24R2013_Attach 3 -Volume II Past Perf.docx

DOCX document 50 KB Posted

Attached to
STUDENT TRANSPORTATION SERVICES for GARMISCH & MUNICH. Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
HE1254-24-R-2013
Issued by
Department of Defense Education Activity

About this file

This document is the Past Performance Volume for a federal contract opportunity to provide Student Transportation Services (STS) for the Garmisch Elementary Middle School (GEMS) and Munich International School (MIS).

The solicitation requires the offeror to submit at least one past performance reference for the prime contractor and one for any subcontractors/teaming partners. The past performance must be recent (within the last 3 years) and relevant in scope, magnitude of effort, and complexity, such as transporting pre-K through high school students, providing transportation for special needs students, managing bus personnel and vehicles, responding to incidents, and maintaining vehicles. The offeror must describe how their past performance aligns with these requirements. Failure to submit the Past Performance Volume will result in non-compliance.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to STUDENT TRANSPORTATION SERVICES for GARMISCH & MUNICH., newest first.
File Type Posted
24R2013_AMD6__SF1449_052224.pdf PDF
24R2013_AMD6_SF30_052224.pdf PDF
24R2013_AMD5_SF30_051324.pdf PDF
24R2013_AMD5__SF1449_051324.pdf PDF
24R2013_AMD4_SF30_050824.pdf PDF
24R2013_AMD4_SF1449_050824.pdf PDF
24R2013_Attach_X5_PricingSheet_050824.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
24R2013_AMD3_SF1449_050724.pdf PDF
24R2013_Attach_X2_Personnel_05724.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
24R2013_AMD3_SF30_050724.pdf PDF
23R2013_Attach_X5_Pricing Sheet_050224.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
24R2013_AMD2_SF30_050224.pdf PDF
24R2013_AMD2_SF1449_050224.pdf PDF
24R2013_AMD1_SF30_050124.pdf PDF
24R2013_AMD1_SF30_050124.pdf PDF
24R2013_Attach 1_PWS_050124.pdf PDF
24R2013_AMD1_SF1449_050124.pdf PDF
24R2013_Attach_X2_Personnel.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
24R2013_Enclosure6_52.204-26.pdf PDF
24R2013_Attach 2_PPQ.docx DOCX document
24R2013_Enclosure1_52.209-7.pdf PDF
24R2013_SF1449_041024.pdf PDF
24R2013_Enclosure3_52.222-56.pdf PDF
24R2013_Enclosure7_52.204-24.pdf PDF
24R2013_Attach 1_PWS_040424.pdf PDF
24R2013_Enclosure5_CPARS.pdf PDF
24R2013_Enclosure2_52.212-3 Alt1.pdf PDF
24R2013_Attach_X3_Vehicles.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
24R2013_Enclosure4_Letter of Commitment.pdf PDF
24R2013_Attach_X6_ RepsCerts.pdf PDF
24R2013_Enclosure8_252.239-7009.pdf PDF
24R2013_Attach_X7_NDA.pdf PDF
24R2013_Attach_X5_Pricing Sheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Show all 33

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION – SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104

FACTOR 2: PAST PERFORMANCE VOLUME

Garmisch School Complex (GEMS School Zone A & MIS School Zone B)

N/CAGE Code:

Unique Entity ID:

Email Address:

Point of Contact Number:

Company Name:

Address:

Phone Number:

Point of Contact:

Attachment 3

HE125424R2013

Volume II – Past Performance

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION-SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION – SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104

Past Performance Volume Instructions

Failure to submit a Past Performance Proposal (Attachment 3) will result in noncompliance. In the event the Offeror does not have any past performance record, the Offeror shall still submit a Past Performance proposal with a statement that past performance is unavailable.

The Offeror shall submit at a minimum of one (1) recent past performance for the prime and one (1) for the subcontractors/teaming contractor (performing as the Prime on that effort) to determine the recency, relevancy, and quality of the Offeror’s performance. To be recent, the effort much be on-going or must have been completed within the last three (3) years by the closing date/time of this solicitation. To be relevant, the Offeror must demonstrate that performance that performance involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires. The relevancy analysis will focus on if the Offeror has provided bus transportation services similar in scope, magnitude of effort and complexities as follows:

Scope: Refers to the type of work performed in the Offeror’s past performance reference when compared to the type of work required in this solicitation. The type of work required is for student transportation services.

Magnitude of Effort: Refers to the size (e.g., dollar amount, personnel, vehicles) of an Offeror’s past performance reference. The Offeror’s past performance reference will be compared to the Government’s estimated amount to perform the work required in the PWS.

Complexity: Refers to the level of complication of an Offeror’s past performance reference. The level of complexity will be compared to the Government’s estimated complexity level. The following factors will be considered for each past performance reference to determine whether each reference is similar in complexity.

1. Transporting pre-kindergarten through high school grade children from their designated bus stops to and from school in the European school districts.

1. Transporting a special needs student with a Safety Aide and providing an appropriate vehicle for special needs students from their designated stop to their school, and vice versa.

1. Providing Bus Monitor, Safety Aide and/or Safety Attendant services on the school bus during runs.

1. Appropriately managing personnel and vehicles (i.e., Responsiveness to deficiencies and performance issues and making timely corrections. Taking a proactive approach when known performance issues may hinder mission requirements).

1. Responding to incidents and accidents in regards to transporting students on the bus.

1. Maintaining vehicles in accordance with host nation and contractual requirements.

1. Providing, tracking, and reporting required training.

1. Providing timely and accurate reports and other contract deliverables.

1. Effectively communicating with all stakeholders. Communicating issues as necessary to ensure all stakeholders were informed.

The Contractor shall follow the format shown in the next page when submitting Volume II – Past Performance.

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION – SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104

Volume II – Past Performance Information

The Offeror, shall at a minimum, submit the following for each past performance reference:

Reference Information:

Contract Number:
Contract Type: (ex: FFP, IDIQ-FFP, Cost, etc)
Contract Period of Performance:
Contract Value:
Customer/Agency of Reference: (ex: DoDEA – Kaiserslaughtern Military Community)
Customer Address:
Customer Point of Contact:
Customer Email Address:
Customer Contact Number:

Brief Description of Effort Please provide a brief description of the past performance reference to include the services provided.

Past Performance Relevancy Factors In this section, please indicate how the past performance reference is relevant in scope, magnitude of effort and complexity based on the definitions provided to you in this document and under Factor 2: Past Performance in the solicitation. Please feel free to use additional pages (but not exceeding the page limit) if more than one past performance reference is used.

Scope: Please describe how your past performance reference is relevant in scope.

Magnitude of Effort: Please describe how your past performance reference is relevant in magnitude of effort.

Complexity: Please describe how your past performance reference is relevant in complexity.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .