36C24526Q0496 0001_1.docx

DOCX document 34 KB Posted

Attached to
F999--GEMS Technical Assistance
Solicitation number
36C24526Q0496
Issued by

About this file

This file is an Amendment of Solicitation/Modification of Contract (SF 30) containing questions and answers for solicitation 36C24526Q0496, a GEMS Technical Assistance Support Services contract for the Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Integrated Service Network 05 (VISN 05). The amendment shares 15 questions and corresponding Government responses regarding the scope of work, contract structure, evaluation factors, and required expertise for environmental compliance services at the Baltimore, Loch Raven, and Perry Point VAMCs.

The scope requires the contractor to provide comprehensive environmental compliance-related evaluations, investigations, surveys, sampling oversight, and permitting services across multiple regulatory disciplines including RCRA, NEPA, stormwater, drinking water, wastewater, petroleum/oils/lubricants, hazardous materials and waste, lead-based paint, asbestos, air quality, EPCRA, AST/UST operations, pest management, and natural/cultural resources. The Government clarified that the contractor will provide oversight of sampling and laboratory coordination rather than performing sampling directly, will oversee oil-filled equipment and aboveground storage tank removals (not perform them), and will occasionally sign hazardous waste manifests. The contract structure is base plus two option periods (not five as initially stated), with estimated effort of approximately 8 hours per week including both on-site and off-site work. The Government confirmed evaluation factors as Technical Capability, Past Performance, and Price, with preference for offerors demonstrating expertise in Maryland regulations and familiarity with VAMHCS campuses. SCA Wage Determinations apply with FAR 52.222-43 incorporation for price adjustments during option periods. Proposals must be submitted by email to cassie.white@va.gov, with the amended due date of June 26, 2026 at 10:00 AM EST.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
36C24526Q0496 0001.docx DOCX document
36C24526Q0496_1.docx DOCX document
Wage Determination- Baltimore.txt TXT text file
Wage Determination- Perry Point.txt TXT text file

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

5. PROJECT NUMBER (if applicable)

CODE

7. ADMINISTERED BY

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER

CODE

6. ISSUED BY

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NUMBER

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

9B. DATED

PAGE OF PAGES

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER

10B. DATED

BPA NO.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE

FACILITY CODE

CODE

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers

E. IMPORTANT:

is extended,

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning __________ copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY is not extended.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

(REV. 11/2016)

is required to sign this document and return ___________ copies to the issuing office.

is not, A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

15C. DATE SIGNED

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER

Contractor

16C. DATE SIGNED

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

STANDARD FORM 30

PREVIOUS EDITION NOT USABLE

Prescribed by GSA - FAR (48 CFR) 53.243 (Type or print) (Type or print) (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

(Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (If other than Item 6) (Specify type of modification and authority) (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.)

(If required)

(SEE ITEM 11)

(SEE ITEM 13)

(X)

CHECK

ONE

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS,

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

(Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer) 06- -2026

19ACQ

Department of Veterans Affairs

VAMC (613)

VISN 5 Contract Satellite Office 510 Butler Avenue, Building 306A Martinsburg WV 25405 Department of Veterans Affairs

VAMC (613)

VISN 5 Contract Satellite Office 510 Butler Avenue, Building 308B Martinsburg WV 25405 To all Offerors/Bidders

36C24526Q0496

X X X The purpose of this amendment is to share all questions and answers that were submitted for this request for quote.

Please see below.

Cassie White Contracting Officer

Amendment- Questions and Answers

1. Will this contract be using a Blanket Purchase Agreement under the GSA Multiple Award Schedule if the selected awardee has a GSA Multiple Award Schedule award schedule? TBD (To be Determined)

2. The Solicitation includes applicable SCA Wage Determinations. Does the VAMHCS anticipate the awardee will be required to complete any construction-related activities such as oil-filled equipment and aboveground storage tank removals; overseeing underground storage tank testing and compliance, reviewing design and construction projects for compliance with environmental regulations, signing hazardous waste manifests (for remediation, construction or other VA wastes), which could technically be considered construction-related depending on what the offeror is ultimately asked to do? If so, will there be applicable SCA or Davis-Bacon Act Wage Determinations for these activities? This will be applicable to SCA.

3. If there will be applicable SCA or Davis-Bacon Act Wage Determinations (see question 2), would the VAMHCS consider incorporating FAR 52.222-43 as well as handling future price adjustments related to published SCA Wage Determination revisions during the Option Periods? Yes, the Government would incorporate FAR 52.222‑43 into the contract. Any future price adjustments associated with updated SCA Wage Determinations during the option periods would be handled in accordance with that clause.

4. In the Scope, it states, “The contractor shall provide a full range of compliance-related evaluations, investigations, surveys, sampling and permitting as required for Baltimore, Loch Raven, and Perry Point VAMCs. This includes training, plan and permit review/development for the VA Maryland Health Care System (VAMHCS)… Primary scope areas are reviewing and updating records, documents and permits associated with RCRA, National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), stormwater, drinking water, wastewater, Petroleum, Oils, and Lubricants (POL), hazardous material, hazardous waste, solid waste, Lead-Based Paint, Asbestos-Containing Materials, air quality (e.g., for new and current air emissions sources), Employee and Community Right to Know Act (EPCRA), AST/UST (e.g., Oil Operations Permits and registrations), Scrap Tires, pest management, and natural/cultural resources.”

a. To accomplish this part of the scope, will the offeror be required to:

i. Complete and submit permit applications and reporting? or

ii. Just supply a regulatory analysis to alert the VAMHCS of what needs to be done? or Both i and ii? We will need both depending on different situations

5. In the Scope on page 4, it states, “The contractor shall provide a full range of compliance-related evaluations, investigations, surveys, sampling and permitting as required for the Baltimore, Loch Raven, and Perry Point VAMCs.” and “...confirmation sampling for compliance with regulations such as RCRA, TSCA, CWA, SDWA, etc. Oversight of laboratory sampling and testing for CWA, SDWA, RCRA, and CAA requirements.”

And in Section B.2 Price/Cost Schedule, Item numbers 0005, 1005, 2005, 3005, and 4005 request a cost for “Regulatory Sampling & Laboratory Coordination”.

Please confirm if the awardee will be required to perform sampling (including confirmation sampling) or just review sampling and confirmation sampling that was done by another contractor or internal VAMHCS personnel?

a. If the awardee is required to perform sampling, please provide the law (e.g. RCRA, CERCLA, CWA), frequency, quantity (# of samples), and the laboratory methods/testing analytes required for each sample (e.g., EPA SW-846 Method 6010D for lead in for lead in soil) If the awardee is only required to review sampling done by another contractor or internal VAMHCS personnel, would you please clarify and remove the cost item numbers 0005, 1005, 2005, 3005, and 4005 in Section B.2 Price/Cost Schedule? we will only need overview, in house gets done by a waste contractor.

6. In the Scope on page 4, in the “Remediation and Environmental Compliance,” it states, “This includes but is not limited to remediation services such as reviewing results from Phase I or II ESAs, oil-filled equipment and aboveground storage tank removals...”

a. Please clarify if the awardee would be providing oil-filled equipment and storage tank removals or only overseeing oil-filled equipment and aboveground storage tank removals? Only overseeing oil-filled equipment and aboveground storage tank removals.

7. Due to the complexity of the costing and the time needed to address VA’s responses to questions, may we request an extension to the proposal due date to 30 June 2026? The request for quote date has been amended to June 26th at 10am EST.

8. Please provide the Government’s estimated level of effort for the base period and each option period, including the anticipated hours and/or mix of on-site versus off-site support expected across the locations? This will depend on workload of services needed, approximately 8hrs per week. This could be general reviews or high-level reviews needed. Most work can be completed off campus. Some work will be needed in person on all three campuses due to eyes on need.

9. Please confirm the required submission method for quotes, including whether submission is by email, SAM.gov, VA portal, and identify any file naming or attachment requirements. Submission is by email to cassie.white@va.gov.

10. Please confirm the intended evaluation factors. Section IV lists Expertise/Technical Capability, Management Approach, and Price, while E.2 lists Technical Capability, Past Performance, and Price. The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforms to the solicitation and is most advantageous to the Government, considering price and other factors.

The confirmed evaluation factors are:• Technical Capability• Past Performance• Price Additional elements such as expertise, management approach, and similar considerations may be included as sub‑factors within the primary evaluation areas listed above.

Past performance with MD regulations and preferably someone familiar with our campuses. This would allow better use of time and resources, If the company does not have 3 yrs of past performance, but an employee that works for the company does. This will be acceptable if that person is the one doing the work for this contract.

11. Please confirm the intended contract/ordering period structure. The solicitation references base plus four-year/five ordering periods, but the price schedule includes Base, Option 1, and Option 2, and FAR 52.217-9 states total duration shall not exceed three years. This is an error and should be a base + 2 option periods.

12. Will the offeror be required to sign hazardous or universal waste manifests?

Yes, on occasion, our current staff handle this day to day. But there could be a situation where the contractor will be needed to sign.

13. Is there a conflict-of-interest concern for this contract if a former Perry Point VAMC were to be employed with the awarded contractor?

No, that could be a huge benefit. That campus is huge and if they have familiarization with the campus that would save money and help get things moving.

14. To allow offerors to accurately estimate the required level of effort for the environmental compliance and remediation services described in Section B and the accompanying Statement of Work, can the Government please provide additional magnitude‑of‑effort details for each primary task area? Specifically, please provide available historical or projected workload metrics, such as:

1. Number of environmental permits requiring annual updates or renewals (RCRA, CWA, SDWA, air permits, AST/UST permits, stormwater, etc.);

We as a team are trying to figure this out on the fly, I know each location have an air permit, stormwater, and others. (This is where we could use someone with familiarity). We are trying to figure all these out to stay compliant.

2. Estimated number of site visits per month per VAMC (Baltimore, Loch Raven, Perry Point);

This will vary depending on regulatory issues, I would say 1-5. I can do most visits to share information to the contractor.

3. Historical volume of regulatory sampling events and associated laboratory analyses per year;

Most of our sampling is handled by our waste contractor.

4. Typical number of hazardous waste manifests requiring review and signature annually;

I would guess under 10, Our current staff handle them on a Dailey basis. This will only happen if we are not on site.

5. Expected number of design/construction project reviews per year for environmental compliance;

Average 10 per year for NEPA reviews.

6. Approximate number of progress meetings and typical duration beyond the monthly requirement; and 1 per week, more of an update and discuss any current work and issues. Short meeting 15-20mins only if needed.

7. Any other quantifiable workload drivers referenced in the SOW that materially impact labor effort.

There wont be any wage grade work, oversite, compliance, paperwork, nepa review.

15. Section II and the Technical Qualifications section of the SOW indicate that key personnel must demonstrate expertise in multiple environmental regulatory disciplines and must have at least three years of experience working with VAMHCS operations. To ensure proposals align with the Government’s expectations, can the Government please identify which specific key personnel positions it requires or prefers to be designated as ‘Key Personnel’ for this contract?

GEM’s Background, knows government guidelines, VA Standards, MDE regulations, Local regulations, Water Treatment guidelines, Shoreline requirements, MS4 permit regulations, Stormwater regulations, Air permit requirements, Emergency generator requirements, ATS Regulations, UST regulations, NEPA forms.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .