NPS-NOIP20AS00080.pdf
PDF 336 KB Posted
- Attached to
- The Digital Documentation of Petroglyphs
- Opportunity number
- P20AS00080
About this file
P20AS00080
View the file
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE: NOTICE OF INTENT TO AWARD
This announcement is not a request for applications.
This announcement is to provide public notice of the National Park Service’s intention to award financial assistance for the following project activities. Refer to Section 2. Grants.gov Posting Determination.
ABSTRACT
Grants.gov Opportunity Number Project Title Recipient Anticipated Federal Funding Non-Federal Cost Share Total Anticipated Award Amount
Award Instrument
Anticipated Period of Performance
Legal Authority
CFDA # and Title
Single Source Justification Criteria
National Park Service Point of Contact
PROJECT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
STATEMENT OF PUBLIC PURPOSE
Section 1. Project Summary
Task Agreement Cooperative Agreement
Grant Agreement
Current as of 10/29/2018
STATEMENT OF WORK SUMMARY
RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE PARTIES
A. The recipient shall be responsible for the following items under this agreement:
B. The NPS Responsibilities:
A task agreement is proposed;
A cooperative agreement is proposed;
therefore substantial involvement by NPS is anticipated during the period of performance of this agreement. In support of this agreement NPS will:
A grant agreement is proposed, therefore no substantial involvement on the part of the NPS is anticipated for the successful completion of the statement of work. It is anticipated that involvement will be limited to actions related to monitoring project performance and technical assistance at the request of the recipient.
Section 3. Single Source Justification
NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
SINGLE SOURCE POLICY REQUIREMENTS
National Park Service Policy FAP&P 1443-2015-06 requires a written justification which explains why competition is not practicable. The justification must address one of the following criteria.
In order for an assistance award to be made without competition, the award must satisfy one or more of the following criteria:
(1) Unsolicited Proposal – The proposed award is the result of an unsolicited assistance application which represents a unique or innovative idea, method, or approach which is not the subject of a current or planned contract or assistance award, but which is deemed advantageous to the program objectives. The unsolicited proposal must demonstrate an innovative capability or concept not currently available to the government, and prepared without Government involvement. ;
(2) Continuation – The activity to be funded is necessary to the satisfactory completion of, or is a continuation of, an activity presently being funded, for which competition would have a significant adverse effect on the continuity or completion of the activity;
(3) Legislative intent – The language in the applicable authorizing legislation or legislative history clearly indicates Congress’ intent to restrict the award to a particular recipient of purpose;
(4) Unique Qualifications – The applicant is uniquely qualified to perform the activity based upon a variety of demonstrable factors such as location, property ownership, voluntary support capacity, technical expertise, or other such unique qualifications. Successful past performance, familiarity with existing requirements, capabilities that can be obtained or matched by a competitor, or a positive reputation, are not considered to be unique qualifications.
(5) Emergencies – Program/award where there is insufficient time available (due to a compelling and unusual urgency, or substantial danger to health or safety) for adequate competitive procedures to be followed.
NPS did not solicit full and open competition for this award based the following criteria:
Task Agreement issued under previously competed or single source master cooperative agreement per Section 2 above. Single Source Justification not applicable.
Continuation
Unique Qualifications
Unsolicited Proposal
Legislative Intent
Explanation of the proposed recipient’s qualifications or the criteria of the proposed project which requires use of the single source criteria cited.
Section 2. Grants.gov Posting Determination
Emergency
The National Park Service intends to award a task agreement under a previously competed or single source justified award.
The National Park Service intends to award a single source justified cooperative agreement. Refer to Section 3 Single Source Justification.
The National Park Service intends to award a single source justified grant agreement. Refer to Section 3 Single Source Justification.
Section 4. Department of the Interior Secretary’s Priorities
This award will support the following DOI Secretary priority(ies):
Other Key Initiatives:
Employment of veterans.
Supporting DOI Infrastructure needs.
Creating jobs in the American economy.
Access to outdoor recreation opportunities.
Priority 1: Creating a conservation stewardship legacy second only to Teddy Roosevelt Utilize science to identify best practices to manage land and water resources and adapt to changes in the environment.
Examine land use planning process and land use designations that govern public use and access.
Revise and streamline the environmental and regulatory review process while maintaining environmental standards.
Review DOI water storage, transportation, and distribution systems to identify opportunities to resolve conflicts and expand capacity.
Foster relationships with conservation organizations advocating for balanced stewardship and use of public lands.
Identify and implement initiatives to expand access to DOI lands for hunting and fishing.
Shift the balance towards providing greater public access to public lands over restrictions to access.
Priority 2: Utilizing our natural resources Ensure American energy is available to meet our security and economic needs.
Ensure access to mineral resources, especially the critical and rare earth minerals.
Refocus timber programs to embrace the entire 'healthy forests' lifecycle.
Manage competition for grazing resources.
Priority 3: Restoring trust with local communities Be a better neighbor with those closest to our resources by improving dialogue and relationships with persons and entities bordering our lands.
Expand the lines of communication with Governors, state natural resource offices, Fish and Wildlife offices, water authorities, county commissioners, Tribes, and local communities.
Priority 4: Ensuring sovereignty means something Support tribal self-determination, self-governance, and sovereignty.
Solidify mutual interests between the U.S. and the freely associated states and territories.
Priority 5: Generating additional revenues to support DOI & National interests Ensure that the public receives the full market value for the natural resources produced on Federal lands.
Ensure that fees or costs levied for DOI services are reasonable and targeted to achieve cost recovery.
Consider the impact of DOI decisions on economic development and job creation.
Priority 6: Protecting our people and the border Actively support efforts to secure our southern border.
Ensure DOI law enforcement staffing addresses public safety risks anticipated on DOI land.
Promote a "public service" demeanor within our law enforcement community.
Priority 7: Striking a regulatory balance
Reduce the administrative and regulatory burden imposed on U.S.
industry and the public.
Ensure that Endangered Species Act decisions are based on strong science and thorough analysis.
Priority 8: Modernizing our infrastructure Support the White House Public/Private Partnership Initiative to modernize U.S. infrastructure.
Remove impediments to infrastructure development and facilitate private sector efforts to construct infrastructure projects serving American needs.
Prioritize DOI infrastructure needs to highlight:
1. Construction of infrastructure;
2. Cyclical maintenance;
3. Deferred maintenance.
Senior executives are expected to provide leadership in achieving goals of the President and the Secretary.
The Management Team is expected to:
1. Ensure cost-effective operations and quality service to the public;
2. Facilitate organizational cooperation and conflict resolution;
3. Ensure the workplace environment is conducive to employee productivity and safety;
4. Hold individuals accountable for actions that violate DOI policies and requirements.
Priority 10: Achieving our goals and leading our team forward
The proposed project does not support any of the DOI Secretary priorities, but the project is being funded for the following reasons:
Priority 9: Reorganizing for the next 100 years
Improve alignment and integration of the DOI organizational structure. Redistribute organizational resources (people and funding) to enhance mission achievement and improved public service.
Improve organizational alignment with Executive Branch counterparts with major land management assets or influence.
| PROJECT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES |
| STATEMENT OF PUBLIC PURPOSE OF SUPPORT OR STIMULATION IN COMPLIANCE WITH LEGAL AUTHORITY |
| PROJECT OVERVIEW |
| Grant: |
| gov number: P20AS00080 |
| Title: The Digital Documentation of Petroglyphs |
| Funding: 61322 |
| Cost share: 0 |
| Total funding: 61322 |
| POP: 07/01/2020 - 11/30/2021 |
| Authority: 54 U.S.C. §101702(b) Cooperative Agreements, Cooperative Research and Training Programs |
| CFDA: 15.945, Cooperative Research and Training |
| SS: Unique Qualifications |
| POC: Kelly Adams, Grants Management Officer |
| Goals: The objective of this Agreement is to work with the Center for Advanced Spatial Technologies (CAST) at the University of Arkansas (UA) to conduct and evaluate the utility of multiple 3D documentation methods on petroglyph panels at archaeological sites within Pecos NHP. The project will assist the park with determining which methods are most appropriate to record petroglyphs as well as facilitate analyses related to condition assessment, cyclical monitoring for change detection, and management planning/tribal consultation related to petroglyph sites. |
| PP: The project benefits the public by documenting and preserving rare archaeological resources- the products of this documentation can be used for visitor education and to help the public understand the importance of these resources so they can help protect them. |
| Overview: See responsibilities of the parties |
| Recipient: University of Arkansas |
| Sub Involv: 1. Provide a list of high priority petroglyph sites for fieldwork/documentation. |
