36C25520R0063-014.pdf

PDF Posted

Attached to
Z1DA--Replace Mechanical Systems in Buildings 18 & 60 PN:657-19-103JB
Solicitation number
36C25520R0063
Issued by

About this file

This pre-solicitation notice seeks bids for a construction project to replace mechanical systems in two buildings at the Jefferson Barracks Division of the VA Saint Louis Health Care System. The project has an estimated cost between $2-5 million under NAICS code 238220. The duration is expected to be 426 calendar days after notice to proceed. The solicitation will be posted on April 7, 2020 to FedBizOpps and will utilize the Best Value Lowest Price Technically Acceptable process. The successful bidder must perform at least 25% of construction labor and be registered in SAM and VetBiz. The pre-solicitation site visit date will be included in the solicitation. Questions should be emailed by the subject line deadline to the addresses provided. The Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Health Administration VISN 15 will award the contract without discussions but reserves the right to hold discussions if necessary.

36C25520R0063 657-19-103JB - Combined Specifications 100PCT_Part8.pdf

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
36C25520R0063-016.pdf PDF
36C25520R0063-011.pdf PDF
36C25520R0063-006.pdf PDF
36C25520R0063-008.pdf PDF
36C25520R0063-015.pdf PDF
36C25520R0063-004.pdf PDF
36C25520R0063-009.pdf PDF
36C25520R0063-002.docx DOCX document
36C25520R0063-013.pdf PDF
36C25520R0063-007.pdf PDF
36C25520R0063-003.pdf PDF
36C25520R0063-010.pdf PDF
36C25520R0063-012.pdf PDF
36C25520R0063-005.pdf PDF
Show all 14

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

·:~'I!t '_~ . ',. t~ "'/:~,·~,q"t4~~:§f:,·\~,r~i~·:Jfif~.1i~1t·V'Y~lt".4"~J:;~;L~;)t~~.lf,U~... . ~ lw.:"",J,. !\:I~'~ ~"~~~ t' ~' ' •• ~ _ _ ~ ~_'_'_'__ '~_"; ~~j!r~~~~~~:c~.~\~~~~"~_:! i,{ :~J_~~ht \i·~F"'. t~t'k~ijf.l >,11411~.j:.~. ~'{;'1,1i·"ti~~t~·t"Jil~>~ ~ ,j~~:iM1.i'~~:~~: 4i~~Jt~{<~j1~.:tilJ~ ~.T·.~"."~~~_"~_"·_·~··"_""·~_·~~~·" , •• _._~.~_.~, •• ~ _~~._~, __ •• ~'_ ~"- __ , '_ •• _~~ _

2539 Vandalia Street, Collinsville, IL 62234 * Phone: 618-855-8764

Environmental and Occupational Safety & Health Training

Does hereby certify

Dennis Ida 1139 Olive Street Suite 300, St. Louis, MO 63101

Has successfully completed and passed the course examination with at least 70% for re-accreditation under AHERA (Title II)

Asbestos Building Inspector Refresher

ClassDate:

Examination Date:

STCCertificate Number:

Certification Expiration:

03/01/2019 03/01/2019

STC-20190301-002419ABIR

03/01/2020

This training course is accredited by the Illinois Department of Public Health and the Missouri Department of Natural Resources

2018 Asbestos/Lead Inspection Report St. Louis Jefferson Barracks VAMC – Bldg. 60

SECTION 11.0

PERIODIC SURVEILLANCE FORMS

This section includes the forms completed during the periodic surveillance inspections required every 6 months.

MANAGEMENT PLAN REMOVAL PRIORITY ASSESSMENT CHARTS

Qualitative (Descriptive) Rankings for Current Condition of ACM Qualitative Ranking Example Descriptions of Current Condition

Good (G) Surfacing material has no visible damage; covering on TSI is intact; miscellaneous materials are intact; no visible debris.

Damaged (D) Surfacing material has moderate but not extensive visible damage; covering on TSI is cut or torn, exposing small but not extensive amounts of insulation; miscellaneous materials have moderate but not extensive damage; moderate but not extensive amounts of visible debris

Significantly Damaged (SD) Extensive damage to surfacing material; covering on TSI is cut or torn extensively and insulation itself is damaged; miscellaneous materials such as floor tile is extensively damaged and underlying mastic exposed; extensive amounts of dust and debris.

Note: Damage is considered “extensive” when the total area of distributed damage exceeds 10%, or 25% localized damage.

Qualitative Rankings for Potential for Disturbance of ACM Level of Potential Disturbance Frequency of Potential

Contact (accessibility) Influence of Vibration Potential for Air Erosion or

Water Damage

HIGH (H)

(potential for significant damage) High Any Value Any Value

Any Value High Any Value Any Value Any Value High

MODERATE (M)

(potential for damage)

Moderate Moderate or Low Moderate or Low Moderate or Low Moderate Moderate or Low Moderate or Low Moderate or Low Moderate

LOW (L) Low Low Low Note: Overall rating determined by assigning disturbance probabilities under all 3 categories then adopting highest individual score for each material.

Qualitative Rankings and Numerical Ratings for Removal Priority of ACM Hazard Rank/

Removal Priority ACBM Condition ACBM Disturbance

Potential Recommended Response Actions

1 Significantly Damaged

Any Evacuate or isolate area immediately. Remove ACBM immediately. O&M Required for all friable ACBM.

2 Damaged High Evacuate or isolate area immediately. Remove, enclose, encapsulate or repair ACBM to correct immediately. Reduce potential for disturbance of remaining materials. O&M Required for all friable ACBM.

3 Damaged Moderate Remove, enclose, encapsulate, or repair to correct damage as soon as feasible.

O&M Required for all friable ACBM.

4 Damaged Low Remove, enclose, encapsulate, or repair to correct damage as needed to facilitate future projects. Take steps to reduce potential for disturbance. O&M Required for all friable ACBM.

5 Good High Take steps to reduce potential for disturbance. O&M Required for all friable ACBM.

6 Good Moderate O&M Required for all friable ACBM.

7 Good Low O&M Required for all friable ACBM, but measures need not be as extensive as

Category 6.

VA JEFFERSON BARRACKS CAMPUS

BUILDING 60

SIX MONTH PERIODIC SURVELLIANCE FORM

6/24/2019

Homogeneous Area No. Bldg Floor Material Description

Friable Yes/No

Previous Condition Current Condition Potential for Disturbance Removal

Priority Comments

Rating Based On Rating Based On

Rating Based On

Building 60 – Tunnel

HMA-20 18 T ACM pipe insulation Yes SD Significant damage SD Significant damage M Access/ Maintenance 1 see map for locations of damage and significant damage

HMA-20 18 T ACM pipe insulation Yes G Intact G Intact M Access/ Maintenance 6

HMA-21 18 T Mudded fittings Yes SD Significant damage SD Significant damage M Maintenance 1 see map for locations of damage and significant damage

HMA-21 18 T Mudded fittings Yes G Intact G Intact M Maintenance 6

HMA-57 60 T Debris in tunnels Yes SD Significant Damaged SD Significant

Damaged L Access 1

HMA-58 60 T Assumed chrysotile loose fill at hanger locations Yes SD Significant

Damaged SD Significant Damaged L Access 1 Throughout tunnel system

HMA-59 60 T Assumed TSI remnant in steam system penetrations Yes SD Significant

Damaged SD Significant Damaged L Access 1 Throughout tunnel system

HMA-62 60 T Sewer pipe penetration packing Yes G Intact G Intact M Access/

Maintenance 6

Building 60 – 1st Floor

HMA-A1 18 1 12”x12” floor tile – white w/ black mastic No G Intact G Intact L Floor

Maintenance 7

HMA-B1 18 1 9”x9” floor tile – brown w/ black mastic No G Intact G Intact L Floor

Maintenance 7

HMA-C1 18 1 9”x9” floor tile – light brown w/ black mastic No G Intact G Intact L Floor

Maintenance 7

HMA-4 18 1 Wall mounted heater (PACM) No G Intact G Intact L Maintenance 7

HMA-9 60 1 6”x24” floor tile – dark brown No G Intact G Intact L Floor

Maintenance 7

HMA-19 18 1 Black TSI wrap Yes G Intact G Intact M Maintenance 6

Homogeneous Area No. Bldg Floor Material Description

Friable Yes/No

Previous Condition Current Condition Potential for Disturbance Removal

Priority Comments

Rating Based On Rating Based On

Rating Based On

HMA-20 18 1 ACM pipe insulation Yes SD Significant damage SD Significant damage M Maintenance 1 see map for locations of damage and significant damage

HMA-20 18 1 ACM pipe insulation Yes G Intact G Intact M Maintenance 6

HMA-21 18 1 Mudded fittings Yes SD Significant damage SD Significant damage M Maintenance 1 see map for locations of damage and significant damage

HMA-21 18 1 Mudded fittings Yes G Intact G Intact M Maintenance 6

HMA-29 18 1 Flange gasket (PACM) No G Intact G Intact L Maintenance 7

HMA-34 18 1 Fire door (PACM) No G Intact G Intact L Maintenance 7

HMA-43 60 1 Black penetration caulk No G Intact G Intact L Maintenance 7

HMA-56 60 1

Old covering under white canvas covering on hot water tank Yes G Intact G Intact L Maintenance 7

Building 60 – Exterior

HMA-48 60 Ext Old, hard, gray window caulk No G Intact G Intact L Maintenance 7

HMA-49 60 Ext Gray window frame caulk No G Intact G Intact L Maintenance 7

HMA-55 60 Ext Old, gray window caulk No G Intact G Intact L Maintenance 7

SECTION 12.0

MANAGEMENT PLAN UPDATES

This section includes the records of any asbestos abatement activities that are completed at the subject site. Notifications, daily notes, drawings, air sampling results, etc associated with building specific asbestos abatement projects should be placed in this section or at least represented within a project log tracking page.

SECTION 13.0

RESPONSE ACTIONS

This section includes the records of any internal asbestos abatement or operation and maintenance activities that may be completed by VA employees. This would include any drawings, field notes, and air monitoring completed.

SECTION 14.0

TRAINING DOCUMENTS

This section includes the records of any training for the Designated Person and accredited Supervisor, as well as the two-hour awareness training for the custodial, janitorial and maintenance staff.

SECTION 15.0

ANNUAL NOTIFICATION LETTERS

This section includes copies of the annual Notification Letters provided to employees to inform them of the availability of the Management Plan.

SECTION 16.0

2018 XRF LEAD SURVEY

This section includes tables summarizing the location and findings for all XRF lead samples collected during the 2018 survey.

Lead Containing Materials Summary Table VA-Jefferson Barracks Medical Facility Building 60

LEAD CONTAINING MATERIAL SUMMARY RSH PROJECT NO. SH1476

2018 LEAD SUMMARY

DESCRIPTION LOCATION INSPECTION COMMENTS

Olive 4” x 9”

Glazed Tile Wall N Hallway Riverfront 2018 N/A

Olive 4” x 9” Glazed Tile Wall Room 135 Riverfront 2018 N/A

Olive 4” x 9” Glazed Tile Wall Kitchen Area Riverfront 2018 N/A

Cinnamon Covebase Kitchen Area Riverfront 2018 N/A

Lead Bulk XRF Table

Blue Text: No Lead Detected Yellow Text: Lead Detected Red Text: Lead Concentration Exceeds EPA Limit

2018 XRF Paint Sampling Summary

Sample No.

Material Color Floor Room Component Substrate

Lead Content (mg/cm2)

286 1 Calibration 1.2

287 1 Calibration 1.2

288 1 Calibration 1.2

289 White 1 103 Wall Plaster 0.1

290 White 1 Wall Plaster 0.3

291 White 1 Wall Plaster 0.3

292 White 1 Wall Plaster 0.2

293 White 1 Door Metal 0.5

294 White 1 101 Wall Plaster 0

295 White 1 Wall Plaster 0.1

296 White 1 Wall Plaster 0.2

297 White 1 Wall Plaster 0.3

298 White 1 Door Metal 0.3

299 White 1

Bathroom Wall Plaster 0.2

300 White 1 Wall Tile 0.1

301 White 1 Wall Plaster 0

302 White 1 Wall Plaster 0.5

303 White 1 Wall Tile 0.3

304 White 1 Wall Plaster -0.1

305 White 1 Door Metal 0.2

306 Olive 1 N Hallway Wall 4" X 9" Glazed Tile 3.6

No.

