36C26318R0047-002.pdf
PDF 52 KB Posted
- Attached to
- NCO 23 AE MATOC IDIQ (NE/SD) CLH Architects
- Solicitation number
- 36C26318R0047
About this file
36C26318R0047 S02_ATCH_PPQ for VISN 23 AE IDIQ.pdf
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 36C26319D0060-000.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C26319D0059-000.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C26319D0058-000.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C26319D0057-000.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C26319D0056-000.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C26318R0047-003.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C26318R0047-001.pdf | ||
| 36C26318R0047-000.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
December 6, 2017 Page 1 of 3
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Respondent Information
(The AE firm is to send this PPQ to their references identified under Part 1 IF A CPARS IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR THAT CONTRACT. Once completed, FORWARD pages 1 - 3 to the Contracting Officer – kenneth.spohn@va.gov)
Name of A-E Firm being rated:
Choose the number on the scale of 1 to 5 that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance. PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF 1 OR 2.
Evaluation Areas: Please circle a number or indicate “not applicable” (N/A).
1. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:
A Customer would have no reservations in awarding another contract to the Contractor.
1 2 3 4 5 N/A
2. QUALITY:
A Contractor provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet the contract requirements
1 2 3 4 5 N/A
B Contractor provided well researched and clearly identified submittals that matched contract requirements
1 2 3 4 5 N/A
C Contractor completed all work with good workmanship and in conformance with the specifications
1 2 3 4 5 N/A
D Contractor corrected deficiencies in a timely manner and pursuant to their quality control plan
1 2 3 4 5 N/A
3. TIMELINESS:
A Contractor met established project schedules to complete the project on time 1 2 3 4 5 N/A
B Contractor provided timely cost proposals 1 2 3 4 5 N/A C Contractor submitted the progress schedule and progress reports as required 1 2 3 4 5 N/A
D Contractor provided on time submittals as required 1 2 3 4 5 N/A E Contractor provided payrolls for both their employees and their subcontractors employees as required
1 2 3 4 5 N/A
F Contractor provided timely resolution of all punch list items
1 2 3 4 5 N/A
4. RESPONSIVENESS
A Contractor acted promptly to resolve problems, ensuring compliance with contract requirements and safety regulations
1 2 3 4 5 N/A
Ratings 5 Outstanding 4 Excellent 3 Satisfactory 2 Marginal 1 Unsatisfactory
December 6, 2017 Page 2 of 3
B Contractor was reasonable and cooperated to resolve problems, attended meeting as needed, and maintained communication with the government to keep the project on schedule or minimize the delay
1 2 3 4 5 N/A
C Contractor identified problems as they occurred;
suggested approaches to the problems; displayed initiative to solve problems and performed as a Team Member
1 2 3 4 5 N/A
D Contractor responded to warranty issues within the time frames specified in the contract
1 2 3 4 5 N/A
5. SUBCONTRACTS AND MANAGEMENT:
A Contractor provided experienced/qualified managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements
1 2 3 4 5 N/A
B Contractor hired quality subcontractors and effectively managed and coordinated their work
1 2 3 4 5 N/A
C Contractor hire, maintained and replaced as necessary, qualified personnel and subcontractors/suppliers
1 2 3 4 5 N/A
D Contractor ensured the project manager had sufficient authority to make decisions and take actions during project performance to keep the project on schedule
1 2 3 4 5 N/A
E Contractor ensured site superintendent and quality control representative were consistently present on site when work was performed
1 2 3 4 5 N/A
F Contractor paid employees/subcontractors/ suppliers as required
1 2 3 4 5 N/A
6. CHANGE/COST CONTROL
A Contractor responsive to contract changes and provided accurate, reasonable and supportable cost proposals
1 2 3 4 5 N/A
B Contractor demonstrated the ability to control costs and/or modifications within the magnitude specified
1 2 3 4 5 N/A
C Contractor validated subcontractor cost proposals prior to submission to the Government
1 2 3 4 5 N/A
Narrative Summary:
1. What were the contractor’s greatest strengths in the performance of the contract?
2. What were the contractor’s greatest weaknesses in the performance of the contract?
December 6, 2017 Page 3 of 3
3. Please provide any additional comments concerning the contractor’s performance that you feel would help us in our evaluation.
4. Government Contracts Only: Has/was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?
Yes No
If yes, please provide explanation
5. Government Contracts Only: Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract?
Yes No
If yes, please provide explanation
Evaluated By:
(Signature) (Date)
(Typed or Printed Name) (Address)
(Title) (Address Continued)
(Phone Number) (No. of years’ evaluator worked on contract)
(Project Title, Contract #, and Description)
Thank you for your prompt response and assistance. Please respond no later than posted date. Return this completed questionnaire (pages 1 – 3) via email or by mail to:
Mailing Address: Nebraska Western Iowa Health Care System Attn: Kenneth A. Spohn, Contracting Officer
Contracting (90C) 4101 Woolworth Avenue Omaha, NE 68122
Phone 402-995-4505
OR
Email (preferred method): kenneth.spohn@va.gov mailto:kenneth.spohn@va.gov
| PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE |
| Narrative Summary: |
| Evaluated By: |
File details come from the government source that posted it.