Evaluation Score Matrix Summary

This is an evaluation score matrix for RFP 35079 concerning the OR126B Willamette River to Springfield UGB Pedestrian Improvements Project. The document serves as the scoring template for a competitive solicitation and includes structured sections for proposal evaluation, interview scoring, and reference checks across multiple firms. The evaluation framework establishes a maximum of 75 points for the proposal component, divided equally among three evaluation criteria valued at 25 points each. Three evaluation team members scored proposals, with Kittelson & Associates receiving individual scores of 65, 70, and 60 points, resulting in an average proposal score of 65 points and ranking first among evaluators. The matrix accommodates up to 18 additional firms for comparison, though only Kittelson & Associates has completed scoring data entered. Interview evaluation and reference checks were structured with one evaluator each, though no interview or reference scores have been populated. The final score calculation incorporates proposal average, interview average, cost scores, and establishes a combined final score of 90 points for Kittelson & Associates, maintaining its rank of 1.

The evaluation matrix does not contain information regarding pricing, set-asides, incumbents, or contract funding sources, as this document functions solely as a scoring and ranking tool for proposal evaluation. No scoring deductions were applied to Kittelson & Associates' proposal evaluation. The document indicates provisions for cost scoring integration into final rankings, though specific cost information is not detailed within this matrix. The spreadsheet template includes error codes in the interview scoring section, suggesting incomplete data entry or formula errors in those calculation areas. The structure allows for recording scoring deductions as percentages following the organization's required items review process conducted by the Office of Procurement Oversight (OPO).