Offeror_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 20 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 47PJ0019N0005
About this file
Past performance questionnaire
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amendment_02_Q's_and_answers.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_3_Past_Experience_Form.docx | DOCX document | |
| Supplement_to_SF1442_Region_8_IDIQ_JOCC.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 47PJ0019R0119_Generated_PDF_with_TOC.pdf | ||
| Divide.pdf | ||
| R8_IDIQ_JOCC_ND-_Reps_&_Certs_.pdf | ||
| ATTACH_1.docx | DOCX document | |
| Ward.pdf | ||
| SOW_BMK37_JOCC_Office_Renovation_v2.0_-_RK_Edit.docx | DOCX document | |
| 47PJ0019N0005_Generated_PDF_with_TOC.pdf | ||
| Grand_forks.pdf | ||
| SOW_BMK_ND002ZZ_Bismarck_FB_Damper_JOCC_RK_Edit.docx | DOCX document | |
| R8_IDIQ_JOCC_ND_-_Solicitation_-_.pdf | ||
| Rolette.pdf | ||
| Burleigh.pdf | ||
| Cass.pdf | ||
| Burke.pdf | ||
| Brand_Name_Justification_1_ND_JOCC.pdf | ||
| Pembina.pdf | ||
| R8_IDIQ_JOCC_ND_-_Agreement.pdf |
Show all 20
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Job Order Construction Contract Utah - Grand Junction Colorado
Attachment 4 to GSA Solicitation No. 47PJ0019R0035 Offeror Past Performance Questionnaire
References should complete survey and review Offeror Experience Attachment (to ensure contractor completed information is correct) and submitted directly to Monique Brumley (Monique.brumley@gsa.gov) and David Berry (david.berry@gsa.gov)
Contractor’s Name: _____________________________________________________________________ Reference Name and Title: _______________________________________________________________ Reference Phone Number: _______________________________________________________________ Reference Email Address: _______________________________________________________________ Do you concur with the information provided by the offeror on the Offeror’s Experience Attachment, in regards to this reference? YES______ NO______ If no, please explain the discrepancy:
| Rating |
| Description |
| Excellent |
| Significantly exceeds the standard. |
| Very Good |
| Exceeds the standard. |
| Satisfactory |
| Meets the standard. |
| Marginal |
| Fails to fully meet the standard. |
| Poor |
| Completely fails to meet the standard. |
1. Quality
| How well did the contractor implement effective quality control and safety control procedures to meet the contract/scope requirements? |
| Poor |
| Marginal |
| Satisfactory |
| Very Good |
| Excellent |
Please explain your answer:
2. Problem Solving
| How well was the contractor able to resolve problems effectively? |
| Poor |
| Marginal |
| Satisfactory |
| Very Good |
| Excellent |
Please explain your answer:
3. Timeliness
| How well did the contractor perform timely contract/task order services? |
| Poor |
| Marginal |
| Satisfactory |
| Very Good |
| Excellent |
Please explain your answer:
4. Overall Customer Satisfaction
| How would you rate overall satisfaction with the contractor and the project? |
| Poor |
| Marginal |
| Satisfactory |
| Very Good |
| Excellent |
Please explain your answer:
File details come from the government source that posted it.