2142 - Signed Grant Info Sherman St..pdf
PDF 516 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 2025-14
- Issued by
- Van Buren County, Michigan
About this file
This is a Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) Transportation Economic Development Fund Category B: Community Service Infrastructure Fund Application submitted by the City of Caro for a street rehabilitation project. The application focuses on rehabilitating E Sherman Street, a 1,000-foot long major collector roadway with a current PASER rating of 2 and a daily average traffic count of 434 vehicles. The proposed project involves rehabilitation and partial reconstruction of the street, including a road diet, drainage improvements, curb and gutter work, storm sewer modifications, sidewalk adjustments, and barrier-free ramp improvements. The project will include 2" cold mill and HMA overlay, non-participating water main replacement, and associated sidewalk work. The proposed project start date is 06/08/2026.
The total construction cost is $517,275.00, with the city requesting a grant of $250,000.00, which represents 48% of the total project cost. The project will be paired with $263,901.00 in non-participating infrastructure work, including 460 feet of 8" water main replacement, 3 sanitary manhole replacements, and sidewalk work. The city has committed funds for the non-participating work and will oversee the grant implementation with assistance from a consultant engineering firm. The project aims to address existing street widening issues, improve drainage, and rehabilitate pavement in areas that do not require significant grading/slope changes.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Sherman Engineeering RFP Documents.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Michigan Department of Transportation
2142 (04/2025) OFFICE OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
TRANSPORTATION ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUND
CATEGORY B: COMMUNITY SERVICE INFRASTRUCTURE FUND APPLICATION
SECTION ONE: APPLICANT INFORMATION
CITY OR VILLAGE NAME MAILING ADDRESS ZIP CODE COUNTY
CONTACT PERSON CONTACT TITLE E-MAIL ADDRESS
ALTERNATE CONTACT PERSON
E-MAIL ADDRESS
STATE SENATOR STATE SENATE DISTRICT NO. STATE REP. STATE REP. DISTRICT NO.
SECTION TWO: PROJECT INFORMATION
1) STREET NAME PROPOSED PROJECT LIMITS
(Using nearest cross streets)
LINEAR LENGTH OF PROJECT
ROADWAY CLASSIFICATION PASER RATING DAILY AVERAGE TRAFFIC COUNT CONSTRUCTION COST
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED WORK; include specific treatment method with details such as quantities (ie patching) and/or depth (ie mill/fill), where applicable.
IS ANY ADDITIONAL RIGHT-OF-WAY NEEDED FOR THE PROJECT(S)? YES NO IF YES, PLEASE BRIEFLY DESCRIBE.
2) STREET NAME PROPOSED PROJECT LIMITS
(Using nearest cross streets)
LINEAR LENGTH OF PROJECT
ROADWAY CLASSIFICATION PASER RATING DAILY AVERAGE TRAFFIC COUNT CONSTRUCTION COST
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED WORK; include specific treatment method with details such as quantities (ie patching) and/or depth (ie mill/fill), where applicable.
IS ANY ADDITIONAL RIGHT-OF-WAY NEEDED FOR THE PROJECT(S)? YES NO IF YES, PLEASE BRIEFLY DESCRIBE.
CONTACT PHONE NO.
ALTERNATE CONTACT PERSON TITLE PHONE NO./EXTESION
MDOT 2142 (04/2025) Page 2 of 3
3) STREET NAME PROPOSED PROJECT LIMITS
(Using nearest cross streets)
LINEAR LENGTH OF PROJECT
ROADWAY CLASSIFICATION PASER RATING CONSTRUCTION COST DAILY AVERAGE TRAFFIC COUNT
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED WORK; include specific treatment method with details such as quantities (ie patching) and/or depth (ie mill/fill), where applicable.
IS ANY ADDITIONAL RIGHT-OF-WAY NEEDED FOR THE PROJECT(S)? YES NO IF YES, PLEASE BRIEFLY DESCRIBE.
4) STREET NAME PROPOSED PROJECT LIMITS
(Using nearest cross streets)
LINEAR LENGTH OF PROJECT
ROADWAY CLASSIFICATION PASER RATING DAILY AVERAGE TRAFFIC COUNT CONSTRUCTION COST
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED WORK; include specific treatment method with details such as quantities (ie patching) and/or depth (ie mill/fill), where applicable.
YES NO IF YES, PLEASE BRIEFLY DESCRIBE. IS ANY ADDITIONAL RIGHT-OF-WAY NEEDED FOR THE PROJECT(S)?
5) STREET NAME PROPOSED PROJECT LIMITS
(Using nearest cross streets)
LINEAR LENGTH OF PROJECT
ROADWAY CLASSIFICATION PASER RATING DAILY AVERAGE TRAFFIC COUNT CONSTRUCTION COST
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED WORK; include specific treatment method with details such as quantities (ie patching) and/or depth (ie mill/fill), where applicable.
YES NO IF YES, PLEASE BRIEFLY DESCRIBE. IS ANY ADDITIONAL RIGHT-OF-WAY NEEDED FOR THE PROJECT(S)?
MDOT 2142 (04/2025) Page 3 of 3
SECTION THREE: PROJECT FUNDING
1a) WILL THE PROPOSED PROJECT(S) BE PAIRED WITH OTHER NONPARTICIPATING INFRASTRUCTURE WORK? I.E., SEWER, WATER, ELECTRIC, OR OTHER? YES NO
IF YES, PLEASE BRIEFLY DESCRIBE NATURE OF WORK AND COST ESTIMATE: $
YES NO 1b) ARE FUNDS COMMITTED FOR THIS NONPARTICIPATING WORK?
2) ARE YOU APPLYING FOR ADDITIONAL FUNDING FOR ANY OF THE PROJECTS LISTED IN THIS APPLICATION? YES NO
IF YES, PLEASE PROVIDE
AGENCY NAME ADDITIONAL FUNDING AMOUNT REQUESTED YEAR EXPECTED
OR
3) PROJECT COST CALCULATIONS AND GRANT REQUEST
a. TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS FROM SECTION 2: $
b. MAXIMUM GRANT AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED 50% of SECTION 3.3a: $
c. MAXIMUM GRANT AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED: $250,000.00
d. THE LESSER OF 3b AND 3c = GRANT REQUEST: $ OR % WHICHEVER IS LESS*
e. PARTICIPATING MATCH PROVIDED BY LOCAL AGENCY (AT LEAST 3a MINUS 3d): $
f. TOTAL NONPARTICIPATING COST FROM SECTION 3.1a: $
g. TOTAL AGENCY FUNDING COMMITMENT (SECTION 3.3e PLUS SECTION 3.3f): * *
* If the project total comes in higher or lower than anticipated in this application, the final grant amount will be the lesser of the total grant award or the grant percentage (3d).
* * The resolution should note this dollar amount as committed by the local agency.
SECTION FOUR: PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION
1) PROPOSED PROJECT START DATE (mm/dd/yyyy):
YES NO2) WILL THE PROPOSED WORK BE PAIRED WITH OTHER ROADWORK BY ANOTHER AGENCY?
IF YES, PLEASE PROVIDE THE AGENCY NAME:
3) WILL YOUR AGENCY OVERSEE THE GRANT IMPLEMENTATION? YES NO IF NO, WHO WILL OVERSEE THE GRANT
IMPLEMENTATION? I.E., LOCAL AGENCY, CONSULTANT ENGINEERING FIRM, ETC.:
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS
REQUIRED DOCUMENT CHECKLIST
RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT MAP CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATES PHOTOS
NAME OF AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY FROM RESOLUTION E-MAIL ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER
SIGNATURE DATE
Please submit application and required documents to MDOT-OED-CategoryB@Michigan.gov.
mailto:MDOT-OED-CategoryB@Michigan.gov
| CITY OR VILLAGE NAME: City of Caro |
| MAILING ADDRESS: 317 S. State Street, Caro MI |
| COUNTY: Tuscola |
| ALTERNATE CONTACT PERSON: Tom Reese |
| STATE SENATOR: Dan Lauwers |
| STATE SENATE DISTRICT NUMBER: 25 |
| STATE REP: Matthew Bierlein |
| STATE REP DISTRICT NUMBER: 97 |
| 1 STREET NAME: E Sherman Street |
| PROPOSED PROJECT LIMITS Using Nearest Cross Streets: M-81 to E Frank Street |
| QUANTITY OF WORK DONE If applicable: 1000 feet |
| PASR RATING: 2 |
| AVERAGE TRAFFIC COUNT: 434 |
| 2 STREET NAME: |
| PROPOSED PROJECT LIMITS Using Nearest Cross Streets_2: |
| QUANTITY OF WORK DONE If applicable_2: |
| PASR RATING_2: |
| AVERAGE TRAFFIC COUNT_2: |
| 3 STREET NAME: |
| PROPOSED PROJECT LIMITS Using Nearest Cross Streets_3: |
| QUANTITY OF WORK DONE If applicable_3: |
| PASR RATING_3: |
| AVERAGE TRAFFIC COUNT_3: |
| 4 STREET NAME: |
| PROPOSED PROJECT LIMITS Using Nearest Cross Streets_4: |
| QUANTITY OF WORK DONE If applicable_4: |
| PASR RATING_4: |
| AVERAGE TRAFFIC COUNT_4: |
| 5 STREET NAME: |
| PROPOSED PROJECT LIMITS Using Nearest Cross Streets_5: |
| QUANTITY OF WORK DONE If applicable_5: |
| PASR RATING_5: |
| AVERAGE TRAFFIC COUNT_5: |
| 1 WILL THE PROPOSED PROJECTS BE PAIRED WITH OTHER NONPARTICIPATING INFRASTRUCTURE WORK IE SEWER WATER ELECTRIC OR OTHER YES NO a IF YES PLEASE BRIEFLY DESCRIBE NATURE OF WORK AND COST ESTIMATE: 460 feet of 8" water main replacement and related work, 3 sanitary manhole replacements and sidewalk work. |
See cost estimate included with application.
| undefined_2: June 8, 2026 |
| IF YES PLEASE PROVIDE THE AGENCY NAME: |
| IMPLEMENTATION IE LOCAL AGENCY CONSULTANT ENGINEERING FIRM ETC: with the assistance of a consultant engineering firm |
| ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: Existing street has been widened over the years without adding or improving the drainage. Currently the storm water runs down the pavement at the original width location causing the pavement to remain wet and causes premature pavement failure. Proposed project includes extending the existing curb and gutter for the full length of the street at the "diet" location and partial reconstruction as required to correct the grading accordingly. Pavement Rehabilitation is proposed is areas that do not require grading/slope changes. |
| NAME OF AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY FROM RESOLUTION: Scott R. Czasak, MPA, CPM, PDM |
| EMAIL ADDRESS_3: sczasak@carocity.net |
| PHONE NUMBER: 989-673-7671 |
| DATE: |
| g TOTAL AGENCY FUNDING COMMITMENT SECTION 31a PLUS SECTION 32E: |
| 0: |
| 1: |
| 1: |
| 1: |
| 2025-05-22T11:33:49-0400 | |
| Scott R. Czasak, MPA |
| Clear Form: |
| Section 1 Danger to Fatility?: Yes |
| ST1: Off |
| ST2: Off |
| ST3: Off |
| ST4: Off |
| PG1: No |
| PG2: No |
| PG3: Yes |
| PG4: Yes |
| PG5: Yes |
| mSW1: Choice3 |
| mSW2: Choice2 |
| mSW3: Choice1 |
| mSW4: Choice12 |
| submit application: |
| CC_1: 517275 |
| CC_2: |
| CC_3: |
| CC_4: |
| CC_5: |
| 4-1: 517275 |
| 4-DDD: 250000 |
| GG_4: 531176 |
| 4-TWO: 258637.5 |
| LINE_250K: 250000 |
| ZIP CODE: |
| 0: 48723 |
| 1: |
| 0: |
| 3-1a: 263901 |
| comb: |
| 0: |
| 1: |
| 0: [Major Collector] |
| 1: [ ] |
| 1Type: |
| 0: [ ] |
| 1: |
| 0: [ ] |
| 1: [ ] |
| DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED WORK IS ANY ADDITIONAL RIGHTOFWAY NEEDED FOR THE PROJECTS YES NO IF YES PLEASE BRIEFLY DESCRIBE: |
| 0: ADA Ramp replacement and other sidewalk work will require grading permits. Water service replacements will also required grading permits. |
| 1: Rehabilitation of the northern portion of E Sherman Street with proposed 2" cold mill and HMA overlay. |
Rehabilitation and partial reconstruction of the middle portion of E Sherman Street to facilitate a proposed road diet and drainage improvements as part of the rehabilitation work. Proposed 2" cold mill and HMA overlay of the reduced width travel lanes. Proposed curb and gutter and storm sewer work to improve the storm water drainage and reconstruction of the parking lanes to facilitate the drainage improvements and diet. Non-participating sidewalk work is also proposed to adjust the location of the sidewalks to be adjacent to the new curbing.
Reconstruction of the southern portion of E Sherman Street facilitate a proposed road diet and drainage improvements. Proposed curb and gutter and storm sewer work to improve the storm water drainage and proposed reconstruction of the reduced width street. Non-participating water main replacement and sidewalk work is also proposed.
Barrier free ramp improvements and related work, pavement markings, signage replacement and restoration work is proposed for all three portions of E Sherman Street.
| DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED WORK IS ANY ADDITIONAL RIGHTOFWAY NEEDED FOR THE PROJECTS YES NO IF YES PLEASE BRIEFLY DESCRIBE_2: |
| 0: |
| 1: |
| DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED WORK IS ANY ADDITIONAL RIGHTOFWAY NEEDED FOR THE PROJECTS YES NO IF YES PLEASE BRIEFLY DESCRIBE_3: |
| 0: |
| 1: |
| DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED WORK IS ANY ADDITIONAL RIGHTOFWAY NEEDED FOR THE PROJECTS YES NO IF YES PLEASE BRIEFLY DESCRIBE_5: |
| 0: |
| 1: |
| DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED WORK IS ANY ADDITIONAL RIGHTOFWAY NEEDED FOR THE PROJECTS YES NO IF YES PLEASE BRIEFLY DESCRIBE_4: |
| 0: |
| 1: |
| AR: |
| 0: |
| 1: |
| EMAIL ADDRESS: |
| 1: treese@carocity.net |
| 0: sczasak@carocity.net |
| land 2: |
| 24: |
| 1: |
| 1: |
| 0: ** |
| 1: ** |
| 4-MINUS: 267275 |
| 4-MINUSDD: 48.330191870861725 |
| PHONE NUMBER EXT: |
| 0: 989-248-6424 |
| 1: 989-673-7671 |
| CONTACT PERSON: Scott R. Czasak, MPA, CPM, PDM |
| CONTACT TITLE: |
| 0: City Manager |
| 1: DPW Superintendent |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .