36C26319R0128 QASP Neurology 10-14-19.docx

DOCX document Posted

Attached to
3. 0 FTE Neurologist Physician for SFVAHCS
Solicitation number
36C26319R0128
Issued by

About this file

36C26319R0128 QASP Neurology 10-14-19.docx

View the file

Other files

Show all 23

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

The contractor will be evaluated in accordance with the following:

1. PURPOSE

This Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) provides a systematic method to evaluate performance for the stated contract. This QASP explains the following:

· What will be monitored?

· How monitoring will take place.

· Who will conduct the monitoring?

· How monitoring efforts and results will be documented.

This QASP does not detail how the contractor accomplishes the work. Rather, the QASP is created with the premise that the contractor is responsible for management and quality control actions to meet the terms of the contract. It is the Government’s responsibility to be objective, fair, and consistent in evaluating performance.

This QASP is a “living document” and the Government may review and revise it on a regular basis. However, the Government shall coordinate changes with the contractor through contract modification. Copies of the original QASP and revisions shall be provided to the contractor and Government officials implementing surveillance activities.

2. GOVERNMENT ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES. The following personnel shall oversee and coordinate surveillance activities.

a. Contracting Officer (CO) – The CO shall ensure performance of all necessary actions for effective contracting, ensure compliance with the contract terms, and shall safeguard the interests of the United States in the contractual relationship. The CO shall also assure that the contractor receives impartial, fair, and equitable treatment under this contract. The CO is ultimately responsible for the final determination of the adequacy of the contractor’s performance.

Assigned CO: Sandra McAnany, sandra.mcanany@va.gov Organization or Agency: NCO 23 Contracting

b. Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) – The COR is responsible for technical administration of the contract and shall assure proper Government surveillance of the contractor’s performance. The COR shall keep a quality assurance file. The COR is not empowered to make any contractual commitments or to authorize any contractual changes on the Government’s behalf.

Assigned COR: Jason Vollmer, jason.vollmer@va.gov Organization or Agency: Sioux Falls VA Health Care Systems

3. CONTRACTOR REPRESENTATIVES. The following employee(s) of the contractor serve as the contractor’s program manager(s) for this contract.’

Primary:

Alternate:

Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP)

Page of V 0003 Revised 3/1/2018

4. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS. The contractor is responsible for performance of ALL terms and conditions of the contract. CORs will provide contract progress reports quarterly to the CO reflecting performance on this plan and all other aspects of the resultant contract. The performance standards outlined in this QASP shall be used to determine the level of contractor performance in the elements defined. Performance standards define desired services. The Government performs surveillance to determine the level of Contractor performance to these standards.

The Performance Requirements are listed below in Section 6. The Government shall use these standards to determine contractor performance and shall compare contractor performance to the standard and assign a rating. At the end of the performance period, these ratings will be used, in part, to establish the past performance of the contractor on the contract.

5. METHODS OF QA SURVEILLANCE. Various methods exist to monitor performance. The COR shall use the surveillance methods listed below in the administration of this QASP.

a. DIRECT OBSERVATION. SFVAHCS staff will have random direct observation to assist with evaluating reviews on the contractor.

b. PERIODIC INSPECTION. Inspections scheduled and reported quarterly per COR delegation or as needed. Ten (10) randomly selected patient files will be reviewed per inspection period. All inspections and reports will be conducted in compliance with VA Privacy and Information security standards.

c. VALIDATED USER/CUSTOMER COMPLAINTS. Data will be collected from actual patient complaints. Complaints will be investigated and verified.

d. RANDOM SAMPLING. Ten (10) randomly selected patient files will be reviewed per quarter. All reviews and reports will be conducted in compliance with VA Privacy and Information security standards.)

e. Verification and/or documentation provided by Contractor. Contractor provided information on services provided to patients.

6. QASP PERFORMANCE REPORT DATE:

Measures

PWS

Reference

Performance Requirement

Standard Acceptable Quality Level

Surveillance Method

MET / NOT MET

Provider Quality Performance
4.5.3.1
OPPE Documentation
OPPE documentation for all (100%) staff providing services under the contract. All staff (100%) meets Standards.
Meets 95% standards
Ongoing Provider Performance Evaluation (OPPE) data pertinent to care performed for each

provider working under the contract.

Board Certification
4.5.3.2
All Contractor’s physician(s) shall be Board Certified in accordance with American Board of Internal Medicine’s Neurology Standards.
All (100%) Contractor’s physician(s)are Board Certified.
100% Board Certification
Random inspection of qualification documents.
Scope of Practice / Privileging
4.5.3.3.
Contractor’s physician(s) and midlevel provider perform within their individual scopes of practice/privileging.
All (100%) Contractor’s physician(s) and midlevel provider perform within their scope of practice/privileges 100% of the time.
100% Contractor’s physician(s) and midlevel provider perform within their scope of practice/privileges 100% of the time.
Random Inspection of records.
Patient Access
4.5.3.4.
The Contractor shall provide Contractor’s physician(s) and midlevel provider in accordance with the operating hours and VA

clinical schedule outlined in this PWS.

All (100%) Contractor’s physician(s) and midlevel provider are on time and available to perform services.
Contractor’s physician(s) and midlevel provider is on-time and available to perform services 95% of the time
Periodic Sampling of Time and Attendance Sheets
Patient Safety
4.5.3.5.
Patient safety incidents shall be reported using Patient Safety Report. All incidents reported immediately (within 24 hours.)
All (100%) of patient safety incidents are reported using Patient Safety Report within 24 hours of incident.
100% of patient safety incidents are reported using Patient Safety

Report within 24 hours of incident, Periodic Sampling and Random Sampling

Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP)

Page of V 0003 Revised 3/1/2018

Maintains
4.5.3.6.
Updated Licensing,
All (100%) licensing,
Licensing,
Periodic Sampling and

licensing,

registration and certification
registration(s) and
registration(s) and
Random Sampling

registration, and

shall be provided as they are
certification(s) for
certification(s) for

certification

renewed. Licensing and
Contractor’s
Contractor’s
registration information kept
physician(s) shall be
physician(s) shall
current.
provided as they are
be provided as they
renewed. Licensing and
are renewed.
registration
Licensing and
information kept
registration
current.
information kept

current, 100% of the time.

Mandatory
4.5.3.7.
Contractor shall complete all
All (100%) of required training is
95% completion
Periodic Sampling

Training

required training on time per
complete on time by
VAMC policy.
Contractor’s

physician(s) and midlevel providers.

Privacy,
4.5.3.8.
Contractor shall complete all
All (100%) of Contractor’s
100% compliance
Periodic Sampling;

Confidentiality and

required training on time per
physician(s) and midlevel providers comply

HIPAA

VAMC policy and procedures
with all laws,
relating to Privacy,
regulations, policies
Confidentiality and HIPAA.
and procedures

relating to Privacy, Confidentiality and

HIPAA

7. CPAR RATINGS ASSIGNED TO QASP ITEMS. Metrics and methods are designed to determine rating for a given standard and acceptable quality level. The following ratings shall be used (Reference: CPARS User Manual https://www.cpars.gov/pdfs/CPARS-Guidance.pdf p. A2-1):

EXCEPTIONAL
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub- element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
VERY GOOD
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub- element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
SATISFACTORY
Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
MARGINAL
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
UNSATISFACTORY
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub- element being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Page of version 0005 Dated 12/1/2016

8. DOCUMENTING PERFORMANCE

a. The Government shall document positive and/or negative performance. Any report may become a part of the supporting documentation for any contractual action and preparing annual past performance using CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT (CPAR).

b. If contractor performance does not meet the Acceptable Quality level, the CO shall inform the contractor. This will normally be in writing unless circumstances necessitate verbal communication. In any case the CO shall document the discussion and place it in the contract file. When the COR and the CO determines formal written communication is required, the COR shall prepare a Contract Report (CR), and present it to CO. The CO will in turn review and will present to the contractor's program manager for corrective action.

c. The contractor shall acknowledge receipt of the CR in writing. The CR will specify if the contractor is required to prepare a corrective action plan to document how the contractor shall correct the unacceptable performance and avoid a recurrence. The CR will also state how long after receipt the contractor has to present this corrective action plan to the CO. The Government shall review the contractor's corrective action plan to determine acceptability. The CO shall also assure that the contractor receives impartial, fair, and equitable treatment. The CO is ultimately responsible for the final determination of the adequacy of the contractor’s performance and the acceptability of the Contractor’s corrective action plan.

d. Any CRs may become a part of the supporting documentation for any contractual action deemed necessary by the CO. See Sample CR on the following page.

9. COR AND CONTRACTOR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF QASP

COR Signature Date

Contractor Signature Date

Page of version 0005 Dated 12/1/2016

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .