A-E Past Performance Questionnaire (3 Pages).pdf
PDF 221 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 36C26324R0045
About this file
This document is a presolicitation notice for an indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity contract to provide architectural and engineering services to the Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Health Administration Veterans Integrated Service Network 23. The contract will have a five-year base period and five-year ordering period, with a minimum order guarantee of $2,000 and maximum order limitation of $15 million per contract. The solicitation is set aside 100% for service-disabled veteran-owned small businesses. Interested firms must submit a Standard Form 330 by April 2, 2024. Firms will be evaluated based on professional qualifications, specialized experience, capacity, experience in construction period services, past performance, and geographic proximity. The top twenty-five highest rated firms will be invited for interviews. Approximately twenty contracts will be awarded to the most highly qualified firms.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
1 of 3 Pages
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
AE MATOC IDIQ VISN 23
INSTRUCTIONS TO CONTRACTOR
Complete the CONTRACTOR INFORMATION section, below (type answers into light blue shaded boxes). Save the document. Send an electronic or hard copy print of the form to each of your reference contacts, asking them to please complete the form and submit it according to the instructions, below.
INSTRUCTIONS TO REFERENCE CONTACT
The contractor named below is submitting an offer for a United States Department of Veterans
Affairs contract requirement, and has sent this form to you, in your role as a past performance reference contact. Please complete this form in full (all areas shaded in light yellow, below).
Once completed, please send the form directly to the Contracting Officer via email at eric.reis@va.gov.
GENERAL INFORMATION [completed by Contractor]
Contractor Company Name Street Address
Contractor Point of Contact
Name City
Point of Contact Phone
Number State
Reference Project Title Zip Code
Contract Period of
Performance (start to finish): Email
Contract Number
Contract Dollar
Value
Description of Work
Role of Contractor on This
Project (check appropriate box) ☐ Prime Contractor ☐ Sub-contractor ☐ Key Personnel
2 of 3 Pages
RESPONDENT INFORMATION [completed by Reference Contact]
Company Name Street Address
POC Name City
Phone Number State
Fax Number Zip Code
PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the number on the scale of 1 to 5 that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE
EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF 1 OR 2 in the Remarks section, below (text box will expand to whatever extent is necessary).
1 2 3 4 5
UNSATISFACTORY MARGINAL SATISFACTORY VERY GOOD EXCEPTIONAL
Performance did not meet most contractual requirements. There were serious problems and the contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.
Performance did not meet some contractual requirements.
There were problems, some of a serious nature, for which corrective action was only marginally effective.
Performance met contractual requirements. There were some minor problems and corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded some to the government’s benefit. There were a few minor problems, which the contractor resolved in a timely, effective manner.
Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded many to the government’s benefit. Problems, if any, were negligible and were resolved in a timely, highly effective manner.
The Contractor … 1 2 3 4 5
1. Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.
2. Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.
3. Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements.
4. Home office participated in solving significant local problems. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
5. Followed approved quality control plan. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
6. Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.
7. Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.
8. Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
9. Identified problems as they occurred. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
10. Suggested alternative approaches to problems. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
3 of 3 Pages
11. Displayed initiative to solve problems. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
12. Developed realistic progress schedules. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
13. Met established project schedules. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
14. Provided timely resolution of warranty defects. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
15. Was responsive to contract changes. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
16. Provided adequate project supervision. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
17. Obtained consent of surety for increases in bonding as work-in-progress increased. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
18. Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
19. Provided accurate and complete line item cost proposals including all aspects of work required for each task.
20. Cooperated with Government personnel after award. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
21. How would you rate the contractor's overall performance? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
22. Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.”
YES
NO
23 Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, please explain in
“remarks.”
YES
NO
24 To the best of your knowledge, is the contractor rated in CPARS? ☐
YES
NO
REMARKS (Please use as much space as is needed – the box will expand as you type).
Name of Person Completing Form Signature
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .