D.1 QASP PLAN Cytotechnoligist.docx

DOCX document 44 KB Posted

Attached to
Q999--Cytotechnologist Service
Solicitation number
36C25724Q0266
Issued by

About this file

This document outlines requirements for a federal contract solicitation seeking cytotechnologist services. The solicitation number is 36C25724Q0266 and is being issued by the Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Health Administration Veterans Integrated Service Network 17 to contract for cytotechnologist services in the North Texas region. Responses are due by the date listed on the Federal Business Opportunities website. The contract would provide cytotechnologist staffing and services to support healthcare operations at VA medical centers in the local area.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
36C25724Q0266 0001.docx DOCX document
D.6 Experience Worksheet.docx DOCX document
D.5 Organizational Conflicts of Interest.docx DOCX document
36C25724Q0266_1.docx DOCX document
D.4 Contractor Certification Immigration and Nationality Act.docx DOCX document
D.2 Background Investigation.docx DOCX document
D.3 Contractor Rules of Behavior.docx DOCX document

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE PLAN (QASP)

For: Cytotechnologist Services

BPA Number: < Upon award, Government will enter BPA number>

BPA Description: The contractor shall provide a Certified Cytotechnologist to support Pathology & Laboratory Medicine Anatomic Pathology Section at the Dallas VA Medical Center, 4500 S Lancaster Rd. Dallas, TX 75216-7167.

Contractor’s Name: <Enter your company name.> (hereafter referred to as the contractor).

1.PURPOSE

This Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) provides a systematic method to evaluate performance for the stated BPA. This QASP explains the following:

· What will be monitored.

· How monitoring will take place.

· Who will conduct the monitoring.

· How monitoring efforts and results will be documented.

This QASP does not detail how the contractor accomplishes the work. Rather, the QASP is created with the premise that the contractor is responsible for management and quality control actions to meet the terms of the BPA. It is the Government’s responsibility to be objective, fair, and consistent in evaluating performance.

This QASP is a “living document” and the Government may review and revise it on a regular basis. However, the Government shall coordinate changes with the contractor. Copies of the original QASP and revisions shall be provided to the contractor and Government officials implementing surveillance activities.

2. Government Roles and Responsibilities

The following personnel shall oversee and coordinate surveillance activities.

a. Contracting Officer (CO) - The CO shall ensure performance of all necessary actions for effective contracting, ensure compliance with the BPA terms, and shall safeguard the interests of the United States in the contractual relationship. The CO shall also assure that the contractor receives impartial, fair, and equitable treatment under this BPA. The CO is ultimately responsible for the final determination of the adequacy of the contractor’s performance.

Assigned CO:Carlos Jaquez, Contracting Officer
Phone: 915-217-1249
Email: carlos.jaquez@va.gov
Organization or Agency:VHA RPO West - NCO 17 El Paso
Health Care Resources Branch
11495 Turner Road
El Paso, TX 79936-1372

b. Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) - The COR is responsible for technical administration of the BPA and shall assure proper Government surveillance of the contractor’s performance. The COR shall keep a quality assurance file. The COR is not empowered to make any contractual commitments or to authorize any contractual changes on the Government’s behalf.

Assigned COR: William J. Scott Phone: 214-857-3369 Email: william.scott3@va.gov

Organization or Agency:Pathology & Laboratory Medicine Service
Assistant Laboratory Manager

4500 S Lancaster Road Dallas, TX 75216-7167

3. Contractor Representatives

The following employee(s) of the Contractor serve as the Contractor’s program manager(s) for this BPA.

Primary:

Alternate:

4. Performance Standards

The Contractor is responsible for performance of ALL terms and conditions of the BPA. CORs will provide BPA progress reports quarterly to the CO reflecting performance on this plan and all other aspects of the resultant BPA. The performance standards outlined in this QASP shall be used to determine the level of Contractor performance in the elements defined. Performance standards define desired services. The Government performs surveillance to determine the level of Contractor performance to these standards.

The Performance Requirements are listed below in Section 6. The Government shall use these standards to determine Contractor performance and shall compare Contractor performance to the standard and assign a rating. At the end of the performance period, these ratings will be used, in part, to establish the past performance of the Contractor on the BPA.

5. METHODS OF QA SURVEILLANCE

Various methods exist to monitor performance. The COR shall use the surveillance methods listed below in the administration of this QASP.

a. DIRECT OBSERVATION: 100% surveillance: Staff and management’s direct observation of methods, process adherence, and quality during the performance of contractual duties.

b. PERIODIC INSPECTION: Inspections scheduled and reported quarterly per COR delegation or as needed. Clinical or operational reports and/or ten (10) randomly selected patient files will be reviewed per inspection period. All inspections and reports will be conducted in compliance with VA Privacy and Information security standards.

c. VALIDATED USER/CUSTOMER COMPLAINTS: Each customer complaint will be investigated by the Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Service Supervisor/COR. Methods of investigation include the examination of the medical record, EDIS data, and statements provided by the patient, other staff/patients, and the BPA personnel. Final determination on the validity of the complaint rests with the Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Service Chief.

d. RANDOM SAMPLING: Ten (10) randomly selected patient files will be reviewed on an as-needed basis to validate other quality indicators.

e. Verification and/or documentation provided by Contractor. Supplied documentation will be reviewed and verified by VA Credentialing staff.

6. QASP PERFORMANCE REPORT DATE: January 11, 2024

Measure
PWS Ref
Performance Requirement
Standard
Acceptable Quality Level
Surveillance Method

Frequency

Positive Patient Identification
4.6.3.1
Contractor’s technician(s)/technologist(s) shall perform as follows:

a. Receive specimens and requests that are properly identified and labeled following regulatory agency requirements and CLSI standards on patient identification.

b. Specimens are processed in a timely manner lab.

99%

Direct observation and random inspection of records

Monthly

Specimen Receipt and Processing
4.6.3.2
Contractor’s technician(s)/technologist(s) shall perform as follows:

a. Receive acceptable specimens, maintains specimen integrity and is alert to specimen errors.

b. Process workload in a timely manner ensuring section established turn-around-times are adhered to.

All contractor’s technician(s)/technologist(s) shall meet the following standards:

a. Samples are received in the appropriate containers with the correct and adequate amount of medium.

b. Any inadequate specimens are addressed following section standard operating procedures.

90%

Direct observation and random inspection.

Follows established safety and infection control guidelines

4.6.3.3
Follows regulatory agency requirements and CLSI standards guidelines for hand hygiene, use of appropriate PPE, and decontaminates and cleans equipment and work area, as required.

All contractor’s technician(s)/technologists shall comply with safety rules and regulation at all time.

99%

Direct observation and random inspection
Monthly
Customer Service
4.6.3.4
Contractor’s technician(s)/technologist(s) shall perform as follows:

a. Contractor’s technician(s)/technologist(s) shall respond to customer needs. Assesses the customer’s concern properly and performs the tasks required to resolve the problem within the scope of the position.

b. Customer concerns are addressed in a timely manner.

c. Communicates with customers and co-workers and responds to requests for assistance in a professional and respectful manner and adhering to HR-35 Code of Conduct.

All contractor’s technician(s)/technologist(s) shall meet the following standards:

a. Customer concerns are regularly addressed or referred appropriately with minimal guidance and provides follow-up in all cases.

b. Customer service issues are addressed with minimal guidance within 24 hours of receipt.

c. Regularly communicates in a professional manner.

99%

Direct observation and random inspection

Supply and Inventory Control
4.6.3.5
Contractor’s technician(s)/technologist(s) shall perform as follows:

a. Replenishes stock items and maintains adequate supplies.

b. Supplies are replenished in timely manner.

All contractor’s technician(s)/technologist(s) shall meet the following standards:

a. Work area is clean and has adequate supplies.

b. Supplies are replaced, and orders requested for supplies with minimal guidance.

90%

Direct observation and random inspection.

Time and Attendance

4.6.3.6
Contractor’s technician(s)/technologist(s) shall maintain time and attendance, no late occurrences, or no shows.
Contractor’s technician(s)/technologist(s) shall not have late occurrences or no shows. Absences will be advised of ahead of time.

95%

Direct observation and random inspection.

Mandatory Training
4.6.3.7
Contractor’s technician(s)/technologist(s) shall complete all required training on time per NTVHCS policy. Contractor’s technician(s)/technologist(s) shall provide evidence of training required by NTVHCS.
All required training shall be complete on time by contractor’s technician(s)/technologist(s).

99%

Periodic Sampling

Privacy, Confidentiality and HIPAA
4.6.3.8
Contractor’s technician(s)/technologist(s) shall be aware of all laws, regulations, policies, and procedures relating to Privacy, Confidentiality and HIPAA and complies with all standards. Zero breaches of privacy or confidentiality.
All contractor technician(s)/technologist(s) comply with all laws, regulations, policies, and procedures relating to Privacy, Confidentiality and HIPAA.

99%

Direct observation and random inspection.

7. CPAR RATINGS ASSIGNED TO QASP ITEMS

Metrics and methods are designed to determine if performance exceeds, meets, or does not meet a given standard and acceptable quality level. A rating scale shall be used to determine a positive, neutral, or negative outcome. The following ratings shall be used:

Per the performance standard grid above, a calculation of percent goal will be made during the random sampling/observation. For example, a random sampling of progress notes will be conducted to ensure 95% or better are actually entered for veteran participants as well as 95% or better within time-frame.

Metrics and methods are designed to determine rating for a given standard and acceptable quality level. The following ratings shall be used (Reference: CPARS User Manual, https://www.cpars.gov/documents/CPARS-Guidance.pdf:

EXCEPTIONAL:
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.

Note: To justify an Exceptional rating, you should identify multiple significant events in each category and state how it was a benefit to the GOVERNMENT. However, a singular event could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

VERY GOOD:
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

Note: To justify a Very Good rating, you should identify a significant event in each category and state how it was a benefit to the GOVERNMENT. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

SATISFACTORY:
Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Note: To justify a Satisfactory rating, there should have been only minor problems, or major problems the Contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

MARGINAL:
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The Contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Note: To justify Marginal performance, you should identify a significant event in each category that the Contractor had trouble overcoming and state how it impacted the GOVERNMENT. A Marginal rating should be supported by referencing the management tool that notified the Contractor of the contractual deficiency (e.g. Management, Quality, Safety or Environmental Deficiency Report or letter).

UNSATISFACTORY:
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Note: To justify an Unsatisfactory rating, you should identify multiple significant events in each category that the Contractor had trouble overcoming and state how it impacted the GOVERNMENT. However, a singular problem could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating. An Unsatisfactory rating should be supported by referencing the management tools used to notify the Contractor of the contractual deficiencies (e.g., Management, Quality, Safety or Environmental Deficiency Reports, or letters).

8. DOCUMENTING PERFORMANCE

a. The Government shall document positive and/or negative performance. Any report may become a part of the supporting documentation for any contractual action and preparing annual past performance using CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT (CPAR).

b. If Contractor performance does not meet the Acceptable Quality level, the CO shall inform the Contractor. This will normally be in writing unless circumstances necessitate verbal communication. In any case the CO shall document the discussion and place it in the BPA file. When the COR and the CO determines formal written communication is required, the COR shall prepare a BPA Discrepancy Report (CDR), and present it to CO. The CO will in turn review and will present to the Contractor's program manager for corrective action.

The Contractor shall acknowledge receipt of the CDR in writing. The CDR will specify if the Contractor is required to prepare a corrective action plan to document how the Contractor shall correct the unacceptable performance and avoid a recurrence. The CDR will also state how long after receipt the Contractor has to present this corrective action plan to the CO. The Government shall review the Contractor's corrective action plan to determine acceptability. The CO shall also assure that the Contractor receives impartial, fair, and equitable treatment. The CO is ultimately responsible for the final determination of the adequacy of the Contractor’s performance and the acceptability of the Contractor’s corrective action plan.

Any CDRs may become a part of the supporting documentation for any contractual action deemed necessary by the CO.

See Sample CDR on the following page.

Any CDRs may become a part of the supporting documentation for any contractual action deemed necessary by the CO.

BPA DISCREPANCY REPORT

1. BPA NUMBER
2. REPORT NUMBER FOR THIS DISCREPANCY
3. TO: (Contracting Officer)
4. FROM: (Name of COR)

5. DATES

a. CDR PREPARED

b. RETURNED BY CONTRACTOR:
c. ACTION COMPLETE

6. DISCREPANCY OR PROBLEM (Describe in detail. Include reference to PWS Directive; attach continuation sheet if necessary.)

7. SIGNATURE OF COR
Date:
8. SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER
Date:
9a. TO (Contracting Officer)
9a. FROM (Contractor)

10. CONTRACTOR RESPONSE AS TO CAUSE, CORRECTIVE ACTION AND ACTIONS TO PREVENT RECURRENCE. (Cite applicable quality control program procedures or new procedures. Attach continuation sheet(s) if necessary.)

11. SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTOR REPRESENTATIVE
Date:

12. GOVERNMENT EVALUATION. (Acceptance, partial acceptance, reflection. Attach continuation sheet(s) if necessary.)

13. GOVERNMENT ACTIONS (Acceptance, partial acceptance, reflection. Attach continuation sheet(s) if necessary.)

14. CLOSE OUT

NAME
TITLE
SIGNATURE
DATE

a. CONTRACTOR NOTIFIED

b. COR

c. ONTRACTING OFFICER

9. CONTRACTOR AND COR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF QASP

SIGNED:

CONTRACTOR NAME/TITLE DATE

SIGNED:

COR NAME/TITLE DATE

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .