About this file

This document provides details for an indefinite-delivery indefinite-quantity contract for architectural and engineering services. The Department of Veterans Affairs Network Contracting Office 23 seeks to award up to five contracts under a $10 million ceiling to Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Businesses for work within Minnesota and Wisconsin. Services include design, construction, historic preservation, and other services following all regulations. Responses are due by January 12, 2018 in the form of Standard Form 330 submissions. Evaluation criteria include professional qualifications, specialized experience, location, past performance, quality control processes, capacity, reputation, claims history, and team qualifications. The purpose is to provide high quality and cost-effective facilities for Veterans.

36C26318R0024 PPQ for VISN 23 AE IDIQ.rtf

Text of this file

November 6, 2017

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Respondent Information

(The AE firm is to send this PPQ to their references identified under Part 1 IF A CPARS IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR THAT CONTRACT. Once completed, FORWARD pages 1 - 3 to the Contracting Officer – cynda.rosa@va.gov)

Name of A-E Firm being rated:

Ratings Outstanding Excellent Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory

Choose the number on the scale of 1 to 5 that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance. PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF 1 OR 2.

Evaluation Areas: Please circle a number or indicate “not applicable” (N/A).

1. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

A Customer would have no reservations in awarding another contract to the Contractor.

N/A

2. QUALITY:

A Contractor provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet the contract requirements N/A B Contractor provided well researched and clearly identified submittals that matched contract requirements N/A C Contractor completed all work with good workmanship and in conformance with the specifications N/A D Contractor corrected deficiencies in a timely manner and pursuant to their quality control plan N/A

3. TIMELINESS:

A Contractor met established project schedules to complete the project on time N/A B Contractor provided timely cost proposals N/A C Contractor submitted the progress schedule and progress reports as required N/A D Contractor provided on time submittals as required N/A E Contractor provided payrolls for both their employees and their subcontractors employees as required N/A F Contractor provided timely resolution of all punch list items N/A

4. RESPONSIVENESS

A Contractor acted promptly to resolve problems, ensuring compliance with contract requirements and safety regulations N/A

B Contractor was reasonable and cooperated to resolve problems, attended meeting as needed, and maintained communication with the government to keep the project on schedule or minimize the delay N/A C Contractor identified problems as they occurred; suggested approaches to the problems; displayed initiative to solve problems and performed as a Team Member N/A D Contractor responded to warranty issues within the time frames specified in the contract N/A

5. SUBCONTRACTS AND MANAGEMENT:

A Contractor provided experienced/qualified managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements N/A B Contractor hired quality subcontractors and effectively managed and coordinated their work N/A C Contractor hire, maintained and replaced as necessary, qualified personnel and subcontractors/suppliers N/A D Contractor ensured the project manager had sufficient authority to make decisions and take actions during project performance to keep the project on schedule N/A E Contractor ensured site superintendent and quality control representative were consistently present on site when work was performed N/A F Contractor paid employees/subcontractors/ suppliers as required N/A

6. CHANGE/COST CONTROL

A Contractor responsive to contract changes and provided accurate, reasonable and supportable cost proposals N/A B Contractor demonstrated the ability to control costs and/or modifications within the magnitude specified N/A C Contractor validated subcontractor cost proposals prior to submission to the Government N/A

Narrative Summary:

What were the contractor’s greatest strengths in the performance of the contract?

file_0.wmf file_1.wmf

What were the contractor’s greatest weaknesses in the performance of the contract?

file_2.wmf file_3.wmf

Please provide any additional comments concerning the contractor’s performance that you feel would help us in our evaluation.

file_4.wmf file_5.wmf

Government Contracts Only: Has/was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?

Yes No

If yes, please provide explanation file_6.wmf

Government Contracts Only: Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract?

Yes No

If yes, please provide explanation file_7.wmf

Evaluated By:

file_8.wmf

Other files

File Type Posted
36C26319D0021-001.docx DOCX document
36C26319D0022-000.docx DOCX document
36C26319D0023-001.docx DOCX document
36C26319D0024-005.docx DOCX document
36C26318R0024-005.docx DOCX document
36C26318R0024-004.docx DOCX document
36C26318R0024-001.pdf PDF
36C26318R0024-002.docx DOCX document
36C26318R0024-000.docx DOCX document

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .