36C26318R0695-004.pdf
PDF 111 KB Posted
- Attached to
- STC - 2. 0FTE Internal Medicine Physician Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 36C26318R0695
About this file
36C26318R0695 D.3 - Attachment 3 - QASP.pdf
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 36C26318R0695-0001000.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C26318R0695-006.pdf | ||
| 36C26318R0695-001.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C26318R0695-005.pdf | ||
| 36C26318R0695-003.pdf | ||
| 36C26318R0695-008.pdf | ||
| 36C26318R0695-002.pdf | ||
| 36C26318R0695-007.pdf | ||
| 36C26318R0695-000.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM (QASP)
FOR HEALTH CARE RESOURCES (HCR)
Date: June 25, 2018 From: Service Chief, Primary & Specialty Medicine Service Line Subj: Quality Assurance Surveillance Program for Primary Care Services To: Network Contracting Office (NCO)
Thru: Medical Center Chief of Staff Medical Center Director VISN Network Director
1. This QASP adheres to the same quality standards and bench marks as set forth for St. Cloud VA Health Care System staff.
2. Contracted staff will be held to these same performance standards.
Ongoing Professional Practice Evaluation (OPPE) OPPE Dates: FY 2018
Provider:
Service: PSM
Designated Women's Health Provider:
No/Yes
MEASURE
Sample/Data
Source Target QTR 1 QTR
2 QTR 3 QTR
ADMINISTRATIVE
Panel Size PCMM Coord NA Encounters Face-to-Face PCMM Coord NA Number of ACE Exams PCMM Coord NA
PATIENT CARE AND PROCEDURAL SKILLS
Source Target QTR 1 QTR
2 QTR 3 QTR
Medical Records: % of Progress notes signed w/in 7 days
PSM Quality Coord 95%
Encounter Closure: % of encounters closed w/in 7 days
PCMM
Coordinator 99%
3rd Next available: Avg 3rd next available date per quarter PCMM Coord NA
C&P: Inadequate exams returned from VBA (adjusted total)
PSM Quality Coord/C&P Clerks
≤2%
Procedures (# cases reviewed)
Coord NA
Colposcopies
Endometrial Biopsies
IUD Insertions
IUD Removal
Procedures: Complication Rate
Coord < 1%
Informed consent completed
Coord
90%
Participation in time out
Correct site surgery marking or Provider remains with patient from consent to procedure performed
Coord 90%
Blood Transfusions (# of episodes)
Blood Utilization: Complication Rate
Coord 0%
Pre-transfusion labs
Appropriate indication documented
Transfusion order present
Informed consent completed
Reassignments: Total # of Primary Care Provider Reassignment Requests
# of Pt Neg Reassign Requests/ # of Neg Reassign Req Approved
# of Provider Reassign. Requests
# of Other Reassign. Requests (distance, different gender, saw PCP in Community, etc.)
MEDICAL KNOWLEDGE
Source Target QTR 1 QTR
2 QTR 3 QTR
DM BP<140/90
Clin Rem Rpt by Stop Code 77%
DM FOOT EXAM
Stop Code 90%
HGB A1C >/= 9
Stop Code ≤ 19%
HTN BP<140/90 Ages 18-59
Stop Code 80%
HTN BP<150/90 Ages 60-85
Stop Code 80%
% of + Alcohol screens completed within 14 days
Coord 80%
% of + Depression screens completed within 24 hours
% of + PTSD screens completed within 24 hours
Evidence of chief complaint or reason for evaluation
Clinical Pertinence Review by Peer
Evidence of examination appropriate to chief complaint
Clinical Pertinence
Impression/diagnosis accurate
Clinical Pertinence
Evidence plan is appropriate
Clinical Pertinence
Evidence that evaluation addressed reason for visit
Clinical Pertinence
Appropriate orders and consults were placed as described in the plan
Clinical Pertinence Review by Peer
90% Started Q2-18
Documentation patient was notified of test results within 7 calendar days of available for actionable tests
Clinical Pertinence
Documentation patient was notified of test results within 14 calendar days of available for non-actionable tests
Clinical Pertinence
Med list reconciled/updated and documented in the medical record
ECG Overeader / Do you agree with the Interpretation (MD/DO Only)
Clinical Review by Peer 90%
CERVICAL CYTOLOGY MONITORS
(WH Providers only)
Sample/Data Source Target QTR 1 QTR
2 QTR 3 QTR
Appropriate recommendation for follow-up of abnormal cervical cytology according to ASCCP criteria.
PSM Quality
100%
Unsatisfactory Pap Obtained
Coord ≤ 1
PRACTICE-BASED LEARNING AND
IMPROVEMENT
Sample/Data Source Target QTR 1 QTR
2 QTR 3 QTR
Med Staff Meeting attendance (For Full Time MD/ DO only)
COS Admin Asst. 50%
Clinical Pertinence Reviews: # completed / # given
PSM Admin Staff NA
% of Clinical Pertinence Reviews returned within 30 days of being sent to staff
PSM Admin Staff/ PSM QC 90%
INTERPERSONAL AND COMMUNICATION
SKILLS
Sample/Data Source Target QTR 1 QTR
2 QTR 3 QTR
Patient complaints
Report of Contact, Communications to Pt Advocate Office, Survey Comments, PSM
Administration, or COS office
≤ 3 complaints in a quarter
Colleague or other staff complaints
PSM
Administration, or COS office
≤ 3 complaints in a quarter
Patient compliments
Report of Contact, Comm to Pt Advocate Office, Survey Comments, PSM Admin COS office
NA
Colleague or other staff compliments
PSM
Administration, or COS office
NA
PROFESSIONALISM
Source Target QTR 1 QTR
2 QTR 3 QTR
Validated disruptive or unprofessional behavior with patients
PSM SLD or PSM Nurse Administrator
Validated disruptive or unprofessional behavior with staff
PSM SLD or PSM Nurse Administrator
SYSTEMS-BASED PRACTICE
Source Target QTR 1 QTR
2 QTR 3 QTR
Interfacility Transfers % have the consulting MD co-sign note when Inter-Facility Transfer Form 10-2649Ais completed by a non-MD
PSM Quality
Intra-facility Transfers Provider to provider verbal hand-off communication
Acceptance of patient documentation
C&P QUALITY REVIEW
Source Target QTR 1 QTR
2 QTR 3 QTR
Does the report address the exam/DBQ worksheet criteria for the condition(s) at issue?
Clinical Pertinence
Does the examiner reconcile/explain any internal discrepancies, inconsistencies or contradictions?
Clinical Pertinence
Does the report provide a precise diagnosis or explain why a precise diagnosis was not provided for each condition at issue?
Clinical Pertinence
If there is a change in the diagnosis of a service connected condition, did the examiner provide an explanation or rationale for the change?
Clinical Pertinence
If the examiner documented the presence of a noted or suspicious condition requiring immediate medical care or further evaluation, was there documentation that the Veteran/Service Member was notified?
Clinical Pertinence
If a medical opinion was requested, was the claim file, VBMS, and/or Virtual VA were reviewed in conjunction with any other records?
Clinical Pertinence
If a medical opinion was requested, was the requested medical opinion provided?
Clinical Pertinence
If a medical opinion was requested, was a rationale provided for the requested medical opinion?
Clinical Pertinence
Note: All provider profile measures/data are customized to reflect provider-specific practice and are defined at the time of credentialing and privileging.
File details come from the government source that posted it.