Material Color Floor Room Component Substrate

Lead Content (mg/cm2)

307 Beige 1 Window Frame Metal 0.3

308 Cream 1 Ceiling Dravit -0.2

309 Olive 1 135 Wall 4" X 9" Glazed Tile 3

310 Olive 1 Wall 4" X 9" Glazed Tile 2.9

311 Olive 1 Wall 4" X 9" Glazed Tile 3.9

312 White 1 Wall Plaster 0.4

313 White 1 Door Metal 0.3

314 White 1 Ceiling Plaster 0.2

315 White 1 135A Wall Plaster 0

316 White 1 Wall Plaster 0.4

317 White 1 Wall Plaster 0.2

318 White 1 Wall Plaster 0.3

319 White 1 Door Metal 0.6

320 White 1 Ceiling Plaster 0.2

321 Olive 1

Kitchen Area

(Ceiling Too High To Shoot)

Wall 4" X 9" Glazed Tile 2.7

322 Olive 1 Wall 4" X 9" Glazed Tile 3.2

323 Olive 1 Wall 4" X 9" Glazed Tile 2.6

324 Olive 1 Wall 4" X 9" Glazed Tile 2.9

325 White 1 134 Wall Plaster 0.1

326 White 1 Wall Plaster -0.1

No.

Material Color Floor Room Component Substrate

Lead Content (mg/cm2)

327 White 1 Wall Plaster -0.1

328 White 1 Wall Plaster 0.2

329 White 1 Door Metal 0

330 White 1 Ceiling Plaster 0.1

331 Cinnamon 1 Kitchen

Area Wall Covebase 1

332 Cinnamon 1 Wall Covebase 1

333 Cinnamon 1 Wall Covebase 1

334 Cinnamon 1 Wall Covebase 1.5

335 White 1 Door Metal 0.2

336 White 1 Ceiling Plaster 0.1

337 1 Calibration 1

338 1 Calibration 1.1

339 1 Calibration 1.1

SECTION 17.0

PREVIOUS INSPECTION REPORTS

This section includes copies of all known previous inspection reports considered and referenced during this 2018 re-inspection effort, including the 2008 Altec report and the 1994 report. It should be noted that information from these reports was used, when deemed reliably accurate, in the development of the 2018 re-inspection report, and has been provided for reference herein.

ASBESTOS ASSESSMENT

ASBESTOS REINSPECTION REPORT

Jefferson Barracks Division 1 Jefferson Barracks Drive

St. Louis, Missouri

Prepared for:

St. Louis V. A. Medical Center 1 Jefferson Barracks Drive

St. Louis, Missouri

Prepared by:

1421 Clarkview Road, Suite 100 P. O. Box 17867 Baltimore, MD 21209 Shreveport, Louisiana 71138-0867

(888) 776-0670 (318) 687-3771

INTRODUCTION

2008 ASBESTOS REINSPECTION REPORT

ST. LOUIS V. A. MEDICAL CENTER

JOHN COCHRAN AND JEFFERSON BARRACKS DIVISIONS

SCOPE OF WORK

1. The Inspector and Management Planner reviewed prior inspections and Management Plan information on file and compared this information with existing conditions for each facility.

2. This asbestos reinspection complies with the requirements of Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA).

3. Each facility inspection was performed by an accredited inspector.

4. For each facility, the inspector performed the following tasks:

a. Visually reinspected and reassessed the condition of all friable known or assumed

ACBM.

b. Visually inspected material that was previously considered non-friable Asbestos- Containing Building Material (ACBM) and touched the material to determine whether it has become friable since the last inspection.

c. Identified any homogeneous areas with material that has become friable since the last inspection or reinspection.

d. The inspector collected bulk samples for analysis of newly friable material that is already assumed (not sampled) to be ACBM or collected additional bulk samples to fully assess the suspect materials.

e. Visually inspected, sampled, analyzed, and assessed the conditions of building materials that have been added to the facility since the last inspection or reinspection.

f. Assessed the condition of the newly friable material in areas where samples were collected and of newly friable material in areas assumed to be ACBM.

g. Reassessed the condition of friable known or assumed ACBM previously identified.

h. Recorded above information on field inspection forms for each facility.

5. A Management Planner reviewed the above information and performed the following required functions:

a. Reviewed each Management Plan for compliance with AHERA and verified that the plan reflects current conditions.

b. Reviewed the results of each reinspection and assessment.

c. Recommended in writing, the appropriate response actions.

d. Signed and dated the review documents, included the accreditation number of inspectors and planners, and submitted a copy to the Designated Person.

6. The following information was submitted to the Designated Person under AHERA, for inclusion in the Management Plan for each facility and, optionally, at a central office location.

a. The date of the inspection, the name and signature of the person making the inspection, state of accreditation, his or her accreditation number, and any changes in the condition of known or assumed ACBM.

b. If samples were collected, the exact locations where samples are collected during the inspection, a description of the manner used to choose sampling locations, the name and signature of each accredited inspector who collected the samples, state of accreditation, and his or her accreditation number.

c. Any assessments or reassessments made of friable material, the name and signature of the accredited inspector making the assessments, state of accreditation, and his or her accreditation number.

MANAGEMENT PLAN RECOMMENDATIONS

The following general notes are for all facilities inspected during the Asbestos Reinspection.

These notes reference any deficiencies found in prior inspections, reinspections, and the current Management Plan.

1. Removal Priorities were developed for each homogeneous area. The Removal Priorities are an indicator of priorities for future repair work or abatement work to be scheduled as financial budgets allow. Please see the 2008 Reinspection Condition and Removal Priority Table for further detail.

2. The current condition of material was listed for each homogeneous area. The condition, location, and potential for disturbance factors are used for the hazard ranking. Please see the 2008 Reinspection Condition and Removal Priority Table for the condition summaries.

3. Records for custodial, janitorial, and maintenance staff who have received two-hour awareness training should be filed in the Management Plan.

4. Any new custodial, janitorial, or maintenance staff that have the potential to come in contact with asbestos-containing materials (ACM) are required to attend a two-hour awareness training class. Records of training for new employees should be filed in the Management Plan.

5. The Designated Person is required to inform workers and building occupants at least once a year about the Management Plan. This includes information about inspections, response actions, and post-response action activities that are planned or in progress.

Provide a copy of the notification to each facility and include a copy in the Management Plan.

6. Maintenance areas (boiler rooms, janitor closets, etc.) are required to have warning labels where ACM are located. Install warning labels in these areas as needed. Some older labels may have come loose and are no longer visible. Post the labels in a prominent location.

7. Review the enclosed 2008 Reinspection Condition and Removal Priority Table for maintenance actions that may be required and to establish priorities and budgets for future repair and abatement work.

8. Periodic “Surveillance Inspections” are required every six (6) months. This inspection should indicate the condition of the material and provide recommendations for repair or potential removal. Consistency of inspections is desired and, therefore, should be performed by the same individual(s) for all facilities. An accredited inspector is not required, but is recommended. Records of Surveillance Inspections should be filed in both the administrative and facility Management Plans.

9. ”Reinspections” are required every three (3) years. Updated information should be added to the Management Plan.

10. The existing Management Plan (original) is updated by this Three-Year Reinspection.

All procedures and methods listed in the Plan are still in effect and should be followed unless specifically updated or omitted by this inspection. This includes maintenance procedures, repairs to damaged material, response actions, record keeping, surveillance inspections, and training.

11. An accredited “Supervisor” should be on staff or available on a contract basis per AHERA guidelines. Certification paperwork should be filed in the training section of the Management Plan.

12. ACBM should only be removed by licensed and accredited contractors in the State of Missouri. Response actions related to abatement activity should be filed in the Management Plan. Removal of limited amounts of asbestos is within the scope of the Management Plan by the accredited Supervisor and trained individuals.

13. Notification should be provided to “outside contractors” about ACM within the facility.

This should include such trades or services as telephone, electrical, plumbing, air conditioning, and other construction work. A form should be created for this purpose and placed in the Management Plan.

14. New building construction and portable buildings added to a facility are required to be inspected and sampled for ACM. In lieu of this, a letter from the architect, engineer, or manufacturer can be obtained that states “no ACM were specified or used in the facility”.

A copy of this letter is to be filed with the Management Plan at the facility. This letter will cancel the requirement for sampling.

15. Abatement Costs were developed for each homogeneous area and per facility. The estimated abatement cost is for budget purposes only. The cost is based on the area of material and estimated abatement costs for this material. The cost is for abatement only and does not include abatement design, air monitoring, or project observation costs.

REPORT SECTION

This report includes the following sections:

ACM Homogeneous Areas Summary Table and Drawings

This section provides a quick table reference to all asbestos-containing homogeneous areas found during the reinspection and drawings with the asbestos-containing homogeneous areas found during the 2008 asbestos reinspection.

Condition and Removal Priority Table

This section provides a table with the current condition, potential for disturbance, and removal priority for each homogeneous area.

Master Summary Table – Asbestos Bulk Samples

This table provides a listing of all asbestos bulk samples taken to date.

Asbestos-Containing Bulk Samples

This table provides a listing of all asbestos-containing bulk samples.

2008 Reinspection – Inspection Logs

This section provides the field inspection logs for samples taken during the 2008 asbestos reinspection.

Bulk Sample Location Drawings

This section provides drawings with sample locations for all asbestos bulk samples.

2008 Reinspection – Photographs

This section provides photographs of all asbestos bulk samples taken during the 2008 asbestos reinspection.

2008 Reinspection – Laboratory Reports

This section provides all laboratory analytical results.

Certifications

This section provides certifications for all Inspectors, the Management Planner who reviewed this Management Plan, and the laboratory that performed the bulk sample analysis.

Periodic Surveillance Forms

This section includes the forms completed during the periodic surveillance inspections required every six (6) months.

Management Plan Updates

This section includes the records of any asbestos abatement activities that are completed at the subject site. Notifications, daily notes, drawings, etc., should be placed in this section. This would also include air-monitoring data from asbestos abatement projects.

Response Actions

This section includes the records of any internal asbestos abatement or operation and maintenance activities that may be completed by V. A. employees. This would include any drawings, field notes, and air monitoring that was completed.

Training Documents

This section includes the records of training for the Designated Person and accredited Supervisor, as well as the two-hour awareness training for the custodial, janitorial, and maintenance staff.

Annual Notification Letters

This section includes copies of the annual Notification Letters provided to employees to inform them of the availability of the Management Plan.

Initial Inspection

This section contains the original asbestos inspection that was completed in 1994. This information was used to develop the 2008 Asbestos Reinspection.

CONTRACTORS

This 2008 Asbestos Reinspection was provided by:

Contractor: Subcontractor:

FINBACK 670, Inc. ALTEC Environmental Consultants, Inc.

1421 Clarkview Road, Suite 100 10100 Woolworth Road Baltimore, MD 21209 Keithville, LA 71047

(888) 776-0670 (Office) (318) 687-3771 (Office)

(877) 776-0670 (Fax) (318) 687-9923 (Fax)

INSPECTORS:

Brandon Odom Donald R. Joiner LA Certificate No. 9I01392 LA Certificate No. 8I01348 LA Certificate No. 9I01348

Eric Clipps Joshua Anders LA Certificate No. 9I01588 LA Certificate No. 9I01589

Justin L. Holcomb LA Certificate No. 9I00306

MANAGEMENT PLANNER:

Roy W. Dowling LA Certificate No. 9I00213 – Inspector LA Certificate No. 9P00072 – Management Planner

Accreditation Agency: Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality

ACM Homogeneous Areas Summary Table and Drawings

JEFFERSON BARRACKS DIVISION

2008 THREE-YEAR ASBESTOS REINSPECTION

ACM HOMOGENEOUS AREAS SUMMARY TABLE

Floor Flooring Materials Surfacing Materials TSI Materials Miscellaneous Materials

1 HMA-01 12x12 Floor Tile & Adhesive HMA-02 9x9 Floor Tile No ACM HMA-03 Pipe Insulation & Fittings No ACM

Building 60 - 1st Floor

Cody Dey Text Box

Cody Dey Text Box

Cody Dey Text Box

Cody Dey Text Box

Cody Dey Text Box

Cody Dey Text Box

Cody Dey Text Box

Cody Dey Text Box

Cody Dey Text Box

Cody Dey Text Box

Cody Dey Text Box

Cody Dey Text Box

Cody Dey Text Box

Cody Dey Text Box

Cody Dey Text Box

Cody Dey Text Box

Cody Dey Text Box

Cody Dey Text Box

Cody Dey Text Box

Cody Dey Text Box

RSH

Text Box

RSH

Text Box

RSH

Text Box

1st FLOOR

ST. LOUIS V.A. MEDICAL CENTER

2008 THREE-YEAR REINSPECTION

THERMAL SYSTEM INSULATION (TSI) SUMMARY TABLE

Room # Description Qty S/LF Ftgs TH/DI 101-60-JB magnesia pipe lagging 40 lf 0 4.00 101-60-JB mudded joint ftg on mag pipe lagging 0 ea 3 4.00

101A-60-JB magnesia pipe lagging 45 lf 0 4.00 101A-60-JB mudded joint ftg on mag pipe lagging 0 ea 5 4.00

112-60-JB magnesia pipe lagging 35 lf 0 4.00 112-60-JB mudded joint ftg on mag pipe lagging 0 ea 3 4.00

112A-60-JB magnesia pipe lagging 50 lf 0 4.00 112A-60-JB mudded joint ftg on mag pipe lagging 0 ea 10 4.00

113-60-JB magnesia pipe lagging 37 lf 0 4.00

114-60-JB magnesia pipe lagging 43 lf 0 4.00 114-60-JB mudded joint ftg on mag pipe lagging 0 ea 15 4.00

129-60-JB magnesia pipe lagging 15 lf 0 4.00 129-60-JB mudded joint ftg on mag pipe lagging 0 ea 8 4.00

134-60-JB magnesia pipe lagging 25 lf 0 4.00 134-60-JB mudded joint ftg on mag pipe lagging 0 ea 7 4.00

135-60-JB magnesia pipe lagging 30 lf 0 4.00 135-60-JB mudded joint ftg on mag pipe lagging 0 ea 10 4.00

H101-60-JB magnesia pipe lagging 165 lf 0 4.00 H101-60-JB mudded joint ftg on mag pipe lagging 0 ea 25 4.00

485 86

Building 60

TOTALS

Condition and Removal Priority Table

Qualitative Ranking Numerical Rating

Good 8, 9, 10

Fair 4, 5, 6, 7

Poor 1, 2, 3

Physical Disturbance Environmental Disturbance

Low 1, 2, 3

Medium 4, 5, 6, 7

High 8, 9, 10

Qualitative Ranking Numerical Rating High 1, 2, 3

Medium 4, 5, 6, 7

Low 8, 9, 10

1 Qualitative Rankings and Quantitative (Numerical) Ratings for Current Condition

2 Qualitative Rankings and Quantitative (Numerical) Ratings for Potential for Disturbance

Assessment FactorsQualitative Ranking Numerical Rating

Description of Current Condition Surfacing material has no visible damage or small amounts of damage; covering on thermal system insulation is intact or has small amounts of damage; miscellaneous materials intact; no visible debris or small amounts of debris.

Address with on-going maintenance procedures

Maintain in good condition

Surfacing material has moderate but not extensive amounts of visible damage; covering on thermal system insulation is cut or torn, exposing moderate but not extensive amounts of insulation; moderate but not extensive damage to miscellaneous materials such as floor tile; moderate but not extensive amounts of visible dust and debris..

3 Qualitative Rankings and Quantitative (Numerical) Ratings for Removal Priority

Description of Current Condition Address short-term

Extensive damage to surfacing material; covering on thermal system insulation is cut or torn extensively and insulation itself is damage; miscellaneous materials such as floor tile extensively damaged and underlying mastic exposed; extensive amounts of dust and debris.

Accessibility: accessibility during normal operations

Activities: activities that people do and how often they do them

Vibration: vibration from operating machinery, HVAC equipment, and so forth

Air/Dust: air currents strong enough to dislodge loose ACM; airborne dust that can erode material

Corrosive: corrosive atmosphere or liquids that can erode the covering or matrix

Water Damage: water damage from leaking roof, pipe or other source

2008 THREE-YEAR ASBESTOS REINSPECTION

CONDITION AND REMOVAL PRIORITY TABLE

Rating Based On Rating Based On

HMA-01 60 1 12x12 Floor Tile & Adhesive No Yes 10 Intact 2 Floor Maintenance 7

HMA-02 60 1 9x9 Floor Tile No No 10 Intact 1 Access 9

HMA-03 60 1 Pipe Insulation & Fittings Yes No 7 Damage 2 Access 6

Material Description Removal Priority 3

Current Condition 1

Building 60 - 1st Floor

Friable Yes/No

Accessibility Yes/No

Restricted

Potential for Disturbance 2

Homogeneous Area No. Bldg Floor

Master Summary Table Asbestos Bulk Samples

2008 THREE-YEAR ASBESTOS REINSPECTION

SUMMARY OF BULK SAMPLES TAKEN TO DATE

Building Floor Room Sample ID Material Description

JB60 01 126 JB-60-01-M-126-25 4" black cove base JB60 01 111 JB-60-01-S-111-21 Cork and plaster insulation JB60 01 112 JB-60-01-S-112-22 Cork and plaster insulation w/grid pattern JB60 01 120B JB-60-01-M-120B-23 2x4 plain fiberglass ceiling tile JB60 01 103 JB-60-01-M-103-24 1x1 white ceiling tile JB60 01 122 JB-60-01-M-122-26 Black condensate wrap JB60 01 101 JB-60-01-M-101-27 Gypsum drywall JB60 01 110 JB-60-01-T-110-04 Mudded joint fitting on cardboard lagging JB60 01 H101 JB-60-01-T-H101-11 Mudded joint fitting on cork and tar lagging JB60 01 108 JB-60-01-T-108-16 Mudded joint fitting on magnesia pipe lagging JB60 01 110 JB-60-01-T-110-01 Cardboard wrap pipe lagging JB60 01 H103 JB-60-01-T-H103-07 Cork and tar paper pipe lagging JB60 01 108 JB-60-01-T-108-14 Magnesia pipe lagging JB60 01 H102 JB-60-01-S-H102-19 Hardwall plaster JB60 01 112A JB-60-01-S-112A-20 Gray plaster

JB60 01 108 JB-60-01-M-108-001A White vibration isolator JB60 01 115 JB-60-01-F-115-002A White 12x12 floor tile, black mastic JB60 01 126 JB-60-01-F-126-003A White 12x12 floor tile, black mastic JB60 01 107 JB-60-01-F-107-004A Layer 1 - Brown 9x9 floor tile JB60 01 107 JB-60-01-F-107-004A Layer 2 - Black mastic JB60 01 107 JB-60-01-F-107-005A Layer 1 - Light brown 9x9 floor tile JB60 01 107 JB-60-01-F-107-005A Layer 2 - Black mastic JB60 01 129 JB-60-01-T-129-006A Black mastic, black tar paper wrap, brown insulation JB60 01 129 JB-60-01-T-129-007A Layer 1 - 6" Elbow - black tar JB60 01 129 JB-60-01-T-129-007A Layer 2 - 6" Elbow - black mastic JB60 01 129 JB-60-01-T-129-007A Layer 3 - 6" Elbow - paper JB60 01 101A JB-60-01-F-101A-008A Layer 1 - White 12x12 floor tile JB60 01 101A JB-60-01-F-101A-008A Layer 2 - Black mastic JB60 01 101 JB-60-01-F-101-009A Layer 1 - Brown 9x9 floor tile JB60 01 101 JB-60-01-F-101-009A Layer 2 - Black mastic JB60 01 101 JB-60-01-F-101-010A Layer 1 - Light brown 9x9 floor tile JB60 01 101 JB-60-01-F-101-010A Layer 2 - Black mastic JB60 01 104 JB-60-01-F-104-011A Layer 1 - Brown 9x9 floor tile JB60 01 104 JB-60-01-F-104-011A Layer 2 - Black mastic JB60 01 104 JB-60-01-F-104-012A Layer 1 - Light brown 9x9 floor tile JB60 01 104 JB-60-01-F-104-012A Layer 2 - Black mastic JB60 01 Roof JB-60-01-S-RF-013A Gray flashing, black roofing tar

Red = Asbestos-Containing Material (ACM) Blue = Non ACM Purple = Abated ACM

2008 Asbestos Reinspection

1994 Initial Asbestos Inspection

Asbestos-Containing Bulk Samples

2008 THREE-YEAR ASBESTOS REINSPECTION

LIST OF ASBESTOS-CONTAINING SAMPLES

Building Floor Room Sample ID Material Description

JB60 01 110 JB-60-01-T-110-04 Mudded joint fitting on cardboard lagging JB60 01 H101 JB-60-01-T-H101-11 Mudded joint fitting on cork and tar lagging JB60 01 108 JB-60-01-T-108-16 Mudded joint fitting on magnesia pipe lagging JB60 01 110 JB-60-01-T-110-01 Cardboard wrap pipe lagging JB60 01 108 JB-60-01-T-108-14 Magnesia pipe lagging

JB60 01 115 JB-60-01-F-115-002A White 12x12 floor tile, black mastic JB60 01 126 JB-60-01-F-126-003A White 12x12 floor tile, black mastic JB60 01 107 JB-60-01-F-107-004A Layer 1 - Brown 9x9 floor tile JB60 01 107 JB-60-01-F-107-005A Layer 1 - Light brown 9x9 floor tile JB60 01 129 JB-60-01-T-129-006A Black mastic, black tar paper wrap, brown insulation JB60 01 129 JB-60-01-T-129-007A Layer 1 - 6" Elbow - black tar JB60 01 101A JB-60-01-F-101A-008A Layer 2 - Black mastic JB60 01 101 JB-60-01-F-101-009A Layer 1 - Brown 9x9 floor tile JB60 01 101 JB-60-01-F-101-010A Layer 1 - Light brown 9x9 floor tile JB60 01 104 JB-60-01-F-104-011A Layer 1 - Brown 9x9 floor tile JB60 01 104 JB-60-01-F-104-012A Layer 1 - Light brown 9x9 floor tile

Red = Asbestos-Containing Material (ACM) Blue = Non ACM Purple = Abated ACM

2008 Asbestos Reinspection

1994 Initial Asbestos Inspection

2008 Reinspection Inspection Logs

Client: Date: October 15, 2008 Location: Inspector(s): Donald Joiner and Joshua Anders Address: 1 Jefferson Barracks Drive, St. Louis, Missouri

Note:

Sample ID Material Description Floor Room Location

JB-60-01-M-108-001A White vibration isolator 01 108 Northwest quadrant of room 108 above crawlspace access on air handler

JB-60-01-F-115-002A White 12x12 floor tile, black mastic 01 115 Northwest corner below breaker boxes

JB-60-01-F-126-003A White 12x12 floor tile, black mastic 01 126 Middle of room 126 on east wall in between doors

JB-60-01-F-107-004A Layer 1 - Brown 9x9 floor tile 01 107 Southwest quadrant in front of lockers

JB-60-01-F-107-004A Layer 2 - Black mastic 01 107 Southwest quadrant in front of lockers

JB-60-01-F-107-005A Layer 1 - Light brown 9x9 floor tile 01 107 Southwest quadrant in front of lockers

JB-60-01-F-107-005A Layer 2 - Black mastic 01 107 Southwest quadrant in front of lockers

JB-60-01-T-129-006A Black mastic, black tar paper wrap, brown insulation 01 129 West quadrant above access panel on ceiling

JB-60-01-T-129-007A Layer 1 - 6" Elbow - black tar 01 129 Northwest quadrant above access panel on ceiling

JB-60-01-T-129-007A Layer 2 - 6" Elbow - black mastic 01 129 Northwest quadrant above access panel on ceiling

JB-60-01-T-129-007A Layer 3 - 6" Elbow - paper 01 129 Northwest quadrant above access panel on ceiling

JB-60-01-F-101A-008A Layer 1 - White 12x12 floor tile 01 101A Northwest corner of room 101A

JB-60-01-F-101A-008A Layer 2 - Black mastic 01 101A Northwest corner of room 101A

JB-60-01-F-101-009A Layer 1 - Brown 9x9 floor tile 01 101 Southeast corner in front of door to 102

JB-60-01-F-101-009A Layer 2 - Black mastic 01 101 Southeast corner in front of door to 102

ASBESTOS INSPECTION LOG

Red = Asbestos-Containing Material (ACM) Blue = Non ACM Green = Non ACM (determined by Point Count analysis)

Jefferson Barracks Division - Building 60 St. Louis V. A. Medical Center

Client: Date: October 15, 2008 Location: Inspector(s): Donald Joiner and Joshua Anders Address: 1 Jefferson Barracks Drive, St. Louis, Missouri

Note:

Sample ID Material Description Floor Room Location

ASBESTOS INSPECTION LOG

Red = Asbestos-Containing Material (ACM) Blue = Non ACM Green = Non ACM (determined by Point Count analysis)

Jefferson Barracks Division - Building 60 St. Louis V. A. Medical Center

JB-60-01-F-101-010A Layer 1 - Light brown 9x9 floor tile 01 101 Southeast corner in front of door to 102

JB-60-01-F-101-010A Layer 2 - Black mastic 01 101 Southeast corner in front of door to 102

JB-60-01-F-104-011A Layer 1 - Brown 9x9 floor tile 01 104 Southeast corner of room 104 behind door

JB-60-01-F-104-011A Layer 2 - Black mastic 01 104 Southeast corner of room 104 behind door

JB-60-01-F-104-012A Layer 1 - Light brown 9x9 floor tile 01 104 Southeast corner of room 104 behind door

JB-60-01-F-104-012A Layer 2 - Black mastic 01 104 Southeast corner of room 104 behind door

JB-60-01-S-RF-013A Gray flashing, black roofing tar 01 Roof Southeast quadrant on roof by air conditioning unit

GOOD = Surfacing material has no visible damage or small amounts of damage; covering on thermal system insulation is intact or has small amounts of damage; miscellaneous materials intact; no visible debris or small amounts of debris. FAIR = Surfacing material has moderate but not extensive amounts of visible damage; covering on thermal system insulation is cut or torn, exposing moderate but not extensive amounts of insulation; moderate but not extensive damage to miscellaneous materials such as floor tile; moderate but not extensive amounts of visible dust and debris. POOR = Extensive damage to surfacing material; covering on thermal system insulation is cut or torn extensively and insulation itself is damaged; miscellaneous materials such as floor tile extensively damaged and underlying mastic exposed; extensive amounts of dust and debris.

Material Category: F = Flooring S = Surfacing T = TSI M = Miscellaneous Friability: F=Friable NF=Non-Friable Condition: Good = 8, 9, 10 Fair = 4, 5, 6, 7 Poor = 1, 2, 3

Red = Asbestos-Containing Material Blue = Non Asbestos-Containing MaterialPlease use the following guidelines when reading this report:

Bulk Sample Location Drawings

1st FLOOR

2008 Reinspection Photographs sample does not contain asbestos

JB-60-01-M-108-001A JB-60-01-F-115-002A

JB-60-01-F-126-003A JB-60-01-F-107-004A

sample contains asbestos

JB-60-01-F-107-005A JB-60-01-T-129-006A

JB-60-01-T-129-007A JB-60-01-F-101A-008A

JB-60-01-F-101-009A JB-60-01-F-101-010A

JB-60-01-F-104-011A JB-60-01-F-104-012A

JB-60-01-S-RF-013A

2008 Reinspection Laboratory Reports

Sample Location Appearance % Type

AsbestosNon-Asbestos

% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy

390805236

Attn: Roy W. Dowling ALTEC Environmental Consultants, Inc.

2920 Truly Lane Shreveport, LA 71138

Customer PO:

Received: 10/16/08 3:45 PM

VAMC Reinspection 08-14529 VAMC Reinspection JB Building 60

Customer ID: ALT50

Fax: (318) 687-9923 Phone: (318) 687-3771 Project:

EMSL Order:

EMSL Proj:

10/17/2008Analysis Date:

Report Date: 10/17/2008

EMSL Analytical, Inc.

11040A Lin-Valle Drive, Saint Louis, MO 63123 Phone: (314) 845-8910 Fax: (314) 845-6459 Email: saintlouislab@emsl.com

JB-60-01-M-108-

001A 390805236-0001 wht vibration isolator

White None Detected

Fibrous

Heterogeneous

Fibrous (other)79% Non-fibrous (other)21%

JB-60-01-F-115-

002A floortile 390805236-0002 wht 12x12/blk mastic

White Non-Fibrous

Heterogeneous

Chrysotile6%Non-fibrous (other)94%

JB-60-01-F-115-

002A adhesive 390805236-0002A wht 12x12/blk mastic

Black Non-Fibrous

Heterogeneous

Chrysotile12%Non-fibrous (other)88%

JB-60-01-F-126-

003A floortile 390805236-0003 wht 12x12/blk mastic

White Non-Fibrous

Heterogeneous

Chrysotile6%Non-fibrous (other)94%

JB-60-01-F-126-

003A adhesive 390805236-0003A wht 12x12/blk mastic

Black Non-Fibrous

Heterogeneous

Chrysotile12%Non-fibrous (other)88%

JB-60-01-F-107-

004A floortile 390805236-0004 brn 9x9/blk mastic Brown Non-Fibrous

Heterogeneous

Chrysotile9%Non-fibrous (other)91%

JB-60-01-F-107-

004A adhesive 390805236-0004A brn 9x9/blk mastic Black None Detected

Non-Fibrous

Heterogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

Jeff Siria, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory

PLM-1

Analyst(s)

Due to magnification limitations inherent in PLM, asbestos fibers in dimensions below the resolution capability of PLM may not be detected. The limit of detection as stated in the method is 1%. The above test report relates only to the items tested and may not be reproduced in any form without the express written approval of EMSL Analytical, Inc. EMSL’s liability is limited to the cost of analysis. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. This report must not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government.

Analysis performed by EMSL St. Louis (AIHA #102636, NVLAP # 200742-0, CA ELAP #2668)

Sue Ferrario (24)

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com mailto:saintlouislab@emsl.com http://www.pdffactory.com

% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy

390805236

Attn: Roy W. Dowling ALTEC Environmental Consultants, Inc.

2920 Truly Lane Shreveport, LA 71138

Customer PO:

Received: 10/16/08 3:45 PM

VAMC Reinspection 08-14529 VAMC Reinspection JB Building 60

Customer ID: ALT50

Fax: (318) 687-9923 Phone: (318) 687-3771 Project:

EMSL Order:

EMSL Proj:

10/17/2008Analysis Date:

Report Date: 10/17/2008

EMSL Analytical, Inc.

11040A Lin-Valle Drive, Saint Louis, MO 63123 Phone: (314) 845-8910 Fax: (314) 845-6459 Email: saintlouislab@emsl.com

JB-60-01-F-107-

005A floortile 390805236-0005 lt brn 9x9/blk mastic

Brown Non-Fibrous

Heterogeneous

Chrysotile12%Non-fibrous (other)88%

JB-60-01-F-107-

005A adhesive 390805236-0005A lt brn 9x9/blk mastic

Black None Detected

Non-Fibrous

Heterogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

JB-60-01-T-129-

006A 390805236-0006 blk mastic/blk tar/paper wrap/brn ins

Various Non-Fibrous

Heterogeneous

Chrysotile47%Cellulose7% Min. Wool7%

Non-fibrous (other)39%

JB-60-01-T-129-

007A tar 390805236-0007 blk mastic/blk tar/paper/elbow

Black Non-Fibrous

Heterogeneous

Chrysotile6%Non-fibrous (other)94%

JB-60-01-T-129-

007A adhesive 390805236-0007A blk mastic/blk tar/paper/elbow

Black None Detected

Non-Fibrous

Heterogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

JB-60-01-T-129-

007A insulation 390805236-0007B blk mastic/blk tar/paper/elbow

Brown None Detected

Fibrous

Heterogeneous

Hair98% Non-fibrous (other)2%

JB-60-01-F-101A-

008A floortile 390805236-0008 wht 12x12/blk mastic

White None Detected

Non-Fibrous

Heterogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

Jeff Siria, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory

PLM-1

Analyst(s)

Due to magnification limitations inherent in PLM, asbestos fibers in dimensions below the resolution capability of PLM may not be detected. The limit of detection as stated in the method is 1%. The above test report relates only to the items tested and may not be reproduced in any form without the express written approval of EMSL Analytical, Inc. EMSL’s liability is limited to the cost of analysis. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. This report must not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government.

Analysis performed by EMSL St. Louis (AIHA #102636, NVLAP # 200742-0, CA ELAP #2668)

Sue Ferrario (24)

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com mailto:saintlouislab@emsl.com

% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy

390805236

Attn: Roy W. Dowling ALTEC Environmental Consultants, Inc.

2920 Truly Lane Shreveport, LA 71138

Customer PO:

Received: 10/16/08 3:45 PM

VAMC Reinspection 08-14529 VAMC Reinspection JB Building 60

Customer ID: ALT50

Fax: (318) 687-9923 Phone: (318) 687-3771 Project:

EMSL Order:

EMSL Proj:

10/17/2008Analysis Date:

Report Date: 10/17/2008

EMSL Analytical, Inc.

11040A Lin-Valle Drive, Saint Louis, MO 63123 Phone: (314) 845-8910 Fax: (314) 845-6459 Email: saintlouislab@emsl.com

JB-60-01-F-101A-

008A adhesive 390805236-0008A wht 12x12/blk mastic

Black Non-Fibrous

Heterogeneous

Chrysotile12%Non-fibrous (other)88%

JB-60-01-F-101-

009A floortile 390805236-0009 brn 9x9/blk mastic Brown Non-Fibrous

Heterogeneous

Chrysotile9%Non-fibrous (other)91%

JB-60-01-F-101-

009A adhesive 390805236-0009A brn 9x9/blk mastic Black None Detected

Non-Fibrous

Heterogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

JB-60-01-F-101-

010A floortile 390805236-0010 lt brn 9x9/blk mastic

Brown Non-Fibrous

Heterogeneous

Chrysotile12%Non-fibrous (other)88%

JB-60-01-F-101-

010A adhesive 390805236-0010A lt brn 9x9/blk mastic

Black None Detected

Non-Fibrous

Heterogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

JB-60-01-F-104-

011A floortile 390805236-0011 brn 9x9/blk mastic Brown Non-Fibrous

Heterogeneous

Chrysotile9%Non-fibrous (other)91%

JB-60-01-F-104-

011A adhesive 390805236-0011A brn 9x9/blk mastic Black None Detected

Non-Fibrous

Heterogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

Jeff Siria, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory

PLM-1

Analyst(s)

Due to magnification limitations inherent in PLM, asbestos fibers in dimensions below the resolution capability of PLM may not be detected. The limit of detection as stated in the method is 1%. The above test report relates only to the items tested and may not be reproduced in any form without the express written approval of EMSL Analytical, Inc. EMSL’s liability is limited to the cost of analysis. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. This report must not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government.

Analysis performed by EMSL St. Louis (AIHA #102636, NVLAP # 200742-0, CA ELAP #2668)

Sue Ferrario (24)

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com mailto:saintlouislab@emsl.com

% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy

390805236

Attn: Roy W. Dowling ALTEC Environmental Consultants, Inc.

2920 Truly Lane Shreveport, LA 71138

Customer PO:

Received: 10/16/08 3:45 PM

VAMC Reinspection 08-14529 VAMC Reinspection JB Building 60

Customer ID: ALT50

Fax: (318) 687-9923 Phone: (318) 687-3771 Project:

EMSL Order:

EMSL Proj:

10/17/2008Analysis Date:

Report Date: 10/17/2008

EMSL Analytical, Inc.

11040A Lin-Valle Drive, Saint Louis, MO 63123 Phone: (314) 845-8910 Fax: (314) 845-6459 Email: saintlouislab@emsl.com

JB-60-01-F-104-

012A floortile 390805236-0012 lt brn 9x9/blk mastic

Brown Non-Fibrous

Heterogeneous

Chrysotile12%Non-fibrous (other)88%

JB-60-01-F-104-

012A adhesive 390805236-0012A lt brn 9x9/blk mastic

Black None Detected

Non-Fibrous

Heterogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

JB-60-01-S-RF-

013A 390805236-0013 grey flashing/blk roofing tar

Various None Detected

Non-Fibrous

Heterogeneous

Cellulose4% Non-fibrous (other)96%

Jeff Siria, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory

PLM-1

Analyst(s)

THIS IS THE LAST PAGE OF THE REPORT.

Due to magnification limitations inherent in PLM, asbestos fibers in dimensions below the resolution capability of PLM may not be detected. The limit of detection as stated in the method is 1%. The above test report relates only to the items tested and may not be reproduced in any form without the express written approval of EMSL Analytical, Inc. EMSL’s liability is limited to the cost of analysis. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. This report must not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government.

Analysis performed by EMSL St. Louis (AIHA #102636, NVLAP # 200742-0, CA ELAP #2668)

Sue Ferrario (24)

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com mailto:saintlouislab@emsl.com

Certifications

028211A TRADITIONAL ASBESTOS ABATEMENT REPORT
ABI Cert 19
MO Inspector 9-21-18
ACSI 081018
MO Inspector EXP 11-02-19
ABIR EXP 10-19-19
EMC LABS NVLAP 2019
CoverLetter60
60-6month
JB-Draft-60-Report
LeadSummary60
LeadBulk60
CoverLetter60
08-14529 JB Bldg 60 Report
7 - Attachment 4 Divider.pdf (p.517-520)
028333.13 LEAD BASED TITAN
028333.13A LEAD BASED TITAN REPORT
1-TES_~1.pdf (p.1-5)
2.0 LBP Draings Combined.pdf (p.6-11)
2.1 Bldg. 60 - LBP Combined Drawings.pdf (p.12-13)
3 - Attachment 2.pdf (p.14)
4.0 - Bldg. 60 Photo Log.pdf (p.15-16)
4.2 - Bldg. 18 Photo Log.pdf (p.17-22)

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .