4.02 SPRMM1-26-D-ND01 signed.pdf

Shefic Khoury

General Manager, Aerospace Americas

9/15/2026

SPRMM1-26-R-KA01 Attachment #2

CLIN NSN ADQ

Quantity Ranges FROM

Ranges TO

Base Year 1 Base Year 2 Base Year 3 Option Year 1 Option Year 2

0001 8010-01-565-2617 2,800 1 1,400 $100.41 $105.43 $110.70 $116.24 $122.05 1,401 2,800 $95.02 $99.77 $104.76 $110.00 $115.50 2,801 4,200 $89.98 $94.48 $99.20 $104.16 $109.37

0002 8010-01-565-2623 12,873 1 6,500 $100.41 $105.43 $110.70 $116.24 $122.05 6,501 13,000 $95.02 $99.77 $104.76 $110.00 $115.50 13,001 19,500 $89.98 $94.48 $99.20 $104.16 $109.37

0003 8010-01-568-7048 1 1 4 $539.83 $566.82 $595.16 $624.92 $656.17 5 49 $523.65 $549.83 $577.32 $606.19 $636.50 50 100 $497.45 $522.32 $548.44 $575.86 $604.65

0004 8010-01-577-3926 1,700 1 850 $51.33 $53.90 $56.59 $59.42 $62.39 851 1,700 $48.58 $51.01 $53.56 $56.24 $59.05 1,701 2,500 $45.99 $48.29 $50.70 $53.24 $55.90

0005 8010-01-578-5657 1 1 4 $56.46 $59.29 $62.25 $65.36 $68.63 5 49 $54.77 $57.51 $60.38 $63.40 $66.57 50 100 $52.03 $54.63 $57.36 $60.23 $63.24

0006 8030-01-703-2619 11,520 1 5,760 $170.23 $178.74 $187.68 $197.06 $206.92 5,761 11,520 $165.12 $173.38 $182.05 $191.15 $200.71 11,521 17,280 $156.87 $164.71 $172.95 $181.59 $190.67

CLIN Lead Time 0001 12 Weeks ARO 0002 12 Weeks ARO 0003 12 Weeks ARO 0004 6 Weeks ARO 0005 6 Weeks ARO 0006 15 Weeks ARO

Pricing Spreadsheet Section B

8010-01-578-5657 8030-01-703-2619

CONTRACTOR DELIVERY: NSN

8010-01-565-2617 8010-01-565-2623 8010-01-568-7048 8010-01-577-3926

PACKAGING INQUIRY PFW22D80

PPW22D80 A01

FOLDER NR: 25268-0104 TOTAL PDS: 5 TOTAL ITEMS: 5

PD NR: N0010422X6364

NSN: 1HM 8010 015652617 ST ITEM NAME: PRIMER COATING

PACKAGING REQUIREMENT CODE

PCK CTGY CD: ZZZ0

HM QUP ICQ PMT CD PM WM CUD CT UC LP IC UCL SP MK PACK UNIT PKWT

D 001 012 HM 1 00 ZZ ZZ Z ZZ A ED O ZZ EQQ 1.3

UNIT PKCU OPI CAGE SPI NUMBER REV SPI DATE CONTAINER NSN

1.396 A 03950 0395010155 B 24 JUN 2024

UNIQUE: N SUPPLEMENTAL INSTRUCTIONS

ZZ = PACKAGE PER SPI 0395010155

PPPM LEVEL: SHELF LIFE CD: 4 SHELF LIFE ACTION CD: C0

VIEW ADDITIONAL PACKAGING INFO:

PF2 - PRIOR NIIN PF3 - NEXT NIIN PF7 - PRIOR PD PF8 - NEXT PD MORE...

FOLDER NR: 25268-0104 TOTAL PDS: 5 TOTAL ITEMS: 5

PD NR: N0010422X6365

NSN: 1HM 8010 015652623 ST ITEM NAME: SEALER,SURFACE

PACKAGING REQUIREMENT CODE

PCK CTGY CD: ZZZ0

HM QUP ICQ PMT CD PM WM CUD CT UC LP IC UCL SP MK PACK UNIT PKWT

D 001 012 HM 1 00 ZZ ZZ Z ZZ A ED O ZZ EQQ 3.6

UNIT PKCU OPI CAGE SPI NUMBER REV SPI DATE CONTAINER NSN

1.396 A 03950 0395010155 B 24 JUN 2024

DJE0121

Underline

FOLDER NR: 25268-0104 TOTAL PDS: 5 TOTAL ITEMS: 5

PD NR: N0010422X6387

NSN: 1HM 8010 015687048 ST ITEM NAME: PRIMER COATING

PACKAGING REQUIREMENT CODE

PCK CTGY CD: ZZZ0

HM QUP ICQ PMT CD PM WM CUD CT UC LP IC UCL SP MK PACK UNIT PKWT

D 001 000 HM 1 00 ZZ ZZ Z ZZ A 00 B 33 FFF

UNIT PKCU OPI CAGE SPI NUMBER REV SPI DATE CONTAINER NSN

M 03950 0395010155 18 JUL 2016

FOLDER NR: 25268-0104 TOTAL PDS: 5 TOTAL ITEMS: 5

PD NR: N0010423X3528

NSN: 1HM 8010 015773926 ST ITEM NAME: SEAM FLR HULL21 PTA

PACKAGING REQUIREMENT CODE

PCK CTGY CD: ZZZ0

HM QUP ICQ PMT CD PM WM CUD CT UC LP IC UCL SP MK PACK UNIT PKWT

N 001 AAA 10 1 00 00 00 0 BD A ED O 33 EQQ .8

UNIT PKCU OPI CAGE SPI NUMBER REV SPI DATE CONTAINER NSN

.048 O

FOLDER NR: 25268-0104 TOTAL PDS: 5 TOTAL ITEMS: 5

PD NR: N0010423X3530

NSN: 1HM 8010 015785657 ST ITEM NAME: REPR KT HULL21 PT A

PACKAGING REQUIREMENT CODE

PCK CTGY CD: ZZZ0

HM QUP ICQ PMT CD PM WM CUD CT UC LP IC UCL SP MK PACK UNIT PKWT

D 001 AAA HM 1 00 ZZ ZZ Z ZZ A ED O 33 EQQ 1.8

UNIT PKCU OPI CAGE SPI NUMBER REV SPI DATE CONTAINER NSN

.048 M

ZZ = PACKAGE PER PMT REQUIREMENTS

FOLDER NR: 25268-0104 TOTAL PDS: 5 TOTAL ITEMS: 5

PD NR: N0010423X3549

NSN: 1HM 8030 017032619 ITEM NAME: SEAM FILLER SEALANT

PACKAGING REQUIREMENT CODE

PCK CTGY CD: ZZZ0

HM QUP ICQ PMT CD PM WM CUD CT UC LP IC UCL SP MK PACK UNIT PKWT

D 001 010 HM 1 00 ZZ ZZ Z ZZ A ED O 33 EQQ 1.8

UNIT PKCU OPI CAGE SPI NUMBER REV SPI DATE CONTAINER NSN

.211 M

ZZ = PACKAGE PER PMT, UN1133

PF2 - PRIOR NIIN PF3 - NEXT NIIN PF7 - PRIOR PD PF8 - NEXT PD

06/11/26

�����/� ��0 ��"�1�� �������0 ������2

����������0 1�� �������)�������������2

�������3����

*���&�4$�)&��$�

�����&�$�+$/&)$�*���$�$��54��

4���

��3 ��'(�6�����'##'�

� �/012

3�����

SOLICITATION, OFFER AND AWARD 1. THIS CONTRACT IS A RATED ORDER

UNDER DPAS (15 CFR 700)

RATING PAGESOFPAGE

2. CONTRACT NUMBER 3. SOLICITATION NUMBER 6. REQUISITION/PURCHASE NUMBER5. DATE ISSUED4. TYPE OF SOLICITATION

CODE7. ISSUED BY 8. ADDRESS OFFER TO (If other than item 7)

NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".

SOLICITATION

9. Sealed offers in original and copies for furnishings the supplies or services in the Schedule will be received at the place specified in item 8, or if hand carried, in the depository located in until local time

CAUTION - LATE Submissions, Modifications, and Withdrawals: See Section L, Provision No. 52.214-7 or 52.215-1. All offers are subject to all terms and conditions contained in this solicitation.

10. FOR

INFORMATION

CALL:

A. NAME B. TELEPHONE (NO COLLECT CALLS)

AREA CODE NUMBER EXTENSION

C. E-MAIL ADDRESS

11. TABLE OF CONTENTS

(X) SEC. DESCRIPTION (X)PAGE(S) SEC. PAGE(S)DESCRIPTION

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

I

J

K

L

M EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS, AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS

REPRESENTATIONS, CERTIFICATIONS AND OTHER

STATEMENTS OF OFFERORS

PART IV - REPRESENTATIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS

LIST OF ATTACHMENTS

PART III - LIST OF DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS AND OTHER ATTACH.

CONTRACT CLAUSESSOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM

SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES/COSTS

DESCRIPTION/SPECS./WORK STATEMENT

PACKAGING AND MARKING

INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE

DELIVERIES OR PERFORMANCE

CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION DATA

SPECIAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS

NOTE: Item 12 does not apply if the solicitation includes the provisions at 52.214-16, Minimum Bid Acceptance Period.

OFFER (Must be fully completed by offeror)

12. In compliance with the above, the undersigned agrees, if this offer is accepted within calendar days (60 calendar days unless a different period is inserted by the offeror) from the date for receipt of offers specified above, to furnish any or all items upon which prices are offered at the set opposite each item, delivered at the designated point(s), within the time specified in the schedule.

13. DISCOUNT FOR PROMPT PAYMENT

(See Section I, Clause No. 52.232-8)

14. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS

(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the SOLICITATION for offerors and related documents numbered and dated):

20 CALENDAR DAYS (%)10 CALENDAR DAYS (%) 30 CALENDAR DAYS (%) CALENDAR DAYS(%)

DATEAMENDMENT NO.AMENDMENT NO. DATE

15A. NAME AND

ADDRESS

OF OFFEROR

CODE FACILITY

15B. TELEPHONE NUMBER

EXTENSIONNUMBERAREA CODE

15C. CHECK IF REMITTANCE ADDRESS IS

DIFFERENT FROM ABOVE - ENTER SUCH

ADDRESS IN SCHEDULE.

17. SIGNATURE 18. OFFER DATE

AWARD (To be completed by Government)

19. ACCEPTED AS TO ITEMS NUMBERED 20. AMOUNT 21. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION

2. AUTHORITY FOR USING OTHER THAN FULL OPEN COMPETITION:2

10 U.S.C. 2304 (c) ( )41 U.S.C. 3304(a)

4. ADMINISTERED BY2 (If other than Item 7)

26. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

IMPORTANT - Award will be made on this Form, or on Standard Form 26, or by other authorized official written notice.

AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION

Previous edition is unusable

23. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN

(4 copies unless otherwise specified)

25. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY

27. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

28. AWARD DATE

CODE

ITEM

STANDARD FORM 33 (REV. 6/2014)

Prescribed by GSA - FAR (48 CFR) 53.214 (c)

SEALED BID (IFB)

NEGOTIATED (RFP)

(Hour) (Date)

PART I - THE SCHEDULE PART II - CONTRACT CLAUSES

DO-A3 851

25268-0104 (VERSLTC)

DLA MECHANICSBURG - CODE ZID1

P.O. 2020, 5450 CARLISLE PIKE

MECHANICSBURG, PA 17055-0788

SPRMM1

DLA WEAPONS SUPPORT - MECHANICSBURG

DLA PROCUREMENT OPS DLA - ZI

SPRMM1-26-R-KA01

BLDG. 203, NORTH END, CODE ZID1 4:00 PM

JENNIFER ELLIOTT (ZID1) JENNIFER.ELLIOTT@DLA.MIL

51 11&81

6&74

5/29/2026

607717 8980

4/28/2026

0 0 0 0

23354

PRC - DeSoto International 823 E Gate Drive Unit 4 Mount Laurel, NJ 08054

16. NAME AND THE TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN

OFFER(Type or print)

Millikin, Sam A.

President and CEO

856 234-1600 06/11/2026

CONTINUATION PAGE SPRMM1-26-R-KA01

(PLEASE NOTE THAT SECTIONS B THROUGH H MAY NOT BE IN ALPHABETICAL ORDER.

PLEASE READ SOLICITATION IN ITS ENTIRETY).

SECTION A - GENERAL INFORMATION FOR OFFERORS

1. The purpose of this solicitation is to establish an Indefinite-Delivery type contract for the supplies listed in Section B.

2. To satisfy its requirement, the Government intends to award multiple contracts from this solicitation but reserves the right to award one contract to a single offeror, if it is determined by the Contracting Officer to be in the best interest of the Government. Under this solicitation, the resulting contract will be a Firm-Fixed-Price, Indefinite-Delivery Indefinite-Quantity (IDIQ) Contract issued under FAR Part 15 in conjunction with FAR Part 12. The contract will consist of a 3-year base period and

(2) one-year option years. The total contract period shall not exceed 5 years. The terms “year” or “contract year,” as used in this solicitation, mean a period of 365 days beginning on the contract start date and every 365 days thereafter, except for a leap year, in which the contract year shall be 366 days.

3. The method used to place orders under this contract will be: Delivery Orders placed by Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) Weapons Support at Mechanicsburg (DLA-Mech). DLA-Mech will issue delivery orders with the awardee(s) for the supplies cited in Section B. This contract is not obligating any funds. Funding will be provided on each delivery order placed under the contract.

4. The proposals received in response to this solicitation will be evaluated under Trade Off procedures described in Section M of this solicitation.

5. Please note that contractors shall complete all contractor required fill-ins and submit the pricing spreadsheet along with all pages of the solicitation to jennifer.elliott@dla.mil, regardless of the number of CLINs that are proposed on. These sections are pertinent to understanding the requirements of the solicitation.

6. Some clauses/provisions may not appear in the correct section (D-M), due to system constraints.

7. Guaranteed Contract Minimum / Maximum: Based on clause 52.216-19 Order Limitations, located within this solicitation. The contract maximum value below is an aggregate ceiling for all awardees combined, covering the total contract period of 5 years. Please Note: Contractors must successfully pass first article testing to receive the guaranteed minimum.

CONTRACT MINIMUM VALUE – $500.00

CONTRACT MAXIMUM VALUE - $21,510,957.26

If a multiple award is issued, the guaranteed minimum will be split evenly amongst all offerors receiving an award. The Government intends to satisfy the guaranteed minimum on the first delivery order. Subsequent delivery orders will be issued on a competitive basis, pursuant to DLAD procurement note C10 Placement of Task or Delivery Orders Against Multiple Indefinite Delivery Contracts, to all awardees that have successfully completed First Article Testing and all other contract deliverables such as user manuals, etc. Please see DLAD procurement note C10 for further information.

8. Contractors will be required to have access to classified data:

Facility Clearance Level Required: Secret

SECTION B – SCHEDULE OF SUPPLIES

1. This solicitation is for the acquisition of the items specified under Section B Spreadsheet Information/Instructions below. Offerors shall provide their pricing in the Section B Pricing Spreadsheet found below.

2. Section B Spreadsheet Information/Instructions.

FSC NIIN Part Number Item Unit of Measure

8010 01-565-2617 REPAIRHULL21688SK Primer Coating KT

8010 01-565-2623 HULLFILL21688SK Sealer, Surface KT

8010 01-568-7048 REPAIRHULL21GLKT Primer Coating KT

8010 01-577-3926 ISO143LSFHULL21SYR Seam FLR Hull21 PTA EA

8010 01-578-5657 ISO143LRKHULL21SYR Repr KT Hull21 PT A EA

8030 01-703-2619 PHL-SFXXCA688SK Seam Filler Sealant KT

3. Section B – Pricing Spreadsheet

Pricing – The supplies covered by this contract are listed in the table below. The annual demand quantity (ADQ) is only an estimate for planning and evaluation purposes and does not constitute a firm order. Please complete the following table with your pricing information for any quantity ordered:

Ranges

FROM

TO

Base Year 1

Year 2

Year 3

Option

0001 8010-01-565-2617 2,800 1 1,400

1,401 2,800

2,801 4,200

FAT

0002 8010-01-565-2623 12,873 1 6,500

6,501 13,000

13,001 19,500

0003 8010-01-568-7048 1 1 4

5 49

50 100

0004 8010-01-577-3926 1,700 1 850

851 1,700

1,701 2,500

0005 8010-01-578-5657 1 1 4

5 49

50 100

0006 8030-01-703-2619 11,520 1 5,760

5,761 11,520

11,521 17,280

ADQ: Estimated Annual Demand Quantity Quantity Ranges: Self-Explanatory (Offeror must quote the quantity ranges above) Base

Year One – Option Year Two: Offeror shall fill in each base year and each option year unit price. All unit prices shall be priced as FOB Origin. Unit prices proposed shall not include shipping costs.

First Article Testing and Waived Sources: The following sources have passed first article testing and have been waived for first article testing.

o CAGE: 23354

SECTION D – PACKAGING AND MARKING

Packaging shall be in accordance with MIL-STD 2073.

SECTION E – INSPECTION & ACCEPTANCE

Please identify the following, if different from your facility/cage. If locations are the same as offeror’s address, offeror can indicate “SAME”.

CAGE for performance: ________________ CAGE for inspection: ________________ CAGE for acceptance: ________________

E06 INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE AT ORIGIN (SEP 2016)

The contractor shall indicate the location where supplies will be inspected:

Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) code:

Address:

Applicable to contract line-item numbers(s) (CLIN(s)):

The contractor shall indicate the location where packaging will be inspected:

( ) Same as for supplies OR CAGE code:

Address:

Applicable to CLIN(s):

SECTION F – DELIVERIES

1. Place of Delivery: The place of delivery for all items to be acquired hereunder will be specified in individual delivery orders issues under the resultant Indefinite Delivery – Indefinite Quantity contract.

2. ACCELERATED DELIVERIES: Accelerated deliveries in advance of the specified delivery schedule are authorized. Any accelerated delivery will be at no additional expense to the Government, unless specifically authorized by the Procuring or Administrative Contracting Officer.

3. PARTIAL SHIPMENTS: Shipments of item quantities less than each line-item quantity specified in the delivery order schedule are authorized. Multiple shipments to one destination are authorized.

Any partial shipment will be at no additional expense to the Government, unless specifically authorized by the Procuring or Administrative Contracting Officer.

SECTION L – CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS

L.1. PROPOSAL SUBMISSION:

L.1.1. Introduction: This section contains general proposal submission instructions as well as specific proposal requirements for this Solicitation.

L.1.2. General: The proposal shall be presented in sufficient detail to allow Government evaluation of response to the requirements of the Request for Proposal (RFP). The Government will not assume the Offeror possesses any capability, understanding, or commitment not specified in the proposal. Offerors shall not make any assumptions to modify the Government’s requirements without any prior written verification through the Contracting Officer.

L.2. PROPOSAL INSTRUCTIONS:

L.2.1. General

L.2.1.1. Offerors shall provide information by addressing each factor/sub-factor in the format and sequence identified below. The Offeror must provide information in sufficient detail to allow the Government to make a tradeoff assessment of the Offerors capability to support the proposed response to the evaluation criteria.

Offerors should thoroughly read and understand the terms and conditions contained in the solicitation.

Failure to provide any information requested may render the Offerors’ proposal non-responsive, and preclude it from any further consideration for contract award. Offerors should ensure that the information contained in their proposal is factual, accurate, and complete.

L.2.1.2. The proposal must not merely repeat the requirements but rather must provide convincing documentary evidence in support of conclusive statements supported by facts/data of how contract requirements will be met.

L.2.1.3. Each large business Offeror shall provide a Small Business Subcontracting Plan that contains all the elements required by FAR 52.219-9 Alt II (DEV 2026-O0037). This plan shall be incorporated into any resultant contract in reference to the RFP.

L.2.1.4. If an Offeror takes exceptions to any of the solicited terms; the Offeror shall include a list setting out the exceptions with supporting rationale.

L.2.1.5. In order to be considered for an award an Offeror must submit a Technical Proposal, Past Performance Proposal, and Small Business Participation Plan that will be evaluated separately from Price.

The proposals shall be submitted in four separate sections. Further, the RFP and all amendments must be completed and signed by the offeror, including all representations and certifications.

L.3. PROPOSAL TECHNICAL QUALIFICATIONS

L.3.1. Each Offeror shall submit a technical proposal delineating its manufacturing/production execution plan for each NSN with supporting documented evidence to include plan of actions to meet all contract technical requirements, completion of all required testing, and soft deliverables. The technical proposal shall be concise and consistent with solicited requirements for a complete and acceptable submission. The technical proposal shall include a table of contents that cross-references the factors and sub-factors as discussed below, to include the appropriate page numbers.

The technical proposal, to include associated supplemental data, shall NOT exceed 6 pages. The total page count will be determined by counting the pages from left to right, consecutively. Pages that exceed the noted 6-Pages limitation based on counting guidelines will not be evaluated. Each paragraph shall be separated by at least one blank line. All annexes, documentation and attachments that are submitted by the Offeror will count against the total 6-Pages limitation. If pages are printed on both sides, each side will count as a separate page. The following will not count towards total page limitations: Table of Contents, , Acronym with Description Listing, and Proposal Section dividers. Pages should not exceed 8-1/2 inches in width by 11 inches in length. The font used shall not be less than 10 points.

L.3.2. File Packaging: All of the proposal files shall be compressed (zipped) into one file using WinZip version 6.2 or later, or as separate uploads in their native format, i.e. doc, xls, ppt. etc.

L.3.3. The Technical Proposal shall consist of separate sub-sections identifying and outlining each technical factor and sub-factor. Information provided by the Offeror should enable the Government to determine whether the Offeror can fully meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation. Offerors are responsible for including sufficient details (i.e. test data, plans, procedures) to permit a complete and accurate evaluation strictly from a technical standpoint. The proposal shall be detailed and clearly stated to allow an assessment by the Government without the need for additional clarification. All information and data provided shall be specific to the items being procured, except for past performance. In response to the Request for Proposal, the Offeror must address the following:

L.3.4. Factor: Technical:

L.3.4.1 Technical Evaluation Approach: To meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation, the offeror must clearly show within their submitted proposals how they plan to meet the Government’s product requirements in Section B. The offeror shall demonstrate their technical capability by discussing in their technical proposal the plans, methods, and procedures for fulfilling the technical requirements described in the technical specifications.

L.3.4.2. Sub-Factor: Managing Security: The offeror shall verify that they have the necessary security clearance (FCL) and personnel clearances (PCL) required for the classification level of the drawings. The Offeror shall describe its process to demonstrate full capability to satisfy and validate Data Handling Protocols, to include the methods for storing, transferring, and destroying classified drawings (e.g., compliant with National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual - NISPOM). The Offeror shall provide controls and procedures in place for Access Control and how they will restrict access to drawings to cleared personnel only, as requested in the RFP.

L.3.4.3. Sub-Factor: Testing Capabilities: The Offeror shall describe its process to demonstrate full capability to satisfy and validate all of the performance requirements in accordance with all applicable baseline documents, e.g., Technical Requirements, Performance Specifications, and drawings.

Sources waived for FAT: Offerors that have been waived for FAT need not submit plans for FAT; they shall however, submit information and plans on how they plan to conduct production testing. Please take into consideration that Government Furnished Equipment (GFE) is not available for testing.

Source not waived for FAT: Offerors that have not been waived for FAT shall submit detailed information on how they plan to conduct first article AND production tests. Please take into consideration that Government Furnished Equipment (GFE) is not available for testing. The offeror shall also provide a detailed description of and availability of all major resources which will be used in performance of First Article Testing AND Production Testing. A plan shall be provided for sourcing resources that are not already available to the offeror.

L.4. PAST PERFORMANCE

L.4.1. To assist the Government in evaluating past performance, all Offerors must provide a list of relevant completed contracts/orders, commercial or Government, performed within the past five (5) years. Up to three

(3) total, Government or commercial contracts for the same or similar items shall be submitted. For the purposes of this evaluation, “similar items” will be defined as products that have been successfully produced and delivered in the same federal supply class (FSC), and/or complexity, dollar value, contract type, and degree of subcontracting. “Same items” will be defined as completed contracts for the same NSNs identified in Section B.

L.4.2. For each contract/order requested, the Offeror shall provide the following information:

a. Name and address of the Government Contracting Activity or the name and address of the commercial customer in addition to identifying customer’s Point of Contact/Representative phone number and Email address.

b. For Government contracts, please submit the name, Email, and phone number of the Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO); for commercial customers, please include the name, Email and phone number of the commercial customer purchasing official.

c. The contract/order number or other means of document identification if no contract/order number was assigned along with period of performance and associated delivery schedule while identifying any delay(s), if applicable, and causes for such delay(s).

d. The contract type (i.e., fixed price, fixed price with EPA, etc.) or commercial agreement type.

e. Total contract/order ceiling dollar value.

f. A description of the item(s)/supplies or services provided under the contract.

g. A listing of any technical or logistical problems or discrepancies (including shortages, overages, damages, defects, or mis-shipments, etc.) experienced with the contracts or customers reported in the paragraph above.

Include a brief description of how these problems were addressed and remedied.

L.5. SMALL BUSINESS PARTICIPATION PLAN

The extent of participation of Small Businesses and other Socio-Economically Disadvantaged Small Businesses or Entities will be measured as a percentage of the total anticipated contract effort regardless of whether the Small Business or other Socio-Economically Disadvantaged Small Business or Entity is a prime contractor, subcontractor, or joint venture partner.

Both large and small businesses will be required to submit a Small Business Participation Plan under the unrestricted RFP/Solicitation, which is an evaluation factor in the Source Selection process. Market research, based on the nature and location of the work, is required to determine optimal percentage of total contract dollars planned to be performed by small businesses. Small business participation is the collective small business participation from any type of small business or sub-category small business. Work self-performed by a small business prime Offeror will be credited as Small Business Participation.

All Offerors (both large and small businesses) are required to complete the following Small Business Participation Plan Form and submit with their proposal. This form will be the primary source of data used to evaluate the Small Business Participation factor. Offeror's market research and small business participation analysis in accordance with the evaluation criteria listed in the previous paragraphs should be reflected on this form.

SMALL BUSINESS PARTICIPATION PLAN FORM

(a) Check the applicable size and categories for the PRIME Offeror only -- Check all applicable boxes:

{ } Large Prime { } Historically Black Colleges or Universities and Minority Institutions (HBCU/MI) or { } Small Business Prime; also categorized as a

{ } Small Disadvantaged Business (SDB) { } Woman-Owned Small Business (WOSB) { } Historically Underutilized Zone (HUB Zone) Small Business { } Veteran Owned Small Business (VOSB) { } Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business (SDVOSB)

(b) Submit the total combined percentage of work to be performed by both large and small businesses (including the percentage of work to be performed both by Prime and Subcontractors):

Total Percentage planned for Large Business(es) _______% or $ _______ Total Percentage planned for Small Business(es) _______% or $ _______ _______% Total $________ Must =100% Must = Total Value of the Contract

(c) Please indicate the total percentage and/or total dollars of participation to be performed by each type of subcategory small business. The percentage of work performed by Small Businesses that qualify in multiple small business categories may be counted in each category:

Small Disadvantaged Business _______% or $ _______ HUB Zone Small Business _______% or $ _______ Woman Owned Small Business _______% or $ _______ Service Disabled Veteran Owned SB _______% or $ _______ Veteran Owned Small Business %

(d) List principal supplies/services to be performed by Small Businesses:

Name of Company Type of Service/Supply Small Business (SB):

Small Disadvantaged Business (SDB):

Women-Owned Small Business (WOSB):

Historically Underutilized Business Zone (HUB Zone):

Veteran Owned Small Business (VOSB):

Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business (SDVO):

Historically Black Colleges and Universities and Minority Institutions (HBCU/MI):

(e) Describe the extent of commitment to use small businesses (for example, what types of commitments if any, are in place for this specific acquisition either - small business prime, written contract, verbal, enforceable, non-enforceable, joint venturing, mentor-protg , etc.)

Additional Important Note for Other than U.S. Small Businesses ONLY: IAW FAR 52.219-9 Alt II (DEV2026-O0037), if a large business is selected for a contract, it must submit acceptable subcontracting plans to be eligible for award. That submission should be made with the proposal. Those firms required to submit subcontracting plans are expected to conduct market research to determine appropriate subcontracting goals. A subcontracting plan is separate from the Small Business Participation plan and must meet the requirements of FAR 52.219-9 Alt II (DEV 2026-O0037) and DFARS 252.219-7996 (DEV 2026-O0037).

SUBCONTRACTING PLANS SHALL REFLECT AND BE CONSISTENT WITH THE TOTAL

CONTRACT DOLLAR COMMITMENTS OFFERED IN THE SMALL BUSINESS PARTICIPATION

PLAN.

L.6. PRICE

L.6.1. Prices offered must be unit prices only, which are clearly stated and which require no further interpretation by the Government to determine the actual offered price. Prices must not be stated as part of a pricing formula or as charges per lot. Unit prices offered must include costs of compliance with all RFP/Solicitation requirements. For each item of supply for which a price is offered, prices must be offered for each quantity increment and year located in Section B. Pricing is required for all quantity ranges for all production CLINs (CLINs 0001-0006), including option years as well as any FAT CLINs. Failure to submit proposed prices in accordance with these instructions may result in rejection of the offer.

L.6.2. The Contractor may be required to submit other than certified cost or pricing data in accordance with

FAR 15.403-1 (DEV 2026-O0048).

SECTION M – EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

M.1. The Government intends to award multiple contracts from this solicitation but reserves the right to award one contract to a single offeror if determined by the Contracting Officer to be in the best interest of the Government. The contracting officer will select for award the proposal or proposals that represent the lowest evaluated price for each NSN and who submits a technically acceptable proposal.

In accordance with FAR 15.103-1 (DEV 2026-O0048), award will be made based on the best overall (e.g.

Tradeoff approach) proposal that is determined to be the most beneficial to the Government, with DLA giving appropriate consideration to the four evaluation factors: Technical, Past Performance, Small Business Participation Plan, and Price. The Government will weigh the relative benefits of each proposal, and an award will be made based on an assessment of the results of the evaluation. In making this assessment, DLA will give due consideration to all of the Factors and Sub-Factors and their relative order of importance. All non-cost evaluation Factors, when combined, are approximately equal to cost or price. The Government reserves the right to make an award to other than the lowest priced Offeror, or to other than the Offeror with the highest technical rating if DLA determines that to do so would result in the best value to the Government.

Offerors that receive a final rating of Unacceptable at any factor/sub-factor level are ineligible for award.

Evaluation factors and sub-factors for tradeoff are listed below in descending order if importance for both non-cost and cost importance.

Non-Cost Evaluation Factors and Sub-Factors

1. Technical

a. Technical Evaluation Approach

b. Managing Security

c. Testing Capabilities

2. Past Performance

a. Relevancy

b. Confidence

3. Small Business Participation Plan

Cost Evaluation Factor:

1. Price

M.2. Technical:

M.2.1. The contracting officer will evaluate the following Sub-Factors for Technical Proposal:

M.2.1.1. Sub-factor: Technical Evaluation Approach: The Government will evaluate the extent to which the technical requirements have been considered, defined and satisfied, and will evaluate that the proposal demonstrates a clear understanding of the technical Factors and Sub-Factors. The Government will assess how well the Offeror’s proposal meets the requirements of the solicitation; specifically, the Government’s requirements in Section B and all identified technical requirements including the plans, methods, and procedures for fulfilling the technical requirements described in the technical specifications.

M.2.1.2. Sub-factor: Managing Security: The Government will evaluate that the Offeror demonstrated a clear understanding of the security requirements, to include having the necessary clearances, data handling, and access control required for the classification level of the drawings.

M.2.1.3. Sub-factor: Testing Capabilities: The Government will evaluate that the offeror demonstrated through their proposal submission that they have an understanding of the scope and the resources required for first article and production testing requirements

M.2.2. Technical Evaluation

M.2.2.1. An adjectival rating will be assigned to each factor and sub-factor to depict the degree to which each Offeror’s proposal exceeds, meets, or does not meet the minimum performance or capability requirements of each of the technical factors and sub-factors through an assessment of the strengths, weaknesses, or deficiencies of each proposal. The technical rating evaluates the quality of the Offeror’s technical solution for meeting the Government’s requirement. See below for the Combined Technical/Risk ratings:

Adjectival Rating Description Description

Outstanding Proposal demonstrates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements and contains multiple strengths and/or at least one significant strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low.

Good Proposal indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements and contains at least one strength or significant strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low to moderate.

Acceptable Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.

Marginal Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is high.

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet requirements of the solicitation and, thus, contains one or more deficiencies and is unawardable, and/or risk of performance is unacceptably high.

M.3. Past Performance:

M.3.1. The past performance evaluation will assess the Offeror’s probability of meeting the solicitation requirements. The past performance evaluation considers each Offeror's demonstrated recent and relevant record of performance in supplying products that meet the contract’s requirements. The contracting officer will assign a performance confidence rating based on an Offeror's recent past performance, focusing on performance that is relevant to the contract requirements.

There are two aspects to the past performance evaluation. The first is to evaluate the offerors past performance to determine how relevant a recent effort accomplished by the offeror is to the effort to be acquired through the source selection. The second aspect of the past performance evaluation is to determine how well the contractor performed on the contracts. The past performance evaluation performed in support of a current source selection does not establish, create, or change the existing record and history of the offerors past performance on past contracts; rather, the past performance evaluation process gathers information from customers on how well the offeror performed those past contracts.

M.3.1.1. Past Performance Relevancy

Relevancy will be defined as how relevant a recent effort accomplished by the offeror is to the solicited requirement. Relevancy includes contracts/orders of similar products. The contracting officer will assess whether prior efforts are relevant based on whether prior awards were, for example, in the federal supply class (FSC)/, and of similar complexity, dollar value, contract type, magnitude (500 units), and degree of subcontracting. The contracting officer will consider efforts completed within a period of the five (5) previous years.

All offerors should provide a list, as instructed in section L of this solicitation, of the most recently completed contracts/orders, either for commercial or government customers, performed within the past five years.

The Government reserves the right to limit the number of references it decides to contact.

Proposals will receive one of the following ratings for Relevancy:

Adjectival Rating Description

Very Relevant Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Relevant Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Somewhat Relevant Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Not Relevant Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

M.3.1.2. Performance Confidence Assessment

Performance confidence will be defined as how well the contractor performed on past contracts. In evaluating performance confidence, the Government will evaluate the offerors record of contract compliance in supplying products that meet the users’ needs. The contracting officer will review the following: product quality, delivery, and customer satisfaction.

Sources of Past Performance Information for Evaluation are as follows:

- Past performance information may be provided by the offeror, as solicited.

- Past performance information may be obtained from questionnaires tailored to the circumstances of the acquisition.

- Past performance information shall be obtained from any other sources available to the Government, to include, but not limited to, Supplier Performance Risk System (SPRS)Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), SAM.gov, previously Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), or other databases; interviews with Program Managers, Contracting Officers, and the Defense Contract Management Agency.

Proposals being evaluated against performance confidence will receive one of the following ratings:

Adjectival Rating Description

Substantial Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Neutral Confidence No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned. The offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance.

Limited Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

No Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

M.4. Small Business Participation Plan

M.4.1. The Government will evaluate the proposals to determine which Offeror(s) proposes the best value in terms of meeting all the Small Business Participation goals using the following criteria:

M.4.1.1. The extent of participation of small business prime Offerors and small business sub-contractors in terms of the percentage of the value of the total acquisition. The goals for Small Business participation is 30% of total contract dollars (aggregate of all small businesses participation including the small business socioeconomic contracting programs (i.e., 8(a), HUBZone, SDVOSB, or WOSB programs). The following are non-mandatory suggested goals, which should be determined through market research:

M.4.1.1.1. Small Disadvantaged Business (SDB) 5% of total contract dollars.

M.4.1.1.2. Women-Owned Small Business (WOSB) 5% of total contract dollars.

M.4.1.1.3. Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSB) 5% of total con-tract dollars.

M.4.1.1.4. Historically Underutilized Business Zone (HUBZone) 3% of total contract dollars.

M.4.1.2. The extent to which such firms, as defined in FAR Part 19, are specifically identified in proposals;

M.4.1.3. The extent of commitment to use such firms (existing and enforceable commitments will be considered more favorably than business relationships that are simply planned or theoretical);

M.4.1.4. Identification of the complexity and variety of the work specific small firms are to perform; and

M.4.1.5. The past performance of Offerors in complying with requirements of FAR 52.219-9 (DEV 2026- O0037) Small Business Subcontracting Plan on previous contracts.

Proposals will receive one of the following ratings:

Adjectival Rating Description Description

Outstanding Proposal indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the small business objectives.

Good Proposal indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the small business objectives.

Acceptable Proposal indicates an adequate approach and understanding of small business objectives.

Marginal Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the small business objectives.

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet small business objectives.

M.5. Price

For evaluation purposes, the Offeror’s pricing will be evaluated utilizing accepted price analysis techniques per FAR 15.404-1 (DEV 2026-O0048). Other than certified cost or pricing data may be necessary if a fair and reasonable price cannot be determined from provided/available information. The pricing analysis will be performed on a comparative basis. An Offeror’s total evaluated price will be considered. Analysis to determine if prices are significantly unbalanced between line items or options, which may indicate risk to the government. Pricing is required for all quantity ranges for each year for production CLINs.

For the purposes of this evaluation factor, the total evaluated price shall be the sum of the total evaluated production price, including option years (CLINs 0001-0006), and all of the separately priced CLINs. Pricing is required for all quantity ranges for production CLINs.

Pricing for each production quantity range for each year, including option years (CLINs 0001-0006), will be evaluated by applying the following weighted factors to arrive at an average weighted unit price.

30% to the first quantity range 35% to the second quantity range 35% to the third quantity range

This average weighted unit price will then be multiplied by the estimated annual quantity to arrive at an evaluated price for each production year, including option years. The evaluated prices for each production year will be summed together to arrive at the total evaluated production price (including options).

The cost for separately priced line items such as First Article Testing, etc. will be added to an Offeror’s total evaluated production price to arrive at the total evaluated price. This total evaluated price will be the price evaluation factor. As mentioned throughout this paragraph, option year prices will be considered in price evaluation factor.

� SPRMM1-26-R-KA01 18 85

� SPRMM1-26-R-KA01 19 85�����������������

� SPRMM1-26-R-KA01 20 85����������������������

� SPRMM1-26-R-KA01 Page 21 of 85

���0�+���1�'���(���$���

2!��

&�)��!����������0����

�3������������4�3�& ��#3�3%�����56$.��56�.��56�.� 567.��56�.��8,�.��6.$.��6.�.��6.7.��,$$.��,$����,$7.��,$�.�����,$5.�� ���� ��

��0� �

�3�9�:;�2�����<��(������������������ 3�9�:;�2���-�� �.88������#8$8%5.��$�5$ �#$.�.5%

$���(!� ���������1����!� �;���'��-+�(�3=�

��)����&������������!� ���������1����!� ����������0

�������!� ���������1����!�

>������!� ���������1����!�

����1������)��0 ���� >������!� ���������1����!� �� !������4

��3��!��0��� �!� ���������1����!�

�� ���(!� ���������1����!�

�����������#������&���7%

?�@3�9�'��5,.�58�5�,6��:���$�;����� A3�9�'��5,.�58�5�,8�()��;����;����� �����B

SPRMM1-26-R-KA01 Page 22 of 85

8�����

������9����:

��� �!(;1)" � �01/ 1.#, /0!33 -# 204/1*!334 1%#).1'1#% 1) !**$(%!)*# <1.0 ������������

�$%# �A

�$%# �A �//#,-34 5$( /#. $( ;1.6 )$. '+()1/0#% � �/#% '$33$<1)" %#.!13 2!(./�

SPRMM1-26-R-KA01 Page 233 of 85

!�"�.����/0 ����1�������02� �����#�'3�++!",��� �����