2026-03-23 responses to vendor questions.docx

DOCX document 24 KB Posted

Attached to
RFP - Managed Services Provider
Solicitation number
S-R21689-00016248
Issued by
Jackson County, Oregon

About this file

This is a vendor question and response document related to the Port of Newport's Request for Proposals for Managed IT Services in Oregon. The Port is seeking comprehensive managed services including project management, transition management, implementation services for migration from the current IT provider, and ongoing managed services covering network infrastructure, cloud services management, software implementation, cybersecurity support, user provisioning, routine and on-call IT support, device deployment, and technical assistance. The Port currently operates without in-house IT staff and requires support for approximately 27-29 end users with an estimated need of less than 5 hours per month of support activity. The service commencement date is September 3, 2026, with proposals due by April 7, 2026. The Port expects a remote-first service delivery model with on-site support provided on an as-needed basis, with no requirement for a dedicated full-time on-site resource.

The Port's current IT environment is cloud-based except for camera systems and operates primarily on Microsoft platforms including Microsoft 365, Microsoft Dynamics 365, and Microsoft VOIP. The infrastructure consists of 38 total devices including 37 Windows workstations and 1 Windows server with varying specifications. The Port is open to all pricing proposals that provide the best value, including fixed monthly models or consumption-based approaches, and expects the selected vendor to provide and license all security and backup tools within their proposed pricing. The incumbent MSP is not participating in this RFP as the new majority owner has divested from MSP services. A historical budget has been posted on the Port's website as a reference for proposers. The Port expects bidders to recommend cybersecurity controls and tools aligned with frameworks such as NIST, CIS, or ISO 27001, and vendors must maintain current Microsoft certifications appropriate to the services provided.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Screenshot 2026-03-05 155746.png PNG image
2026 Managed Service Provider RFP.docx DOCX document
july-aug 2024 invoice.pdf PDF
2026-03-19 Responses to RFP Questions.docx DOCX document
Screenshot 2026-03-05 155815.png PNG image
Screenshot 2026-03-05 155937.png PNG image
Screenshot 2026-03-05 155804.png PNG image
PON-Port of Newport-THIS_MONTH-2026-03-05 235634.pdf PDF
Screenshot 2026-03-05 155911.png PNG image

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

1. Current Support Model and Transition Could you describe your current IT support structure, including whether services are delivered by an incumbent Managed Services Provider, and outline expectations for transition and knowledge transfer?

We use a third party provider for all of our support needs, we do not have any IT staff onsite. We expect a warm handoff from our current vendor, they are no longer going to provide MSP services.

1. Key Operational Challenges What are the top operational or service challenges the Port is currently experiencing with its IT environment or support model?

The Port operates in a cloud environment (Except our cameras). The IT company provides all services for the Port. The top challenge is when we implement new software.

1. Security Posture and Requirements What cybersecurity controls are currently in place (for example, endpoint protection, email security, monitoring), and are there any specific compliance, audit, or cyber insurance requirements we should align with?

All tools are provided by our Current MSP, including Bitpoint, we expect those who bid on this project to recommend the best options to protect the port against attack.

1. Backup and Business Continuity What data protection approach is currently implemented, including backup coverage for Microsoft 365 and endpoints, and are there defined recovery objectives such as Recovery Time Objective and Recovery Point Objective?

This has not been defined

1. Device and Endpoint Management Is Microsoft Intune or another Mobile Device Management solution currently in use for endpoint governance, and are all devices centrally managed under a defined policy framework?

The port does have a mobile device solution in place, I believe it is intune.

1. Service Model and Commercial Structure Does the Port prefer a fixed monthly managed services model, or is there openness to a flexible, consumption-based approach aligned to actual support usage?

We are open to all proposals that give the port the best value.

7. How many employees or end users will the selected vendor be expected to support?

The Port has 27-29 end users Is the selected vendor expected to provide a dedicated, full-time on-site resource, or is the Port seeking a remote-first service model with on-site support provided on an as-needed basis?

The Port does NOT expect a dedicated full-time on-site resource, we are expecting remove first service model with on-site, as needed.

8. What security and infrastructure software, if any, is currently in place at the Port? Specifically, does the Port currently utilize antivirus, endpoint detection and response (EDR), managed detection and response (MDR), or backup software solutions?

The current MSP provides all these solutions. We are expecting the new MSP to recommend what they feel will best protect the port.

9. Does the Port expect the selected vendor to provide and license security and backup tools within their proposed pricing, or will the Port procure and license these tools separately?

Yes, the Port expects the selected vendor to provide and license security and backup tools withing their proposed pricing.

10. Is there a historical or established annual budget for this project?

There is a historical budget, we have posted a copy an invoice on the Ports website .

11. Is the incumbent MSP participating in this RFP? If so, what is the name of that company?

No, the historical MSP is moving away from this business as the a new majority owner of the business does not want to be involved in the MSP business.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .