36C77624R0021 0001.pdf

PDF 129 KB Posted

Attached to
Request for SF-330's Expand Cancer Research Building 42
Solicitation number
36C77624R0021
Issued by

About this file

This document is a request for Standard Form 330 qualification packages for architect-engineer services related to expanding the Cancer Research Building 42 at the Durham VA Medical Center in Durham, North Carolina. The Veterans Health Administration Program Contracting Activity Central is seeking submissions to award a firm-fixed price design contract. The selected architect-engineer firm will be responsible for site visits, studies, and preparing drawings, specifications, and cost estimates to facilitate adding two additional floors totaling 20,000 square feet to the existing four-story building to expand its cancer treatment capabilities. One floor will be for chemical infusion and one for exam rooms. The contract will be awarded in accordance with the Selection of Architects and Engineers Statute, the Federal Acquisition Regulation, and the VA Acquisition Regulation for architect-engineer services. Construction contracts will not be awarded to the designing firm or its affiliates per the FAR.

View the file

Other files

Show all 11

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

5. PROJECT NUMBER (if applicable)

CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER

CODE

6. ISSUED BY

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

9B. DATED

PAGE OF PAGES

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER

10B. DATED

BPA NO. 1. CONTRACT ID CODE

FACILITY CODE CODE

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers

E. IMPORTANT:

is extended,

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning __________ copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR

ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY is not extended.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

(REV. 11/2016)

is required to sign this document and return ___________ copies to the issuing office. is not, A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

15C. DATE SIGNED

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES

SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER

Contractor

16C. DATE SIGNED

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

STANDARD FORM 30 PREVIOUS EDITION NOT USABLE

Prescribed by GSA - FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

(Type or print) (Type or print)

(Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

(Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code)

(If other than Item 6)

(Specify type of modification and authority)

(such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.)

(If required)

(SEE ITEM 11)

(SEE ITEM 13)

(X)

CHECK

ONE

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS,

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

(Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer)

1 3

558-324 Expand Cance

36C776

Department of Veterans Affairs

Program Contracting Activity Central

6100 Oak Tree Blvd, Suite 490

Independence OH 44131

36C776

Department of Veterans Affairs

Program Contracting Activity Central

6100 Oak Tree Blvd, Suite 490

Independence OH 44131

To all Offerors/Bidders

36C77624R0021

03-01-2024

X

X X

March 11th, 2024 at 12:00 PM EST

X 1

The purpose of this amendment is to provide answers to technical questions received within the declared time period, this amendment also extends the due date for the Phase I SF-330's.

Please see the attached memo for details.

Jennifer Salerno-Diciuccio

Contracting Officer

VA-VHA-RPOC-2022-314273

Department of MEMORANDUM

Veterans Affairs

Date: March 1, 2024

From: Contracting Officer

To: All Potential Offerors for Solicitation 36C77624R0021

Subject: Answers to Questions Asked to Clarify Solicitation — 36C77624R0021

Expand Cancer Research Building 42 for Durham VA Medical Center (VAMC) at Durham, NC

Purpose: The Veterans Health Administration (VHA), Program Contracting Activity Central (PCAC) is issuing this amendment to answer questions asked by offerors for all potential offerors to witness for the solicitation issued on the project to Expand Cancer Research Building 42 at the VAMC in Durham, NC.

This memorandum will be structured in a question-answer format.

Q. The cover page states the response date is 12:00pm EST March 1, 2024, but on page 9 highlighted in yellow the response date is 12:00pm EST on March 8, 2024. Please clarify which date is the correct date?

A. Due to the late return of answers to technical questions received the Phase I SF-330 due date is now March 11th, 2024 at 12:00 PM EST as stated in this amendment.

Q. While the RFP states that the “building was originally designed to be completed as a 4-story building” it does not address whether the first floor was designed to support future stories which would trigger the requirement to resist progressive collapse, as required by the PSRDM. Adding a second story does not trigger progressive collapse avoidance criteria but adding a third story, as requested by the RFP, would trigger a need to comply with progressive collapse avoidance. If the base building was not constructed to resist progressive collapse of these future stories, significant structural modifications will be required on Level 1, possibly including subgrade foundations?

A. The structural engineer was able to evaluate our structural set and determined that the original engineer did not cite specific progressive collapse criteria as that type of analysis was rare for

2014-2015. We feel confident that a progressive analysis was not done for any additional story as it was not required at the time of the initial contract in 2014. However, the statement that

“significant structural modifications will be required on Level 1, possibly including subgrade foundations” is not necessarily true. We would recommend a progressive collapse analysis of the building be done.

Q. On page 9 of 10, Section 6. SUBMISSION CRITERIA/REQUIREMENTS, bullet 11, you state: "All

Joint Ventures must be CVE verified at time of SF330 and Oral Presentation...." Does this imply that the SDVOSB Firm is required or expected to be in a Joint Venture with the Architect-

Engineer Firm? As an alternative, will it be allowable for the SDVOSB Firm to use a Strategic

Partnership Agreement or a Sub-Contract Agreement with the Architecture - Engineer Firm?

A. If the submission is made as a Joint Venture then one firm must be SDVOSB certified and the JV itself must be CVE verified.

Summary: The above questions were asked by prospective offerors and after consulting with the assigned COR and the provided documents the provided answers were obtained during the allotted time period for technical questions. A record of the e-mails have been kept and filed into the project briefcase.

Jennifer Salerno-Diciuccio

Contracting Officer

VHA-PCAC

Prepared by Contract Specialist, Joshua Slapnicker

End of Document

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .