35728_QA for 35728 as of 240112~1.pdf
PDF 193 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Building System Automation Controls
- Solicitation number
- S-435000-00009034
- Issued by
- Marion County, Oregon
About this file
This is a Questions and Answers document for a Mini-RFP issued by the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) regarding the Josephine County Bridge Bundle, Bid Solicitation Number S-73000-00007483. The document addresses clarifications on evaluation criteria for consultant selection. Two key questions were submitted regarding the composition of required key staff and the potential reordering of evaluation criteria. ODOT clarified that proposers must provide resumes for a Project Manager and three specific key staff disciplines—Environmental, Roadway, and Traffic—and cannot substitute these with other discipline areas such as hydraulics. Additionally, ODOT declined to reorder the evaluation criteria from the Mini-RFP structure, requiring proposals to address evaluation items in their original sequence: Specific Experience of Key Staff, Understanding of Requested Services, Approach, Local Presence, and Project Samples.
The document does not contain information regarding pricing terms, set-asides, contract duration, or funding sources. As a Q&A document, it serves as clarification material for prospective proposers and does not establish financial parameters or contract conditions. The responses indicate ODOT's intention to maintain strict compliance with the established evaluation framework and staffing requirements outlined in the original Mini-RFP solicitation.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| RFP 362 - Request for Proposal.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Level 3 - Restricted
Mini-RFP #35278 Questions and Answers Received as of 01/12/2024
Josephine County Bridge Bundle
OregonBuys Bid Solicitation Number S-73000-00007483
Question 1: Evaluation Item 1 requests specific experience of four key staff: PM, environmental, roadway, and traffic. If one key staff member fulfills multiple roles – for example, one team member may lead both the roadway and traffic design elements – can the team allocate a fourth key staff resume for another discipline not explicitly listed in Evaluation Item 1 (hydraulics, for example)?
Answer 1: No. As stated in the Mini-RFP, please “Provide information for the proposed Project Manager (for each project) and proposed key staff (for each project) for only the following disciplines:
1. Environmental;
2. Roadway; and
3. Traffic.
Question 2: Would ODOT consider reordering and renumbering the evaluation criteria in the manner below to optimize the flow of proposal responses by describing our understanding of the project before our approach?
o 2.2.1 Evaluation Item 1 – Specific Experience of Key Staff o 2.2.2 Evaluation Item 2 – Understanding of Requested Services o 2.2.3 Evaluation Item 3 – Approach o 2.2.4 Evaluation Item 4 – Local Presence o 2.2.5 Evaluation Item 5 – Project Samples
Answer 2: No
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .