Attachment Six (6) - Past Performance Questionaire.pdf
PDF 91 KB Posted
- Attached to
- W042--Mobile MRI Broward CBOC Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 36C24822Q0181
About this file
This document contains a request for quotes for mobile magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) services. The Department of Veterans Affairs Miami Veterans Affairs Healthcare System intends to issue a solicitation on November 22, 2021 to small businesses set aside for Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Businesses for a 3T MRI trailer to be located at the William Bill Kling VA Clinic in Sunrise, Florida. The period of performance will be from December 15, 2021 through December 14, 2022. The solicitation will require two personnel at all times - a board certified MRI technologist and an assistant, both certified in basic life support. Interested parties should register on beta.SAM.gov and the solicitation will be issued as a firm fixed price contract. Questions should be directed to the contracting officer.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 36C24822Q0181 0001.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment One (1) - Organizational Conflict of Interest 02.pdf | ||
| Attachment Six 6 - Past Performance Questionaire.pdf | ||
| Attachment Five (5) - Wage Determination.pdf | ||
| Attachment Four (4) - Contractor Rules of Behavior.pdf | ||
| Attachment Three (3) - Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan.pdf | ||
| Attachment Two (2) - Contractor Certification.pdf | ||
| 36C24822Q0181_2.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment. D.6
RFQ 36C24822Q0181
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Request for Quote - 36C24822Q0181
3T Mobile Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) services, along with a Board-Certified MRI Technologist(s), and a Tech. Assistant
1. Background: The Miami Veterans Affairs Healthcare System (MVAHCS) has an ongoing requirement for 3T Mobile Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) services, along with a Board-Certified MRI Technologist(s), and a Tech. Assistant. The vendor has identified you as a reference to validate the their past performance. This question is concerns pass or current contractors/agreements for which you have personal knowledge.
2. Instruction: Please complete this questionnaire based on the following guidance. Please take the time to answer the questions to the best of your knowledge. Circle the responses that best describe the company’s performance and write in a narrative explanation for you answer. Use a N/A rating to indicate that you have no performance information for that particular area, or if the question does not apply to you. Each question has space for your comments. If more space is needed, please attach additional sheets to the end of the questionnaire and reference to respective questions. Handwritten (ink) responses are sufficient.
Please complete the following questionnaire to assist our evaluation of the company's past performance and return no later than the date the contractor advises. Please return to Rosetta Quinn email at Rosetta.quinn@va.gov.
Name of Company: _____________________________________________
Title/Description of Proposed Project:
Please evaluate the past performance using only the following ratings without variation. If the ratings is Marginal or Unsatisfactory, please provide additional information in the appropriate block or in the remarks section of this form
“O” = Outstanding = Performance greatly exceeded the contract requirements “A” = Above Average = Performance exceeded the contract requirements “S” = Satisfactory = Performance met the contract requirements “M = Marginal = Performance meet the minimum contract requirements but some material aspects of the company's performance were less than satisfactory “U” = Unacceptable = Performance was poor and/or did not satisfy contract requirements mailto:osetta.quinn@va.gov
CUSTOMER SATISFACTION
1. Company maintain a professional staff.
Outstanding Above Average Satisfactory Marginal Unacceptable
BRIEF EXPLANATION OF RATING GIVEN:
2. Company was responsive to inquiries regarding contract/agreement.
Outstanding Above Average Satisfactory Marginal Unacceptable
BRIEF EXPLANATION OF RATING GIVEN:
3. Company was flexible in responding two urgent requirements.
Outstanding Above Average Satisfactory Marginal Unacceptable
BRIEF EXPLANATION OF RATING GIVEN:
4. Overall customer satisfaction.
Outstanding Above Average Satisfactory Marginal Unacceptable
BRIEF EXPLANATION OF RATING GIVEN:
COMPLIANCE WITH STAFFING REQUIREMENTS
5. Company provided sufficient notice of personnel changes/additions, to ensure adequate time to credential personnel.
Outstanding Above Average Satisfactory Marginal Unacceptable
BRIEF EXPLANATION OF RATING GIVEN:
6. Company consistently provided trained/qualified staff.
Outstanding Above Average Satisfactory Marginal Unacceptable
BRIEF EXPLANATION OF RATING GIVEN:
7. Company ensured staff remained fully qualified/proficient at all times.
Outstanding Above Average Satisfactory Marginal Unacceptable
BRIEF EXPLANATION OF RATING GIVEN:
8. What's the company ever issues a cure or show cause notice under the reference contract/agreement?
If yes, explain in “comments.” Yes/No
Comments:
9. Would you hire this company again?
If yes, explain in “comments.” Yes/No
Comments:
Overall Rating: ____________________________________
Name of Evaluator: ______________________________ E-Mail: ______________________________
Position Title/Grade: _____________________________ Phone Number: _______________________
Company/City: _____________________ Date Questionnaire Completed: ______________________
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .