36C26225Q0970 0001.pdf
PDF 130 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 36C26225Q09700001
About this file
This document is a Standard Form 30 Amendment of Solicitation/Modification of Contract for a surgical instrument sharpening and repair services contract at the Loma Linda VA Healthcare System. The amendment, issued by the Department of Veterans Affairs Network Contracting Office 22 in Tucson, AZ, extends the receipt of offers deadline to June 23, 2025, at 8:00 AM PDT and includes a questions and answers section providing critical clarification on instrument replacement requirements.
The Q&A section reveals this is a new contract requirement with no current incumbent. The key clarification focuses on instrument replacement, where the VA allows flexibility in OEM vendors, requiring replacements to be the same style and "like for like" when exact matches are unavailable. The document provides an extensive list of acceptable manufacturers, including Aesculap, CODMAN, Stryker, Zimmer, and over 20 others. Additionally, the VA indicates approximately 200 instruments were ordered and replaced in the previous 12 months, which can help potential bidders estimate pricing and volume expectations.
View the file
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
5. PROJECT NUMBER (if applicable)
CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY
2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER
CODE
6. ISSUED BY
8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR
4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE
9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER
9B. DATED
PAGE OF PAGES
10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER
10B. DATED
BPA NO. 1. CONTRACT ID CODE
FACILITY CODE CODE
Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:
The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers
E. IMPORTANT:
is extended,
(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning __________ copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR
ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY is not extended.
12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA
(REV. 11/2016)
is required to sign this document and return ___________ copies to the issuing office. is not, A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.
15C. DATE SIGNED
B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES
SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).
RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.
C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:
D. OTHER
Contractor
16C. DATE SIGNED
14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION
16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.
15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER
15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR
STANDARD FORM 30 PREVIOUS EDITION NOT USABLE
Prescribed by GSA - FAR (48 CFR) 53.243
(Type or print) (Type or print)
(Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)
(Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code)
(If other than Item 6)
(Specify type of modification and authority)
(such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.)
(If required)
(SEE ITEM 11)
(SEE ITEM 13)
(X)
CHECK
ONE
13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS,
IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.
11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS
AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT
(Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer)
1 3
0001 06-18-2025
36C262
Department of Veterans Affairs
NCO 22 - Network Contracting
3601 S. 6th Avenue
Tucson AZ 85723
36C262
Department of Veterans Affairs
NCO 22 - Network Contracting
3601 S. 6th Avenue
Tucson AZ 85723
To all Offerors/Bidders
36C26225Q0970
06-05-2025
X
X X
** HOUR & DATE for Receipt of Offers is EXTENDED to: 06-23-2025 8:00AM PDT
X 1
Please see attached for timely questions and answers to said questions.
Koby Thiel
Contracting Specialist
Q: Is this a new contract or is there an incumbent?
A: This is a new requirement.
Q: On page 6 of the solicitation for surgical instrument sharpening and repair services at the
Loma Linda VA, the Performance Work Statement includes the following requirement:
“Surgical grade stainless steel instruments that are beyond repair shall be replaced with exact instruments (exact vendor, catalog number and quantity) before the set is returned to VALLHS.
No substitutions are acceptable.”
We respectfully request clarification on whether this requirement is considered absolute, or if there is any flexibility in circumstances where the exact instrument (vendor, catalog number) is no longer available, has been discontinued, or would involve an extended lead time. Our intent is to remain fully compliant with the contract requirements, and we want to ensure our proposal accurately reflects your expectations.
A: We are flexible in instrument OEM vendors, but replacement must be the same style and like for like. When not available, we can use another OEM to avoid unplanned delays and better patient outcomes
Q: To further clarify the above requirement, that the contractor must also provide documentation to show the ability to supply replacements of surgical instruments—specifically exact matches to
OEM catalog numbers and models—we would appreciate clarification on the following point:
Could you please provide a list of the specific OEMs, manufacturers, or brands that are included in the scope of acceptable replacements? This will help ensure our proposed listing of replacement instruments aligns exactly with your expectations and the scope of the solicitation
A:
Aesculap
CODMAN
SMITH&NEPH
ZIMMER
CODMAN
BIOMET
HU FRIEDY
STERIS /VMUELLER
STRYKER
STRYKER ORTHO
ZIMMER
ASSI
WRIGHT MED
KATENA
DUCKWORTH
CODMAN
KARL STORZ
JARIT INTEGRA
MILLENIUM
SURGICAL
OSTEOMED
INLAND
ORTHOPEDICS
BUFFALO/JARIT
ASPEN/CODMAN
MST
PILLING
DEPUY
CRITICOR
SYNTHES
ARTHREX
AMERICAN MEDICAL
ASPEN/CODMAN
MEDTRONICS
BARD PARKER
IMS VIKON
INTEGRA
Q: We understand that basic instrument replacements are expected as part of this requirement.
To better anticipate volume and budget impact, are you able to share approximate spend or quantity of instruments replaced under the current or previous contract? This will help ensure our pricing is realistic and aligned with program expectations.
A: There is not a current contract. However, over the past 12 months…the previous contract and vendor did not provide instrument replacement as part of their services. But approximately
200 instruments were ordered and replaced in the last 12months.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .