36C24520Q0345 Attachment - Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 113 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Q502--Cardiac Monitoring for Outpatients
- Solicitation number
- 36C24520Q0345
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| S06_RFQ 36C24520Q0345 Amendment 0003.docx | DOCX document | |
| RFQ 36C24520Q0345 Amendment 0002.pdf | ||
| RFQ 36C24520Q0345 Amendment 0001.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C24520Q0345 Attachment - Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan_QASP.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C24520Q0345 Attachment - SCA_DOL_ Wage Determination 2015-4281 Rev 15_Washington DC.pdf | ||
| RFQ 36C24520Q0345.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
36C24520Q0345 Outpatient Cardiac Monitoring - Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
Past Performance Questionnaire
The Department of Veterans Affairs is evaluating a proposal submitted by _________________________
[Offeror’s name], hereafter referred to as “Offeror,” to provide satellite media tour services for the VA
Central Office. Offeror has provided your name so that we may ask you questions regarding Offeror’s past performance on a similar contract between your company and Offeror.
Any information you provide in this questionnaire is considered Source Selection Information and is prohibited from disclosure and exempt from release under the Freedom of Information Act; as such, the
Department of Veterans affairs will not release your name or the names of other individuals providing reference information about Offeror’s past performance.
Instructions: Be honest. Provide an assessment of Offeror’s past performance by checking the box of one the following rating options. You are encouraged to write comments as often as you’d like. If your assessment is “Excellent” or “Unacceptable,” then please provide a brief narrative that explains your rationale for the rating.
When you are finished, please email your completed questionnaire to Amy Ritchey, Email:
marquerita.johnson@va.gov
THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT AND PARTICIPATION!
Rating Options:
Satisfactory—Offeror’s performance meets (or met) all contractual requirements and performance was accomplished with minor issues or concerns, for which Offeror’s corrective actions were effective.
Marginal—Offeror’s performance meets (or met) some contractual requirements and performance was accomplished with frequent problems, issues or concerns, for which Offeror’s corrective actions were somewhat effective.
Unsatisfactory—Offeror’s performance does not meet (or did not meet) contractual requirements and performance was accomplished with significant problems, issues or concerns, for which Offeror’s corrective actions were ineffective.
Not Applicable—Unable to provide a meaningful assessment.
Source Selection Information—See FAR 2.101 and 3.104
Performance Assessment
1. Quality of performance
a. What is your overall assessment of the quality of Offeror’s performance?
Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory N/A
Comments:
b. Assess Offeror’s quality of performance in these areas:
Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory
Conformance to contract requirements
Standards of workmanship
(technical, professional, safety, etc.)
2. Management performance
a. What is your overall assessment of Offeror’s ability to meet contract requirements?
b. Assess Offeror’s contract management performance in these areas:
Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory N/A
Management responsiveness
(timeliness, reliability, cooperation, etc.)
Management of personnel (hiring, training, retaining, replacing, etc.)
Source Selection Information—See FAR 2.101 and 3.104
Management of program
(coordination, use of resources, communication, risk management, etc.)
Management of conflicts or issues
(reactive, provides good solutions, flexible to changing needs, etc.)
3. Cost control
a. What is your overall assessment of Offeror’s ability to forecast, manage and control costs?
b. Assess Offeror’s cost control performance in these areas:
Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory N/A
Cost/Price Estimates
(ability to meet forecasted costs/prices)
Invoicing accuracy and timeliness of invoice submission
4. General comments
Assessor’s Signature:_____________________________________ Date:_____________________
THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT AND PARTICIPATION!
Source Selection Information—See FAR 2.101 and 3.104
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .