20MACISAC1 - Scorecard - Final.docx
DOCX document 71 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- BD-19-1026-DOE02-DOE01-38526
- Issued by
- Barnstable County, Massachusetts
About this file
This document is an Evaluation Criteria Scorecard used by the Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education to assess responses to a solicitation for Conference Space, Catering Services, and Hotel Accommodations. The solicitation, identified as 20MACISAC1, requires a minimum of 2 years of business experience and a current Municipal Board of Health License. Responses will be evaluated on pricing, Supplier Diversity Program Plans, qualifications to provide the required services, menu offerings, and reference information. Vendors responding to Categories II and III must also provide details on conference room specifications and AV/internet capabilities. Vendors responding to Category I must receive a minimum score of 65, while vendors responding to Category II or III must receive a minimum score of 75 to be awarded.
The scorecard outlines the specific point allocations for each evaluation criteria, with pricing and services comprising 40% of the total score, Supplier Diversity Program Plans 10%, vendor qualifications 40%, and reference information 15%. This solicitation is being conducted by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, and the contract term and any renewal options are not specified in the provided materials.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| sdp-plan-form-1-commitment Updated.docx | DOCX document | |
| 20MACISAC1 - Attachment A - Final~2.docx | DOCX document | |
| 20MACISAC1 - Bid - Final.docx | DOCX document | |
| 20MACISAC1 - Counties List.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 20MACISAC1 - Response Form - Final~1.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
75 Pleasant Street, Malden, Massachusetts 02148-4906 Main Telephone: (781) 338-3000 TTY: N.E.T. Relay 1-800-439-2370
EVALUATION CRITERIA SCORECARD
Agency Staff use only (This document will be used to evaluate all responses submitted to this Solicitation) Updated March 1, 2019
| Name of Bidder: |
| Name of Reviewer(s): |
| Date Reviewed: |
Required Qualifications Criteria (Bidder must receive a “yes” on all the following criteria to move on to the next evaluation section)
| Vendor meets the two year minimum in business requirement |
| Yes |_| |
| No |_| |
| Vendor has current Municipal Board of Health License on file with the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and is able to produce a copy of this license |
| Yes |_| |
| No |_| |
Scoring rubric:
| Non-Responsive |
| Qualifications is not applicable to request; elements missing / non-responsive to request |
| Unsatisfactory: |
| Little evidence of qualification. Many required elements are missing. |
| Below Average: |
| Evidence of expertise or qualification in some areas is unclear or unsubstantiated by supporting documentation. Some required elements are missing. |
| Average: |
| Application materials are complete and suggest adequate qualifications, providing clear evidence of expertise. |
| Above Average: |
| Application materials are complete and suggest solid qualifications, providing clear and well-documented evidence of expertise. |
| Outstanding: |
| Application materials is complete, suggest exemplary qualifications, providing compelling, clear, and well-documented evidence of expertise. |
Alternate ID: 20MACISAC1 COMMBUYS Document #:
Non-Responsive 0 pts.
Unsatisfactory 1 pt.
Below Average 2 pts.
Average 3 pts.
Above Average 4 pts.
Outstanding 5 pts.
| Multiplier |
| Maximum |
Points Available (5 x Multiplier) Points Awarded (0 – 5 x Multiplier)
Additional Evaluation Criteria:
| Pricing submitted for response and services provided are clearly defined and explained for each service provided in an all-inclusive manner, where applicable. |
| (x4) |
| 20 |
| Supplier Diversity Program Plan (Any Bidder responding to an RFR Bid, valued $150,000 or more, must submit the SDP Form 1 document at the time of submission with a percentage greater than 0%. This form will be part of the evaluation on this scorecard and points will be calcuated as follows: under 1 % = 0 pt, under 2% = 1 pts, under 3% = 2 pts, under 4% = 3 pts, under 5% = 4 pts,5% or higher = 5 pts. |
| (x2) |
| 10 |
| Vendor is able to provide services in the category in which they submitted a response to and clearly define how these qualifications meet the requirements of the category |
| (x4) |
| 20 |
| Vendor provide a menu with pricing and the menu offers a variety of items to select from, including, but not limited to, vegetarian, gluten-free, kosher. |
| (x4) |
| 20 |
| The Following Criteria is for vendors who responded to Categories II and III only: Vendor has submitted a map and description of each conference room available, AV services available in each of these rooms and Internet Connectivity availability in each of these rooms. |
| (x3) |
| 15 |
| Vendor submitted required three written references requested and these references appropriately describe the services the vendor is able to provide and requirements that will meet the need of the Department. |
| (x3) |
| 15 |
| Total: |
| 100 |
Vendors responding to Category I only must meet a minimum score of 65 to be awarded. Vendors responding to Category II or III must receive a minimum score of 75.
Comments:
image1.png image2.png
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .