4_Adambrook_Court_Asbestos_Report.pdf

Asbestos Assessment Report

Residential Structure – 4 Adambrook Court

Mauldin, South Carolina

S&ME Project No. 22690023 Phase 03

PREPARED FOR:

Greenville County

301 University Ridge, Suite 4100

Greenville, South Carolina 29601

PREPARED BY:

S&ME, Inc.

48 Brookfield Oaks Drive, Suite F

Greenville, South Carolina 29607

February 10, 2022

Inspection Performed by:

Brian Mulholland

SCDHEC License BI-00691

Inspection Date: February 3, 2022

Asbestos Identified No

Asbestos Design Required No

Asbestos Air Monitoring Required No

S&ME, Inc. | 48 Brookfield Oaks Drive, Suite F | Greenville, SC 29607 | p 864.297.9944 | www.smeinc.com

February 10, 2022

Greenville County

301 University Ridge, Suite 4100

Greenville, South Carolina 29601

Attention: Ms. Mollie Hodges

Reference: Asbestos Assessment Report

Residential Structure – 4 Adambrook Court

Mauldin, South Carolina

S&ME Project No. 22690023, Phase 03

Dear Ms. Hodges:

S&ME, Inc. (S&ME) has completed an asbestos assessment for the referenced property. The purpose of the assessment is to identify asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) in the structure prior to demolition. Our assessment was conducted in general accordance with our Proposal Number 42-2000362, dated April 14, 2020.

This work was authorized by the Greenville County Task Order #03, dated February 1, 2022.

S&ME appreciates the opportunity to provide our asbestos assessment services to Greenville County. Please contact us at your convenience if there are questions regarding the information contained in this report.

Sincerely, S&ME, Inc.

Brian Mulholland Tom Behnke, P.G., CHMM

Project Manager Environmental Services Manager bmulholland@smeinc.com tbehnke@smeinc.com

BM/TB T:\ENV\Projects\2022\22690023_Greenville County_Greenville County Flood 2022 Services_Greenville\4 ENV\Project Docs\Phase 03 4

Adambrook Court ACM\4 Adambrook Court Asbestos Report.docx

Mauldin, South Carolina

S&ME Project No. 22690023, Phase 03

February 10, 2022 ii

Table of Contents

Executive Summary

1.0 Introduction

2.0 Site and Project Descriptions

2.1 Purpose

2.2 Site Description

3.0 Assessment Procedures

3.1 Assessment

4.0 Findings and Results

5.0 Conclusions and Recommendations

6.0 Assumptions and Limitations

Appendices Appendix I – Location Plan

Appendix II – Photographs

Appendix III – Table 1 – Summary of Asbestos Results

Appendix IV – Asbestos Laboratory Reports

Appendix V – Copy of Inspector’s License

Mauldin, South Carolina

S&ME Project No. 22690023, Phase 03

February 10, 2022 1

Executive Summary

S&ME performed an asbestos assessment of the residential structure located at 4 Adambrook Court in Mauldin, South Carolina. The assessment was conducted by S&ME on February 3, 2022. This Executive Summary is intended as an overview for the convenience of the reader. The complete report must be reviewed in its entirety prior to making decisions regarding this site.

The residential structure is an approximately 2,4000 square feet (SF) two-story structure. We understand the structure is scheduled for demolition. The structure was previously damaged due to fire and appears to be partially reconstructed prior to the assessment. Based on our observations, construction of the house appears to have been halted prior to preoccupancy. According to the Greenville County Tax Assessor’s database, the subject property is identified as Tax Parcel #M006.01-01-158.00. The interior is generally unfinished with wood studs and wood floors and ceilings besides the garage/laundry area. The garage/laundry area appear to be original drywall wall panels, drywall ceiling panels, and concrete floors. Exterior materials consist of wood and plastic sheeting, vinyl windows, and a shingle roof. No insulation was observed in the attic area. Piping appears to be PVC with no insulation.

The asbestos assessment included bulk sampling and laboratory analysis of suspect ACMs associated with the interior and exterior of the structures. A total of 8 samples were collected from the structure including drywall/joint compound, roof shingles, and felt paper.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control

(SCDHEC) define materials as asbestos-containing (ACMs) if an asbestos content of one percent or greater (> 1%) is detected in a representative sample. Asbestos, in concentrations greater than one percent, was not identified as a result of this assessment.

This summary is for convenience only and should not be relied upon without first reading the full contents of this report, including appended materials.

Mauldin, South Carolina

S&ME Project No. 22690023, Phase 03

February 10, 2022 2

1.0 Introduction

S&ME was contracted by Greenville County to perform an asbestos assessment of the residential structure located at 4 Adambrook Court in Mauldin, South Carolina. S&ME performed the asbestos assessment on February 3, 2022. This assessment consisted of observing for, sampling, and analyzing suspect ACM that may be disturbed during future demolition.

The scope of this assessment fulfills the requirements of the United States Environmental Protection Agency

(USEPA) National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPS) asbestos regulation, 40 CFR, Part

61, Subpart M, and SCDHEC Regulation 61-86.1, which requires an asbestos assessment of buildings scheduled for renovation or demolition.

2.0 Site and Project Descriptions

2.1 Purpose

The assessment was performed to identify ACMs, prior to disturbing building materials during demolition activities. The assessment included the interior and exterior of structure located on the premises including roofing materials. An assessment strategy appropriate for this purpose was presented in our proposal and this report should be interpreted only with regard to the specific purpose indicated.

2.2 Site Description

The residential structure is an approximately 2,4000 square feet (SF) two-story structure. We understand the structure is scheduled for demolition. The structure was previously damaged due to fire and appears to be partially reconstructed prior to the assessment. Based on our observations, construction of the house appears to have been halted prior to preoccupancy. According to the Greenville County Tax Assessor’s database, the subject property is identified as Tax Parcel #M006.01-01-158.00. The interior is generally unfinished with wood studs and wood floors and ceilings besides the garage/laundry area. The garage/laundry area appear to be original drywall wall panels, drywall ceiling panels, and concrete floors. Exterior materials consist of wood and plastic sheeting, vinyl windows, and a shingle roof. No insulation was observed in the attic area. Piping appears to be PVC with no insulation.

3.0 Assessment Procedures

The assessment was performed by observing, assessing, and sampling suspect ACMs associated with the subject building. The possibility exists that suspect materials were undetected in inaccessible areas such as flooring overlays, wall voids, or pipe chases. If additional suspect ACMs not identified in this report are discovered during destructive activities, bulk samples must be collected by a SCDHEC licensed inspector and analyzed for asbestos content prior to disturbance or disposal of the suspect materials.

A sampling strategy was developed to provide representative samples in accordance with the SCDHEC and the

EPA. Bulk samples of suspect ACMs were collected by a SCDHEC licensed inspector. The bulk samples were then

Mauldin, South Carolina

S&ME Project No. 22690023, Phase 03

February 10, 2022 3 recorded on a chain of custody record and submitted to Eurofins CEI Labs of Cary, North Carolina for analysis by

Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) and Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) for those non-friable organically bound materials reported negative via PLM. The laboratory is accredited by the National Voluntary Laboratory

Accreditation Program (NVLAP), which is administered by the National Institute of Standards and Technology.

Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM)

The suspect materials were analyzed by trained microscopists using PLM techniques coupled with dispersion staining in accordance with EPA Test Method Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations, Chapter I (1-1-87 edition), Part

763, Subpart F-APPENDIX A. This method identifies asbestos mineral fibers based on six optical characteristics:

morphology, birefringence, refractive index, extinction angle, sign of elongation and dispersion staining colors.

The laboratory analysis reports the specific type of asbestos identified (there are six asbestos minerals) and the percentage of asbestos present.

Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM)

Representative suspect non-friable organically bound materials, exhibiting negative results via PLM analysis, were analyzed by trained microscopists via TEM, in accordance with ASTM E2356 per the SCDHEC requirements.

3.1 Assessment

The sampled materials were assessed based on condition (good, fair or poor) and potential for disturbance due to the scheduled renovation/demolition. The sampled materials were also categorized based on the EPA’s National

Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) regulation categories. Friable ACM is classified as an

ACM that can be crumbled to a powder by moderate hand pressure. Non-friable ACM is classified as either

Category I Non-friable ACM or Category II Non-friable ACM. Category I and Category II Non-friable ACM are distinguished from each other by their fiber release potential when damaged. Generally, Category I Non-friable

ACM, which by definition includes intact ACM roofing materials, gaskets, packing, resilient floor coverings and floor mastics, is less likely to become friable and release fibers in a damaged state. Category II Non-friable ACM include all other non-friable ACM excluding Category I that have a high probability of being rendered friable during removal activities or demolition. All Friable ACM, Category I Non-friable ACM that has become friable, Category I Non-friable ACM that will be or has been subjected to sanding, grinding, cutting or abrading, or

Category II Non-friable ACM that has a high probability of becoming or has become crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by the forces expected to act on the material in the course of demolition or renovation operations are considered to be a Regulated Asbestos-Containing Material (RACM).

4.0 Findings and Results

EPA and SCDHEC define materials as asbestos-containing when an asbestos content greater than 1% is detected in a representative sample. The suspect materials identified consist of drywall and associated joint compound, asphalt roof shingle, and roof felt paper. Of the representative materials sampled and analyzed during this assessment, asbestos in concentrations >1% was not identified as a result of the assessment

Mauldin, South Carolina

S&ME Project No. 22690023, Phase 03

February 10, 2022 4

A site location plan is included in Appendix I. Photographs of the suspect samples are included in Appendix II.

Table 1, Asbestos Results Summary, is found in Appendix III, and presents a summary of the suspect materials, material friability, condition, potential for disturbance, quantity, and asbestos analysis of the samples collected.

The laboratory results are located in Appendix IV. A copy of the asbestos inspector’s SDHEC license is included in

Appendix V.

5.0 Conclusions and Recommendations

No asbestos-containing materials were identified in the structure. Therefore, no specific recommendations are made regarding asbestos abatement. This report should be maintained as documentation that the required asbestos assessment was performed and provided to the contractor(s) to assist with compliance with applicable

State and Federal regulations. If additional suspect materials are discovered during demolition activities, bulk samples must be collected and analyzed for asbestos content prior to continuation of work.

6.0 Assumptions and Limitations

This report is provided for the sole use of the Client. Use of this report by any other parties will be at such party’s sole risk, and S&ME disclaims liability for any such use or reliance by third parties. The results presented in this report are indicative of conditions only during the time of the sampling period and of the specific areas referenced. Under no circumstances is this report to be used as a bidding document, or as a project design or specification.

S&ME performed the services in accordance with generally accepted practices of reputable environmental consultants undertaking similar studies at the same time and in the same geographical area. S&ME has endeavored to meet this standard of care. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is intended or made with respect to this report or S&ME’s services. Users of this report should consider the scope and limitations related to these services when developing opinions as to risks associated with the site.

The possibility exists that suspect materials were undetected in inaccessible or concealed areas such as inside pipe chases or wall voids. If additional suspect materials are discovered during the planned destructive activities, bulk samples must be collected by an asbestos inspector and analyzed for asbestos content.

Appendices

Appendix I – Location Plan

SCALE:

NTS

A d a m b ro o k

C o u rt

M a u ld in

, S o u th

C a ro lin a

L O

C A

T

IO

N P

L A

N

FIGURE NO:

PROJECT NUMBER

22690023

DATE:

2/3/2022

Site Location

Appendix II – Photographs

Greenville County – Residential Structure

4 Adambrook Court

Mauldin, South Carolina

S&ME Project # 22690023 Phase 03

Taken by: B. Mulholland Date Taken: 2/3/2022

1 General front view of the structure.

4 Adambrook Court, Mauldin South Carolina 2 General rear view of the structure.

3 General view of the attic space. Burnt roof rafters were observed. 4 General view of the 1st floor living area and fireplace.

Mauldin, South Carolina

S&ME Project # 22690023 Phase 03

Taken by: B. Mulholland Date Taken: 2/3/2022

5 General view of the 1st floor dining area. 6 General view of the 1st floor ceiling material.

7 General view of the 2nd floor hallway. 8 General view of the 2nd floor bathroom.

Mauldin, South Carolina

S&ME Project # 22690023 Phase 03

Taken by: B. Mulholland Date Taken: 2/3/2022

9 General view of the garage. 10 General view of the laundry area attached to the garage.

11 Sample A – Drywall/joint compound located in the garage/laundry area. No asbestos was detected.

12 Sample B – Asphalt roof shingles and roof felt paper.

No asbestos was detected.

Appendix III – Table 1 – Summary of Asbestos Results

Summary of Asbestos Results

Greenville County - Residential Structure

4 Adambrook Court

Mauldin, South Carolina

S&ME Project No. 22690023 Phase 03

Date of Sampling: February 3, 2022

HA Material Description Material

Location

2Approx.

Quantity

Cat.

(F/I/II)

Type

Condition/

Potential for

Disturbance

Sample Number Sample

Location

1Type and

Percent

Asbestos

A1 Garage

ND

ND

A2 Garage

ND

ND

A3 Laundry

ND

ND

B1 Roof - Rear

ND

ND

B2 Roof - Rear

ND

ND

3B3 Roof - Garage

ND

ND

SF = square feet Misc. = Miscellaneous LPD = low potential for disturbance

LF = linear feet Sur. = Surfacing PD = potential for disturbance

F= friable TSI = Thermal System Insulation PSD = potential for significant disturbance

NF = non-friable G = good ND = No Asbestos Detected

Cat I = Category I D = damaged N/A = Not Applicable

Cat II = Category II SD = significantly damaged EA = each

1EPA, SCDHEC and OSHA defines a material as asbestos containing if an asbestos content greater than one percent (>1%) is detected in a representative sample

2Quantities are estimated, and should not be used for bidding purposes, as field conditions should be verified

3Samples analyzed by TEM to confirm negative results reported by PLM analysis

B Asphalt Roof Shingle and

Roof Felt Paper 2,400 SF NF Cat I Misc. G / LPDRoof

Table I: Summary of Asbestos Results

1,200 SFGarage and Laundry Room FA Drywall and

Joint Compound

Misc./

Surf.

G / PD

Appendix IV – Asbestos Laboratory Reports

February 7, 2022

S&ME

48 Brookfield Oaks Dr, Suite F Greenville, SC 29607

CLIENT PROJECT: Adambrook, 22690023 phase 03

CEI LAB CODE: B222598

Dear Customer:

Enclosed are asbestos analysis results for PLM Bulk samples received at our laboratory on February 3, 2022. The samples were analyzed for asbestos using polarizing light microscopy (PLM) per the EPA 600 Method.

Sample results containing >1% asbestos are considered asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) per EPA regulatory requirements. The detection limit for the EPA 600 Method is <1% asbestos by weight as determined by visual estimation.

Thank you for your business and we look forward to continuing good relations.

730 SE Maynard Road • Cary, NC 27511 • 919.481.1413

Tianbao Bai, Ph.D., CIH Laboratory Director

Kind Regards, ASBESTOS ANALYTICAL REPORT

By: Polarized Light Microscopy

Prepared for

S&ME

CLIENT PROJECT:

LAB CODE:

TEST METHOD: EPA 600 / R93 / 116 and EPA 600 / M4-82 / 020

REPORT DATE:

TOTAL SAMPLES ANALYZED:

# SAMPLES >1% ASBESTOS:

Adambrook, 22690023 phase 03

02/07/22

B222598

730 SE Maynard Road • Cary, NC 27511 • 919.481.1413

Asbestos Report Summary By: POLARIZING LIGHT MICROSCOPY

PROJECT: Adambrook, 22690023 phase 03 LAB CODE: B222598

Client ID Lab ID Color Sample Description

ASBESTOS

%Layer

METHOD: EPA 600 / R93 / 116 and EPA 600 / M4-82 / 020

A1 Layer 1 B31072 White Joint Compound None DetectedA1

Layer 2 B31072 White Drywall None Detected

A2 Layer 1 B31073 White Joint Compound None DetectedA2

Layer 2 B31073 White Drywall None Detected

A3 Layer 1 B31074 White Joint Compound None DetectedA3

Layer 2 B31074 White Drywall None Detected

A4 Layer 1 B31075 White Joint Compound None DetectedA4

Layer 2 B31075 White Drywall None Detected

A5 Layer 1 B31076 White Joint Compound None DetectedA5

Layer 2 B31076 White Drywall None Detected

B1 Layer 1 B31077 Black Asphalt Roof Shingle None DetectedB1

Layer 2 B31077 Black Felt Paper None Detected

B2 Layer 1 B31078 Black Asphalt Roof Shingle None DetectedB2

Layer 2 B31078 Black Felt Paper None Detected

B3 Layer 1 B31079 Sample Submitted for TEM Analysis

B3

Layer 2 B31079 Sample Submitted for TEM Analysis

Page 1 of 1730 SE Maynard Road • Cary, NC 27511 • 919.481.1413

ASBESTOS BULK ANALYSIS

Lab Code: B222598 Date Received: 02-03-22 Date Analyzed: 02-07-22 Date Reported: 02-07-22

