S06 A003 Bldg 42 - LBP Survey Report (Final).pdf

IIHHII

E N V I R O N M E N T A L

LEAD BASED PAINT INSPECTION

Bob Stump Veterans Affairs Medical Center Building 42 – Warehouse

500 North Highway 89

Prescott, Arizona

Order Number VA649-C10326

March 16, 2012

Prepared for:

Richard Trevino Northern Arizona Veterans Affairs Health Care System

500 North Highway 89 Prescott, Arizona 86313

Prepared by: Reviewed by:

Mr. Oulono Folau

EPA Lead Inspector Joseph K. Palermo, REA, LEED® AP

Regional Manager

Project #11P-A3138

4527 NORTH 16TH STREET, #105 PHOENIX AZ 85016 TELEPHONE: 602.776.0300 FAX: 602.776.0301 E-MAIL: PHOENIX@IHI-ENV.COM

SALT LAKE CITY SAN FRANCISCO PHOENIX DENVER SEATTLE

NAVAHCS Bob Stump VAMC Bldg. 42 Executive Summary IHI Environmental LBP Inspection Project #11P-A3138

IIHHII

E N V I R O N M E N T A L

Executive Summary As requested by the Northern Arizona Veterans Affairs Health Care System (NAVAHCS), IHI Environmental (IHI) conducted a Lead-based Paint (LBP) Inspection at the Building 42 – Warehouse facility located at the Bob Stump Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 500 North Highway 89, Prescott, Arizona.

The Lead-based Paint Inspection was performed to identify and locate lead-based paint at the facility. This inspection included a Paint Condition Inspection to identify Lead Hazards.

The following table summarizes the results.

XRF Samples 93 Positive for Lead (>1 mg/cm2) 46

Components in Poor Condition 0

Based on the results of the survey, lead-based paint was identified on several exterior and interior building components. The paint on all of the components was considered to be in either intact or fair condition, with some exceptions. None of the components containing lead-based paint were considered to be in poor condition. Based on HUD guidelines, all painted components that are considered LBP (>1.0 mg/cm2) and identified as being in poor condition, represent potential lead hazards.

There are no estimated costs for the abatement of lead-based painted components, as none of the components were determined to be in poor condition.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 Scope of Work

2.0 METHODOLOGY

2.1 Lead-paint Inspection

2.2 Paint Condition Inspection

3.0 RESULTS

3.1 Summary of LBP Inspection and Condition Results

4.0 LEAD HAZARD CONTROLS DISCUSSION

4.1 Lead Hazard Controls for LBP Hazards

5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

5.1 Lead-paint Hazards

6.0 COST ESTIMATES FOR ABATEMENT

7.0 REFERENCES

8.0 PROJECT LIMITATIONS

APPENDICES

Appendix A Floor Plans Appendix B LBP Summary Sheet Appendix C XRF Data Appendix D Cost Estimates for Abatement Appendix E IHI Certification

NAVAHCS Bob Stump VAMC Bldg. 42 TOC-1 IHI Environmental

NAVAHCS Bob Stump VAMC Bldg. 42 TOC-2 IHI Environmental

Abbreviations and Definitions

ADEQ Arizona Department of Environmental Quality

DEUR ADEQ’s Waste Programs – Remediation and Declaration of Environmental Use Restriction

AWP ADEQ’s Waste Programs

EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

EPCRA Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act

Hazardous substance

A substance defined as a hazardous substance (Section 101(14) of CERCLA). In accordance with ASTM Standard E 1527, this definition includes petroleum products.

HUD U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development

HUD

guidelines

HUD Guidelines for the Evaluation and Control of Lead-Based Paint Hazards in Housing, June 1995, US Department of Housing and Urban Development, (http://www.hud.gov/offices/lead/lbp/hudguidelines)

LBP Lead-based Paint. HUD considers paint to be lead-based paint (LBP) if the concentration is 1.0 milligram of lead per square centimeter (1.0 mg/cm2) or greater, or if the lead concentration is greater than 5,000 parts per million (ppm) or 0.5% by weight.

