ventures as described in the RFP document “The Solicitation”, paragraph II.F. Requirements of

Joint Venture Offerors”.

Joint Venture offerors should also be aware of the minimum work performance requirements as described in the RFP document “The Agreement”, paragraph IV. Contract Clauses, sub-paragraph

A.9., FAR 52.219-14 Limitations on Subcontracting (OCT 2022).

If applicable, the relationship of JV team members and their proposed roles to meet the minimum work performance requirements for this project should be addressed in the Joint Venture offeror’s proposal in Technical Evaluation Factor 1: Experience of the General Contractor and Major Sub-contractors, and/or in Technical Evaluation Factor 3: Technical and Management Approach.

Celia Rectangle

Celia Callout

TOP OF RAISED FLOOR

Celia Callout

TOP OF FLOOR DECK

Celia Rectangle

Celia Callout

TYPICAL

MonicaBarba Polygon

MonicaBarba Callout

LAYDOWN SPACE