3.02_Amendment(3)_N0038323QD281_23131-0012.pdf

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

FACILITY CODE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required) copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15C. DATE SIGNED

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

PAGE OF PAGES

6. ISSUED BY CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X)

CODE

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

Previous edition unusable

The quantity being solicited is hereby increased by 11ea, from 6ea to 17ea.

The verbiage “Required RTAT: ###159 days after receipt of asset.” is hereby removed from the remarks section of the solicitation.

The verbiage “This is a limited competition solicitation. Only approved sources will be considered for award. Offers will be evaluated using the “Lowest Price Technically Acceptable” (LPTA) methodology.

Offers must be submitted by the solicitation due date to be considered for award. “ is hereby removed from the remarks section of the solicitation.

Clauses WSSTERMLZ10 - SUBMISSION OF OFFERS FOR LOWEST PRICE, TECHNICALLY ACCEPTABLE OFFERS, WSSTERMMZ04 – EVALUATION FOR AWARD (LOWEST PRICE TECHNICALLY ACCEPTABLE and WSSTERMMZ01 – EVALUATION CRITERIA AND BASIS FOR AWARD – SINGLE AWARD are hereby removed from the solicitation.

The verbiage “This is a limited competition solicitation. Only approved sources will be considered for award. Offers will be evaluated using the ‘Best Value / Tradeoff’ methodology. Offers must be submitted by the solicitation due date and time to be considered for award. “ is hereby incorporated into the remarks section of the solicitation.

The verbiage “A more detailed delivery schedule will be made at award based on award date, RTAT, awardee’s proposal information and assets ready to ship.” is hereby incorporated into the remarks section of the solicitation.

Attachment A below is hereby incorporated into the solicitation. For instructions (section L) and evaluation criteria (section M), please see the pages below.

Evaluation Factors in compliance with the solicitation requirements include: capacity/delivery, past performance and price. Please see sections L & M below.

Government’s desired RTAT is 120 calendar days, and Government’s desired throughput is 1-2 units per month.

Please complete the attached Past Performance Information Form (Attachment B) or affirmatively state that you do not possess any relevant past performance.

The due date for offers is hereby extended to 4:00 p.m. EST on 11/27/2023. Offers should be submitted through electronic commerce methods such as email or the Government Point of Entry (GPE).

Written confirmation of receipt and understanding of the amendment should be provided with the offer submission.

ATTACHMENT A

SECTION L – INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS OR RESPONDENTS

L01 – SOLICITATION PROVISIONS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

CLAUSE

NUMBER

CLAUSE TITLE CLAUSE

DATE

52.204-7 System for Award Management OCT 2018 52.204-16 Commercial and Government Entity Reporting AUG 2020 52.204-22 Alternative Line Item Proposal JAN 2017 52.214-34 Submission of Offers in the English Language APR 1991 52.214-35 Submission of Offers in U.S. Currency APR 1991 52.215-1 Instructions to Offerors-Competitive Acquisistion JAN 2017

52.215-5 Facsimile Proposals (The telephone number of receiving facsimile equipment is: 215-697- 1227)

OCT 1997

52.215-16 Facilities Capital Cost of Money JUN 2003 52.215-22 Limitations on Pass-Through Charges-Identification of Subcontract Effort OCT 2009

52.222-24 Preaward On-Site Equal Opportunity Compliance Evaluation FEB 1999 52.232-13 Notice of Progress Payments APR 1984 52.247-46 Shipping Point(s) Used in Evaluation of F.O.B.—Origin Offers APR 1984 252.215-7010 Requirements for Certified Cost or Pricing Data and Data Other Than Certified Cost or Pricing

Data-Basic

JAN 2023

252.215-7011 Requirements for Submission of Proposals to the Administrative Contracting Officer and Contract Auditor

JAN 2018

252.215-7012 Requirements for Submission of Proposals Via Electronic Media JAN 2018 252.215-7013 Supplies and Services Provided by Nontraditional Defense Contractors JAN 2023 252.239-7017 Notice of Supply Chain Risk (Orders for information technology that is a covered system, is part of a covered system, or is in support of a covered system, as defined in DFARS 239.7301).

FEB 2022

252.246-7005 Notice of Warranty Tracking of Serialized Items MAR 2016

L02 - FAR 52.211-14 - NOTICE OF PRIORITY RATING FOR NATIONAL DEFENSE, EMERGENCY

PREPAREDNESS, AND ENERGY PROGRAM USE (APR 2008)

Any contract awarded as a result of this solicitation will be [ ] DX rated order; [ X-A1A ] DO rated order certified for national defense, emergency preparedness, and energy program use under the Defense Priorities and Allocations System (DPAS) (15 CFR 700), and the Contractor will be required to follow all of the requirements of this regulation.

(End of provision)

L03 - FAR 52.216-1 - TYPE OF CONTRACT (APR 1984)

The Government contemplates award of a firm fixed price repair contract resulting from this solicitation.

(End of provision)

L04 - FAR 52.233-2 - SERVICE OF PROTEST (SEP 2006)

(a) Protests, as defined in section 33.101 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation, that are filed directly with an agency and copies of any protests that are filed with the Government Accountability Office (GAO), shall be served on the Contracting Officer (addressed as follows) by obtaining written and dated acknowledgment of receipt from:

Contracting Officer (identified on Page 1)

Building 1, Code N7 (identified on Page 1) 700 Robbins Avenue Philadelphia, PA 19111-5098

(b) The copy of any protest shall be received in the office designated above within one day of filing a protest with the GAO.

(End of provision)

L06 - DFARS 252.217-7026 - IDENTIFICATION OF SOURCES OF SUPPLY (JAN 2023)

(applicable to all Delivery Orders when the acquisition is being conducted under Other Than Full and Open Competition)

(a) The Government is required under 10 U.S.C. 2384 to obtain certain information on the actual manufacturer or sources of supplies it acquires.

(b) The apparently successful Offeror agrees to complete and submit the following table before award:

TABLE

Line Items

National Stock Number

Commercial Item (Y or N)

Source of Supply Company Address Part No.

Actual Mfg?

(1) (2) (3) (4) (4) (5) (6)

(1) List each deliverable item of supply and item of technical data.

(2) If there is no national stock number, list “none.”

(3) Use “Y” if the item is a commercial item; otherwise use “N.” If “Y” is listed, the Offeror need not complete the remaining columns in the table.

(4) For items of supply, list all sources. For technical data, list the source.

(5) For items of supply, list each source’s part number for the item.

(6) Use “Y” if the source of supply is the actual manufacturer, “N” if it is not; and “U” if unknown.

(End of provision)

L07 - WSSTERMLZ05 - REVIEW OF AGENCY PROTESTS

(applicable when FAR clause 52.233-2 and/or 52.233-3 are included).

In accordance with FAR Subpart 33.103(d)(4), interested parties may request an independent review of their protest at a level above the contracting officer. The request for an independent review may be made in lieu of a protest to the contracting officer, or as an appeal of a contracting officer decision on a protest. If an agency appellate review of the contracting officer’s decision on a protest is requested, it will not extend GAO’s timeliness requirements.

Any subsequent protest to the GAO must be filed within 10 days of knowledge of the initial adverse agency action.

The individual who will conduct the independent review is the Chief of the Contracting Office (CCO). Interested parties requesting to have an independent review of a protest or to appeal a contracting officer protest decision shall address their correspondence to:

For solicitations or contracts issued by DODAAC N00104--

Independent Protest Review Official NAVSUP WSS Code N7 Building 312, Bay E16 5450 Carlisle Pike

Mechanicsburg, PA 17055-2411

For solicitations or contracts issued by DODAAC N00383--

Independent Protest Review Official NAVSUP WSS Code N7 Building 1, Rm. 2209 700 Robbins Avenue Philadelphia, PA 19111-5098 (02-13)

L08 - WSSTERMLZ06 - CONSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS

Consignment Addresses are readily available electronically at the DoD Activity Address Codes (DODAAC) website https://www.daas.dla.mil/daasinq/dodaac.asp?cu=d Contractors are to enter a specific DODAAC Code (i.e. N63126), then select "Scan Query."

Three addresses will appear:

TAC1=Mailing Address TAC2=Shipping Address TAC3=Billing Address

The TAC2 Shipping Address should always be used.

If it is missing for whatever reason, the contractor is authorized to use the TAC1 Mailing Address.

For Mobile Units and Ships, call the Naval Operational Logistics Support Center (NOLSC) Fleet Locator at:

Commercial 757-443-5434 or DSN 646-5434. (05-10)

L09 – SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS (BEST VALUE/TRADE-OFF)

I. GENERAL

In addition to instructions to offerors contained elsewhere in this solicitation, the following instructions are provided.

Proposals are to be submitted to the Contracting Officer on or before the closing date/time cited elsewhere in this Request for Proposals.

Offerors shall submit the following information on their proposal:

- Non-price Proposal information

- Price/Cost Proposal information

In addition, offers consist of and shall include the following items:

• Solicitation cover sheet with appropriate blocks completed by the offeror or a quote containing substantially similar information such as:

o Name of quoter o Address or CAGE of quoter o Date of quotation o Unit Price o RTAT o Throughput Constraint

• Past Performance Information Form (Attachment B) completed by the offeror.

https://www.daas.dla.mil/daasinq/dodaac.asp?cu=d

- The offeror shall provide relevant past performance information on this form (see Section M for definition of relevant past performance information) or affirmatively state that it possesses no relevant past performance.

• Representations and certifications completed by the offeror in accordance with instructions contained elsewhere in the solicitation. If the offeror has completed all of the representations and certifications required by this solicitation in SAM.gov in accordance with FAR 52.204-8 and DFARS 252.204-7007 ALT A, then the offeror need not submit the hardcopy Representations and Certifications.

• Acknowledgement of solicitation amendments pursuant to FAR 52.215-1 (if not previously acknowledged).

• An offer may be presented as a quote so long as it presents substantially the same information as is requested here.

The completion and submission of the above as called for herein will constitute an offer (proposal) and will be considered the offeror’s unconditional assent to the terms and conditions of this solicitation and any attachments and/or exhibits hereto. Alternate proposals are not authorized. An objection to any of the terms and conditions of the solicitation will constitute a deficiency (see FAR 15.001) which will make the offer unacceptable.

Non-price Proposal Information

This volume shall address compliance with solicitation factors, capacity/delivery, relevant Past Performance and include all information required for proposal evaluation.

In making such submission, the offeror shall utilize Attachment B Past Performance Information Form. This volume of the proposal shall exclude any reference to the price aspects of the proposal.

Capacity should be presented in the form of Repair Turnaround Time (RTAT) and Throughput Constraint.

Repair Turnaround Time (RTAT) definition: The contractual delivery requirement is measured from asset acceptance under the terms of the contract. For purposes of this section, Return is defined as physical receipt of the F-condition asset at the contractor’s facility as reflected in the Action Date entry in the Commercial Asset Visibility (CAV) system. In accordance with the CAV Statement of Work, the contractor is required to accurately report all transactions by the end of the fifth regular business day after receipt and the Action Date entry in CAV must be dated to reflect the actual date of physical receipt. RTAT day count begins on the date of induction.

Throughput Constraint: Total assets to be repaired monthly after initial delivery commences.

A more detailed delivery schedule will be made at award based on award date, RTAT, awardee’s proposal information and assets ready to ship.

Price/Cost Proposal Information This informaton shall include the completed solicitation documents or a quote containing substantially similar information.

IMPORTANT NOTES:

(1) The price/cost proposal shall support the Non-price proposal. Offerors are cautioned not to alter the solicitation.

(2) In the event any person who is not a bona fide employee of the offeror participated in the creation, formulation, or writing of any portion of the proposal, a certificate to this effect shall be included in the proposal which shall be signed by an officer of the offeror. Such certificate shall identify the name of the person who is not a bona fide employee, that person’s employment capacity, the name of the person’s firm, the relationship of that firm to the offeror, and the portion of the proposal in which the person participated.

II. REQUIREMENTS FOR PROPOSAL CONTENT

(1) Any offeror who will be submitting CLASSIFIED data in its Non-price proposal shall first notify the Contracting Officer by contacting the point of contact in the solicitation. CLASSIFIED data that is forwarded as part of an offeror’s proposal shall be housed in its own binder, separate from the unclassified portion.

(2) Introduction and Purpose - This section specifies the format that offerors should use in proposals submitted in response to this solicitation. The intent is not to restrict the offerors in the manner in which they will perform their work but rather to ensure a certain degree of uniformity in the format of the proposals for evaluation purposes.

(3) Requirements for Style: Each offeror shall submit a proposal that clearly and concisely sets forth the contractor’s response to the requirements of the solicitation. Unnecessary elaboration or other presentations beyond that sufficient to present a complete and effective proposal are not desired and may be construed as an indication of the offeror’s lack of cost consciousness. Elaborate artwork, expensive paper or bindings, and expensive visual or other presentation aids are neither necessary nor desired. The proposal shall contain all the pertinent information in sufficient detail in the one area of the proposal where it contributes most critically to the discussion. When necessary, the offeror shall refer to the initial discussion and identify its location within its proposal.

III. PROPOSAL CONTENT

1. Non-price Proposal Information

The non-price proposal is based on compliance with the solicitation requirement, capacity/delivery, and past performance.

The following Technical Factors will be used to evaluate offers: Compliance with the solicitation requirements, Capacity/Delivery, Past Performance.

The Non-price evaluation factors are listed in detail below:

(a) Compliance with the Solicitation Requirements

The Government will evaluate the offeror’s proposal and determine whether it complies with the requirements of the solicitation. Please note, compliance with terms of the solicitation includes, but is not limited to:

(1) Demonstrate Government Source Approval prior to award.

(2) Demonstrates an unconditional offer to perform. A proposal that offers alternative terms or takes exceptions to a solicitation requirement will be considered “technically unacceptable.”

Compliance with solicitation requirements will be as either acceptable or unacceptable. The proposal will only be further evaluated if it is rated as acceptable.

(b) Capacity/Delivery:

(c) Past Performance:

The offeror shall indicate its throughput constraint and repair turn around time (RTAT) to do the repairs hereunder in terms of number of repairs per month for throughput and calendar days for RTAT.

Repair Turnaround Time (RTAT) definition: The contractual delivery requirement is measured from asset acceptance under the terms of the contract. For purposes of this section, Return is defined as physical receipt of the F-condition asset at the contractor’s facility as reflected in the Action Date entry in the Commercial Asset Visibility (CAV) system. In accordance with the CAV Statement of Work, the contractor is required to accurately report all transactions by the end of the fifth regular business day after receipt and the Action Date entry in CAV must be dated to reflect the actual date of physical receipt. RTAT day count begins on the date of induction.

Contractor must notify the government in writing (including electronic commerce methods, such as email) when assets have been received upon physical receipt of the assets.

Throughput Constraint: Total assets to be repaired monthly after initial delivery commences.

The offeror shall indicate its capacity and repair turn around time (RTAT) to do the repairs hereunder in terms of output of RFI or “A” Condition items per month for each line item. The contractor shall do so by indicating such output figures in the chart below to this amendment. For example, if from a capacity standpoint, for Year 1, the first month’s throughput is estimated at 4 units, insert “4” in the corresponding block.

NIIN Throughput Constraint

Government’s Desired Throughput

RTAT Government’s Desired RTAT

016219050 1-2 units per month 120 calendar days

A more detailed delivery schedule will be made at award based on award date, RTAT, awardee’s proposal

The evaluation will consider capacity/delivery as important as past performance and price.

(c) Past Performance

The offeror should complete a “Past Performance Information Form” (Attachment B) for each reference submitted. The form is an attachment to the solicitation. For additional information regarding a particular reference beyond that which will fit on the form, the offeror may continue onto another sheet of paper. The offeror shall demonstrate relevant past performance or affirmatively state that it possesses no relevant past performance. Relevant past performance is performance under contacts or efforts (within the past three years) that is of similar scope, magnitude, and complexity to that which is described in the solicitation.

The evaluation will consider past performance as important as capacity/delivery and price.

3. Price/Cost Information

Price/Cost Information shall include the completed solicitation documents or a quote containing substantially similar information. The price/cost proposal shall support the Non-price proposal. If the price/cost proposal does not support the Non-price proposal, the offeror’s overall technical proposal rating may be downgraded. The price/cost proposal shall include all elements of cost and such other cost information as considered appropriate to support the offeror’s proposal. The evaluation of proposals will consider the offeror’s Non-price proposal as important as the offeror’s Price proposal.

(a) Each offeror shall identify in its pricing proposal if the offeror intends to obtain engineering support services from the government for efforts related to this procurement. NAVSUP WSS intends to identify the level of support, if any, provided to an offeror by the government in the past fiscal year and assign the appropriate monetary value associated with any engineering support provided to an offeror during that fiscal year. This value will then be added accordingly to the unit price per repair in order to ensure that each offeror’s price is evaluated equally.

The evaluation will consider price as important as capacity/delivery and past performance.

L10 – FAR 52.216-27 SINGLE OR MULTIPLE AWARDS (OCT 1995)

The Government may elect to award a single delivery order contract or to award multiple delivery order contracts for the same or similar supplies to two or more sources under this solicitation.

SECTION M – EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

M01 – FAR 52.247-47 EVALUATION – F.O.B ORIGIN (JUN 2003)

This clause of the Federal Acquisition Regulation set forth at FAR 52.247-47 is hereby incorporated by reference and made a part hereof with the same force and effect as if set forth in full.

M02 - EVALUATION CRITERIA AND BASIS FOR AWARD

The Government intends to award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose proposal represents the best value after evaluation in accordance with the factors in the solicitation. The offeror’s proposal shall contain a response to each of the areas identified in the Section L solicitation provision entitled “Submission of Proposals.” The evaluation of proposals will consider the offeror’s non-price factors as important as the offeror’s price factor.

The non-price evaluation factors are in compliance with the solicitation requirements, capacity/delivery, and past performance.

The evaluation of proposals will be as follows.

A. Factors and Evaluation

(1) Compliance with the Solicitation Requirements

The Government will evaluate the offeror’s proposal and determine whether it complies with the requirements of the solicitation. Please note, compliance with terms of the solicitation includes, but is not limited to:

1. Demonstrates Government Source Approval prior to award.

2. Demonstrates an unconditional offer to perform. A proposal that offers alternative terms or takes exceptions to a solicitation requirement will be considered “technically unacceptable.”

Compliance with solicitation requirements will be rated as either acceptable or unacceptable as shown in the table below The proposal will only be further evaluated if it is rated as acceptable.

Adjectival Rating Description Acceptable Proposal meets the requirements of the solicitation Unacceptable Proposal does not meet the requirements of the solicitation.

(2) Capacity/Delivery

Desired RTAT is 120 calendar days. RTAT is subject to negotiation if deemed necessary by the Contracting Officer. Justification for RTAT values exceeding 120 calendar days is strongly recommended and will be considered in evaluation.

Desired throughput constraint is 1-2 per month. Throughput is subject to negotiation if deemed necessary by the Contracting Officer. Justification for throughput constraint values below those desired is strongly recommended and will be considered in evaluation.

Contractor must notify the government in writing (including electronic commerce methods, such as email) when assets have been received upon physical receipt of the assets. Assets must be inducted within 5 business days of physical receipt.

A more detailed delivery schedule will be made at award based on award date, RTAT, awardee’s proposal

The evaluation will consider capacity/delivery as important as past performance and price.

(2) Past Performance

In determining the rating for the Past Performance evaluation factor, the Government will give greater consideration to the contracts or efforts which the Government considers most relevant to the RFP. Relevant past performance is performance under contracts or efforts (within the past three years) that is of similar scope, magnitude, and complexity to that which is described in the solicitation.

Relevancy will be rated based on the ratings in the table below:

Very Relevant Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Relevant Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Somewhat Relevant Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Not Relevant Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

The Government reserves the right to obtain information for use in the evaluation of past performance from any and all sources including sources outside of the Government. Offerors lacking relevant past performance history will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance. However, the proposal of an offeror with no relevant past performance history, while not rated favorably or unfavorably for past performance, may not represent the most advantageous proposal to the Government and thus, may be an unsuccessful proposal when compared to the proposals of other offerors.

The offeror should provide the information requested above for past performance evaluation, or affirmatively state that it possesses no relevant directly related or similar past performance. If an offeror fails to provide any past performance information which is similar in scope, magnitude and complexity to that which is detailed in the RFP or fails to affirmatively state that it possesses no relevant directly related or similar past performance, the offer may not be awardable.

The Government will consider the quality of offeror’s past performance. This consideration is separate and distinct from the Contracting Officer’s responsibility determination. The assessment of the offeror’s past performance will be used as a means of evaluating the relative capability of the offeror and other competitors to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP.

When an offeror is determined to have relevant past performance, the quality of its past performance will be evaluated; an offeror whose past performance demonstrates either a low expectation or no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort will be considered ineligible for award. The ratings shown in the table below will be used:

Substantial Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort

Neutral Confidence No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.

The offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance.

Limited Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

No Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

(3) Price

Price will be evaluated on the basis of price analysis. The method of evaluation used by the Contracting Officer is solely within the discretion of the Contracting Officer and will be based on the evaluated standard repair price of all items listed. The Government reserves the right to award the contract to other than the lowest priced offeror.

The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with offerors. Therefore, the offeror’s initial offer should contain the offeror’s best terms from a price and non-price standpoint. However, the Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if later it is determined by the Contracting Officer to be necessary or in the Government’s best interests.

The Contracting Officer reserves the right to determine that the offeror’s overall firm fixed price proposal represents an unacceptable level of risk, based on the information submitted by the offeror.

A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer or no fewer than 10 business days, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer’s specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.

(END OF CERTIFICATE

Page 1 of 4 RFP # N00383-23-Q-D281

PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION FORM (PPIF)

Provide the information requested in this form for each one of the present or past contracts you have identified. Provide a separate completed form for each contract identified. Attach a separate sheet if additional space is needed.

A. Current Offeror (Company/Division):

CAGE Code:

DUNS Number:

(NOTE: If the company or division performing this past or present effort is different from the current Offeror, note this fact below. Refer to the "Organizational Structure Change History" you provided as part of your Past Performance Volume).

B. Program Title:

C. Contract Specifics:

1. Complete Name of Customer:

2. Customer Address and Telephone #:

3. Contract Number or Citation:

4. Type of Contract:

5. Period of Performance:

6. Initial Contract Price/Cost and Fee: $

7. Final Amount Invoiced/Amount Invoiced to Date: $

8. Original completion date:

9. Current scheduled completion date:

10. Estimated completion date:

11. Number of contract changes:

12. Enter primary cause for contract changes below:

Page 2 of 4 RFP # N00383-23-Q-D281

D. Description of Work as Prime or Subcontractor.

E. Describe how the work under this contract relates to the experience cited by the Offeror in its present proposal.

F. Self-Assessment of past performance record. Provide information of any problems encountered and your corrective actions.

Page 3 of 4 RFP # N00383-23-Q-D281

G. Current Status of Contract (Choose One):

[ ] Work Continuing – On Schedule

[ ] Work Continuing – Behind Schedule

[ ] Work Completed – Litigation Pending or Underway

[ ] Work Completed – No Further Action Pending or Underway

[ ] Work Completed – Routine Administrative Action Pending or Underway

[ ] Work Completed – Claims Negotiations Pending or Underway

[ ] Terminated for Convenience

[ ] Terminated for Default

[ ] Other (Explain)

H. Primary customer points of contact. (For Government contracts/orders, provide current information on all three individuals. For commercial contracts, provide points of contact filling these same roles.)

1. Program Manager and/or Site Manager

2. Procurement Contracting Officer

3. Administrative Contracting Officer

Name:

Office:

Address:

Telephone:

FAX #:

E-Mail:

I. Address below any technical (or other) issues about this contract considered particularly relevant to the current solicitation.

Page 4 of 4 RFP # N00383-23-Q-D281

J. Include below relevant information concerning compliance with FAR 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns, under the cited earlier contract.

K. Subcontracting Plan Requirements.

1. Was a subcontracting plan required? ____________ If YES, go to # 2.

2. Planned goal (%) Achieved goal (%)

3. Explain below why any goals were not met.

700 Robbins Avenue Philadelphia, PA 19111-5098