The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.
CONTRACTOR’S NAME: CONTRACT NUMBER
ATTACHMENT - B
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
A. GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:
Contractor’s Name: Telephone Number: Address:
Fax Number:
Point of Contact:
Project Title and Brief Description of Work:
Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror:
Contractor performed as the 0 Prime Contractor 0 Sub-Contractor 0 Key Personnel.
* Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.
B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:
Name of Respondent: Title:
Address:
Telephone Number: Fax Number:
Email Address:
D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (E, G, S, M, U, and N) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF M or U.
| Exceptional |
| Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfacto ry |
| Neutral |
| Performance |
| Performance |
| Performance |
| Performance |
| Performance |
| Performance |
| meets |
| meets |
| meets |
| does not |
| does not |
| was not |
| contractual |
| contractual |
| contractual |
| meet some |
| meet most |
| observed or |
| requirements |
| requirements |
| requirements. |
| contractual |
| contractual |
| not |
| with many |
| with some |
| The contractual |
| requirements |
| requirements |
| applicable to |
| exceeded to |
| exceeded to |
| performance of |
| . The |
| and recovery |
| the current |
| the |
| the |
| the element or |
| contractual |
| is not likely in |
| effort being |
| Government’s |
| Government’s |
| sub-element |
| performance |
| a timely |
| reported |
| benefit. The |
| benefit. The |
| contains some |
| of the |
| manner. The |
| against. |
| contractual |
| contractual |
| minor problems |
| element or |
| contractual |
| performance |
| performance of |
| for which |
| sub-element |
| performance |
| of the element |
| the element or |
| corrective |
| being |
| of the |
| or sub- |
| sub-element |
| actions taken by |
| assessed |
| element or |
| element being |
| being assessed |
| the contractor |
| reflects a |
| sub-element |
| assessed was |
| was |
| were |
| serious |
| contains a |
| accomplished |
| accomplished |
| satisfactory. |
| problem for |
| serious |
| with no more |
| with no more |
| by the contractor were highly effective. |
| contractor were effective. |
contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented ineffective.
CONTRACTOR’S NAME: CONTRACT NUMBER:
Note: Include this information on each page of the questionnaire form to ensure there is no mix up in information among contracts surveyed for respective primes/subs, etc.
Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.
| The contractor: |
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| 1. |
| Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements. |
| 2. |
| Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period. |
| 3. | | | | | |
| Delegated | authority | to | project | managers | and |
supervisors commensurate with contract requirements.
| 4. | | | | | | |
| Home | office | participated | in | solving | significant | local |
problems.
| 5. |
| Followed approved quality control plan. |
| 6. | | | | | |
| Provided | effective | quality | control | and/or | inspection |
procedures to meet contract requirements.
| 7. |
| Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures. |
| 8. |
| Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies. |
| 9. |
| Identified problems as they occurred. |
| 10. |
| Suggested alternative approaches to problems. |
| 11. |
| Displayed initiative to solve problems. |
| 12. |
| Developed realistic progress schedules. |
| 13. |
| Met established project schedules. |
| 14. |
| Provided timely resolution of warranty defects. |
| 15. |
| Was responsive to contract changes. |
| 16. |
| Provided adequate project supervision. |
| 17. |
| Obtained consent of surety for increases in bonding as work-in-progress increased. |
| 18. |
| Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner. |
| 19. | | | | | | |
| Provided | accurate | and | complete | line | item | cost |
proposals including all aspects of work required for each task.
| 20. |
| Cooperated with Government personnel after award. |
| 21. | | | | | | |
| How | would | you | rate | the | contractor's | overall |
performance?
| 22. |
| Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.” |
| YES/NO |
| 23. |
| Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.” |
| YES/NO |
| 24. |
| Is the contractor rated in CPARS? |
| YES/NO |
Remarks:
Note: While these questions are generic and will work as written in many acquisitions, consider them as they relate to each individual acquisition and tailor them as needed and appropriate. Also, when tailoring the form, consider leaving space between questions for comments.