Attachment 4 - Past Performance Questionnaire - West Haven EHRM.docx
DOCX document 104 KB Posted
- Attached to
- EHRM Infrastructure Upgrades - West Haven Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 36C77622R0150
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire template for a federal contractor to provide to past clients as references for an upcoming EHRM infrastructure upgrades project opportunity with the Department of Veterans Affairs Technology Acquisition Center Austin. The template collects information about the contractor and past project, and includes questions for references to rate the contractor's performance on quality, schedule, communication, management, cost control, subcontract management, and an overall rating. References are asked if they would work with the contractor again. The related opportunity notice indicates the project is for EHRM infrastructure upgrades in West Haven, Connecticut, with responses due as listed in the pre-solicitation notice.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| AE Design SOW - EHRM Infrastructure Upgrades 01262023.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C77622R0150 0003.pdf | ||
| 36C77622R0150 0002.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 5 - Design Alerts 1-9.pdf | ||
| SOW EHRM Infrastructure Upgrades - West Haven 1.10.23.pdf | ||
| 36C77622R0150 0001.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 2 - PG 18-15 A-E Submission Reqs Vol C - EHRM.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 1 - SOW EHRM West Haven rev.12.23.22.pdf | ||
| Attachment 3 - Telecom Spaces.pdf | ||
| 36C77622R0150 - Request for SF330s.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
VA PROGRAM CONTRACTING ACTIVITY CENTRAL ● 6100 OAK TREE BLVD SUITE 490 ● INDEPENDENCE, OH 44131
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)
*PPQs should be provided back to the requestor to incorporate into their proposal, all PPQs should be included in the proposal submission by the offeror and it will not count towards the page limitation listed in the Request for SF 330’s pre-solicitation notice.
SECTION 1
CONTRACT INFORMATION – Contractor to complete #1-3
1. CONTRACTOR INFORMATION
NAME OF OFFEROR BEING EVALUATED: Click or tap here to enter text.
ADDRESS: Click or tap here to enter text.
POINT OF CONTACT: Click or tap here to enter text.
CONTACT PHONE NUMBER: Click or tap here to enter text.
CONTACT EMAIL ADDRESS: Click or tap here to enter text.
WORK PERFOMED AS: Click or tap here to enter text.
PERCENT OF PROJECT WORK PERFORMED: Click or tap here to enter text.
IF SUBCONTRACTOR, WHO WAS THE PRIME? Click or tap here to enter text.
2. CONTRACT INFORMATION
CONTRACT TITLE: Click or tap here to enter text.
CONTRACT NUMBER AND DO/TO NUMBER: Click or tap here to enter text.
CONTRACT TYPE: Choose an item.
if other:
CONTRACT LOCATION: Click or tap here to enter text.
AWARD DATE: Click or tap to enter a date.
ORIGINAL CONTRACT ACCCEPTANCE (construction accepted) Date: Click or tap to enter a date.
ACTUAL CONTRACT ACCEPTANCE: Click or tap to enter a date.
EXPLAIN DIFFERENCES: Click or tap here to enter text.
ORIGINAL IMPLEMENTATION PRICE: Click or tap here to enter text.
ORIGINAL CONTRACT PRICE (all costs - design/installation/financing): Click or tap here to enter text.
FINAL CONTRACT PRICE (including modifications, if applicable): Click or tap here to enter text.
EXPLAIN DIFFERENCES: Click or tap here to enter text.
3. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
SCOPE INCLUDED IN PROJECT: Click or tap here to enter text.
HOW IS THIS PROJECT RELEVANT TO PROJECT OF SUBMISSION? Click or tap here to enter text.
SECTION 2
EVALUATOR INFORMATION – Client to complete
Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Program Contracting Activity Central (PCAC) is considering the Offeror identified above for award of a project.
Your comments would be appreciated regarding this firm’s past performance. The intent of this form is to evaluate the company’s ability to perform the work as described in the solicitation.
Please verify the information in Section 1 is accurate and complete the enclosed questionnaire as thoroughly as possible. In addition to submitting this questionnaire, VHA-PCAC may contact you in order to obtain any additional information regarding a contract award.
Please email your completed questionnaire back to the firm requesting prior to the date listed in the Request for SF 330’s/Pre-solicitation Notice as they will need these completed documents to incorporate into their submission.
*Submissions made after this date and time will not be accepted or evaluated.
EVALUATOR INFORMATION
NAME OF EVALUATOR: Click or tap here to enter text.
POSITION: Click or tap here to enter text.
ADDRESS: Click or tap here to enter text.
PHONE: Click or tap here to enter text.
EMAIL: Click or tap here to enter text.
DESCRIBE YOUR ROLE IN THE PROJECT: Click or tap here to enter text.
*Please see Page 4 for Adjectival Ratings for the following:
1. QUALITY
| Ability to meet quality design and/or construction standards specified for technical performance |
| Choose an item. |
| Comments: |
2. SCHEDULE/ TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE
| Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including timely submission of data deliverables (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below.) |
| Choose an item. |
| Comments: |
3. COMMUNICATION
| Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with client staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/ disputes; and responsiveness to client requests) |
| Choose an item. |
| Comments: |
4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/ LABOR
| Effectiveness of management, including suppliers, materials, and/or labor force (including the ability to effectively lead, manage, and control the project) |
| Choose an item. |
| Continuity in the contractor’s personnel during execution of the contract (e.g., one person or team that stayed with the project throughout the contract) |
| Choose an item. |
| Comments: |
5. COST/ FINANCIAL MANGEMENT
| Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price? |
| Choose an item. |
| Comments: |
6. SUBCONTRACT MANAGEMENT
Ability to manage subcontracting effort including any subcontracting issues, and the contractor’s ability to resolve the problems without extensive customer guidance.
Choose an item.
Comments:
7. SUMMARY
| Would you hire or work with this firm again? If no, please explain below. |
| Choose an item. |
| Provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor. |
| Choose an item. |
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
| EVALUATOR SIGNATURE: |
| DATE: |
ADJECTIVAL RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE
*THIS PAGE WILL BE REMOVED FOR EVALUATION PURPOSES AND NOT BE COUNTED TOWARD THE PROPOSAL PAGE COUNT – IT IS FOR PPQ COMPLETION PURPOSES ONLY*
| Rating |
| Definition |
| Outstanding |
| The Offeror’s performance met contractual requirements and exceeded many requirements to the Client’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Offeror were highly effective |
| Above Average |
| The Offeror’s performance met contractual requirements and exceeded some requirements to the Client’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Offeror were effective. |
| Satisfactory |
| The Offeror’s performance met contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Offeror were satisfactory. |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Performance did not meet contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflected a serious problem for which the Offeror has yet to identify corrective actions or the Offeror’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| Not Applicable |
| No information or did not apply to your contract. |
image1.tiff
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .