CMS Back on Campus Phase II BIM Execution Plan 2 24 2022.pdf

BIM EXECUTION PLAN

FOR

CMS PHASE 2 BACK ON CAMPUS

Version: 2.0

Submitted Date: 02/24/2021

Submitted By:

Krueck Sexton Partners 221 W Erie St Chicago, IL 60654

U.S. General Services Administration

Public Buildings Service

Building Information Model Execution Plan, Version [1.1] CMS Phase 1: Back on Campus Solicitation Number [47PD0219F0014] ii

Forward The BIM Execution Plan (BEP) is developed to provide a master information/data management plan and assignment of roles and responsibilities for model creation and data integration at project initiation. The BEP aligns the project acquisition strategy needs and requirements with GSA technical standards, team member skills, construction industry capability, and technology maturity. Through this process, the team members and GSA project management have jointly agreed on how, when, why, to what level, and for which project outcomes BIM will be used.

iii

BIM PROJECT EXECUTION PLAN

FOR

Phase1: CMS BACK ON CAMPUS

Table of Contents

SECTION A: BIM PROJECT EXECUTION PLAN OVERVIEW

SECTION B: PROJECT INFORMATION

SECTION C: KEY PROJECT CONTACTS

SECTION D: PROJECT GOALS / BIM USES

SECTION E: COLLABORATION PROCEDURES

SECTION F: QUALITY CONTROL

SECTION G: TECHNOLOGICAL INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS

SECTION H: MODEL STRUCTURE

SECTION I: PROJECT DELIVERABLES

SECTION J: ATTACHMENTS ............................................................................ ERROR! BOOKMARK NOT DEFINED.

SECTION A: BIM PROJECT EXECUTION PLAN OVERVIEW

To successfully implement Building Information Modeling (BIM) on a project, the project team has developed this detailed BIM Project Execution Plan. The BIM Project Execution Plan defines uses for BIM on the project (e.g. design authoring, spatial data management, and design coordination), along with a detailed design of the process for executing BIM throughout the project lifecycle.

SECTION B: PROJECT INFORMATION

This section defines basic project reference information and project milestones.

1. Project Basics:

Project Owner: GSA CMS Project Name: CMS Phase 1 Back On Campus Project Location and Address: 7500 Security Boulevard Windsor Mill, MD 21244 Brief Project Description: [Design and documentation for renovation of Central Lower) office space), Level 1 (Main Campus Lobby) and Level 2 and South Lower level (office spaces).

2. Project Numbers:

Project Information Number Task Order Number 47PD0219F0020

GSA Building Number MD0415HC

Krueck + Sexton Project Number 2008

3. Project Schedule/Phases/Milestones:

*see attachment 1 – Model Progression Matrix for detailed breakdown

Project Stage / Milestone Estimated Start Date Estimated Completion Date

Project Stakeholders Involved

Design Stage

Design Model

Design concept phase

LOD 100-200

07/19/2021 09/03/2021 GSA, CMS, A+E Team

Design development phase

LOD 200-300

9/13/2021 12/02/2021 GSA, CMS, A+E Team

Construction Documents Phase LOD 300 Complete

12/03/2021 06/22/2022 GSA, CMS, A+E Team

Construction Stage

As-built Model

Construction delivery Phase LOD 400 Complete

Project close-out phase LOD 500 Complete

4. Project Management System ePM is the standard GSA Project Management System(PMS). If additional systems will be used, list them below.

SECTION C: KEY PROJECT CONTACTS AND ROLES

The team has identified who will be responsible for various aspects of the project based on delivering the BIM goals.

The intent of the team is only to help clarify contractual obligations of the team members and stakeholders. No portion of this is intended to redefine or override any contractual obligations each party owes under their respective contracts.

1. BIM Roles and Responsibilities This section is intended to cover the macro level major responsibilities of the team members.

Stakeholder Scope of Work

Architect Overall design lead responsible for overseeing the design through LOD300 and contributing to the LOD400 and LOD500 efforts. Establish and maintain the projects DMS through project close out.

Engineer Establish and construct the design BIMs for all mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems.

2. Project Contacts These are the primary management and technical contacts. These contacts should be used to seek immediate resolution of projects coordination challenges.

Design Team

Role Organization Contact Name Location E-Mail Phone

Lead Q/C Krueck and Sexton Don Semple Chicago, IL dsemple@ks.partners.com 312-374-1427

End User CMS

GSA BIM Rep. GSA

Project Manager(s) Krueck and Sexton Don Semple Chicago, IL dsemple@ks.partners.com 312-374-1427

Project Architect(s) Krueck and Sexton Veronica Widholm Chicago, IL vwidholm@ks.partners.com 312-4979365

BIM Manager(s) Krueck and Sexton Michael

Pfammetter

Chicago, IL Mpfammatter@ks.partners.com

Consultant MEP Engineer WSP Engineering Sam Ciulla New York City, NY Cathy.Chang@WSPGroup.com 212-951-2757

Consultant BIM Manager (s) WSP Engineering Abel Francis….. Chicago, IL abel.francis@wsp.com 1 (646) 487-5562

Consultant AV+Acoustic Threshold Acoustics Constance Walker Chicago, IL cwalker@thresholdacoustics.com 312-386-1400 x106

Consultant Structural Thornton Thomasetti Jose Medero Chicago, IL JMedero@ThorntonTomasetti.com 312-596-2110 mailto:dsemple@ks.partners.com mailto:dsemple@ks.partners.com mailto:Cathy.Chang@WSPGroup.com mailto:cwalker@thresholdacoustics.com mailto:JMedero@ThorntonTomasetti.com

Construction Team

Role Organization Contact Name Location E-Mail Phone

Lead Project Integrator

Lead Q/C

Project Manager(s)

BIM Manager(s)

Discipline Leads

Other Project Roles

SECTION D: PROJECT GOALS/BIM USES

1. Major BIM Goals / Objectives:

The projects goals are defined below as well as what metric is being used to validate their success. After careful consideration of the BIM maturity of the team members tasked with their completion, the team believes that all goals listed are achievable.

The team believes that the success of all goals defined is a team effort and expects all stakeholders and project participants to positively contribute to their success.

Priority / Measure ment

Goal / Achieved if Primary Responsibility

Pr io rit y

Hi gh

Goal:

Leverage Spatial Data Management to conduct digital code reviews and energy analysis.

Owner / Operator Provide standards to design team. Inform the team of historic energy data as well as local code related issues.

Architect

Embed the SDM into the design model, and assist with embedding this data into the construction model. Will conduct reviews of energy model. Will lead digital code review meetings.

Mechanical Consultant

Will use the SDM data from the Architect to programmatically derive the Space elements used for energy calculations. Will conduct digital energy analysis and track results through the design of the project.

Builder / Contractor Ensure that proper SDM data is included within the construction model.

M ea su re m en t Achieved if:

• Energy consumption projections are reduced by >15% using the model.

• No substantial code violations surface during construction.

Builder / Contractor

Track code compliance through construction.

Report any code related issues to the team including costs to the project in both dollars and time.

Architect

Perform root-cause analysis on any code issues that cost the project during construction and present the results to the team.

MEP Contractors

Ensure that strategies for energy consumption reduction are taken from design to the real world. Report any deviations to the team.

1. Major BIM Goals / Objectives (Cont.):

Priority /

Measurement Goal /

Achieved if Primary Responsibility

Priority High

Goal:

Model based constructability verification (clash detection, clearance verification, etc.)

Owner / Operator Provide accurate dimensional information for service and maintenance requirements.

End-user

Attend coordination meetings to verify requirements are implemented correctly within the model.

Architect

Generate BIM in a way to facilitate the goal. Ensure that both real objects and non-real space claims are properly modeled.

MEP Contractors Ensure that MEP LOD is sufficient to achieve the goal.

VDC Consultant Verify weekly that all parties are working towards achieving the goal.

Measurement Achieved if:

• Change orders and RFIs are reduced by 50% or more from a traditional project.

• 50% or more off-site fabrication.

• See overall reduction in gross sq. ft. cost compared to traditional project. See large reduction in last minute changes.

Builder / Contractor Track quantity and impact of RFIs and provide competitive feedback to the project team.

MEP Contractors

Track percentage of off-site fabrication. Inform team on benefits and challenges encountered.

Owner / Operator Track and report to the team overall costs. Provide this in comparison to historic cost data.

2. BIM Uses

After careful consideration the team has decided on a number of BIM uses on the project. These uses are based on what stage of the project they are to be completely implemented.

Maturity

BIM Uses

LO

D

-1

(P re -d es ig n)

D

-2

(S ch em at ic

D es ig n

LO

D

-3

(D es ig n De ve lo pm en t)

-3

(C on st ru ct io n

Do cu m en ts

LO

D

-4

(F ab ric at io n

Co ns tr uc tio n)

-5

(C lo se ou

-5

(O pe ra tio n

M an ag em en

Visualization Programming X X

Site Analysis X X

Design Reviews

X X X

Phase Planning (for presentations) X X X X

Documentation Existing Conditions Modeling X X X X X X X

Design Authoring

Cost Estimation (Quantity takeoff)

X

Record Modeling

X X

COBie X X X X X X

BIM Requirements for FM

Model-Based Analysis

Space Management and Tracking

Engineering Analysis

a. Energy Analysis

b. Structural Analysis

c. Lighting Analysis

d. Mechanical Analysis

e. Other Engineering Analysis

Sustainability (LEED) Evaluation

Disaster Planning

Cost Estimation (Estimating) X X X X X X X

Phase Planning (4D modeling)

Site Utilization Planning

Integrated Analyses

3D Coordination

Construction System Design

3D Control and Planning (Digital Layout)

Digital Fabrication (Supply chain management)

Building (Preventative) Maintenance Scheduling

Building System Analysis

Asset Management

Automation & Optimization

Code Validation

Digital Fabrication (Off-site fabrication)

SECTION E: COLLABORATION PROCEDURES

1. Collaboration Strategy:

ePM

• weekly model share between A+E, Revit, CAD, and Navisworks files

• bi-monthly model share with GSA and CMS

Navisworks for visual and interference checks.

2. Meeting Procedures:

The following are examples of meetings that should be considered.

Meeting Type Project Stage Frequency Participants Location

BIM BEP kick-off Concept 1 A+E Team, GSA, CMS

VTC

BIM execution plan demonstration

Concept + Major BEP Revisions

1 + As Needed A+E Team, GSA, CMS

VTC

Design coordination Concept CD Bi-Monthly A+E Team (GSA + CMS as needed)

VTC

3. Model Delivery Schedule of Information Exchange for Submission and Approval:

Document the information exchanges and file transfers that will occur on the project.

Information Exchange

File

Sender

File

Receiver

One-Time Or Frequency

Due Or Start Date

Model File

Model Software

Native File Type

File Exchange Type

Design authoring – 3D coordination

Architect ePM Weekly 09/03/2021 A Revit .rvt .rvt

.nwd

Design authoring –

MEP ePM Weekly 9/03/2021 M, E, P, Revit .rvt .rvt

.nwd

4. Electronic Communication Procedures:

(Note: File Naming and Folder Structure will be discussed in Section H: Model Structure).

The following document management issues should be resolved and a procedure should be defined for each:

Permissions / access, File Locations, FTP Site Location(s), File Transfer Protocol, File / Folder Maintenance, etc.

File Location File Structure / Name File Type

Password Protect

File Maintainer Updated

TBD TBD TBD Don Semple Bi-Weekly

SECTION F: QUALITY CONTROL

1. Overall Strategy for Quality Control:

Lead QC and BIM managers will confirm the use of general BIM best practices by entire team. Quality control checks will be done in accordance with the following schedule.

2. Quality Control Checks:

The following checks should be performed to assure quality.

Checks Definition Responsible Party

Software Program(s)

Frequenc y

VISUAL CHECK Verify that there are no unintended model components and the design intent has been followed

A+E Navisworks Bi-Monthly

INTERFERENCE

CHECK

Detect problems in the model where two building components are clashing including soft and hard

A+E Navisworks Bi-Monthly

STANDARDS

CHECK

Verify that the BIM and AEC CADD Standard have been followed (fonts, dimensions, line styles, levels/layers, model partitioning, common coordinate system and model origin, and any required object enablers)

A+E Revit Monthly

BIM GUIDE

CHECK

Verify that the GSA BIM Guides have been followed (Spatial Program Validation, Circulation and Security Validation, etc.)

A+E Revit Monthly

4D SCHEDULING

CHECK

Describe the utilization of 4D scheduling and construction sequencing technology

CMc

MODEL

INTEGRITY

CHECKS/COBie2

CHECK

Describe the QC validation process used to ensure that the Project Facility Data set has no undefined, incorrectly defined or duplicated elements and the reporting process on non-compliant elements and corrective action plans

A+E BIM

Interoperability Tools for Revit:

Classification Manager + Model Checker

Monthly

SECTION G: TECHNOLOGICAL INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS

1. Software:

List software used to deliver BIM. (On larger projects the team should consider completing a more comprehensive Data Format Matrix ).

BIM Use Discipline (if applicable) Software Version Design Authoring Arch REVIT Ver 2020

2. Modeling Content and Reference Information Identify items such as families, workspaces, and databases.

BIM USE DISCIPLINE

(if applicable)

MODELING CONTENT /

REFERENCE INFORMATION

VERSION

DESIGN AUTHORING ARCH TBD 2020

https://sites.google.com/a/gsa.gov/gsa-region-5-bim-standards/downloads/documents

SECTION H: MODEL STRUCTURE

1. File Naming Structure:

FILE NAMES

ARCHITECTURAL MODELS MD0415HC_AI_CLL_C1_C2.rvt, MD0415HC_AI_SLL_C.rvt

MECHANICAL MODEL MD0415HC_WSP_M.rvt

PLUMBING MODEL MD0415HC_WSP_P.rvt

ELECTRICAL MODEL MD0415HC_WSP_E.rvt

FIRE PROTECTION MODEL MD0415HC_WSP_FP.rvt

TELECOMUNICATIONSMODEL MD0415HC_WSP_T.rvt

2. Model Structure:

Models separated by building, and discipline.

3. Measurement and Coordinate Systems:

Measurement: Metric Coordinate System:

• Survey Coordinate System/Survey Point: TBD, need to attain additional survey information from GSA +

CMS

• Project Coordinate System/Project Base Point: 0,0,0 point from existing project CAD documentation will be used as the project base point. Specifically: hcfce21.dwg - Composite Exiting Plan at First Level x = 19'-2 1/2" y = 28'-10 7/8" from NE corner of South Building

• Project North: 33.569 clockwise from true north such that Center Building is orthogonal

4. BIM and CAD Standards:

Identify items such as the BIM and CAD standards, content reference information, and the version of IFC, etc.

Standard Version BIM Uses Applicable Organizations Applicable

PBS P-100 2018 Facility Standards All project participants

The National Business Space Assignment Policy (NBSAP)

2017 Assignment, classification, and space measurement standards

All project participants

GSA National BIM Guides 2, 7, & 8

Guide 2 – Version 2 Guide 7+8 – Version 1

Guide 2 – Space Validation Guide 7 – Building Elements Guide 8 – Facilities Management

All project participants

GSA PBS CAD

Standard

March 05, 2012 2D CAD Exports All project participants

5. Model Progression Matrix The Model Progression Matrix is attached to this document. This document is based on the AIA E202 document.

http://gsa.gov/portal/content/105075 http://gsa.gov/portal/content/105075 http://www.gsa.gov/portal/content/104697 http://www.gsa.gov/portal/content/104697 https://sites.google.com/a/gsa.gov/gsa-region-5-bim-standards/documents/level-of-detail

SECTION I: PROJECT DELIVERABLES

GSA BIM Standards require very specific BIM deliverables. The team should familiarize themselves with these requirements before any BIM work is commenced.

Item covered by the Standard Include:

• COBie / IFC data requirements

• Quality Control Report (QCR)

• Class Detection Report (CDR)

• Native format

• Minimum data attributes

• Specific versions of software

• Specific model structure requirements

These standards must be followed by all team members.

Project Stage / Milestone Description of Delivery Estimated Delivery Date

Project Stakeholders Involved

Design Stage

Design Model

Design concept phase

LOD 100-200

Not included in deliverables for concept phase.

09/03/2021 Architect and Mechanical Engineers

Design development phase

LOD 200-300

Preliminary submittal of IFC, COBie, Revit, and Navisworks data for review by GSA.

12/02/2021 Architect and Mechanical Engineers

Construction Documents Phase

LOD 300 Complete

Formal submittal of construction documents and BIM data. All 2D and 3D building data produed on the project in both native format, IFC, and COBie spreadsheets. All design level attribute data will be complete.

06/21/2022 All design team members

Construction Stage

As-built Model

Construction delivery Phase

LOD 400 Complete

Several progress sets of Native format, IFC, and COBie spreadsheets will be provided over the development of the project.

XX/XX/XXXX

XX/XX/XXXX

XX/XX/XXXX

Construction team

Project close-out phase

LOD 500 Complete

Final as-built and record data submittal.

This will include all data required by the Data Submittal Standards as well any extended data agreed to within this BEP.

XX/XX/XXXX All construction and design team

SECTION I: PROJECT DELIVERABLES