LBP Hazard A lead-based paint “hazard” is any condition that causes exposure to lead from lead-contaminated dust, lead-contaminated soil, or lead-contaminated paint that is deteriorated or is present in accessible surfaces, friction surfaces, or impact surfaces that would result in adverse human health effects.

OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Administration

RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. The regulations which govern the identification, management, transportation, and disposal of hazardous wastes from “cradle to grave.”

VRP ADEQ’s Voluntary Remediation Program.

1.0 INTRODUCTION

The Northern Arizona Veterans Affairs Health Care System NAVAHCS retained IHI

Environmental (IHI) to conduct a Lead-based Paint Inspection of the Bob Stump Veterans

Affairs Medical Center facility, located at 500 North Highway 89, Prescott, Arizona.

1.1 Scope of Work

IHI was retained by NAVAHCS to conduct a Lead-based Paint Inspection (LBP) Inspection using methodology outlined in the HUD guidelines (HUD, 1995). Each painted space was analyzed using an X-ray fluorescence (XRF) spectrometer to determine the presence of lead-based paint. A sufficient number of samples were collected to meet HUD guidelines. This inspection included a Paint Condition Inspection to identify Lead Hazards.

The results, conclusions, and recommendations in this report are based on information identified during the performance of this inspection. If greater certainty or detail is needed to understand the risks associated with the presence of lead at the site, additional evaluation may be required. Floor plans of the building are presented in Appendix A.

2.0 METHODOLOGY

2.1 Lead-paint Inspection

The LBP Inspection was conducted by Mr. Oulono Folau, a Environmental Protection Agency

(EPA)-accredited Lead Risk Assessor (PB-1056) on January 11, 2012.

Measurements for lead in paint were made using a RMD LPA-1 Lead Paint Analyzer (Serial

Number 1195). The RMD non-destructively measures lead concentrations in painted surfaces, regardless of the number of paint layers present. Results are reported in mg/cm2.

Quality control procedures included checking the internal calibration of the XRF before and after the testing was completed by taking three consecutive measurements on a National

Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST) standard with a known concentration of lead.

2.2 Paint Condition Inspection

IHI inspected the condition of each painted material at the site. The condition of painted surfaces was determined based on the criteria found in Table 1.

NAVAHCS Bob Stump VAMC Bldg. 42 1 IHI Environmental

Table 1 Paint Conditions (as defined by HUD)

Total Area of Deteriorated Paint on Each Component Type of Building

Component1 Intact Fair2 Poor3 Exterior components with large surface areas

Entire surface is intact

Less than or equal to 10 square feet

More than 10 square feet

Interior components with large surface areas (walls, ceilings, floors, doors)

Entire surface is intact

Less than or equal to 2 square feet

More than 2 square feet

Interior and exterior components with small surface areas (window sills, baseboards, soffits, trim)

Entire surface is intact

Less than or equal to 10 percent of the total surface area of the component

More than 10 percent of the total surface area of the component

Notes

1. Building component in this table refers to each individual component or side of building, not the combined surface area of all similar components in a room (e.g., a wall with 1 square foot of deteriorated paint is in “fair” condition, even if the other three walls in a room are intact).

2. Surfaces in “fair” condition should be repaired and/or monitored, but are not considered to be “lead-based paint hazards” as defined in by HUD guidelines.

3. Surfaces in “poor” condition are considered to be “lead-based paint hazards” as defined in HUD guidelines and should be addressed through abatement or interim controls.

3.0 RESULTS

In accordance with federal law, this Lead-Paint Inspection was conducted by Mr. Oulono

Folau. A copy of his current EPA certificate for conducting lead based paint activities is presented in Appendix E.

3.1 Summary of LBP Inspection and Condition Results

A summary of the samples which tested positive as LBP (Appendix B, Summary Report) show 46 components tested positive for LBP. None of the components were identified as both LBP and in poor condition. Based on the HUD guidelines, the components in poor condition represent a lead hazard at the site. A complete set of the XRF data is presented in

Appendix C.

NAVAHCS Bob Stump VAMC Bldg. 42 2 IHI Environmental

4.0 LEAD HAZARD CONTROLS DISCUSSION

As outlined in the HUD guidelines there are two different types of control options for lead hazards. These are interim (temporary) controls or permanent abatement. Interim controls are less expensive initially, but may be more expensive than abatement in the long run since they need to be re-evaluated and maintained more frequently. If all lead-based paint surfaces are abated or replaced, no re-evaluation is needed.

4.1 Lead Hazard Controls for LBP Hazards

As a measure of controlling LBP hazards at this site, there are several interim controls that can be utilized; however, these methods will require ongoing monitoring to assure that the existing hazard has not returned or new hazards developed. A listing of these controls is as follows:

• Paint film stabilization: This interim control involves repair or restoration of existing substrate, removal of the loose or deteriorated paint, and applying a new protective coating, such as a sealant or a new coat of non lead-based paint.

• Lead dust reduction: This interim control involves the ongoing cleaning of potential lead dust-impacted surfaces through the use of a HEPA vacuum in addition to wet washing the impacted components.

• Impact surface elimination or reduction: This interim control involves the reconfiguration of the building components to eliminate impact surfaces. This can include lining window tracks with vinyl guides or the narrowing of doors or windows to eliminate impact surfaces.

As a measure of permanent elimination of the LBP hazard at the site, there are several abatement options that can be selected. These options will eliminate the source of the lead hazard and do not require ongoing monitoring. A listing of permanent abatement measures are as follows:

• Lead-based paint removal: This method involves the removal of the lead-based paint from the building components, using approved methods, such as approved low temperature heat guns, wet sanding or scraping, in addition to a HEPA vacuuming, and/or the use of approved chemical strippers. These methods should only be performed by trained lead abatement contractors.

• Component replacement: This method involves the removal and complete replacement of impacted building components with non lead-based painted materials.

NAVAHCS Bob Stump VAMC Bldg. 42 3 IHI Environmental

5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

5.1 Lead-paint Hazards

Based on HUD guidelines, all painted components that are considered LBP (>1.0 mg/cm2) and were identified as being in poor condition, represent lead hazards. IHI identified no components that represent a lead hazard at the facility. Recommended Controls for the abatement of components include either lead-based paint removal or component replacement.

6.0 COST ESTIMATES FOR ABATEMENT

Cost Estimates for the abatement of lead-based painted components in poor condition are presented in Appendix D. The cost estimates for the abatement of LBP hazards were derived by use of the RS Means Cost Guide and through IHI’s experience in the local and regional markets. The cost estimate provided is for use in long-term budgeting and planning only and does not have a level of accuracy sufficient to be used as construction design cost estimates.

The actual cost of LBP abatement is highly dependent on a number of factors such as the size of the job (single room or window, or an entire floor or building); the required time frame for removal; the time of year the job is conducted; and travel time and distance to the job for the contractor. Therefore, actual removal costs could vary significantly from these estimates.

Materials replacement and consultant abatement management costs are not included in these estimates and can add 15 - 50% to the project costs.

7.0 REFERENCES

HUD, 1995. Guidelines for the Evaluation and Control of Lead-Based Paint Hazards in Housing, June 1995, US Department of Housing and Urban Development, (http://www.hud.gov/offices/lead/lbp/hudguidelines).

8.0 PROJECT LIMITATIONS

This project was performed using, as a minimum, practices consistent with standards acceptable within the industry at this time, and a level of diligence typically exercised by

EH&S consultants performing similar services.

NAVAHCS Bob Stump VAMC Bldg. 42 4 IHI Environmental

NAVAHCS Bob Stump VAMC Bldg. 42 5 IHI Environmental

The procedures used attempt to establish a balance between the competing goals of limiting investigative and reporting costs and time, and reducing the uncertainty about unknown conditions. Therefore, because the findings of this report were derived from the scope, costs, time and other limitations, the conclusions should not be construed as a guarantee that all universal, toxic and/or hazardous wastes have been identified and fully evaluated.

Furthermore, IHI assumes no responsibility for omissions or errors resulting from inaccurate information, or data, provided by sources outside of IHI or from omissions or errors in public records.

It is emphasized that the final decision on how much risk to accept always remains with the client since IHI is not in a position to fully understand all of the client's needs. Clients with a greater aversion to risk may want to take additional actions while others, with less aversion to risk, may want to take no further action.

Appendix A

Floor Plans

V

Pr oj ec ts

\V A

M C

\1 1P

-A

V

A M

C P re sc ot t A sb -L

B P

In sp ii\ D ra w in gs

\S R

_V A

As be st os

S ur ve y

C A

D \2

4\

P-

A

-B ld g

.d w g, F 1_

Pb , 3

/5 /2

1:

:5

PM

, m ik eb

WAREHOUSE

101A

FIRE EQUIP

EXCESS / SCRAP / STORAGE

Stair 1 Stair 2

Main LevelLD1 Loading Dock 1

PROJECT No:

SHEET:

DRAWN BY:

REVIEWED BY:

Le ad

S am pl in g W al l R ef er en ce

K ey

M ai n

Le ve l

DATE:

DATE:

DATE:

REVISED BY:

0 8' 16'

11P-A3138 1 Pb

MBradley 2-17-12

D ep ar tm en t o f V et er an s Af fa irs

N or th er n Ar iz on a Ve te ra ns A ffa irs

H ea lth C ar e

S ys te m

(N

AV

AH

C

S) B ui ld in g

(W ar er ho us

e) P re sc ot t, A riz on a

Side C

Side A

S id e

DS

ide B Lead Sampling Wall Reference Key for

Typical Room

Appendix B

LBP Summary Sheet

Building 42 - Warehouse Summary.TXT SUMMARY REPORT OF LEAD PAINT INSPECTION FOR: Building 42 - Warehouse

Inspection Date: 01/11/12 IHI Environmental #11P-A3138 Report Date: 1/24/2012 NAVAHCS Prescott, Arizona Abatement Level: 1.0 Report No. 01/11/12 14:44 Total Readings: 93 Actionable: 46 Job Started: 01/11/12 14:44 Job Finished: 01/11/12 17:17

Read Paint Paint Lead No. Wall Structure Location Member Cond Substrate Color (mg/cm²) Mode Exterior Room 001 stair 1 030 A Wall U Ctr I Metal Red 1.0 QM 033 D Stairs Ctr Stringers I Concrete Gray >9.9 QM 032 D Stairs Ctr Treads I Concrete Gray 1.0 QM Exterior Room 002 stair 2 043 D Stairs Ctr Stringers I Metal Gray >9.9 QM 042 D Stairs Ctr Treads I Metal Gray 1.0 QM Exterior Room 003 Number Only 050 A Freeze Board Rgt I Wood White >9.9 QM 052 A Truss Rgt I Wood White >9.9 QM 046 A Wall L Rgt I Concrete White 1.0 QM 047 A Wall U Rgt I Concrete White 2.4 QM 048 A Window Rgt Stool I Concrete White 2.4 QM 049 A Window Rgt Rgt casing I Wood White >9.9 QM 063 B Wall L Lft I Concrete Yellow 1.3 QM 058 B Wall L Ctr I Concrete White 1.7 QM 059 B Wall U Ctr I Concrete White 1.5 QM 060 B Window Rgt Stool I Concrete White >9.9 QM 062 B Window Rgt gate I Metal Gray >9.9 QM 061 B Window Rgt Rgt casing I Wood White >9.9 QM 070 C Freeze Board Ctr I Wood White >9.9 QM 071 C Truss Ctr I Wood White >9.9 QM 064 C Wall L Rgt I Concrete White 1.0 QM 065 C Wall U Rgt I Concrete White 1.3 QM 072 C Soffit Ctr I Wood White >9.9 QM 068 C Window Rgt gate I Metal Gray 4.1 QM 067 C Window Rgt Lft casing I Wood White >9.9 QM 076 C Door Ctr Lft casing I Wood Gray >9.9 QM 075 C Door Ctr U Lft I Wood White >9.9 QM 069 C Door Rgt L Rgt I Wood White >9.9 QM Comment: no access to windows due to sec bars Exterior Room 004 stair 3 077 C Stairs Ctr Wall I Concrete White 2.0 QM 082 D Wall L Ctr I Concrete White 1.5 QM 083 D Wall U Ctr I Concrete White 2.3 QM 084 D Window Rgt Stool I Concrete White 2.5 QM 086 D Window Rgt gate I Metal Gray >9.9 QM 085 D Window Rgt Lft casing I Wood White >9.9 QM Interior Room 001 101 008 A Window Lft Rgt casing I Wood Gray 1.9 QM 007 A Window Lft Sash I Wood Gray 1.0 QM 010 A Window Rgt Rgt casing I Wood Gray 2.5 QM 009 A Window Rgt Sash I Wood Gray 1.3 QM

Building 42 - Warehouse Summary.TXT 022 A Door Rgt Rgt casing I Wood Gray >9.9 QM 021 A Door Rgt U Rgt I Wood Brown 2.7 QM 011 C Window Lft Sash I Wood Gray 1.6 QM 012 C Window Lft Lft casing I Wood Gray 1.0 QM 014 C Window Rgt Rgt casing I Wood Gray 1.2 QM 013 C Window Rgt Sash I Wood Gray 2.3 QM 023 C Door Lft U Lft I Wood Varnish 1.0 QM 016 D Window Lft Rgt casing I Wood Gray 1.6 QM Comment: walls and ceiling unpainted. no access to side b windows.

Interior Room 002 101a 025 A Pipe Ctr Sprinkler I Metal Red 1.0 QM Calibration Readings ---- End of Readings ----

Paint Condition I = Intact F = Fair P = Poor

Appendix C

XRF Data

Building 42 - Warehouse Detailed.TXT DETAILED REPORT OF LEAD PAINT INSPECTION FOR: Building 42 - Warehouse

Inspection Date: 01/11/12 IHI Environmental #11P-A3138 Report Date: 1/24/2012 NAVAHCS Prescott, Arizona Abatement Level: 1.0 Report No. 01/11/12 14:44 Total Readings: 93 Job Started: 01/11/12 14:44 Job Finished: 01/11/12 17:17

Read Paint Paint Lead No. Wall Structure Location Member Cond Substrate Color (mg/cm²) Mode Exterior Room 001 stair 1 027 A Wall L Ctr I Concrete White 0.4 QM 030 A Wall U Ctr I Metal Red 1.0 QM 028 B Wall L Ctr I Concrete White 0.6 QM 029 C Wall L Ctr I Concrete White 0.3 QM 033 D Stairs Ctr Stringers I Concrete Gray >9.9 QM 032 D Stairs Ctr Treads I Concrete Gray 1.0 QM 031 D Stairs Ctr Risers I Concrete Yellow -0.2 QM 034 D Stairs Ctr Balusters I Concrete Gray 0.6 QM 035 D Stairs Ctr Railing cap I Concrete Gray 0.5 QM Exterior Room 002 stair 2 036 A Wall L Ctr I Concrete White -0.1 QM 038 A Wall U Ctr I Metal Red -0.1 QM 040 A Railing Ctr Balusters I Metal Gray -0.1 QM 039 A Railing Ctr L Railing I Metal Gray 0.0 QM 037 A Column Ctr I Concrete White 0.6 QM 043 D Stairs Ctr Stringers I Metal Gray >9.9 QM 042 D Stairs Ctr Treads I Metal Gray 1.0 QM 041 D Stairs Ctr Risers I Concrete Yellow -0.1 QM 044 D Stairs Ctr Balusters I Metal Gray 0.2 QM 045 D Stairs Ctr Railing cap I Metal Gray 0.3 QM Exterior Room 003 Number Only 050 A Freeze Board Rgt I Wood White >9.9 QM 052 A Truss Rgt I Wood White >9.9 QM 053 A fascia Rgt I Wood White -0.1 QM 046 A Wall L Rgt I Concrete White 1.0 QM 047 A Wall U Rgt I Concrete White 2.4 QM 054 A Gutter Rgt I Metal White -0.2 QM 055 A Gutter Rgt down-spout I Metal White -0.1 QM 051 A Soffit Rgt I Wood White 0.8 QM 048 A Window Rgt Stool I Concrete White 2.4 QM 049 A Window Rgt Rgt casing I Wood White >9.9 QM 057 A Door Rgt Rgt jamb I Metal White 0.0 QM 056 A Door Rgt U Rgt I Metal White -0.1 QM 063 B Wall L Lft I Concrete Yellow 1.3 QM 058 B Wall L Ctr I Concrete White 1.7 QM 059 B Wall U Ctr I Concrete White 1.5 QM 060 B Window Rgt Stool I Concrete White >9.9 QM 062 B Window Rgt gate I Metal Gray >9.9 QM 061 B Window Rgt Rgt casing I Wood White >9.9 QM 070 C Freeze Board Ctr I Wood White >9.9 QM 071 C Truss Ctr I Wood White >9.9 QM 073 C fascia Ctr I Wood White 0.0 QM 064 C Wall L Rgt I Concrete White 1.0 QM 065 C Wall U Rgt I Concrete White 1.3 QM

074 C Gutter Ctr I Metal White -0.2 QM 072 C Soffit Ctr I Wood White >9.9 QM 066 C Window Rgt Stool I Concrete White 0.3 QM 068 C Window Rgt gate I Metal Gray 4.1 QM 067 C Window Rgt Lft casing I Wood White >9.9 QM 076 C Door Ctr Lft casing I Wood Gray >9.9 QM 075 C Door Ctr U Lft I Wood White >9.9 QM 069 C Door Rgt L Rgt I Wood White >9.9 QM Comment: no access to windows due to sec bars Exterior Room 004 stair 3 077 C Stairs Ctr Wall I Concrete White 2.0 QM 078 C Stairs Ctr Wall I Concrete Yellow -0.2 QM 081 C Stairs Ctr Balusters I Concrete White -0.2 QM 080 C Stairs Ctr Railing cap I Concrete White -0.2 QM 079 C Column Ctr I Concrete White 0.0 QM 087 D Pipe Ctr I Metal White 0.3 QM 082 D Wall L Ctr I Concrete White 1.5 QM 083 D Wall U Ctr I Concrete White 2.3 QM 084 D Window Rgt Stool I Concrete White 2.5 QM 086 D Window Rgt gate I Metal Gray >9.9 QM 085 D Window Rgt Lft casing I Wood White >9.9 QM Interior Room 001 101 024 A Pipe Ctr Sprinkler I Metal Red 0.4 QM 017 A Floor Lft I Wood Yellow 0.6 QM 018 A Floor Rgt I Wood Yellow -0.1 QM 008 A Window Lft Rgt casing I Wood Gray 1.9 QM 007 A Window Lft Sash I Wood Gray 1.0 QM 010 A Window Rgt Rgt casing I Wood Gray 2.5 QM 009 A Window Rgt Sash I Wood Gray 1.3 QM 020 A Door Ctr Rgt jamb I Metal White 0.0 QM 019 A Door Ctr U Rgt I Metal White -0.2 QM 022 A Door Rgt Rgt casing I Wood Gray >9.9 QM 021 A Door Rgt U Rgt I Wood Brown 2.7 QM 011 C Window Lft Sash I Wood Gray 1.6 QM 012 C Window Lft Lft casing I Wood Gray 1.0 QM 014 C Window Rgt Rgt casing I Wood Gray 1.2 QM 013 C Window Rgt Sash I Wood Gray 2.3 QM 023 C Door Lft U Lft I Wood Varnish 1.0 QM 016 D Window Lft Rgt casing I Wood Gray 1.6 QM 015 D Window Lft Sash I Wood Gray 0.5 QM Comment: walls and ceiling unpainted. no access to side b windows.

Interior Room 002 101a 025 A Pipe Ctr Sprinkler I Metal Red 1.0 QM 026 A Pipe Ctr Sprinkler I Metal Red 0.0 QM valve Calibration Readings 001 0.2 Std 002 -0.1 Std 003 -0.1 Std 004 0.9 Std 005 0.9 Std 006 0.9 Std 088 0.9 Std 089 1.0 Std 090 1.0 Std 091 -0.1 Std 092 -0.1 Std 093 -0.1 Std ---- End of Readings ----

Paint Condition I = Intact F = Fair P = Poor

Appendix D

Cost Estimates

No lead-based paint components were determined to be in poor condition.

Appendix E

IHI Certifications