2. Support field work by helping CAST staff locate petroglyph panels and sites to be documented.
3. Work with CAST staff in the field on determining the goals and methods for each petroglyph panel.
| Justification: The University of Arkansas Center for Advanced Spatial Technologies (CAST) is a leader in the research, development, application and education of state of the art 3D and multi-sensor technologies. They have a proven record of applying these technologies to collect and analyze petroglyphs, including integration of the data into GIS formats/platforms. Their unqiue experience working with the kind of cultural resources at PECO and with the existing technology make them an excellent cooperator for this project. Their research team includes specialists with rare experience in the application of multi-sensor technologies for capturing cultural resource data, and with an understanding of the cultural sensitivity of sacred Native American sites. They are also pioneering the use of software to analyze patterns in images that cannot be seen with the naked eye. Their skill in modeling relief at micro scales is unique and especially geared towards this project, which is seeking to identify and document Native American petroglyphs that are eroded and often hard to see. |
| Check Box22: Off |
| Check Box23: Off |
| Check Box24: Yes |
| Check Box25: Off |
| Check Box26: Off |
| Check Box27: Off |
| Check Box29: Off |
| Check Box30: Off |
| Check Box31: Off |
| Check Box32: Off |
| Check Box33: Off |
| Check Box34: Off |
| Check Box35: Off |
| Check Box36: Off |
| Check Box39: Off |
| Check Box40: Off |
| Check Box41: Off |
| Check Box44: Off |
| Check Box45: Off |
| Check Box46: Off |
| Check Box47: Off |
| Check Box48: Off |
| Check Box49: Off |
| Check Box50: Off |
| Check Box51: Off |
| Check Box52: Off |
| Check Box53: Off |
| Check Box54: Off |
| Check Box55: Off |
| Check Box56: Off |
| Check: Choice 2 |
| CheckA: Choice 4 |
| NA: |
| Check Box1: Off |
| Check Box2: Off |
| Check Box3: Off |
| Check Box4: Off |
| Check Box5: Off |
| Responsibilities: 1. Utilize state of the art 3D and multi-sensor technologies to record site locations and feature details of 28-42 at-risk petroglyph elements/panels in the Pecos Unit of Pecos National Historical Park. This approach will increase the amount and utility of data collected using high precision, sub-centimeter resolution, volumetric data collection and analyses. These methods include close-range photogrammetry (CRP), ultra-high-resolution structured light scanning, reflective transformation imaging (RTI), multi and hyperspectral imaging. |
2. Determine which methods are most appropriate for fulfilling the project goals of distinguishing and recording cultural features, facilitating analyses related to data interpretation, relative chronology reconstruction, condition assessment, cyclical monitoring for change detection, inform future long-term management plans, and potential future research.
3. Capture feature data at a resolution, accuracy, and precision appropriate to achieve goals outlined above.
4. Create and execute a workflow that will be replicable by NPS employees in other areas and Parks using a minimal toolkit of cameras and affordable survey grade GNSS equipment.
5. Record equipment and capture metadata for each 3D data capture location.
6. Conduct post processing including:
1. Process CRP data into final point cloud and mesh models
2. Process scan data into final point cloud and mesh models
3. Process RTI data into final products
4. Generate data visualization and transformation products including
i. 3D software tools for curvature, roughness, etc.
ii. 2.5D methods for local relief modeling, skyview factor, rugosity, etc.
iii. 2D image tools to visualize and classify spectral differences.
5. Develop two-dimensional vector drawings of key motifs and panels from three-dimensional models for use in 2D reporting and interpretive materials as well as inclusion in ESRI ArcGIS Pro project
6. Prepare field work documentation
7. Prepare data summary report
8. Prepare data for archiving
7. Hire at least one Native American student or assistant to work on project.
B. Deliverables include:
1. Project abstract suitable for public distribution in Microsoft Word (.docx) and Adobe Reader (.pdf) compatible format.
2. Draft and professional quality final report on the results of all field data processing operations conducted in association with tasks of this agreement. The final report shall consist of one unbound original hardcopy, one bound copy, and one electronic version in .pdf format containing, at a minimum, the following sections:
a. Executive summary describing the cooperator, staff working on the project, time frames, logistics, and reasons for and overall results of the agreement.
b. Illustrated description of the work performed at the sites including overview maps of the sites, photographs of field work in progress and visualizations of captured field data.
c. Documentation and data management strategies for field work and processing.
d. Methods and results of data processing and analyses.
3. Two hard copies and an electronic .pdf of the final report and the abstract will be provided to the NPS GCCESU Research Coordinator.
4. Digital data model files.
a. Scan point cloud data in its native Breuckmann and .ply or .obj export formats
b. CRP models in the processing software project file and non-proprietary export formats.
c. Source photographs for CRP models organized into directories for each model
d. ESRI ArcGIS Pro project of all geospatial data:
i. geodetic and local control points, raw and post-processed
ii. plan format spatial data derived from three-dimensional data
iii. spatial data used for project planning, implementation or processing
iv. any other spatial data files
5. Visualization products with descriptions, metadata and releases, if necessary.
6. Copies of all field notes, forms, maps, photographs, GNSS and other documentation generated during field and processing work
File details come from the government source that posted it.