Coburn Gore CMc Sources Sought Questionnaire Updated 2024 7 23.pdf
PDF 141 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 47PB0024R0068
About this file
This document is a Sources Sought Questionnaire for Construction Manager as Constructor (CMc) or Construction Manager at Risk (CMr) Services for a New Land Port of Entry at Coburn Gore Land Port of Entry in Maine.
The General Services Administration (GSA) is conducting a market survey to identify qualified construction contractors to provide these services. The project has a number of sustainability requirements, including achieving LEED Gold certification, using all-electric HVAC and plumbing, and using low embodied carbon construction materials. The estimated construction value is between $100-130 million, with an anticipated contract duration of 38.5 months. GSA is seeking contractors with experience in similar mission-critical projects, geothermal systems, low embodied carbon materials, and LEED projects. Interested firms must demonstrate experience with at least two similar projects and provide information on their business size, bonding capacity, and low embodied carbon material suppliers. Responses are due by August 15, 2024. GSA also seeks expressions of interest from suppliers and manufacturers of low embodied carbon construction materials by August 8, 2024.
View the file
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Sources Sought Questionnaire CMc Services for a New Land Port of Entry at Coburn Gore Land Port Of Entry, Maine General Services Administration, Region 1
Please answer all questions. Incomplete questionnaires will not be considered.
Company Name:
Point of Contact:
Company Address:
Telephone:
Email address:
Web address:
Employee Identification Number (EIN):
Small business status:
1. The border station will remain open 24/7/365 during construction, creating site constraints and phasing requirements during construction. Does your firm have experience working on mission critical projects with similar constraints?
❏ No ❏ Yes (Explain below)
2. Does your firm have experience with geothermal heating and cooling systems?
❏ No ❏ Yes (Explain below)
3. Does your firm have experience with Low Embodied Carbon (LEC) construction materials (e.g., steel, concrete, glass, and asphalt) on any of your construction projects?
❏ No ❏ Yes (Explain below)
4. Have you worked on a project which met or exceeded the U.S. Green Building Council’s LEED Gold standard?
❏ No ❏ Yes (Explain below)
5. Does your company have an active registration at www.sam.gov?
❏ Yes
6. The project schedule is based on the project being completed by August 31, 2029. The anticipated CMc award date is January 1, 2025. The anticipated completion of 100%
Construction Documents is May 31, 2026. The required substantial completion date is June 30, 2029. Do you agree that this schedule is achievable?
❏ No (Explain below) ❏ Yes (Explain below) http://www.sam.gov/
7. A certification from a Certified Public Accountant (CPA) that an Offeror’s accounting system provides for the following will be required with any proposal for these requirement(s): (1) The accounting system is in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP); (2) There is proper segregation of direct costs and indirect costs; (3) There is proper identification and accumulation of direct costs by contract, and (4) There is a labor time distribution system that charges direct and indirect labor appropriately. Please verify that you would be able to provide the required certification.
❏ Yes
8. Are you familiar with Cost Accounting Standard (CAS) Requirements? Do you know what is involved?
Will you be able to follow CAS rules and regulations? Large Business Offerors would be required to submit all disclosures in accordance with FAR 52.230-1, Cost Accounting Standards Notice and Certifications and FAR 52.230-7, Proposal Disclosure – Cost Accounting Practice Changes. Please verify that you would be able to provide the required certification. Please mark this question "N/A'' if you are a Small Business respondent.
❏ No (Explain below) ❏ Yes
9. As a Construction Manager as Constructor (CMc) or a Construction Manager at Risk (CMr) solicitation and contract, in your opinion, what would be the project benefits in terms of cost, quality, schedule, staffing, and other considerations?
10. As a CMc or CMr solicitation and contract, in your opinion, what would be the disadvantages in terms of cost, quality, schedule, staffing, and other considerations.
11. Is there any additional feedback you would like to provide regarding this project?
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .