2032H324A00002 P00003 LSJ_Redacted.pdf

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

LIMITED-SOURCES JUSTIFICATION

Acquisition Title: Executive Recruiting Services BPA Scope Change This acquisition is conducted under the authority of the Multiple Award Schedule Program (see FAR 8.401)

Treasury Standard Form – 1012 (Rev 12/24)

Prescribed by Treasury: DTAP 1008.405-6

Tracking No.

1. Identification of the agency and the contracting activity:

The requiring activity is the Department of Treasury’s Office of the Chief Information Officer (OCIO), and the contracting activity is IRS Office of the Chief Procurement Officer (OCPO), Treasury Acquisitions, Departmental Offices Branch; Section 1.

2.a Nature and/or description of the action being approved:

The purpose of this Limited Sources Justification is to obtain approval for a scope change under active Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) 2032H324A00002. The existing BPA covers executive recruitment services for Senior Executive Service (SES) roles, but Treasury now requires adding scope to procure similar recruitment support for General Service (GS) level roles.

2.b Name of the vendor: SENSA SOLUTIONS, INC.

2.c Requisition No.: N/A 2.d Bridge contract: Yes No 2.e Brand name: Yes No 3.a A description of the supplies or services required to meet the agency’s needs:

Expanding the scope of the BPA to include GS roles ensures continuity of services, leverages the vendor’s established expertise and infrastructure, and avoids delays or duplication of effort that would result from opening a new competitive procurement. This modification is the most efficient and cost-effective way to meet the agency’s current urgent recruitment needs while maintaining consistency in hiring federal staff. Services will be provided under the existing BPA’s period of performance, which runs from October 23, 2023, through October 22, 2028 (base year plus four 12-month option years).

3.b Includes IT: Yes No 3.c IGCE/Estimated dollar value:

GS recruitment will be added to the BPA at an expected cost of $ annually and $ over four option years. This work will be ordered within the existing BPA ceiling of $3,000,000, which will not be increased as a result of this modification.

4.a Identification of the authority being used (Check the appropriate box that applies).

FAR 8.405-6(a)(1)(i)(A) – An urgent and compelling need exists, and following the procedures would result in unacceptable delays.

FAR 8.405-6(a)(1)(i)(B) – Only one source is capable of providing the supplies or services required at the level of quality required because the supplies or services are unique or highly specialized.

FAR 8.405-6(a)(1)(i)(C) – In the interest of economy and efficiency, the new work is a logical follow-on to an original Federal Supply Schedule order or BPA provided that the original order or BPA was placed in accordance with FSS procedures in accordance with the applicable Federal Supply Schedule ordering procedures. The original order or BPA must not have been previously issued under sole-source or limited-sources procedures.

FAR 8.405-6(b) – Items peculiar to one manufacturer. (i.e., Brand Name specifications) 4.b Supporting Rationale:

The IRS has a need to fill critical computer scientist vacancies essential to advancing its mission of delivering innovative, secure, and reliable IT solutions that support the nation’s tax administration. The incumbent vendor, already providing SES recruitment under the BPA, is uniquely positioned to expand immediately to GS-level roles without disruption. While the current urgency is for computer scientist positions, this modification is necessary to allow the Government to order GS recruitment services for any future needs. While USAJOBS provides

Acquisition Title: Executive Recruiting Services BPA Scope Change This acquisition is conducted under the authority of the Multiple Award Schedule Program (see FAR 8.401) a standard platform to post vacancies and collect applications, it does not offer the proactive sourcing or specialized expertise needed to quickly identify and attract top talent for high visibility, mission-critical roles. A recruitment firm brings dedicated market knowledge and direct candidate outreach, enabling Treasury to urgently fill critical positions such as computer scientists and future GS roles without the delays inherent in USAJOBS-only hiring.

Awarding this scope expansion to the incumbent advances both economy and efficiency by ensuring continuity of services, reducing the risk of delays in meeting urgent hiring milestones, and leveraging a proven partner with established capacity to deliver mission-critical talent without jeopardizing program timelines. This continuity also minimizes transition risk while streamlining coordination. Ultimately, the Government avoids the duplicative administrative burden and costs that would arise from managing two separate BPAs, one for SES and one for GS recruitment, for similar services.

5. A determination by the ordering activity Contracting Officer that the order or BPA represents the best value consistent with FAR 8.404(d):

The Contracting Officer has determined that this BPA modification represents the best value consistent with FAR 8.404(d). The proposed pricing of $ per unit for GS Leader Recruitment Services is fair and reasonable when compared to the BPA holder’s GSA schedule price of $36,264 per unit.

6. A description of the market research conducted among schedule holders and the results or a statement why market research was not conducted:

Market research for recruitment services was conducted at the BPA level to establish the competitive environment for executive recruitment services. That research confirmed multiple capable vendors, resulting in award of BPA 2032H324A00002 under fair opportunity procedures. Given the incumbent’s unique position supporting Treasury executive recruitment and their ability to immediately provide GS-level services without delay, adding to the current BPA was determined to be the required path forward.

This conclusion remains supported by both the official and ongoing market research. The 2023 RFI and RFQ process was extensive and demonstrated that only a limited pool of vendors possessed the scale, quality, scope, and federal prime experience needed, with only one small business shown capable. Since that time, Treasury has continued informal market surveillance and found little substantial changes in the marketplace, particularly given that federal hiring has been paused and vendor capabilities have not shifted in a major way. The same competitive dynamics and requirements that applied to SES recruitment (deep talent networks, rapid sourcing of high-quality candidates, and ability to deliver at Treasury’s scale) apply equally to computer scientist and other GS-level roles. As such, the prior market research is not stale and remains directly applicable to this modification.

7.a Any other facts supporting this justification:

None.

7.b Attachments: Yes No

8. A statement of the actions, if any, the Requiring Activity and Contracting Activity may take to remove or overcome any barriers that led to restricted consideration before any subsequent acquisition for the supplies and services is made:

The Contracting Activity will continue to monitor the marketplace for potential sources through acquisition forecasts and ongoing market research. The Requiring Activity will also consider engagement with industry forums and trade shows to identify additional vendors

Acquisition Title: Executive Recruiting Services BPA Scope Change This acquisition is conducted under the authority of the Multiple Award Schedule Program (see FAR 8.401) of the procuring activity or authorized designee, I hereby approve this limited-sources justification.

Name: Date:

Signature:

10.d Treasury Chief Information Officer (for IT requirements that are over $75 million).

I have reviewed this justification and find it to be accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief, and representative of the Government’s need. Therefore, I hereby consent to the approval of this justification.

Name: Date:

Signature:

10.e Senior Procurement Executive (if over $75 million) (Contracting Activity). I have reviewed this limited-sources justification and find it to be accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. Therefore, I hereby approve this limited-sources justification.

Name: Date:

Signature:

INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE

SF-1012 - LIMITED-SOURCES JUSTIFICATION

I. General instructions. Each Limited-Sources justification shall contain sufficient information and data to justify the proposed action, thereby be able to stand on its own. This type of detail is critical in order to enable a reviewer and/or approver to clearly understand the requirement and the rationale for supporting the justification. Simply copying and pasting information from a vendor’s website or marketing literature fails to support the use of such justification. Market research performed by the Requiring Activity and Contracting Activity should be used to support this document.

Given the majority of the information and data necessary to support this type of action resides with the Requiring Activity, they are the primary party responsible for completing this form.

However, the Requiring Activity shall seek assistance and input from the Contracting Activity/Contracting Officer (preferably in advance of submission of the procurement request).

It is also recommended the justification is not signed by the Requiring Activity until such time the Contracting Officer has had an opportunity to review, make necessary revisions and to include other necessary information or data to support the justification.

For brand-name acquisitions, the requirements of FAR 8.405-6(b)(1) must be addressed in the rationale. Also, keep in mind the brand-name justification is to cover only the portion of the acquisition which is brand-name and that that the document approval requirements only apply to that portion. However, it does not mean that details regarding the overarching requirement (i.e.

in the instance where the brand name is only a portion of an overall requirement) aren’t to be included in the document.

In the event of conflict between this form and applicable regulatory coverage (i.e. FAR and DTAR), the more stringent requirement shall be followed.

If the requirement involves classified or sensitive information ensure the proper steps are taken to protect the information (e.g., labeling and marking).

Prior to distribution for signature: (i) retain only those signature blocks applicable to the dollar value of the items covered by this justification, (ii) delete all green text (which are examples), and (iii) consider converting the document to .pdf to support electronic signature and ease of retention.

The fields within this form are fluid and will change based upon input, therefore individuals completing this form need to be mindful of formatting prior to converting the document to pdf and submitting it for signature.

II. Field specific instructions.

Header – Acquisition Title. Enter the title of the acquisition. Only the first page requires information; all subsequent pages will update automatically.

1. Identification of the requiring activity and the contracting activity. Provide the name of the requiring activity (e.g., BFS’ –IT Office). Provide the name of the contracting agency and the name of the actual contracting activity (e.g., BFS’s – Contracting Office for IT).

2. Nature and/or description of the action being approved. Describe the type of action being issued (e.g., new award, contract modification, or brand name). Identify the contemplated contract type (e.g., firm fixed price). If known, include period of performance. Also, when processing a class justification, include the effective period the justification will be in effect.

If modifying an existing order or BPA, thereby requiring a justification or a modification to the original justification then ensure to include the order/BPA number, proposed contract modification number, nature of why the modification is required, and, if applicable, a copy of the initial justification.

If brand name, state this justification is covering only the portion of the acquisition which is brand-name. The requirements at FAR 8.405-6(b)(1) must be addressed in the rationale narrative required in Section 4.

Section 2.b Name of vendor. If applicable, insert the name of proposed vendor. If not applicable, enter “Not applicable”.

Section 2.c Requisition Number. If known, include the requisition number. If not applicable, enter “Not applicable”.

Section 2.d Bridge contract. Check the applicable box. See DTAP 1017.70 for a definition of bridge contract and other requirements.

Section 2.e Brand name. Check the applicable box.

3.a A description of the supplies or services required to meet the agency’s needs. Provide a clear, concise description of the supplies or services to be procured. Include a statement regarding the delivery schedule and/or the period of performance, inclusive of all option periods and award terms. State the schedule and associated schedule category(ies) the supplies or services are being procured against. For supplies, include details such quantity and a brief description of the items (e.g., twelve (12) laptops).

For brand name, provide the name of the brand, model number and other specific details associated with the brand name item(s) to be procured; name(s) of known sources that can provide the brand name. The requirements at FAR 8.405-6(b)(1) must be addressed in the rationale narrative required in Section 4.

For modification describe the purpose of modification, including details such as proposed extension to the period of performance as well as the purpose of and type of the contract.

3.b Includes IT. Check the applicable box. If, yes is selected then include the NAICS and PSC.

3.c IGCE/Estimated dollar value. Provide the IGCE/estimated dollar value of the anticipated award, inclusive of all options, award terms and any other monetary incentives. If applicable, provide separately for each option, award term and other monetary incentive a general description (e.g., option period 1 – April x, 201x thru March x, 201x) and the associated individual dollar amount. These separate dollar amounts should add up to the total estimated dollar value; however if there is a difference then provide a discussion as to why they don’t.

For brand name provide the IGCE/estimated dollar value of the portion of the proposed acquisition, inclusive of all options, award terms and other monetary incentives, that is for the brand name item and the full IGCE/estimated dollar value of the acquisition.

For modifications provide the IGCE/estimated dollar value of the modification and the current total dollar value of the contract.

4.a Identification of the exception to fair opportunity being used. Check the applicable exception being used for this justification.

4.b Supporting Rationale. Provide a clear and concise description of the rationale for the use of the authority being cited above, including a demonstration that the proposed contractor’s unique qualifications or the nature of the acquisition requires use of the exception cited. The following provides additional insight for purposes of completing this field:

FAR 8.405-6(a)(1)(i)(A) Describe the nature or circumstances of the urgency surrounding the agency’s need; how any follow-on work will be competed or how such urgency will be mitigated in the future; describe the extent and impact of the unacceptable delay (e.g., quantitative data, dollars that would be lost, the impact to schedule) if award is not made in the timeframe needed; provide supporting rationale and a concise description of the extent, nature, and impact of the potential harm to the Government.

FAR 8.405-6(a)(1)(i)(B) Describe what makes this contractor the only responsible source.

For example, (i) does the proposed contractor have facilities or equipment that are specialized or unique that are vital to the effort?; (ii) Is the proposed contractor the only one that can meet critical schedule(s) required by the Government?; (iii) Does the proposed contractor have prior experience or expertise of a highly specialized nature that is vital to the effort?; (iv) Does the contractor have an exclusive licensing agreement? Fully explain why any other supply or service provided by another vendor will not satisfy the Government’s need. Describe market survey and analysis efforts leading to this conclusion. Do not simply take information from a vendor’s website or other such marketing information to use as the basis as to why they are unique.

FAR 8.405-6(a)(1)(i)(C) Describe why the work is a logical follow-on and provide information on the original competition for the first order; thereby describing the relationship between the initial order and the follow-on is logical (e.g., in terms of scope, period of performance, or value). Provide the estimated cost and/or time savings that will result from the non-competitive award, and explain the basis for the estimate. The original order or BPA must not have been previously issued under sole-source or limited-sources procedures.

FAR 8.405-6(b) State the brand name product’s unique attributes (be specific and use technical terms, if necessary). MANDATORY: Describe why the brand name, product, or feature is essential to the Government’s requirements, and why market research indicates other companies’ similar products, or products lacking the particular feature, do not meet, or cannot be modified to meet, the agency’s needs. Provide an estimate of the cost and/or delay the Government would incur if other than the brand name item is used for this requirement.

Do not simply take information from a vendor’s website or other such marketing information to use as the basis as to why they are unique. Also, describe any type of market survey and analysis efforts conducted to support this conclusion.

5. A determination by the ordering activity Contracting Officer that the order or BPA represents the best value consistent with FAR 8.404(d). Provide a clear and complete description of the contracting officer’s determination that the proposed order or BPA represents the best value consistent with FAR 8.404(d). See also DTAP 1008.404(d).

Keep in mind when ordering services that require a statement of work, the Contracting Officer needs to determine, after considering the level of effort and the mix of skills available for the tasks needed, that the proposed order or BPA represents a reasonable total price and will be the best value for the Government.

6. A description of the market research conducted among schedule holders and the results or a statement why market research was not conducted. Provide a clear and concise description of the market research conducted amongst schedule holders and the results (e.g., list the names of the schedule holders that were contacted or expressed interest). Note: If a market research summary report (e.g., SF 1010) was completed, provide a summary of the findings/determination along with a citation to that document so that a reviewer can refer to that document for greater detail. If market research was not conducted, provide a complete discussion of the rationale and, if applicable, the circumstances for why market research was not conducted.

7.a Any other facts supporting this justification. In addition to the example provided within the form itself, the following provides some additional insight based on the circumstances supporting the justification:

If the justification is based on an urgent and compelling need, there may be additional data or estimated costs that further support the extent and nature of the harm to the government in delay in award will cause or

If the justification is based on a need to purchase a patented or copyrighted product that has not been licensed for resale obtain some type of documentation from the vendor demonstrating they are intellectual property holder and there are no authorized resellers.

7.b Attachments. Check the applicable box. Examples of attachments might be a copy of the IGCE, certification from the vendor stating they are other only authorized reseller of the particular item or are the patent holder of the item.

8. A statement of the actions, if any, the Requiring Activity and Contracting Activity may take to remove or overcome any barriers that led to restricted consideration before any subsequent acquisition for the supplies and services is made. Describe actions taken, or that may be taken, to remove or overcome any barriers to competition before any subsequent acquisitions for the supplies or services required (e.g., overcoming challenges to restrictive data markings, data rights, preparation of a performance based work statement). If planning or in the midst of a competition, include information regarding this action (e.g., estimated date when the competitive procurement will occur or award to be made).

9. and 10. Certifications, Reviews, and Approvals. Each review must be preceded by lower level approval(s), e.g., over $75 million all approvals are required. IN NO CASE SHALL AN

INDIVIDUAL SIGN MORE THAN ONE APPROVAL LEVEL.

For justifications that include the purchase of Information Technology (IT) the following apply:

The IT signature reflects only the portion of the acquisition that is IT. This can be important when dealing with an acquisition where IT does not represent the predominate value of the acquisition (i.e. therefore it is not assigned a separate IT PSC code (see the Treasury IT Acquisition Tracker).

The Bureau Chief Information Officer (CIO) may delegate their authority for proposed contracts over $5 million, but not exceeding $15 million to Associate Bureau CIO(s).

Refer to the Bureau supplement to the DTAP to determine if the Bureau CIO has indeed delegated their authority.

FAR 8.405-6(d)(3) uses the terms “head of the procuring activity” which has the same meaning as head of the contracting activity (HCA).

A supplemental justification is required if any of the following revisions occur between the approval of the original justification and the covered award or modification of the contract: an increase in dollar value beyond the authority approved in the justification; a change in the competitive strategy that further reduces competition; or any type of change in the requirement that affects the basis of the justification.

Additional. Tracking No.: This field is completed as prescribed by Bureau procedures.