Client ID Lab ID

Lab Attributes

Lab Description

ASBESTOS

ASBESTOS BULK PLM, EPA 600 METHOD

NON-ASBESTOS COMPONENTS

Non-Fibrous

Client: S&ME 48 Brookfield Oaks Dr, Suite F Greenville, SC 29607

Project: Adambrook, 22690023 phase 03

Fibrous

White A1

B31072

Heterogeneous

Non-fibrous Bound

2% 83% 15%

Paint Binder Calc Carb

None Detected Layer 1

Joint Compound

White Drywall

B31072 15%Heterogeneous

Fibrous Bound

85%Cellulose Gypsum None DetectedLayer 2

White A2

B31073

Heterogeneous

Non-fibrous Bound

2% 83% 15%

Paint Binder Calc Carb

None Detected Layer 1

Joint Compound

White Drywall

B31073 15%Heterogeneous

Fibrous Bound

85%Cellulose Gypsum None DetectedLayer 2

White A3

B31074

Heterogeneous

Non-fibrous Bound

2% 83% 15%

Paint Binder Calc Carb

None Detected Layer 1

Joint Compound

White Drywall

B31074 15%Heterogeneous

Fibrous Bound

85%Cellulose Gypsum None DetectedLayer 2

White A4

B31075

Heterogeneous

Non-fibrous Bound

2% 83% 15%

Paint Binder Calc Carb

None Detected Layer 1

Joint Compound

Page 1 of 4730 SE Maynard Road • Cary, NC 27511 • 919.481.1413

Lab Code: B222598 Date Received: 02-03-22 Date Analyzed: 02-07-22 Date Reported: 02-07-22

Client ID Lab ID

Lab Attributes

Lab Description

ASBESTOS

ASBESTOS BULK PLM, EPA 600 METHOD

NON-ASBESTOS COMPONENTS

Non-Fibrous

Client: S&ME 48 Brookfield Oaks Dr, Suite F Greenville, SC 29607

Project: Adambrook, 22690023 phase 03

Fibrous

White Drywall

B31075 15%Heterogeneous

Fibrous Bound

85%Cellulose Gypsum None DetectedLayer 2

White A5

B31076

Heterogeneous

Non-fibrous Bound

2% 83% 15%

Paint Binder Calc Carb

None Detected Layer 1

Joint Compound

White Drywall

B31076 15%Heterogeneous

Fibrous Bound

85%Cellulose Gypsum None DetectedLayer 2

Black B1

B31077

45%Heterogeneous

Fibrous Bound

40% 15%

Fiberglass Tar Gravel

None Detected Layer 1

Asphalt Roof Shingle

Black Felt Paper

B31077 50%Heterogeneous

Fibrous Bound

45% 5%

Fiberglass Tar Gravel

None DetectedLayer 2

Black B2

B31078

45%Heterogeneous

Fibrous Bound

40% 15%

Fiberglass Tar Gravel

None Detected Layer 1

Asphalt Roof Shingle

Black Felt Paper

B31078 50%Heterogeneous

Fibrous Bound

45% 5%

Fiberglass Tar Gravel

None DetectedLayer 2

B3

B31079 Layer 1

Sample Submitted for TEM Analysis

Page 2 of 4730 SE Maynard Road • Cary, NC 27511 • 919.481.1413

Lab Code: B222598 Date Received: 02-03-22 Date Analyzed: 02-07-22 Date Reported: 02-07-22

Client ID Lab ID

Lab Attributes

Lab Description

ASBESTOS

ASBESTOS BULK PLM, EPA 600 METHOD

NON-ASBESTOS COMPONENTS

Non-Fibrous

Client: S&ME 48 Brookfield Oaks Dr, Suite F Greenville, SC 29607

Project: Adambrook, 22690023 phase 03

Fibrous

Sample Submitted for TEM AnalysisB31079

Layer 2

Page 3 of 4730 SE Maynard Road • Cary, NC 27511 • 919.481.1413

LEGEND: Non-Anth = Non-Asbestiform Anthophyllite Non-Trem = Non-Asbestiform Tremolite Calc Carb = Calcium Carbonate

METHOD: EPA 600 / R93 / 116 and EPA 600 / M4-82 / 020

REPORTING LIMIT: <1% by visual estimation

REPORTING LIMIT FOR POINT COUNTS: 0.25% by 400 Points or 0.1% by 1,000 Points

REGULATORY LIMIT: >1% by weight

Due to the limitations of the EPA 600 method, nonfriable organically bound materials (NOBs) such as vinyl floor tiles can be difficult to analyze via polarized light microscopy (PLM). EPA recommends that all NOBs analyzed by PLM, and found not to contain asbestos, be further analyzed by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM). Please note that PLM analysis of dust and soil samples for asbestos is not covered under NVLAP accreditation. Estimated measurement of uncertainty is available on request.

This report relates only to the samples tested or analyzed and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by Eurofins CEI. Eurofins CEI makes no warranty representation regarding the accuracy of client submitted information in preparing and presenting analytical results.

Interpretation of the analytical results is the sole responsibility of the client. Samples were received in acceptable condition unless otherwise noted. This report may not be used by the client to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. Government.

Information provided by customer includes customer sample ID and sample description.

ANALYST: APPROVED BY:

Tianbao Bai, Ph.D., CIH Laboratory Director

Justin Shu

February 9, 2022

S&ME

48 Brookfield Oaks Dr, Suite F Greenville, SC 29607

CLIENT PROJECT: Adambrook, 22690023 Phase 03

LAB CODE: T220346

Dear Customer:

Enclosed are asbestos analysis results for TEM bulk samples received at our laboratory on February 7, 2022. The samples were analyzed for asbestos using transmission electron microscopy (TEM) per Chatfield/EPA 600/R-93/116 Sec. 2.5.5.1 method.

Sample results containing > 1% asbestos are considered asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) per the EPA regulatory requirements. The detection limit for the TEM Chatfield/EPA 600/R-93/116 Sec. 2.5.5.1 method is <1% depending on the processed weight and constituents of the sample.

Thank you for your business and we look forward to continuing good relations.

Tianbao Bai, Ph.D., CIH Laboratory Director

Kind Regards, ASBESTOS ANALYTICAL REPORT

By: Transmission Electron Microscopy

Prepared for

S&ME

CLIENT PROJECT:

LAB CODE:

TEST METHOD: Bulk Chatfield EPA 600 / R93 / 116 Sec. 2.5.5.1

REPORT DATE:

Adambrook, 22690023 Phase 03

02/09/22

T220346

By: TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY

Lab Code: T220346 Date Received: 02-07-22 Date Analyzed: 02-09-22 Date Reported: 02-09-22

Client ID Lab ID

Material Description

TEM BULK CHATFIELD / EPA 600 / R93 / 116 Sec. 2.5.5.1

Client: S&ME 48 Brookfield Oaks Dr, Suite F Greenville, SC 29607

Project: Adambrook, 22690023 Phase 03

Sample Weight

(g)

Organic Material

Acid Soluble Material

Acid Insoluble Material

Asbestos

T36324 B3 Asphalt Shingle 0.445 19.8 44.3 35.9 None

Detected

T36325 B3 Felt Paper 0.365 44.9 46.8 8.3 None

Detected

LEGEND: None

METHOD: CHATFIELD & EPA/600/R-93/116 Sec. 2.5.5.1

LIMIT OF DETECTION: Varies with the weight and constituents of the sample (<1%)

REGULATORY LIMIT: >1% by weight

This report relates only to the samples tested or analyzed and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by Eurofins CEI. Eurofins CEI makes no warranty representation regarding the accuracy of client submitted information in preparing and presenting analytical results.

Interpretation of the analytical results is the sole responsibility of the client. Estimated measurement of uncertainty is available on request. Samples were received in acceptable condition unless otherwise noted.

Information provided by customer includes customer sample ID, location, volume and area as well as date and time of sampling.

Eurofins CEI recommends between 0.500 and 0.200 grams of sample material. Any weight below

0.100 grams is considered below protocol guidelines.

ANALYST: APPROVED BY:

Tianbao Bai, Ph.D., CIH Laboratory Director

Kamila Reichert

Appendix V – Copy of Inspector’s License

S&ME, Inc. | 48 Brookfield Oaks Drive, Suite F | Greenville, SC 29607 | p 864.297-9944 | www.smeinc.com

South Carolina Department of

Health and Environmental Control

Asbestos License

Brian Mulholland

Air Sampler – AS-00074

Building Inspector – BI-00691

Project Designer – PD-00084