ATTACHMENT A - PRICE COST SCHEDULE - BNOE - NX EQ ORTHOPEDIC SURGICAL ROBOTICS SYSTEMS.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 25 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 36C10G24R0012
About this file
This document is an attachment to a federal contract opportunity for Orthopedic Surgical Robotic Systems. The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is issuing a single award Requirements contract for Orthopedic Surgical Robotic Systems, including Mako Robotic Arm Systems with various application combinations and annual service agreements. The contract will have a 12-month base period with four 12-month option years. Estimated quantities are provided for each contract line item number (CLIN). Vendors must provide pricing for all CLINs and demonstrate the ability to meet the specified salient characteristics, which cover performing robotic partial knee, total knee, and total hip replacement procedures, as well as other functional requirements. Offers are due by 11:59PM EST on March 31, 2024.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Sheet1
| CLIN | Part Number | Brand Name | Item Description | Unit of Measure (UOM) | Quantity Per UOM | Estimated Quantity (Base Year) | Estimated Quantity (Year 1) | Estimated Quantity (Year 2) | Estimated Quantity (Year 3) | Estimated Quantity (Year 4) | Manufacturer Name | Manufacturer Part Number | Item Description | Contractor Part Number (if different from OEM) | Unit of Measure | Quantity per UOM | Delivery Days ARO | Commercial Price | Proposed Unit | |||||||||||||||||
| Price (Base Year) | SLA (3%) | Total Price (Unit Price plus SLA) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Base Year | Proposed Unit | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Price (Option Year 1) | SLA (3%) | Total Price (Unit Price plus SLA) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Option Year 1 | Proposed Unit | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Price (Option Year 2) | SLA (3%) | Total Price (Unit Price plus SLA) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Option Year 2 | Proposed Unit | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Price (Option Year 3) | SLA (3%) | Total Price (Unit Price plus SLA) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Option Year 3 | Proposed Unit | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Price (Option Year 4) | SLA (3%) | Total Price (Unit Price plus SLA) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Option Year 4 | Total Evaluated Price (with 3% SLA and estimated quantities) - Base Year | Total Evaluated Price (with 3% SLA and estimated quantities) - Opt Year 1 | Total Evaluated Price (with 3% SLA and estimated quantities) - Opt Year 2 | Total Evaluated Price (with 3% SLA and estimated quantities) - Opt Year 3 | Total Evaluated Price (with 3% SLA and estimated quantities) - Opt Year 4 | Total Evaluated Price | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 0001 | Mako Robotic Arm System (3 APP) Kitted Part Number (Includes: Stryker Robotic Arm System (Part #220000); Mako Partial Knee Application (Part #211845); Mako Total hip Application (Part #211846); Mako Total Knee Application (Part #212183); Mako Service (1-Year Standard Warranty) | Each | 1 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 6 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | ||||||||||||
| 0002 | Mako Robotic Arm System (2 APP) Kitted Part Number (Includes: Stryker Robotic Arm System (Part #220000); Select Combination of Two Applications -- Mako Partial Knee Application (Part #211845), Mako Total hip Application (Part #211846), Mako Total Knee Application (Part #212183); Mako Service (1-Year Standard Warranty) | Each | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | ||||||||||||
| 0003 | Mako Robotic Arm System (2 APP) Kitted Part Number (Includes: Stryker Robotic Arm System (Part #220000); Select Combination of Two Applications -- Mako Partial Knee Application (Part #211845), Mako Total hip Application (Part #211846), Mako Total Knee Application (Part #212183); Mako Service (1-Year Standard Warranty) | Each | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | ||||||||||||
| 0004 | Mako Annual Service Agreement 3 APP | Each | 1 | 2 | 3 |
tc={8EC788FD-DB34-4845-9476-B06DE08DA6F7}: [Threaded comment]
Your version of Excel allows you to read this threaded comment; however, any edits to it will get removed if the file is opened in a newer version of Excel. Learn more: https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=870924
Comment:
Why do we need 3 services agreements when the estimated numbers of units are 4, and 2? Shouldn't the numbers of agreements sync with the numbers of units being purchased?
Reply:
Per the PM, The service agreement number is a moving target. The reality is that there are already several of these systems in VAMCs and we don’t know how many would want to purchase a Service Agreement for an existing system.
Unlike da Vinci, we are behind the tech curve in getting this in place for VHA. There are already systems in facilities. However, we would like to streamline this and centralize a contract to make it easier on the VISNs (much like da Vinci).
| 3 | 3 | 3 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| 0005 | Mako Annual Service Agreement 2 APP | Each | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | |||||||||||||
| 0006 | Mako Annual Service Agreement 1 APP | Each | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | |||||||||||||
| $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | $ - 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| $ - 0 | Total Price | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| *VENDOR IS TO COMPLETE ALL "YELLOW" HIGHLIGHTED SPACES | *VENDOR IS TO COMPLETE ALL "YELLOW" HIGHLIGHTED SPACES | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| **ARO = Delivery Days After Receipt of Order | **ARO = Delivery Days After Receipt of Order | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Offerors proposing equivalent product must enter Name of Manufacturer for its proposed solution, Description of Part Number(s), etc. starting at Column L. If offeror’s proposed solution does not require a particular CLIN, vendor shall indicate such by writing N/A, None, or Zero (0). Also, the items priced in Pricing volume must correspond with the items proposed in offeror’s Technical volume as the brand name or equivalent solution. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vendors who propose brands that meet all the salient characteristics (SCs), should provide that information in the chart above. |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .