PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONAIRE AND COVER LETTER.docx
DOCX document 41 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Project 557-21-104 Correct Critical Parking and Accessibility Deficiencies Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 36C24723R0008
About this file
This pre-solicitation notice requests SF330 submissions for architectural and engineering services. The Department of Veterans Affairs seeks a firm to provide design services for a project to correct critical parking and accessibility deficiencies at the Carl Vinson VA Medical Center in Dublin, Georgia. The estimated budget is between $2-5 million. Responses are due by December 16th and the anticipated award date is March 30th, 2023. This is a 100% set-aside for Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Businesses. Evaluation criteria include specialized experience with similar VA projects, professional qualifications of the proposed team, and past performance references. Submissions must include the SF330 form along with license and SDVOSB certification information by the stated deadline.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 36C24723R0008.pdf | ||
| 36C24723R0008.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT 1 - PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONAIRE AND COVER LETTER
Complete one set of letters and forms for each project identified in your firm’s SF 330 Section F, Example Projects Which Best Illustrate Proposed Team’s Qualifications for This Contract. Additional space or blank sheets may be added to answer any question.
Transmittal Letter to Accompany Past Performance Questionnaire
FROM: [Insert Company Official Name, Title, and Company Name]
SUBJECT: Past Performance Questionnaire for Contract(s):
[Insert Company Name] is currently responding to Department of Veterans Affairs (NCO 7) request for SF 330, Architect-Engineer Qualifications for a complete design for project 557-21-104, Correct Critical Parking and Accessibility Deficiencies. This Request for SF 330’s requires respondents to identify customers and solicit their response regarding [Insert Company Name] performance.
[Insert Company Name] is providing past performance data to NCO 7 relating to our performance on contract [Insert contract name/number] and have identified [Insert name of reference] as the point of contact for this contract.
The request for SF 330 instructs that the respondents will provide customers with the attached questionnaire. Please complete the questionnaire and submit it by____ directly to the NCO 7 Contracting Office Contracting Officer. The requested data may be submitted by mail, but the preferred method is email to the Government representative identified below. If the Past Performance Questionnaire is emailed, DO NOT send a hard copy via mail.
Christopher Jenkins, Contract Specialist VISN 7 Network Contracting Office (NCO7) 1826 Veterans Blvd Dublin, GA 31021 E-mail: christopher.jenkins@va.gov
The information contained in the completed Past Performance Questionnaire is considered sensitive and cannot be released to [Insert Company Name]. Please direct any questions about the acquisition or the attached questionnaire to the VISN 7 NCO point of contact identified above.
Thank you, [Insert Company Official Name and Title]
A. GENERAL INFORMATION
A-E FIRM TO BE EVALUATED:
Firm Name:
Phone:
Address:
Email:
Point of Contact:
Firm Cage Code: ______________________________ Firm Tax ID Number: __________________________ Firm DUNS Number: _________________________________ Project Title: _______________________________________
Description of Project:
Description of A-E Firms’ Responsibilities:
Contract Number: ________________________________________________________ Dollar Amount: _____________________ _____________________________________ Contract Period of Performance: _____________________________________________ A-E Firm performed as: Prime Contractor/Sub-Contractor/Consultant/Team Member ______ Percent of work performed by A-E Firm:___________________________________________ Other (Please describe) ________________________________________________________
B. EVALUATION INFORMATION:
Evaluator’s Company or Agency Firm Name:
Evaluator’s Name:
Address:
Title:
Phone:
Email:
A. SEND COMPLETED QUESTIONAIRE (SECTIONS B through D) TO: (Email Only)
Christopher Jenkins, Contract Specialist VISN 7 Network Contracting Office (NCO7) 1826 Veterans Blvd Dublin, GA 31021 E-mail: christopher.jenkins@va.gov
B. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate rating that most accurately describes the A/E’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ALL RATINGS OF Marginal or Unsatisfactory on page 7 under Narrative Summary.
| Exceptional (5) |
| Very Good (4) |
| Satisfactory (3) |
| Marginal (2) |
| Unsatisfactory (1) |
| N/A |
| -Performance meets or met contractual requirements and exceeds or exceeded many of your company’s expectations. The contractual performance reflects or reflected few minor problems and corrective actions taken by the contractor appear to be highly effective or corrective actions taken were effective. |
| -Performance meets or met contractual requirements and exceeds or exceeded some of your company’s expectations. The contractual performance reflects or reflected some minor problems and corrective actions being taken by the contractor appear to be effective or Corrective actions taken were effective. |
| -Performance meets or met contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects or reflected some minor problems. |
Corrective actions being taken by the contractor appear to be effective or Corrective actions taken were effective.
| -Performance does or did not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects or reflected serious problems(s) for which the contractor has not yet identified acceptable corrective actions or did not provide acceptable corrective actions. |
| -Performance does or did not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely or did not occur. The contractual performance contains or contained serious problem (s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear ineffective or were ineffective. |
| -Not applicable or rater has not observed performance in this area. |
A-E FIRM’S NAME: PROJECT NAME:
Contract Period of Performance:
Note: Include this information on each page of the questionnaire form to ensure there is no mix up in information among contracts surveyed for respective primes/subs, etc.
Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix on page 4.
Item
FACTORS TO BE RATED
| Exceptional (5) |
| Very Good (4) |
| Satisfactory (3) |
| Marginal (2) |
| Unsatisfactory (1) |
| N/A |
Design Services:
| 1. |
| Overall skill level and technical competence of A/E’s personnel. |
| 2. |
| A/E’s ability to identify and resolve design issues expeditiously. |
| 3. |
| A/E’s responsiveness to design review questions. |
| 4. |
| A/E’s ability to effectively coordinate, integrate and manage their consultants/subcontractors/team |
| 5. |
| A/E’s effectiveness and responsiveness in interfacing with the Client’s staff |
| 6. |
| Overall accuracy, completeness and coordination of final design documents. (Quality) |
| 7. |
| A/E’s ability to provide detailed, accurate cost estimates. |
| 8. |
| A/E’s ability to meet contract schedule. |
Follow-On Construction Support Services:
| 9. |
| Thoroughness and timely review of construction submittals. |
| 10. |
| Timely resolution of construction design issues. |
| 11. |
| Overall quality, responsiveness and timeliness of A/E follow-on construction support services. |
LEED (If Applicable):
| 12. |
| Overall accuracy, completeness, timeliness and coordination of LEED documentation. |
| 13. |
| A/E’s ability and understanding of the overall LEED process. |
BIM (If Applicable):
| 14. |
| Overall accuracy, completeness, timeliness and coordination of BIM documentation. |
| 15. |
| A/E’s ability and understanding of the overall BIM process. |
Owner’s Representative on Design/Build Projects (If Applicable):
| 16. |
| Overall accuracy, completeness, timeliness and coordination of requirements documents and bridging documents. |
| 17. |
| A/E’s ability, thoroughness, timeliness and support as Owner’s Representative throughout the project. |
Overall:
| 18. |
| How would you rate the A/E’s ability to control cost? |
| 19. |
| How would you rate the A/E’s overall management performance on this contract? |
| 20. |
| How would you rate the A/E’s overall technical/quality performance on this contract? |
| 21. |
| Would you use this A/E again? (If “No”, please comment in the Narrative Summary) |
| YES |
| NO |
CONTRACTOR’S NAME:
PROJECT NAME:
CONTRACT PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE
Note: Include this information on each page of the questionnaire form to ensure there is no mix up in information among contracts surveyed for respective primes/subs, etc.
NARRATIVE SUMMARY (Use this section to explain any rating from the previous page)
| ITEMS |
| COMMENTS |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .