QA.pdf
PDF 75 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 36C26321Q0102
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 36C26321Q0102 A0001.pdf | ||
| Attachments A - C - Template for Vendors UPDATED.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 36C26321Q0102 A0001_1.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment E MFG_Waste_Evaluation_Form.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C26321Q0102.pdf | ||
| Attachments A - C - Template for Vendors.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 36C26321Q0102_1.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Q&A
VENDOR QUESTION VA RESPONSE
Does the required back-up analyzer need to be a mirror image/identical instrument to the primary instrument?
No, they do not need to be mirror images.
The VA Twin Ports is not listed on the RFP but was on the previous RFP for VISN 23. Will they require an analyzer? If yes, could you please include test volumes?
No, they will not require an analyzer.
There are significantly lower test volumes on the current solicitation versus the volumes on the
2015 RFP.
Thank you for asking this question. We discovered some quantity errors were made and needed line items were also missed. Please see the new schedule attached. This schedule replaces the schedule in section B.2.
Can you please tell me if the $1.3M ceiling is for the entire 5 year period (Base + 4 option years) or if it is a ceiling for each year?
Lifetime of this contract. Per a previous question regarding test volumes mistakes were found in annual quantity estimates. Due to those corrections the ceiling is raised to $4 million over the lifetime of this contract.
Are the test volumes provided in the current solicitation based on the most recent year’s usage which has been impacted by Covid?
The new test volumes do not consider the most recent years usage due to the impact of COVID.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .