36C24721R0121.docx
DOCX document 47 KB Posted
- Attached to
- C1DA--Correct Physical Security Deficiencies Phase 1 (VA-21-000522 Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 36C24721R0121
About this file
This federal presolicitation notice requests Standard Form 330 qualification packages from architecture and engineering firms for design services. The Department of Veterans Affairs intends to award a firm-fixed-price contract to upgrade physical security at its Central Alabama Veterans Health Care System campus in Montgomery, Alabama. The scope of work includes conducting a security assessment and renovating approximately 10,661 square feet of an existing building to accommodate police services. The project value is estimated between $5 million and $10 million. The solicitation is a 100% set-aside for verified Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Businesses. The contracting office will evaluate submissions based on professional qualifications, experience in relevant project types including security, scheduling, past performance, location, and key personnel. The submission deadline is August 2, 2021. The notice provides detailed instructions on the submission format and content, including a page limit and requirement to include license numbers and past performance questionnaires.
View the file
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SUBJECT*
Correct Physical Security Deficiencies Phase 1 (VA-21-000522
GENERAL INFORMATION
| CONTRACTING OFFICE’S ZIP CODE* |
| 36109-3798 |
| SOLICITATION NUMBER* |
| 36C24721R0121 |
| RESPONSE DATE/TIME/ZONE |
| 08-02-2021 09:00 AM CENTRAL TIME, CHICAGO, USA |
| ARCHIVE |
| 60 DAYS AFTER THE RESPONSE DATE |
CLASSIFICATION
| SET-ASIDE |
| SDVOSBS |
| PRODUCT SERVICE CODE* |
| C1DA |
| NAICS CODE* |
| 541330 |
| PLACE OF PERFORMANCE |
| Department of Veterans Affairs |
Central Alabama Veterans Health Care System
215 Perry Hill Road
Montgomery AL
| POSTAL CODE |
| 36105 |
| COUNTRY |
| United States of America |
CONTACT INFORMATION
| CONTRACTING OFFICE ADDRESS |
| Department of Veterans Affairs |
Central Alabama Veterans Health Care
215 Perry Hill Road Montgomery AL 36109-3798
POINT OF CONTACT*
Contract Specialist Mariah Delaney-Mack Mariah.delaney-mack@va.gov Office: 334-272-4670 Ext. 32072
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
| AGENCY’S URL |
| http://www.va.gov |
| URL DESCRIPTION |
| Serving our Veterans |
| AGENCY CONTACT’S EMAIL ADDRESS |
| mariah.delaney-mack@va.gov |
| EMAIL DESCRIPTION |
| mariah.delaney-mack@va.gov |
DESCRIPTION
PRESOLICITATION NOTICE
THIS IS NOT A REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL. THIS IS A REQUEST FOR STANDARD FORM (SF) 330'S, ARCHITECT-ENGINEER QUALIFICATION PACKAGES, ONLY. ALL INFORMATION NEEDED TO SUBMIT SF 330 DOCUMENTS IS CONTAINED HEREIN. NO SOLICITATION PACKAGE, TECHNICAL INFORMATION, OR BIDDER/PLAN HOLDER LIST WILL BE ISSUED. THE GOVERNMENT WILL NOT PAY, NOR REIMBURSE ANY COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH RESPONDING TO THIS REQUEST. THE GOVERNMENT IS UNDER NO OBLIGATION TO AWARD A CONTRACT AS A RESULT OF THIS ANNOUNCEMENT.
1. GENERAL INFORMATION:
Veterans Health Administration (VHA) is seeking sources and intends to award a firm-fixed price design contract for Architect-Engineering (A-E) services for Project #619-21-102 “Correction of Physical Security Deficiencies” design project located at the Central Alabama Veterans Health Care System (CAVHS) West Campus 215 Perry Hill Road Montgomery, AL 36109-3798. The A-E shall include site visits, field investigation, studies and user interviews to prepare drawings, specifications, and cost estimates for all facets of work and disciplines/trades to facilitate a construction project to upgrade the facilities physical security system.
The A-E Services contract anticipated to be awarded will be procured in accordance with the Selection of Architects and Engineers Statute [formerly known as the Brooks Architect Engineer Act], Federal Acquisition Regulation Part 36.6 “Architectural and Engineering Services,” VA Acquisition Regulation 836.6, and VA Acquisition Manual M836.6 Architect-Engineer Services. In accordance with FAR 36.209 “Construction Contracts with Architect-Engineer Firms,” no contract for the construction of a project shall be awarded to the firm that designed the project or its subsidiaries or affiliates, except with the approval of the head of the agency or authorized representative.
2. PROJECT INFORMATION
This project is a 100% Set-Aside for Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business Concerns (SDVOSB). The NAICS Code for this procurement is 541330 “Engineering Services” and the annual small business size standard is $16.5M. This project requires a full design team to complete this project. The projected award date for the anticipated A-E contract is on or before 30 September 2021.
The anticipated period of performance for completion of design is 270 calendar days after notice of award. The magnitude of construction is between $5M and $10M.
The mission of the Veterans Affairs is to provide the highest quality health care to our nation’s veterans. In order to accomplish this mission, we must protect the health and safety of patients, employees, and visitors. All VA facilities must follow the Mission Critical and Life Safety Physical Security Design Manuals (PSDM’s) for security design guidelines within our network. In addition, OCFM has published recent updated guidance on security requirements for leased facilities.
The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) physical security design manuals are located at:
Mission Critical Facilities: https://www.cfm.va.gov/til/PhysicalSecurity/dmPhySecMC.pdf
Life Safety Protected Facilities: https://www.cfm.va.gov/til/PhysicalSecurity/dmPhySecLS.pdf
In accordance with the aforementioned reference materials, the scope of work for the proposed acquisition shall include two parts, the design and construction for:
Part 1 – Physical Security Assessment: The first objective of the physical security assessment is to compare and develop a gap analysis of existing building and site conditions as they relate to the VA’s PSDM’s level 1-5 “points of control”. There are sections of the VA PSDM requiring certain existing building or site components meet specified test levels, blast and or structural calculations. The VA is not requesting anti-ram testing, deflection calculations or testing, blast load calculations, or any other required structural system calculations. Where such items are specified in the VA PSDM, the risk assessments specified under Task 1 and Task 2 above will be based on a desk top audit of any related VA provided information; and the limits of the non-invasive visual walkthrough specified under Task 1. Structural Analysis by a qualified structural engineer will be limited to providing high level input into the recommendations associated with Task 1 only which focuses on protection of the building exteriors from blast and vehicular ramming threats.
Part 2 – Renovate Building 18 (Tuskegee Campus), Design Security System and Keying System: This project will renovate approximately 10,661 GSF of space of Building 18 to accommodate the Police Service Department. The project will also replace heating, interior work, flooring, air conditioning (HVAC) systems and others in the building.
3. A-E SELECTION PROCESS:
Firms submitting SF 330’s in response to this announcement, not later than the closing date and time specified herein and in accordance with submission requirements, will be considered for evaluation. The selection will be made as follows:
| A. | SF 330s will be evaluated in accordance with the primary selection criteria as stated in this presolicitation notice. These evaluations will determine the most highly qualified firms for this particular requirement. In accordance with FAR 36.602-3-(c), at least three (3) of the most highly qualified firms will then be notified of the Government’s intent to hold discussions. All firms not invited to participate in discussions will be notified at this time. |
| B. | Discussions will be held with the most highly qualified firms in the form determined to be most advantageous and economical by the contracting officer. This may include in writing, via phone interview or in-person interview presentations. However, the form of discussions will be the same for all firms. The firms invited to participate in discussions will be notified by email and provided further instructions, to include any questions or topics to address. Following the completion of discussions, the firms will be evaluated and ranked for selection based on the primary and secondary selection criteria (if necessary), and the most highly qualified firm will be selected and subsequently sent the solicitation. The final evaluation and ranking will consider the SF330 submission for each firm, as well as additional information obtained via discussions. |
A site visit will be authorized for the highest rated firm during the negotiation process. An award will be made as long as the negotiation of rates and hours leads to a fair and reasonable determination of the final contract price. If negotiations are not successful with the highest rated firm, the firm will be notified that negotiations have been terminated. Negotiations will then be initiated with the next highest rated firm, and so on until award can be made.
4. PHASE I SF330 SELECTION CRITERIA:
The A/E Source Selection Team shall utilize the following selection criteria listed in descending order of importance:
A. Professional qualifications necessary for satisfactory performance of required service and working together as a team (in-house and/or consultants(s)). Note: The firm and A/E on staff representing the project or signing drawings in each discipline must be registered/licensed to practice in the United States. Provide your information on the SF 330 clearly marked by providing a current architect and/or engineering License numbers AND proof of Licensure. The VA will confirm the individuals are current and in good standing with the respective state license board.
B. Specialized experience and technical competence in the type of work required, including but not limited to: Architecture, Electrical, Plumbing, Mechanical, Fire Protection, Abatement/Industrial Hygiene, Physical Security (note – must hold the Certified Protection Professional (CPP) or Physical Security Professional (PSP) certification issued by ASIS International), Cost Estimation, Project Management and where appropriate, experience in energy conservation, pollution prevention, waste reduction, and the use of recovered materials. (Include Government and private Experience on similar projects) C. Capacity to accomplish work in the required time.
D. Past performance on contracts with Government agencies and private industry in terms of cost control, quality of work, and compliance with performance schedules. Contract Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) data or Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQs) (if no CPARS data is available) are to be provided for projects noted in SF 330. Please utilize the attached PPQ, if PPQ is required. CPARS data and PPQs do not count toward the page limitation. Government Past Performance Information Systems may be accessed. Evaluating past performance and experience may include information provided by the firm, customer inquiries, Government databases, and publicly available sources. Failure to provide requested data, accessible points of contact or valid phone numbers could result in a firm being considered less qualified.
The following information is required for all projects: contract/task order number, project title, prime firm, start date, and completion date. Evaluations may also include additional performance related from the firm, customer inquiries, Government databases, publicly available sources, and additional projects in CPARS.
Note: We recommend you contact every reference listed and let them know we may contact them for information. Their timely replies would be appreciated.
E. Location in general geographical area and knowledge of the locality of the project and that your proximity to the general geographical area enables you to respond to emergency calls in person within 24 hours if required. (SF 330 submittal should show your knowledge of the locality of the project.)
F. The extent to which potential contractors identify and commit to the use of service-disabled Veteran-owned small businesses, Veteran-owned small businesses, and other types of small businesses as subcontractors. – or Use of Service-Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business G. Experience in construction period services to include professional field inspections during the construction period, review of construction submittals, support in answering requests for information during the construction period, and support of construction contract changes to include drafting statements of work, and cost estimates shall be included as an evaluation criterion when construction period services is included in the statement of work for A-E services or Experience in Construction period services H. Reputation and standing of the firm and its principal officials with respect to professional performance, general management, and cooperativeness. (Awards, Outstanding Merits, Recommendations) I. Specific experience and qualifications of personnel proposed for assignment to the project.
5. SUBMISSION CRITERIA/REQUIREMENTS:
The below information contains the instructions and format that shall be followed for the submission of the SF-330 Statement of Qualifications:
| • | Submit ONE (1) SF-330 Statement of Qualifications via email to the Contract Specialist Mariah Delaney-Mack at mariah.delaney-mack@va.gov. This shall include Parts I and II and any applicable attachments. |
| • | The SF-330 submission is due by 9:00 AM CT ON 02 AUGUST 2021. |
| • | The SF-330 shall be submitted in one email and have a file size that shall be no larger than 5 MB. No hard copies will be accepted. |
| • | The subject line of the email shall read: “SF-330 Submission; 36C24721R0121– 619-21-102 Correction of Physical Security Deficiencies - Montgomery, AL |
| • | The submission must include the SF-330, Architect/Engineer Qualifications (form is available on-line at http://www.cfm.va.gov/contract/ae.asp). |
| • | The page limitation of the SF 330 shall not exceed a total of 60 pages. This includes title page, table of contents, and any other relevant information. Each page shall be in in Arial size 12 font, single spaced. Part II of the SF 330 and any Contractor Performance Assessment Rating System (CPARS) reports will not count as part of the page limitations. Nor does the page limitation apply to the licenses and award documentation. |
| • | All SF-330 submissions must include the following information either on the SF 330 or by accompanying document: |
| 1) | Cage Code; 2) Dun & Bradstreet Number; 3) Tax ID Number; 4) The E-mail address and Phone number of the Primary Point of Contact; 5) A copy of the firms Vet Biz Registry. |
| • | All questions shall be submitted to Contract Specialist Mariah Delaney-Mack at mariah.delaney-mack@va.gov. The cutoff date for question submission is 9:00 AM CT ON 26 JULY 2021. Questions will be answered through modification to the Pre-Sol Notice posted to Contract Opportunities. |
| • | NOTE: Only submissions from SDVOSB concerns will be acceptable for this project. In order for an SDVOSB to be considered as a proposed contractor, the firm must be verified and visible by VET Biz (www.vetbiz.gov) and registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) database (www.sam.gov) at time of submission of their qualifications. Failure of a proposed SDVOSB to be verified by the CVE at the time the SF-330 is submitted shall result in elimination from consideration as a proposed contractor. |
| • | All Joint Ventures must be CVE verified at time of SF330 and Written Responses submissions and award and submit agreements that comply with 13CFR 125.15 prior to contract award. |
| • | SF-330 submissions received after the date and time specified will not be considered. Late proposal rules per FAR 15.208 will be followed for late submittals. Firms not providing the required information may not be evaluated. All information must be included in the SF-330 submission package. |
| • | It is the offeror’s responsibility to check the Contract Opportunities website at: www.beta.sam.gov for any revisions to this announcement prior to submission of SF-330s. |
Attachment 1 - PPQ AE Presolicitation Notice Presolicitation Notice
| *=Required Field |
| Presolicitation Notice |
Presolicitation Notice
V
ISN 7 CONSTRUCTOIN TEAM
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)
*PPQs should be provided back to the requestor to incorporate into their SF330, all PPQs should be included in the SF330 submission by the A-E and it will not count towards the page limitation listed Request for SF 330sin the .
SECTION 1
CONTRACT INFORMATION – Contractor to complete #1-3
1. CONTRACTOR INFORMATION
NAME OF OFFEROR BEING EVALUATED: Click or tap here to enter text.
ADDRESS: Click or tap here to enter text.
POINT OF CONTACT: Click or tap here to enter text.
CONTACT PHONE NUMBER: Click or tap here to enter text.
CONTACT EMAIL ADDRESS: Click or tap here to enter text.
WORK PERFOMED AS: Click or tap here to enter text.
PERCENT OF PROJECT WORK PERFORMED: Click or tap here to enter text.
IF SUBCONTRACTOR, WHO WAS THE PRIME? Click or tap here to enter text.
2. CONTRACT INFORMATION
CONTRACT TITLE: Click or tap here to enter text.
CONTRACT NUMBER AND DO/TO NUMBER: Click or tap here to enter text.
CONTRACT TYPE: Choose an item. if other:
CONTRACT LOCATION: Click or tap here to enter text.
AWARD DATE: Click or tap to enter a date.
ORIGINAL CONTRACT ACCCEPTANCE (construction accepted) Date: Click or tap to enter a date.
ACTUAL CONTRACT ACCEPTANCE: Click or tap to enter a date.
EXPLAIN DIFFERENCES: Click or tap here to enter text.
ORIGINAL IMPLEMENTATION PRICE: Click or tap here to enter text.
ORIGINAL CONTRACT PRICE (all costs - design/installation/financing): Click or tap here to enter text.
FINAL CONTRACT PRICE (including modifications, if applicable): Click or tap here to enter text.
EXPLAIN DIFFERENCES: Click or tap here to enter text.
3. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
SCOPE INCLUDED IN PROJECT: Click or tap here to enter text.
HOW IS THIS PROJECT RELEVANT TO PROJECT OF SUBMISSION? Click or tap here to enter text.
Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Program Contracting Activity Central (PCAC) is considering the Offeror identified above for award of the subject project.
Your comments would be appreciated regarding this firm’s past performance. The intent of this form is to evaluate the company’s ability to perform the work as described in the solicitation.
Please verify the information in Section 1 is accurate and complete the enclosed questionnaire as thoroughly as possible. In addition to submitting this questionnaire, VHA-PCAC may contact you in order to obtain any additional information regarding a contract award.
Please email your completed questionnaire back to the firm requesting prior to the date listed in the SF330 Request as they will need these completed documents to incorporate into their SF330 for submission. *Submissions made after this date and time will not be accepted or evaluated.
SECTION 2
EVALUATOR INFORMATION – Client to complete
EVALUATOR INFORMATION
NAME OF EVALUATOR: Click or tap here to enter text.
POSITION: Click or tap here to enter text.
ADDRESS: Click or tap here to enter text.
PHONE: Click or tap here to enter text.
EMAIL: Click or tap here to enter text.
DESCRIBE YOUR ROLE IN THE PROJECT: Click or tap here to enter text.
*Please see Page 4 for Adjectival Ratings for the following:
1. QUALITY
| Ability to meet quality design and/or construction standards specified for technical performance |
| Choose an item. |
Comments:
2. SCHEDULE/ TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE
| Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including timely submission of data deliverables (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below.) |
| Choose an item. |
Comments:
3. COMMUNICATION
| Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with client staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/ disputes; and responsiveness to client requests) |
| Choose an item. |
Comments:
4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/ LABOR
| Effectiveness of management, including suppliers, materials, and/or labor force (including the ability to effectively lead, manage, and control the project) |
| Choose an item. |
| Continuity in the contractor’s personnel during execution of the contract (e.g., one person or team that stayed with the project throughout the contract) |
| Choose an item. |
Comments:
5. COST/ FINANCIAL MANGEMENT
| Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price? |
| Choose an item. |
Comments:
6. SUBCONTRACT MANAGEMENT
Ability to manage subcontracting effort including any subcontracting issues, and the contractor’s ability to resolve the problems without extensive customer guidance.
Choose an item.
Comments:
7. SUMMARY
| Would you hire or work with this firm again? If no, please explain below. |
| Choose an item. |
| Provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor. |
| Choose an item. |
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
| EVALUATOR SIGNATURE: |
| DATE: |
ADJECTIVAL RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE
*THIS PAGE WILL BE REMOVED FOR EVALUATION PURPOSES AND NOT BE COUNTED TOWARD THE SF 330 PAGE COUNT – IT IS FOR PPQ COMPLETION PURPOSES ONLY*
| Rating |
| Definition |
| Outstanding |
| The Offeror’s performance met contractual requirements and exceeded many requirements to the Client’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Offeror were highly effective |
| Above Average |
| The Offeror’s performance met contractual requirements and exceeded some requirements to the Client’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Offeror were effective. |
| Satisfactory |
| The Offeror’s performance met contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Offeror were satisfactory. |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Performance did not meet contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflected a serious problem for which the Offeror has yet to identify corrective actions or the Offeror’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| Not Applicable |
| No information or did not apply to your contract. |
Page 1 of Page 1 of image1.jpeg
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .