27SEPRLS1 - Scorecard - Final.docx
DOCX document 113 KB Posted
- Attached to
- 27SEPRLS1 | RFR | Improving Positive Social-emotional skills & relationships through PBS
- Solicitation number
- BD-27-1026-DOE02-DOE01-132479
- Issued by
- Massachusetts
About this file
This is an Evaluation Criteria Scorecard for a Request for Response (RFR) issued by the Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) seeking a vendor to provide technical assistance, coaching, consultation, and implementation support for the Pyramid Model in early childhood education settings. The solicitation, identified as 27SEPRLS1 (Alternate ID: 25SEPRLS1, Document #: BD-27-1026-DOE02-DOE01-132479), targets 22 participating Massachusetts public school districts currently engaged in SSIP (State Systemic Improvement Plan) activities. The vendor will deliver services to early childhood educators, Leadership Teams at early childhood and school levels, Site-Based Coaches, and External Coaches to support Pyramid Model implementation. The scorecard indicates that bidders must demonstrate required qualifications across nine mandatory criteria before proceeding to additional evaluation sections, with qualifications spanning expertise in the Pyramid Model, early literacy, behavioral health, social-emotional development, assessment measures, systems of care, culturally responsive and trauma-informed practices, virtual professional development delivery, and coach monitoring and evaluation.
The evaluation scoring structure allocates 100 total points across seven evaluation criteria, with weighted multipliers ranging from 1 to 10. Required qualifications carry zero points but serve as gatekeeping criteria, while scored elements include evidence of activities addressing racial inequities (10 points with 2x multiplier), preferred qualifications such as knowledge of the Massachusetts ECSE Strategic Plan and experience with antiracist practices (10 points with 2x multiplier), budget alignment with funding available and deliverables (15 points with 3x multiplier), narrative quality and scope adherence (50 points with 10x multiplier), work samples demonstrating relevant experience (5 points), references from previous employers (5 points), and submission of required Attachment B (5 points). Bidders are scored on a scale where Non-Responsive receives 0 points, Unsatisfactory receives 1 point, Below Average receives 2 points, Average receives 3 points, Above Average receives 4 points, and Outstanding receives 5 points.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| IP Language.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment B - Contact Form~1.docx | DOCX document | |
| Prompt Pay Discount - PPD Form.docx | DOCX document | |
| DESE Required Language 10-2025.docx | DOCX document | |
| RFR - Required Specifications from OSD 10.1.21.docx | DOCX document | |
| 27SEPRLS1 - Attachment A - Final.docx | DOCX document | |
| Small Business Program Plan Language.docx | DOCX document | |
| 27SEPRLS1 - Bid - Final.docx | DOCX document | |
| FY26 State Forms - April 2026.pdf | ||
| IT RFR Required Specifications.doc | DOC document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
135 Santilli Highway, Everett, MA 02148 | Main Telephone: (781) 338-3000 | TTY: N.E.T. Relay 1-800-439-2370
EVALUATION CRITERIA SCORECARD
Agency Staff use only (This document will be used to evaluate all responses submitted to this Solicitation)
| Name of Bidder: |
| Name of Reviewer(s): |
| Date Reviewed: |
Required Qualifications Criteria (Bidder must receive a “yes” on all the following criteria to move on to the next evaluation section)
| 1 |
| Expertise in the Pyramid Model, inclusive of implementation and research at the early childhood, classroom, school, and district levels. |
| Yes |_| |
| No |_| |
| 2 |
| Expertise in early literacy, children with disabilities, behavioral health, and social emotional development. |
| Yes |_| |
| No |_| |
| 3 |
| Knowledge of various assessment measures, including screening tools to identify social, emotional, and behavioral needs of young children. |
| Yes |_| |
| No |_| |
| 4 |
| Expertise in building systems of care. |
| Yes |_| |
| No |_| |
| 5 |
| Experience implementing culturally responsive, trauma informed practices at the early childhood, classroom, and school levels, emphasizing antiracism, equity, and inclusion. |
| Yes |_| |
| No |_| |
| 6 |
| Experience building strong home and school partnerships, ensuring collaborative, equal partnership between educators and parents. |
| Yes |_| |
| No |_| |
| 7 |
| Understanding of implicit bias and the implications of implicit bias in service delivery and assessment. |
| Yes |_| |
| No |_| |
| 8 |
| Experience providing high quality, interactive virtual professional development trainings. |
| Yes |_| |
| No |_| |
| 9 |
| Experience with ongoing monitoring, evaluation, and support of coaches to ensure successful program implementation. |
| Yes |_| |
| No |_| |
Scoring rubric:
| Non-Responsive |
| Qualifications is not applicable to request; elements missing / non-responsive to request |
| Unsatisfactory: |
| Little evidence of qualification. Many required elements are missing. |
| Below Average: |
| Evidence of expertise or qualification in some areas is unclear or unsubstantiated by supporting documentation. Some required elements are missing. |
| Average: |
| Application materials are complete and suggest adequate qualifications, providing clear evidence of expertise. |
| Above Average: |
| Application materials are complete and suggest solid qualifications, providing clear and well-documented evidence of expertise. |
| Outstanding: |
| Application materials is complete, suggesting exemplary qualifications, providing compelling, clear, and well-documented evidence of expertise. |
Alternate ID: 25SEPRLS1 COMMBUYS Document #: BD-27-1026-DOE02-DOE01-132479 Non-Responsive 0 pts.
Unsatisfactory 1 pt.
Below Average 2 pts.
Average 3 pts.
Above Average 4 pts.
Outstanding 5 pts.
| Multiplier |
| Maximum |
Points Available (5 x Multiplier) Points Awarded (0 – 5 x Multiplier)
Additional Evaluation Criteria:
| 1 |
| Bidder provides evidence of activities focused on addressing racial inequities, articulates how their organization has and is currently working on supporting anti-racist mindsets, internal practices, and services/offerings, and bidder shares specific examples of how their services/offerings are culturally responsive and anti-racist |
| (x2) |
| 10 |
| 2 |
| Bidders meets any/all of the following Preferred Qualifications (.5 point for each qualification met): |
1.Knowledge of the Massachusetts Early Childhood Special Education (ECSE) Strategic Plan and SSIP.
2.Experience in identifying and securing venues (remote and physical) for statewide and local trainings.
3.Experience in building educator and administrative expertise in the Pyramid Model in ECSE.
4.Experience with analyzing and refining practices and supports (internally and/or externally) from a racial equity lens.
5.Experience in building sustainable systems with LEAs 6.Deep understanding of how to implement antiracist, equitable, inclusive, culturally responsive practices at the external coach, early childhood, classroom, and school levels and with families.
7.Expertise in implicit bias and its implications in education.
8.Experience conducting virtual and in person training with External and Site Based Coaches and/or trainers in the Pyramid Model.
9.Expertise in data collection, including SPP/APR Indicator 7A as required by OSEP.
10.Ability to travel or conduct remote visits to early childhood programs, schools, and districts across the Commonwealth to provide job-embedded technical assistance.
| (x2) |
| 10 |
| 3 |
| Budget provided is within the estimate amount of funding available and meets all deliverable asks in the bid. |
| (x3) |
| 15 |
| 4 |
| Narrative provided does not exceed page limit, address all parts of the scope/deliverables in detail with clear and concise responses, address all aspects of the bid. |
| (x10) |
| 50 |
| 5 |
| Two samples of previous work provided align with similar services and demonstrate the bidders ability to meet deliverables in this bid. |
| (x1) |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| Recommendations provided by previous employers displays experience in alignment with the services being sought in this bid. |
| (x1) |
| 5 |
| 7 |
| Attachment B is complete and submitted with response |
| (x1) |
| 5 |
| Total: |
| 100 |
Comments:
image1.jpeg image2.gif
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .