Attachment A - Prior Experience Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 1 MB Posted

Attached to
S207--*Tiered Evaluations* Integrated Pest Management for the VA St. Louis Health Care System, St. Louis, MO
Solicitation number
36C25525Q0251
Issued by

About this file

This document is a Prior Experience Questionnaire for an Integrated Pest Management contract opportunity for the VA St. Louis Health Care System. The four-page form is designed to collect performance references and evaluations from previous clients, with detailed sections assessing the contractor's quality of service, business relations, and customer satisfaction. The questionnaire uses a standardized coding system to rate performance levels from Excellent (E) to Unsatisfactory (U), with specific questions about contract compliance, timeliness, work quality, customer service, communication, problem-solving, and overall business conduct.

Respondents are asked to provide comprehensive feedback across 14 specific evaluation criteria, including contract requirement compliance, performance timeliness, technical excellence, end product quality, contract management efficiency, flexibility, responsiveness, and willingness to recommend the contractor for future work. The completed questionnaire must be submitted to the Network Contracting Office (NCO) 15, specifically to Leslie Ross via email at leslie.ross2@va.gov, by the solicitation's offer due date. The document emphasizes that the government bears no responsibility for ensuring proper receipt of the questionnaires.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Questions and Answers.pdf PDF
36C25525Q0251 Integrated Pest Managment Solicitation.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ATTACHMENT A

PRIOR EXPERIENCE QUESTIONNAIRE

SOLICITATION NUMBER — 36C25525Q0251 Integrated Pest Management

VA St Louis Health Care System

I. Please complete this questionnaire. For assistance with this form or to request an electronic copy, please notify the contract specialist listed at the address below. Handwritten responses will be accepted. If you need more space than provided, please attach additional pages or write on the back. Please include only relevant information. Responses will be treated as source selection sensitive information. Please submit this information on or before the due date as stated on the front of the Standard Form 1449. Return the completed questionnaire by email to the following address:

Network Contracting Office (NCO) 15

ATTN: Leslie Ross E-mail:leslie.ross2@va.gov

II. EXPLANATION OF CODES:

CODE PERFORMANCE LEVEL

E EXCELLENT — Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

G GOOD — Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some (requirements) to the

Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

A ACCEPTABLE — Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

M MARGINAL — Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

U UNSATISFACTORY — Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

N NOT APPLICABLE — Unable to provide a score. Performance in this area not applicable to the effort assessed.

TITLE/POSITION ________________________________________________________

SIGNATURE ____________________________________________________________

THE FOLLOWING IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND PRIOR EXPERIENCE:

PRIOR EXPERIENCE QUESTIONNAIRE

RFP NUMBER: 36C25525Q0251 Integrated Pest Management TITLE: Integrated Pest Management

SECTION I: OFFERORS SHALL COMPLETE requested information, and in turn, provide the questionnaire to the appropriate Respondent for each source of Prior Experience Information mentioned in its Offer. The Respondent must have significant familiarity with the selected contract or subcontract, in order to provide informed answers and comments about various aspects of the prior performance. NOTE: This information shall be for prior performances provided by the Prime Contractor.

NAME OF OFFEROR BEING EVALUATED_________________________________________

COMPANY NAME OF PRIOR EXPERIENCE SOURCE ____________________________

CONTRACT NUMBER and DATES OF SERVICE FOR WHICH PRIOR EXPERIENCE

INFORMATION IS BEING PROVIDED ___________________ _________________

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE ____________________________________________________

SECTION II: RESPONDENT(S) SHALL COMPLETE the requested information concerning the prior experience of the above named Offeror relative to the contract effort stated. Respondent shall return the completed form

NAME OF RESPONDENT _________________________________________________

directly to the Contract Specialist by email to leslie.ross2@va.gov

1. Did the contractor comply with all contract requirements?

Yes___ No___

Comments: ______________________________________________________________

2. With regard to timeliness of performance, were turnaround times of the contract met (i.e. completion of administrative requirements, task orders, milestones, and production and delivery requirements?

Yes ___ No___

Comments: ______________________________________________________________

3. Was the contractor's work found to be accurate and technically/clinically excellent?

Yes___ No____

Comments: ______________________________________________________________

4. How would you rate the quality of the contractor's end products furnished under this contract?

______Excellent _____Good ___Acceptable ____Marginal ____Unsatisfactory

Comments: ______________________________________________________________

5. How would you rate the quality of the contractor's customer service furnished under this contract?

______Excellent _____Good ___ Acceptable ____ Marginal ____Unsatisfactory

Comments: ______________________________________________________________

(B) BUSINESS RELATIONS

6. Was contract Management efficient and responsive?

___Always ___Most of the time ___Sometimes ___Never

Comments: ______________________________________________________________

7. Did the contractor exhibit reasonable, cooperative behavior and effective communication(s)?

___Always ___Most of the time ___Sometimes ___Never

Comments: ______________________________________________________________

8. How would you rate the contractors billing timeliness and accuracy?

______Excellent _____Good ___ Acceptable ____ Marginal ____Unsatisfactory

Comments: ______________________________________________________________

ASSESSMENT ELEMENTS: Place an “X” in the appropriate box next to the letter for each item on the questionnaire. Narrative statements are vital. Please provide a supporting narrative for each area.

Attach additional pages if there is insufficient space in the comment space.

(A). QUALITY OF SERVICE

9. Was the contractor flexible?

___Always ___Most of the time ___Sometimes ___Never

Comments: ______________________________________________________________

10. Did the contractor recommend effective solutions to problems?

___Always ___Most of the time ___Sometimes ___Never

Comments: ______________________________________________________________

11. Did the contractor exhibit a business-like concern for the interests of your Agency or Business:

___Always ___Most of the time ___Sometimes ___Never

Comments: ______________________________________________________________

(C) CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

12. How would you rate the contractor on the basis of customer (end-user) satisfaction?

_____Excellent ___Good ___Acceptable ____ Marginal ____Unsatisfactory

Comments: ______________________________________________________________

13. Would you select this firm again?

____Yes ____No

Comments: ______________________________________________________________

14. How would you rate the contractors timeliness in responding to phone calls and e-mails?

______Excellent _____Good ___ Acceptable ____ Marginal ____Unsatisfactory

End of Section II

THE COMPLETED PRIOR EXPERIENCE REFERENCES MUST REACH THE CONTRACTING

OFFICE BY THE DATE AND TIME OFFERS ARE DUE. THE GOVERNMENT BEARS NO

RESPONSIBILITY TO ASSURE QUESTIONNAIRES ARE PROPERLY RECEIVED.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .