Attachment D - Past Performance.pdf
PDF 104 KB Posted
- Attached to
- CERS SUD Recovery Housing in Lucas County, OH Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 36C25022Q0352
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment I - QASP.pdf | ||
| 36C25022Q0352 - Combined Synopsis Solicitation Notice.pdf | ||
| WD 2015-4741 Rev 15 - Lucas County.pdf | ||
| 36C25022Q0352 - Combined Synopsis Solicitation Notice.pdf | ||
| Attachment I - QASP.pdf | ||
| Attachment IV - Contractor Rules of Behavior.pdf | ||
| Attachment III - Immigration Certification.pdf | ||
| WD 2015-4883 Rev 18.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE SURVEY
Offeror’s Name: ___________________________________________________________________
Contract Number: __________________________________________________________________
Contract Type and Dollar Value: _______________________________________________________
Brief Description of Work: ____________________________________________________________
“O” =Outstanding = Performance greatly exceeded the contract requirements “A” =Above Average = Performance exceeded the contract requirements “S” = Satisfactory = Performance met the contract requirements “M” = Marginal = Performance met the minimum contract requirements, but some material aspects of the contractor’s performance were less than satisfactory “U” = Unacceptable = Performance was poor and/or did not satisfy contract requirements
Please rate and provide information and detailed comments for the following: CIRCLE ONE
1. To what extent did the contractor comply with contract requirements? O A S M U
2. If reports were required, were they accurate in meeting contract requirements? O A S M U
3. To what extent did the contractor use appropriate personnel for contract requirements? O A S M U
4. To what extent did the contractor display technical expertise? O A S M U
5. To what extent was contractor able to meet the performance schedule? O A S M U
6. To what extent was contractor flexible in responding to changing needs? O A S M U
7. To what extent was the contractor reliable? O A S M U
8. To what extent was the contractor responsive to technical directions? O A S M U
9. To what extent did contractor notify you of problems or potential problems? O A S M U
10. Have any cure notices, show cause letters, suspension of payment, or termination been issued? If yes, please explain.
O A S M U
11. Would you award another contract to the party being evaluated? If no, please explain: O A S M U
12. Was the customer satisfied with the end product? If no, please explain: O A S M U
Additional Comments:
Name of Evaluator: _________________________________________________________
Signature of Evaluator: ______________________________________________________
Title: _____________________________________________________________________
Company: _________________________________________________________________
Telephone No.: _____________________________________________________________
Date:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .