Past Performance Survey.pdf
PDF 125 KB Posted
- Attached to
- X1LZ--Detroit parking 65 Spaces
- Solicitation number
- 36C25024Q0561
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Survey related to Solicitation 36C25024Q0561 for the lease/rental of 65 parking spaces in Detroit, Michigan for the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). The survey evaluates the past performance of an offeror across criteria such as management of the parking space, customer satisfaction, and timeliness. Potential ratings range from "Exceptional" to "Unsatisfactory." The survey also includes a narrative section for the evaluator to provide additional comments on the offeror's strengths, areas for improvement, compliance issues, and overall performance rating. This survey must be completed and submitted by the evaluating reference prior to the closing date and time stated in the solicitation.
The related federal contract opportunity is for the lease/rental of 65 parking spaces in Detroit, Michigan for the VA's John D. Dingell VA Medical Center. The solicitation is being issued under simplified acquisition procedures, with a base year plus four one-year option periods. The requested spaces must be located within a defined geographic area in downtown Detroit and available at the time of award, expected to be by June 2024.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 36C25024Q0561_1.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Past Performance Survey
36C25024Q0561
NOTE: This Past Performance Survey Form is Exhibit of Request for RFQ 36C25024Q0561 and must be received via e-mail kevin.adkins@va.gov from the reference(s) prior to the closing date and time stated in the
RLP.
Rating Abbreviation Description
Exceptional
E
Performance meets contract requirements and exceeds many to the lessee’s benefit.
The contract performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Offeror were highly effective.
Satisfactory
S
Performance meets contract requirements. The contract performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Offeror appear or were satisfactory.
Marginal M
Performance does not meet some contract requirements. The contract performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the Offeror has not yet identified corrective actions. The Offeror’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
Unsatisfactory U
Performance does not meet some contract requirements. The contract performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the Offeror has not yet identified corrective actions. The Offeror’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
Neutral N Not Applicable or No performance record identifiable.
For the following elements select a rating from the chart above and CIRCLE the appropriate LETTER:
Management of Contracted Parking Space
Offeror provided experienced/qualified staff or personnel to meet contract requirements: E S M U N
Offeror maintained the grounds / parking in an attractive and professional manner and in good condition per the terms of the contract. E S M U N
Offeror provided services (janitorial, snow removal, utilities, repairs) per the terms of the contract. E S M U N
Customer Satisfaction
The quality of the parking areas provided were acceptable and per the terms of the contract. E S M U N
The Offeror was responsive to service requests. E S M U N
The Offeror was responsive to communications pertaining to the contract administration. E S M U N
Offeror resolved issues to the lessee’s satisfaction and in accordance with the terms of the contract. E S M U N
Offeror / subcontractor provided all services in a courteous and professional manner. E S M U N
Timeliness
The contracted space was delivered in a timely manner. E S M U N
Offeror / subcontractor provided all services in a prompt manner. E S M U N
Provide any explanation you may feel is required to clarify any of the above responses:
Narrative Summary
What were the Offeror’s greatest strengths in the performance of the contract/contract?
What were the Offeror’s greatest opportunity for improvement in the performance of the contract?
Were there any compliance difficulties experienced during performance of this contract/lease?
Would you have any reservations about soliciting this Offeror in the future or having their subcontractors perform one of your critical requirements?
Are there any other issues not covered you feel important to note about performance of this Offeror/contract?
Government contracts only: Has/was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?
Yes Default Convenience Pending Terminations NO _______
If yes, explain (e.g., inability to meet price, performance, or delivery schedules, etc.)
Considering all the information provided above, by selecting one of the rating descriptions, please rate the Offeror’s performance overall . E S M U N.
Printed Name of Evaluator
Signature
Name of Company
Phone Number
Date
Contract/Contract Name
Period of Performance
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .