26MAOLADG1 - Scorecard - Final.docx
DOCX document 112 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- BD-25-1026-DOE02-DOE01-113206
- Issued by
- Middlesex County, Massachusetts
About this file
This is a bid evaluation scorecard from the Massachusetts Department of Education (DOE) for solicitation BD-25-1026-DOE02-DOE01-113206, used to evaluate responses for Professional Development Program (PDP) providers. The document outlines required qualifications including being an approved PDP issuer, meeting space requirements for Blended Learning or technology requirements for Online models, ability to collaborate with Department staff, and capacity to serve as a fiscal agent for course enrollment billing.
The scorecard uses a 0-5 point rating system across five main evaluation criteria, each weighted with a multiplier of 4, for a total possible score of 100 points. The criteria focus on: adequacy of space/technology (20 points), quality of course registration and learning platform (20 points), ELL expertise and RETELL knowledge (20 points), staff experience with public schools and professional development (20 points), and competitive per-participant costs (20 points). The evaluation criteria specifically emphasize candidates' qualifications in ELL-related fields, requiring advanced degrees and significant classroom/administrative experience for maximum points.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| State Forms - Read Only - UPDATED Dec 2024.pdf | ||
| IT RFR Required Specifications.doc | DOC document | |
| DESE Required Language 3-26-24.docx | DOCX document | |
| RFR - Required Specifications from OSD 10.1.21.docx | DOCX document | |
| 26MAOLADG1 - Attachment A - Final.docx | DOCX document | |
| IP Language.docx | DOCX document | |
| 26MAOLADG1 - Bid - final.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
135 Santilli Highway, Everett, MA 02148 Main Telephone: (781) 338-3000 TTY: N.E.T. Relay 1-800-439-2370
EVALUATION CRITERIA SCORECARD
Agency Staff use only (This document will be used to evaluate all responses submitted to this Solicitation)
| Name of Bidder: |
| Name of Reviewer(s): |
| Date Reviewed: |
Required Qualifications Criteria (Bidder must receive a “yes” on all the following criteria to move on to the next evaluation section)
| 1 |
| Approved issuer of PDPs, and established reputation as a provider of professional development to public school educators |
| Yes |_| |
| No |_| |
| 2 |
| Able to meet the space requirements of the Blended Learning model and/or the technology requirements of the Online model, as applied for |
| Yes |_| |
| No |_| |
| 3 |
| Ability to collaborate effectively with Department staff |
| Yes |_| |
| No |_| |
| 4 |
| If necessary, capacity to serve as a fiscal agent, billing individuals and districts for course enrollment. Districts must be able to pay via their usual procedures. |
| Yes |_| |
| No |_| |
Scoring rubric:
| Non-Responsive |
| Qualifications is not applicable to request; elements missing / non-responsive to request |
| Unsatisfactory: |
| Little evidence of qualification. Many required elements are missing. |
| Below Average: |
| Evidence of expertise or qualification in some areas is unclear or unsubstantiated by supporting documentation. Some required elements are missing. |
| Average: |
| Application materials are complete and suggest adequate qualifications, providing clear evidence of expertise. |
| Above Average: |
| Application materials are complete and suggest solid qualifications, providing clear and well-documented evidence of expertise. |
| Outstanding: |
| Application materials is complete, suggesting exemplary qualifications, providing compelling, clear, and well-documented evidence of expertise. |
Alternate ID: 26MAOLADG1 COMMBUYS Document #: BD-25-1026-DOE02-DOE01-113206 Non-Responsive 0 pts.
Unsatisfactory 1 pt.
Below Average 2 pts.
Average 3 pts.
Above Average 4 pts.
Outstanding 5 pts.
| Multiplier |
| Maximum |
Points Available (5 x Multiplier) Points Awarded (0 – 5 x Multiplier)
Additional Evaluation Criteria:
| 1 |
| Evidence that your organization has or can secure adequate space and/or technology that meets the requirements outlined in the scope of work to deliver the applied for course format(s) |
| (x4) |
| 20 |
| 2 |
| Quality/capacity of course registration and learning platform/delivery system |
| (x4) |
| 20 |
| 3 |
| ELL expertise; knowledge of RETELL as evidenced by submitted resumes or letters of reference. 5= all submitted candidates possess advanced degrees in ELL-related field, and 5 or more years classroom and/or admin experience in ELL-related work; 1 = majority of candidates have no advanced degrees in ELL and 2 years experience or less. |
| (x4) |
| 20 |
| 4 |
| Staff with experience interacting with public school districts and professional developers |
| (x4) |
| 20 |
| 5 |
| Proposed per-participant costs, if applicable, are competitive, in relation to all other submissions |
| (x4) |
| 20 |
| Total: |
| 100 |
Comments:
image1.jpeg image2.gif
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .