The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.
135 Santilli Highway, Everett, MA 02148 Main Telephone: (781) 338-3000 TTY: N.E.T. Relay 1-800-439-2370
EVALUATION CRITERIA SCORECARD
Agency Staff use only (This document will be used to evaluate all responses submitted to this Solicitation)
| Name of Bidder: |
| Name of Reviewer(s): |
| Date Reviewed: |
Required Qualifications Criteria (Bidder must receive a “yes” on all the following criteria to move on to the next evaluation section)
| 2 |
| Vendor demonstrates organizational experience and expertise in evaluating core curricular materials for alignment to current national college- and career-ready standards and/or Massachusetts-specific college-, career-, and civic-ready standards, including the English language development standards (WIDA 2020). |
| Yes |_| |
| No |_| |
| 3 |
| Ratings of core curricular materials and accompanying documentation are focused on alignment to the depth and rigor of the national college- and career-ready content standards and/or current Massachusetts-specific content standards, including the English language development standards (WIDA 2020). |
| Yes |_| |
| No |_| |
| 4 |
| Vendor is available to provide sustained technical assistance to DESE, including responding to clarifying questions regarding specific findings, methodologies, or data points on an as-needed basis. |
| Yes |_| |
| No |_| |
| 5 |
| Vendor provides a formal statement of independence from educational publishers, attesting that neither the organization nor individual reviewers hold financial, professional, or personal ties that would constitute a conflict of interest. |
| Yes |_| |
| No |_| |
| 6 |
| K-5 ELA/Literacy ONLY: Vendor demonstates proven experience and expertise in evaluating materials for alignment to grade-level English language arts/literacy standards within the full core literacy block, including explicit and systematic foundational skills instruction: phonemic awareness, phonics, and fluency. |
| Yes |_| |
| No |_| |
Scoring rubric:
| Non-Responsive |
| Qualifications is not applicable to request; elements missing / non-responsive to request |
| Unsatisfactory: |
| Little evidence of qualification. Many required elements are missing. |
| Below Average: |
| Evidence of expertise or qualification in some areas is unclear or unsubstantiated by supporting documentation. Some required elements are missing. |
| Average: |
| Application materials are complete and suggest adequate qualifications, providing clear evidence of expertise. |
| Above Average: |
| Application materials are complete and suggest solid qualifications, providing clear and well-documented evidence of expertise. |
| Outstanding: |
| Application materials is complete, suggest exemplary qualifications, providing compelling, clear, and well-documented evidence of expertise. |
Alternate ID: 27TALWP1 COMMBUYS Document #: BD-26-1026-DOE02-DOE01-129121 Non-Responsive 0 pts.
Unsatisfactory 1 pt.
Below Average 2 pts.
Average 3 pts.
Above Average 4 pts.
Outstanding 5 pts.
Points Available (5 x Multiplier) Points Awarded (0 – 5 x Multiplier)
Additional Evaluation Criteria:
| 1 |
| The bidder defines the specific subjects/content areas and grade spans for which they are qualified to provide curricular ratings. Evaluations are conducted by an educator panel, group, or team with demonstrated expertise in both subject-matter content and inclusive, culturally & linguistically responsive pedagogy through professional experiences as K-12 classroom teachers, curriculum developers, or educational researchers. |
| (x5) |
| 25 |
| 2 |
| The bidder generates curricular evaluation ratings through a thorough, transparent, and evidence-based review process using a standardized tool. Formal training and calibration protocols support consistency, objectivity, and the indentification of implicit bias across all evaluations and reviewers. |
| 3 |
| The bidder demonstrtates evidence of applying a formal equity lens, assessing the degree to which curricular materials represent diverse identities accurately and avoid stereotypes. Evaluations assess whether materials provide equity of access / entry points into content through universal design for learning (UDL) features and research-based practices to support English language development. |
| (x5) |
| 25 |
| 4 |
| The bidder demonstrates evidence of capacity to generate comprehensive curriculum evaluations supported by clear, detailed rationales and specific documentated evidence. All generated reports are clear, user-friendly, actionable, and publicly accessible. |
Comments:
image1.jpeg image2.gif