08 Synopsis SF30 47PH0822N0002 AMD 01.pdf

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

FACILITY CODE

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required) copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15C. DATE SIGNED

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

PAGE OF PAGES

6. ISSUED BY CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X)

CODE

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

Previous edition unusable

PS0001

7PQA

1. This modification is issued to amend the 47PH0822N0002 Synopsis.

2. The primary purposes of this amendment is to include all participants and document all questions and answers that resulted from the 47PH0822N0002 Pre-Synopsis Conference held on 16-Feb 2022.

3. All other terms and conditions of the synopsis remain unchanged.

7PQA

ACQUISITION MANAGEMENT DIVISION

ACQUISITION PROGRAM SUPPORT BRANCH

819 TAYLOR ST RM 12B01

FORT WORTH, TX 76102 USA

ACQUISITION MANAGEMENT DIVISION

ACQUISITION PROGRAM SUPPORT BRANCH

819 TAYLOR ST RM 12B01

FORT WORTH, TX 76102 USA

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

47PH0822N0002

1 3

02/23/2022

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

02/07/2022

Attendance:

Courtney Rothharpt and Whitney Cabaza - Amtech Solutions Erik with GDM - 505**17 202**14 703**33 832**22 Corryn Williams - Method Architecture Tylora Falls April A Sweet - OCMI, Inc.

Stephen Teeters and Christine - Formative Architecture Chuck Kuzma Christine Williams - Formative Architecture Garrett Terlaak - FS3, Inc Ian Skogsberg Jason Holubiak - SMPC Architects Jon Anthony – QA Engineering LLC Julie Wentworth – Vigil Enterprises Keith Jones – BCER Martin Mcllory Rufus Jackson and Rebeca Aristizabal - RNN Architects Whitney Whitehorse and Jeff Zellner – The Hartman + Majewski Design Group Justin Jacobs William Hunt

Questions:

1. Q: Is it permissible to submit a response to the synopsis as both a prime, and as a member of a team?

A: Yes. An entity may submit a proposal as a prime and submit a proposal as part of a joint venture.

2. Q: Can you address if this contract will be for the entire State of New Mexico or will the West Texas Zone IDIQ serve southern New Mexico?

A: This contract will serve New Mexico as its primary zone with the other zones in GSA Region 7 serving as secondary zones.

3. Q: Who is the current incumbent and what is the period of performance of the contract?

A: Hartman + Majewski (The Design Group) is the incumbent contractor. The period of performance is one base year and four one‐year option periods.

4. Q: How many awards are there available under this requirement?

A: This is a single award requirement.

5. Q: Do you have a record of the scopes of work and types of projects?

A: Projects that may be awarded under this IDIQ include the disciplines found in the Synopsis.

Additionally, www.fpds.gov may be used as a tool to search for specific projects that were awarded under the current IDIQ.

6. Q: What is the contract number for the current contract?

A: 47PH0818D0001

7. Q: For the Experience and Past Performance sections, are submittals requiring PPQs or other formats?

Page 2 or 3

A: We are open to whatever format is available to demonstrate a firm’s experience and past performance.

8. Q: For Section B, is GSA requiring the supplemental A/E lookup table to be submitted with the proposal or is that discussed after award with the awardee?

A: GSA will discuss the lookup table with the apparent awardee later in the procurement process.

9. Q: Will the slides today be shared with attendees?

A: No, all the information presented today is found in the synopsis.

10. Q: Several RFPs have recently been issued by GSA with similar scope (West Texas, South‐Central Texas, etc.). Can an awardee be selected for awards in multiple zones, or does GSA envision awarding each zone to a different small business?

A: Firms could potentially win an award in all the zones that recently have been posted to www.sam.gov. An offeror’s award or potential award in another zone is not an evaluation factor.

11. Q: Do you want to see subcontracting disciplines or partners in the proposal?

A: Offerors should follow the guidance in Section 4. Submission Requirements of the Synopsis regarding consultants.

12. Q: If we go in as prime and are invited as a teaming arrangement would that be acceptable to submit 2 proposals?

A: Yes. An entity may submit a proposal as a prime and submit a proposal as part of a joint venture.

13. Q: Can a firm be a prime; and also a subconsultant on another team?

A: Yes.

14. Q: Are joint ventures and Teams allowed? Can 8a and Mentor Protege organizations participate?

A: Yes.

15. Q: Will fire protection documents need to be stamped by licensed fire protection engineers?

A: Yes.

16. Q: Our prime firm is in Dallas, Texas with a remote office in Denver. Would these areas be considered as “geographical delineated” to this solicitation? During the meeting, it was relayed that the majority of the projects will be in New Mexico, with the opportunity to take projects from adjoining states (Oklahoma, Texas, Arkansas, and Louisiana). I would assume that we are in the appropriate geographical area, but I wanted to take a moment to confirm with you.

A: There is no requirement to have an office in the geographical delineated area. As stated in

Sections 3 and 4 of Synopsis, “The evaluation will consider the team’s ability to accomplish at least 35 percent of the required A/E services by a firm located within the geographical delineated area. The evaluation will also consider knowledge of local conditions within the geographical area including tactical, operational, strategic issues for all areas of construction related to the key disciplines as well as design and bidding. This will include everything from supply, labor force, and weather to the local construction climate’s impact on cost estimating.

There will also be consideration given to how key team members can conduct pre‐design site review of the proposed work without incurring extra cost to the government for travel.”

Page 3 or 3