240716 127EAV24Q0079 1120225 Past Performance Questionnaire Sandia Ranger District Cibola NF.pdf
PDF 537 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 127EAV24Q0079
- Issued by
-
Department of Agriculture Forest Service
About this file
This document is a Contractor Past Performance Inquiry for a janitorial services contract (Solicitation 127EAV24Q0079) for the Sandia Ranger District of the Cibola National Forest in New Mexico. The solicitation is a 100% small business set-aside with a Firm Fixed Price contract type. The contractor is requesting a past performance reference from the recipient, including information on customer satisfaction, quality of services, timeliness, and whether the contractor would be recommended for selection again. The contract is for janitorial services at the Sandia Ranger District office (approximately 9,980 sq ft) and warehouse (approximately 1,000 sq ft), with a period of performance from August 28, 2024 to August 27, 2025, and four one-year option periods. The solicitation states that the award will be made on the Lowest Price Technically Acceptable offer.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 240724 1120225 127EA24Q0079 Sandia Ranger District Cibola NF Janitorial.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
127EAV24Q0079 Sandia Ranger District Cibola NF
JANITORIAL SERVICES
Contractor Past Performance Inquiry
INFORMATION/CONFIDENTIAL
Dear Customer:
Our firm has submitted a quote to the USDA Cibola National Forest Sandia Ranger District NM. In accordance with the Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR), they will evaluate our firm’s past performance. Your firm has been listed as a reference for work previously performed.
Your candid response to the attached survey will assist the evaluation team in this process and your participation in this evaluation is greatly appreciated. Please complete the enclosed survey as thoroughly as possible. General information regarding the responses may be released to the quoter; the FAR prohibits the release of names providing the responses.
Complete confidentiality will be maintained.
Please email the completed form NO LATER THAN 08/07/2024.
DO NOT RETURN THIS FORM TO OUR COMPANY, PLEASE RETURN TO: shavera.leveille@usda.gov
Contractor Name:
Address:
Contract or Order No:
Total Value of Contract:
Liquidated Damages Assessed:
Contract Award Date:
Final Completion Date:
Name of person completing this form:
Phone Number:
Name of Company or Government Agency:
Description of work this company performed:
127EAV23Q0079 Sandia Ranger District Cibola NF
RATINGS - Summarize contractor performance and check the number that corresponds to the rating for each category.
RATING DEFINITION
E = Excellent Performance exceeded what was required by the contract VG = Very Good Performance met all the requirements of the contract S = Satisfactory Contractor met most (essentially all) of the requirements of the contract M = Marginal Contractor met some of the requirements of the contract however changes to the contractor’s processes were necessary to achieve contract requirements
U = Unsatisfactory Contractor failed to meet requirements of the contract N/A = Not Applicable Question did not apply to the contract performed for your firm.
CUSTOMER SATISFACTION
Was the project completed in accordance with the contract specifications?
How well did the contractor identify and correct deficient work?
Were submittals, testing, certifications, and final drawings (as-builts) completed accurately and timely?
Was work performed as scheduled?
Were delays resolved quickly and to both parties satisfaction?
QUALITY OF SERVICES
Did the contractor provide adequate oversight to sub-contractors, suppliers, employees?
Did the contractor maintain a good relationship with the owner, contracting agency, and management personnel?
If there were change orders, was the contractor reasonable in defining scope of change and controlling cost?
Did the contractor provide adequate work force (number and skills) for work being performed?
How well did the contractor manage the quality of work?
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
Comments:
127EAV23Q0079 Sandia Ranger District Cibola NF
TIMELINESS
Did the contractor complete the project on time? If there were problems, were they addressed and resolved?
CUSTOMER SATISFACTION
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
Comments:
Would you recommend the selection of this contractor again?
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .